Anda di halaman 1dari 62

2

2
10 5 0 5 10

Lecture 3
Advanced FACTS Devices and Applications:
Performance, Power Quality and Cost
Considerations
Paulo F. Ribeiro, BSEE, MBA, PHD, PE

CALVIN COLLEGE
Engineering Department
Grand Rapids, MI 49546

http://engr.calvin.edu/PRibeiro_WEBPAGE/
PRIBEIRO@CALVIN.EDU

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


1
FACTS

The Concept
History / Background - Origin of FACTS, Opportunities, Trends
System Architectures and Limitations
Power Flow Control on AC Systems
Application Studies and Implementation
Basic Switching Devices
Conditioners: SVC, STATCOM, TCSC, UPFC, SMES
Specification, Cost Considerations and Technology Trends
Impact of FACTS in interconnected networks
Market Assessment, Deregulation and Predictions

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


2
X V
P P P P
The Concept X V tg

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


3
The Concept and Challenges
A transmission system can carry power up to its thermal loading limits. But in practice the
system has the following constraints:

-Transmission stability limits


-Voltage limits
-Loop flows

Transmission stability limits: limits of transmittable power with which a transmission system can
ride through major faults in the system with its power transmission capability intact.

Voltage limits: limits of power transmission where the system voltage can be kept within
permitted deviations from nominal.

Loop flows can be a problem as they are governed by the laws of nature which may not be
coincident with the contracted path. This means that power which is to be sent from point A to
point B in a grid will not necessarily take the shortest, direct route, but will go uncontrolled
and fan out to take unwanted paths available in the grid.

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


4
The Concept
FACTS devices

FACTS are designed to remove such constraints and to meet planners, investors and operators goals
without their having to undertake major system additions. This offers ways of attaining an increase of
power transmission capacity at optimum conditions, i.e. at maximum availability, minimum
transmission losses, and minimum environmental impact. Plus, of course, at minimum investment cost
and time expenditure.

The term FACTS covers several power electronics based systems used for AC power transmission.
Given the nature of power electronics equipment, FACTS solutions will be particularly justifiable in
applications requiring one or more of the following qualities:
-Rapid dynamic response
-Ability for frequent variations in output
-Smoothly adjustable output.

Important applications in power transmission involving FACTS and Power Quality devices:
SVC (Static Var Compensators), Fixed * as well as Thyristor-Controlled Series Capacitors (TCSC) and
Statcom. Still others are PST (Phase-shifting Transformers), IPC (Interphase Power Controllers), UPFC
(Universal Power Flow Controllers), and DVR (Dynamic Voltage Restorers).
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
5
History, Concepts, Background, and Issues
Origin of FACTS
-Oil Embargo of 1974 and 1979
-Environmental Movement
-Magnetic Field Concerns
-Permit to build new transmission lines
-HVDC and SVCs
-EPRI FACTS Initiative (1988)
-Increase AC Power Transfer (GE and DOE Papers)
-The Need for Power semiconductors

Why we need transmission interconnection


-Pool power plants and load centers to minimize generation cost
-Important in a deregulated environment
Opportunities for FACTS
Increase power transfer capacity
SVC (Nebraska GE 1974, Minnesota Westinghouse 1975, Brazil Siemens 1985)
TCSC, UPFC AEP 1999
Trends
-Generation is not being built
-Power sales/purchases are being
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
6
System Architectures and Limitations

System Architecture
Radial, interconnected areas, complex network
Power Flow in an AC System
Power Flow in Parallel and Meshed Paths
Transmission Limitations
Steady-State (angular stability, thermal limits, voltage limits)
Stability Issues (transient, dynamic, voltage and SSR)
System Issues (Post contingency conditions, loop flows, short-circuit levels)
Power Flow and Dynamic Stability Considerations
Controllable Parameters
Basic FACTS Devices - Impact of Energy Storage

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


7
Power Flow Control on AC Systems

Radial
Parallel

Meshed

Power Flow in Parallel Paths


Power Flow in a Meshed Systems
What limits the loading capability?
Power Flow and Dynamic Considerations
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
8
Power Flow Control on AC Systems

50% Series Compensation

Relative Importance of Controllable Parameters

Control of X can provide current control


When angle is large X can provide power control
Injecting voltage in series and perpendicular to the current flow, can increase or
decrease
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
9
FACTS Applications and Implementations
Transmission Transfer Capacity Enhancement

Steady State Dynamic


Issues Traditional Solutions Issues
Voltage Limits Breaking Advanced Solutions Transient Stability
Thermal Limits Resistors Load Damping Power Swings
Angular Stability Limits FACTS
Loop Flows
Shedding Post-Contingency Voltage
Control
Fixed Energy Storage Voltage Stability
Compensation Subsynchronous Res.

