1
2
3
MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM)
4
ALTERNATIF, KRITERIA, BOBOT
5
ALTERNATIF, CRITERIA, BOBOT
6
ALTERNATIF, CRITERIA, BOBOT
7
KLASIFIKASI METODE MCDM
8
Metode Penyelesaian Masalah MCDM
9
Metode Penyelesaian Masalah MCDM
10
11
Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW)
12
Langkah Penyelesaian
13
Langkah Penyelesaian
14
Langkah Penyelesaian
15
Contoh Kasus
Ex-1:
An institute will choose 2 candidates for their officer. There are four
criteria that used to make decision as follow
C1 = information system test
C2 = network installation test
C3 = psycology test
C4 = Religion test
Decision maker (manager) gives weight for every criteria : C1 = 35%;
C2 = 25%; C3 = 25%; dan C4 = 15%.
Six candidates follow the final test, they are:
A1 = Indra,
A2 = Roni,
A3 = Putri,
A4 = Dani,
A5 = Ratna, dan
A6 = Mira.
Criteria
Candidates
C1 C2 C3 C4
Indra 70 50 80 60
Roni 50 60 82 70
Putri 85 55 80 75
Dani 82 70 65 85
Ratna 75 75 85 74
Mira 62 50 75 80
Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)
Normalization:
70 70
r11 0,82
max 70;50;85;82;75;62 85
50 50
r21 0,59
max70;50;85;82;75;62 85
50 50
r12 0,67
max 50;60;55;70;75;50 75
60 60
r22 0,80
max 50;60;55;70;75;50 75
dst
Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)
Result:
21
Contoh Kasus
22
Contoh Kasus
23
Contoh Kasus
24
Nilai setiap alternatif dan perhitungan Vi pada
setiap criteria ditunjukkan pada table berikut
25
Contoh Kasus
27