Line Enhanced
Transmission Power Transfer
Reconfiguration
Link and Stability
Better
Protection SVC
FACTS STATCOM
Increased TCSC, SSSC
Devices UPFC
Inertia
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
10
FACTS Devices

Shunt Connected
Static VAR Compensator (SVC)
Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM)
Static Synchronous Generator - SSG Energy Storage
Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)
Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES)

Combined Series and Series-Shunt Connected


Static Synchronous Series Controllers (SSSC)
Thyristor Controlled Phase-Shifting Transformer or
Phase Angle Regulator (PAR)
Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC)
Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC)
Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC)

Relative Importance of Different Types of Controllers Energy Storage


Shunt, Shunt-Series
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
11
Power Electronics - Semiconductor Devices

Diodes
Transistors
IGBT
Thyristors
SCR, GTO, MTO, ETO, GCT, IGCT, MCT

Devices
Diode (pn Junction)
Silicon Controlled Rectifier (SCR)
Gate Turn-Off Thyristor (GTO) GE
MOS Turn-Off Thyristor (MTO) SPCO
Emitter Turn-Off Thyristor (ETO) Virginia Tech
Integrated Gate-Commutated Thyristor (IGCT) Mitsubishi, ABB
MOS-Controlled Thyristor (MCT) Victor Temple
Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT)
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
12
Power Electronics - Semiconductor Devices
Principal Characteristics
Voltage and Current
Losses and Speed of Switching
Speed of Switching
Switching Losses
Gate-driver power and energy requirements
Parameter Trade-off
Power requirements for the gate
di/dt and dv/dt capability
turn-on and turn-off time
Uniformity
Quality of silicon wafers
IGBT has pushed out the conventional GTO as IGBTs ratings go up.
IGBTs - Low-switching losses, fast switching, current-limiting capability
GTOs - large gate-drive requirements, slow-switching, high-switching losses
IGBTs (higher forward voltage drop)
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
13
Power Electronics - Semiconductor Devices
Decision-Making Matrix
System
VSI CSI

Commutation Forced
Approach Natural

Switching
Technology Synchronous PWM

Transition
Approach Hard Soft

Circuit
Topology Two-Level Multi-Level

Device
Type SCR GTO IGBT MCT MTO

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


14
AC Transmission Fundamentals (Series Compensation)
E2 / 2
E1 / 1 P&Q
I

X
Changes in X will increase or decrease real power flow for a fixed angle or change angle for a fixed power flow.
Alternatively, the reactive power flow will change with the change of X. Adjustments on the bus voltage have
little impact on the real power flow. Vc Vx I
P1 = E1 . E2 . sin () / (X - Xc)
Vr
Vs Vseff = Vs + Vc

Real Power Angle Curve Xeff = X - Xc


2
2
Vx
Vc
P1( x delta V1) 1
Vxo Vr
Vs
Vseff I
0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0 delta 3.14

Phase Angle
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
15
AC Transmission Fundamentals (Voltage-Series and Shunt Comp.)
E1 / 1 P&Q E2 / 2
I
X
P

Injected Voltage
E1

E1 - E2

E2
Integrated voltage series injection and bus voltage regulation (unified) will
directly increase or decrease real and reactive power flow.
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
16
AC Transmission Fundamentals (Stability Margin)
Improvement of Transient Stability With FACTS Compensation
Equal Area Criteria

Q/V
with VAR compensation (ideal midpoint)

Amargin
A2
no compensation
A1
1 - prior to fault
A1 = Acceleration Energy
1 2 3 crit Phase Angle 2 - fault cleared
A2 = Deceleration Energy
Therefore, FACTS compensation can increase 3 - equal area
3 >crit - loss of synchronism
power transfer without reducing the stability margin
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
17
Voltage Source Vs. Current Source Converters

CSC Adv VSC Adv


Dis
Dis
Device Type Thyristor Thyristor
Self-Commutation Self-Commutation
Device Characteristic Symmetrical Asymmetrical +
Symmetry

Short-Circuit Current Lower + Higher

Rate of Rise of Fault Limited by DC Reactor + Fast Rise (Due to capacitor discharge)
Current
Losses Higher - Lower +
AC Capacitors Required Not Required +
DC Capacitors Not Required + Required

Valves dv/dt Lower + Higher


(AC Capacitors)
Interface with AC System More Complex Less Complex +
Reactive Power Generation Depends on Current Flowing Independent of Energy Storage +
through Energy Storage
Performance
Harmonics -
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
18
Voltage Source Converters

S hun tC om p en sa toi n S e r ei s C om p en sa toi n


V
S ys tem bu s
V V
S ys tem bu s

C oup lni g C oup lni g


T ran s fo m
r er T ran s fo m
r er
I I
T ran s fo m
r e r el a kage T ran s fo m
r e r el a kage
X ni du c tan ce
X ni du c tan ce
Vo Vo

DC A-C DC A-C
Sw itch ni g Sw itch ni g
C on ve r te r C on ve r te r

Cs Cs
+ +
V dc V dc
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
19
Voltage Source Converters

Basic 6-Pulse, 2-level, Voltage-Source Converter


di c

ai Ta1 D a1 Tb1 D b1 T c1 D c1 V dc
ea
2
bi + V dc
H ypo the t ci a l
eb Cs
neu tra lpo ni t
ci
ec V dc
Ta2 D a2 Tb2 D b2 T c2 D c2 2

ea Vdc

eb Vdc

ec Vdc

eab
[a ]

ebc

eca

D Ta2
ia a1
P. Ribeiro Ta1 D Tb2 June, 2002
D a2 20
ib b1
Tb1 D D Tc2 [b ]
ic c1 b2
Voltage Source Converters
2, 3, 5-level, VSC Waveforms

vd c +
vd c v dc
2
+ 2
e ou t
vd c vd c
2
2

+
v dc

2 v dc
v dc
N eu tra l e ou t
m( di -) po ni t

+
vd c 1

+
v dc 2

+ vdc
N eu tra l
m( di - ) po ni t e ou t
- v dc

+ +
vd c v dc

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


21
Voltage Source Converters
Output voltage control of a two-level VSC
v =V 0
it
v= V s n io

t v o= V o ( )

*
t
= *

i t t
v oF ( )= V (+ ) s n
v o ( ) (v+ v )d c
v d c nom ni a l
v o ( ) (v - v )d c
v dc

t
C i dc
v dc = 1 i dc d t
v oF ( )= V (+ ) s n
i t C
i d c = f
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
22
FACTS Technology - Possible Benefits
Control of power flow as ordered. Increase the loading capability of lines to their
thermal capabilities, including short term and seasonal.

Increase the system security through raising the transient stability limit, limiting
short-circuit currents and overloads, managing cascading blackouts and
damping electromechanical oscillations of power systems and machines.

Provide secure tie lines connections to neighboring utilities and regions thereby
decreasing overall generation reserve requirements on both sides.

Provide greater flexibility in siting new generation.

Reduce reactive power flows, thus allowing the lines to carry more active power.

Reduce loop flows.

Increase utilization of lowest cost generation.


P. Ribeiro June, 2002
23
FACTS and HVDC: Complimentary Solutions
HVDC
Independent frequency and control
Lower line costs
Power control, voltage control,
stability control

FACTS
Power control, voltage control,
stability control
Installed Costs (millions of dollars)

Throughput MW HVDC 2 Terminals FACTS

2000 MW $ 40-50 M $ 5-10 M


500 MW $ 75-100M $ 10-20M
1000 MW $120-170M $ 20-30M
2000 MW $200-300M $ 30-50M
(*)Hingorani/Gyugyi

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


24
FACTS and HVDC: Complimentary Solutions
HVDC Projects: Applications

Submarine cable

Long distance overhead transmission

Underground Transmission

Connecting AC systems of different or incompatible frequencies

Large market potential for FACTS is within the ac system on a value-added basis, where:
The existing steady-state phase angle between bus nodes is reasonable
The cost of a FACTS device solution is lower than HVDC or other alternatives
The required FACTS controller capacity is less than 100% of the transmission throughput rating

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


25
FACTS Attributes for Different Controllers
FACTS Controller Control Attributes
Static Synchronous Compensator Voltage control, VAR compensation, damping oscillations, voltage
(STATCOM without storage) stability
Static Synchronous Compensator Voltage control, VAR compensation, damping oscillations, transient
(STATCOM with storage, BESS, SMES, and dynamic stability, voltage stability, AGC
large dc capacitor)
Static VAR Compensator (SVC, TCR, Voltage control, VAR compensation, damping oscillations, transient
TCS, TRS and dynamic stability, voltage stability
Thyristor-Controlled Braking Resistor Damping oscillations, transient and dynamic stability
(TCBR)
Static Synchronous Series Compensator Current control, damping oscillations, transient and dynamic stability,
(SSSC without storage) voltage stability, fault current limiting
Static Synchronous Series Compensator Current control, damping oscillations, transient and dynamic stability,
(SSSC with storage) voltage stability
Thrystor-Controlled Series Capacitor Current control, damping oscillations, transient and dynamic stability,
(TCSC, TSSC) voltage stability, fault current limiting
Thyristor-Controlled Series Reactor Current control, damping oscillations, transient and dynamic stability,
(TCSR, TSSR) voltage stability, fault current limiting
Thyristor-Controlled Phase-Shifting Active power control, damping oscillations, transient and dynamic
Transformer (TCPST or TCPR) stability, voltage stability
Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) Active and reactive power control, voltage control, VAR
compensation, damping oscillations, transient and dynamic stability,
voltage stability, fault current limiting
Thyristor-Controlled Voltage Limiter Transient and dynamic voltage limit
(TCVL)
Thyristor-Controlled Voltage Regulator Reactive power control, voltage control, damping oscillations,
(TCVR) transient and dynamic stability, voltage stability
Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) Reactive power control, voltage control, damping oscillations,
transient and dynamic stability, voltage stability

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


26
FACTS Implementation - STATCOM
E1 / 1 I P&Q E2 / 2

Regulating Bus Voltage


Can Affect Power Flow Indirectly / Dynamically

P1 = E1 (E2 . sin ())/X

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


27
FACTS Implementation - TCSC

E1 / 1 P&Q E2 / 2

Line Impedance Compensation


Can Control Power Flow Continuously P1 = E1 (E2 . sin ()) / Xeff

Xeff = X- Xc

The alternative solutions need to be distributed; often series compensation has to be installed in several places along a line but many of the
other alternatives would put both voltage support and power flow control in the same location. This may not be useful. For instance, if
voltage support were needed at the midpoint of a line, an IPFC would not be very useful at that spot. TCSC for damping oscillations ...
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
28
FACTS Implementation - SSSC

E1 / 1 P&Q E2 / 2
I
X

P1 = E1 (E2 . sin ()) / Xeff

Xeff = X - Vinj/I

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


29
FACTS Implementation - UPFC
E1 / 1 P&Q E2 / 2
I
X

Regulating Bus Voltage and Injecting Voltage


In Series With the Line
Can Control Power Flow

P1 = E1 (E2 . sin ()) / Xeff


Xeff = X - Vinj / I
Q1 = E1(E2 - E2 . cos ()) / X
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
30
FACTS Implementation - UPFC
Series Transformer

Shunt Inverter Series


Inverter

Shunt
Transforme
r

Unified Power Flow Controller

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


31
FACTS Implementation - STATCOM + Energy Storage

E1 / 1 P&Q E2 / 2
I
X

Regulating Bus Voltage Plus Energy Storage


Can Affect Power Flow Directly / Dynamically

Plus Energy Storage

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


32
FACTS Implementation - SSSC + Energy Storage

E1 / 1 P&Q E2 / 2
I
X

Voltage Injection in Series Plus Energy Storage


Can Affect Power Flow Directly / Dynamically
and sustain operation under fault conditions

Plus Energy Storage

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


33
FACTS Implementation - UPFC + Energy Storage
E2 / 2
E1 / 1 P&Q
I
X

Regulating Bus Voltage + Injected


Voltage + Energy Storage
Can Control Power Flow Continuously,
Plus Energy Storage
and Support Operation Under Severe
Fault Conditions (enhanced performance)

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


34
FACTS Implementation - UPFC + Energy Storage
Series
Inverter 1000
F
Shunt
Inverter 1000
F

1000
F

1000
F SMES Chopper
and Coil

Unified Power Flow Controller - SMES Interface

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


35
FACTS Implementation - UPFC + Energy Storage

MOV

UPFC
Grounding

SMES Chopper and Coil - Overvoltage Protection


P. Ribeiro June, 2002
36
FACTS Implementation - TCSC + STACOM + Energy Storage

Regulating Bus Voltage + Energy


Storage + Line Impedance Compensation
Can Control Power Flow Continuously,
and Support Operation Under Severe
Fault Conditions (enhanced performance)

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


37
FACTS Implementation - IPFC

E1 / 1 E3 / 3

E2 / 2

P12 = E1 (E2 . sin (1- 2)) / X

P13 = E1 (E2 . sin (1- 3)) / X

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


38
FACTS Implementation - IPFC
Series Transformer, Line 1

Series Transformer, Line 2

Series Inverter #1 Series Inverter #2

Interline Power Flow Controller


P. Ribeiro June, 2002
39
Enhanced Power Transfer and Stability:
Technologies Perspective
Compensation FACTS Devices
Devices Energy Storage

Fast
SMES Real Power Injection
and Absorption
P
TSSC
P TSSC
P Increased Power
SSSC Additio
SSSC Transfer
UPFC nal
UPFC
Stabilit
Electric Grid Electric Grid y
Margin 2

Q STATCOM Q STATCOM
1.5
Acceleration
Area
Deceleration
Area

Power Transfer
1 Stability
Fast Fast Margin
0.5

Reactive Power Injection Reactive Power Injection and


and Absorption Absorption 0
0 0.5 1 1.5
Phase Angle
2 2.5 3

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


40
Q
FACTS + Energy Storage
The Role of Energy Storage: real
power compensation can
increase operating control and STATCOM
reduce capital costs Reactive Power Only
Operates in the
vertical axis only
MVA Reduction P P - Active Power
Q - Reactive Power

The Combination or Real


and Reactive Power will
typically reduce the Rating of
the Power Electronics front
end interface.
Real Power takes care of STATCOM + SMES
power oscillation, whereas Real and Reactive Power
reactive power controls Operates anywhere within the
voltage. PQ Plane / Circle (4-Quadrant)

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


41
FACTS + Energy Storage - Location Sensitivity

Closer to generation
Additional Power Transfer(MW)

Closer to load centers

SMES Power (MW)

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


42
Enhanced Power Transfer and Stability:
Location and Configuration Type Sensitivity

No Compensation
60.
8

59.
2

time (sec)

2 STATCOMs 1 STATCOM + SMES


60. 60.
8 8

59. 59.
2 2

time (sec)
time (sec)
Voltage and Stability Control Enhanced Voltage and Stability Control
(2 x 80 MVA Inverters) ( 80 MVA Inverter + 100Mjs SMES)

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


43
FACTS For Optimizing Grid Investments

FACTS Devices Can Delay Transmission Lines Construction


By considering series compensation from the very beginning, power transmission between regions can be
planned with a minimum of transmission circuits, thus minimizing costs as well as environmental impact
from the start.

The Way to Proceed


Planners, investors and financiers should issue functional specifications for the transmission system
to qualified contractors, as opposed to the practice of issuing technical specifications, which are
often inflexible, and many times include older technologies and techniques) while inviting bids for a
transmission system.

Functional specifications could lay down the power capacity, distance, availability and reliability
requirements; and last but not least, the environmental conditions.

Manufacturers should be allowed to bid either a FACTS solution or a solution involving the
building of (a) new line(s) and/or generation; and the best option chosen.

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


44
Specifications

(Functional rather than Technical )

Transformer Connections
Higher-Pulse Operation
Higher-Level Operation
PWM Converter
Pay Attention to Interface Issues and Controls

Converter
Increase Pulse Number
Higher Level
Double the Number of Phase-Legs and Connect them in Parallel
Connect Converter Groups in Parallel
Use A Combination of several options listed to achieve required rating and performance

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


45
Cost Considerations
Technology Transmission Line Cost Range Operating principle Procurement
Transfer Enhancement Availability
Reconductor lines Increase thermal capacity $50K to $200K per Increases thermal limit for line Competitive
mile
Fixed or Switched Shunt Voltage reduction Light $8-$12 kVAR Compensates for capacitive var- Competitive
Reactors Load Management load
Fixed or Switched Shunt Voltage support and $8-$10 kVAR Compensates for inductive var- Competitive
Capacitors stability load
Fixed or Switched Series Power flow control, $12-$16 kVAR Reduces inductive line Competitive
Capacitors Voltage support and impedance
Stability
Static VAR Compensators Voltage support and $20-$45 kVAR Compensates for inductive Competitive
stability and/or capacitive var-load
Thyristor Controlled Series Power flow control, $25-$50 kVAR Reduces or increases inductive Limited
Compensation (TCSC) Voltage support and line impedance competition
stability
STATCOM Voltage support and $80-$100 kVAR Compensates for inductive and Limited
stability capacitive var-load competition
STATCOM w/SMES Voltage support and $150-$300 kW Compensates for inductive Limited
stability and/or capacitive var-load plus
energy storage for active power
Unified Power Flow Power flow control, $150-$200 kW SVC and TCSC functions plus Sole source
Controller (UPFC) Voltage support, and phase angle control
Stability
Unified Power Flow Power flow control $250-$350 kW SVC and TCSC functions plus Sole source
Controller (UPFC) w/SMES Voltage support and voltage regulator, phase angle
Stability, controller and energy storage
Shaded area indicates technologies that are either permanently connected or switched on or off with mechanical switches. (i.e. these are
not continuously controllable)

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


46
Cost Considerations

Hardware
Eng & Project Mgmt.
Installation
Civil Works
Commissioning
Insurance

Cost structure

The cost of a FACTS installation depends on many factors, such as power rating, type of device, system
voltage,
system requirements, environmental conditions, regulatory requirements etc. On top of this, the variety of
options available for optimum design renders it impossible to give a cost figure for a FACTS installation.

It is strongly recommended that contact is taken with a manufacturer in order to get a first idea of costs and
alternatives. The manufacturers should be able to give a budgetary price based on a brief description of the
transmission system along with the problem(s) needing to be solved and the improvement(s) needing to be
attained.

(*) Joint World Bank / ABB Power Systems Paper


Improving the efficiency and quality of AC transmission systems
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
47
Technology & Cost Trends
$
I

$$$

$
I

additional cost savings possible


P. Ribeiro June, 2002
48
Concerns About FACTS

Cost

Losses

Reliability

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


49
Economics of Power Electronics

Sometimes a mix of conventional and FACTS systems has the lowest cost
Losses will increase with higher loading and FACTS equipment more lossy than conventional ones
Reliability and security issues - when system loaded beyond the limits of experience
Demonstration projects required

100% Power
Electronics
Delta-P4

Delta-P2
Delta-P3

Delta-P1

100%
Conventional
Cost of System
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
50
Stig Nilsons paper
Operation and Maintenance

Operation of FACTS in power systems is coordinated with operation of other items in the
same system, for smooth and optimum function of the system. This is achieved in a
natural way through the Central Power System Control, with which the FACTS device(s)
is (are) communicating via system SCADA. This means that each FACTS device in the
system can be operated from a central control point in the grid, where the operator will
have skilled human resources available for the task. The FACTS device itself is normally
unmanned, and there is normally no need for local presence in conjunction with FACTS
operation, although the device itself may be located far out in the grid.

Maintenance is usually done in conjunction with regular system maintenance, i.e.


normally once a year. It will require a planned standstill of typically a couple of days.
Tasks normally to be done are cleaning of structures and porcelains, exchanging of
mechanical seals in pump motors, checking through of capacitors, checking of control and
protective settings, and similar. It can normally be done by a crew of 2-3 people with
engineers skill.

Joint World Bank / ABB Power Systems Paper


Improving the efficiency and quality of AC transmission systems
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
51
Impact of FACTS in interconnected networks
The benefits of power system interconnection are well established. It enables the participating parties to
share the benefits of large power systems, such as optimization of power generation, utilization of
differences in load profiles and pooling of reserve capacity. From this follows not only technical and
economical benefits, but also environmental, when for example surplus of clean hydro resources from one
region can help to replace polluting fossil-fuelled generation in another.

For interconnections to serve their purpose, however, available transmission links must be powerful
enough to safely transmit the amounts of power intended. If this is not the case, from a purely technical
point of view it can always be remedied by building additional lines in parallel with the existing, or by
uprating the existing system(s) to a higher voltage. This, however, is expensive, time-consuming, and calls
for elaborate procedures for gaining the necessary permits. Also, in many cases, environmental
considerations, popular opinion or other impediments will render the building of new lines as well as
uprating to ultrahigh system voltages impossible in
practice. This is where FACTS comes in.

Examples of successful implementation of FACTS for power system interconnection can be found among
others between the Nordic Countries, and between Canada and the United States. In such cases, FACTS
helps to enable mutually beneficial trade of electric energy between the countries.
Other regions in the world where FACTS is emerging as a means for AC bulk power interchange between
regions can be found in South Asia as well as in Africa and Latin America. In fact, AC power corridors
equipped with SVC and/or SC transmitting bulk power over distances of more than 1.000 km are a reality
today.

Joint World
P. Ribeiro Bank / ABB Power Systems Paper June, 2002
Improving the efficiency and quality of AC transmission systems 52
Power Quality Issues
1 Background
2 The Need For An Integrated Perspective of PQ
3 Harmonics
4 Imbalance
5 Voltage Fluctuations
6 Voltage Sags
7 Standards, Limits, Diagnostics, and Recommendations
Flexibility, Compatibility, Probabilistic Nature, Alternative Indices
8 Combined effects
9 Power Quality Economics
10 Measurement Protocols
11 Probabilistic Approach
12 Modeling & Simulation
13 Advanced Techniques
(Wavelet, Fuzzy Logic, Neural Net, Genetic Algorithms)
14 Power Quality Programs

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


53
Compatibility: The Key Approach

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


54
Relative Trespass Level (RTL)

U k Uref k
RTLk max 0,
Uref k

Uk - measured or calculated harmonic voltage


Uref - harmonic voltage limit (standard or particular equipment)
k - harmonic order
8 8
8 8

6 6

RTL k 4 RTL k 4

2 2

0 0 0 0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 0.05 0.1
2 k 13 0 Uk .1

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


55
Harmonic Distortion Diagnostic Index Applying Fuzzy Logic
Comparisons
Alternative Approach
Individual Harmonics (Vh)
Equipment Malfunction
Fuzzy - Color Code Criteria
No Problem
Normal
Below
Normal
Below
a

Caution
NormalOver
b

Heating

Possible Problems
c
d

Very
Hot

Imminent Problems
e

1
Normal Caution Possible Severe Dangerous
Levels Problems Distortions Levels
0 A B C D E F G RTL
P. Ribeiro June, 2002
56
How To Interpret This?

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


57
How To Interpret This?

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


58
The Total Quality Environment
Power System Value Chain
Environmental
Maintainability
Availability
Safety
Efficiency
Reliability
Performance
Price
Power Quality

Energy Communication
Power
INPUTS Generation Delivery Conversion Processing OUTPUTS
Light / Motion

Central T&D AC-AC Motion


Station Supplies

SMES FACTS UPS Appliances


Batteries SMES
PQ Parks

Power Electronics Systems and Components

Utility User

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


59
Conclusions

Future systems can be expected to operate at higher stress levels


FACTS could provide means to control and alleviate stress
Reliability of the existing systems minimize risks (but not risk-free)
Interaction between FACTS devices needs to be studied
Existing Projects - Met Expectations
More Demonstrations Needed
R&D needed on avoiding security problems (with and w/o FACTS)
Energy storage can significantly enhance FACTS controllers performance

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


60
Conclusions
A Balanced and Cautious Application

The acceptance of the new tools and technologies will take time, due to the
computational requirements and educational barriers.

The flexibility and adaptability of these new techniques indicate that they
will become part of the tools for solving power quality problems in this
increasingly complex electrical environment.

The implementation and use of these advanced techniques needs to be done


with much care and sensitivity. They should not replace the engineering
understanding of the electromagnetic nature of the problems that need to
be solved.

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


61
Questions and Open Discussions

P. Ribeiro June, 2002


62

Anda mungkin juga menyukai