(17/42061/PKG/01148)
Rinda Wanodyatama
(17/420664/PKG/0116)
The title consists of sixteen words too long
The title describes the main content
Interesting
without abbreviations
writing has been in accordance with the rules
of writing the journal
Place of research is often used as a quality
assurance report content
abstract one paragraph (not a structured
abstract IMRAD)
Content 130 words (max 250)
There is an abbreviation not previously
described
Content 3 keyword (4-6)
Consist 3 paragraph (2-3
paragraph)
supported by relevant
references
Consist 2 pages (less
than 1 pages)
Implisit hypothesa :
It has teorical
backgroud that
links between
variables A and B
Explain about
previous research
see the authors'
tendency and
specify
Materials : chemicals,
tools, machinery
Subject: human
methods
The authors explain about the subjects which are drop out and the v
reason
Numerical accuracy are written correctly v
The tables are written correctly V
The tables and its supplementary information which is needed are v
written
There is some result in the tables that are not mentioned later in this V
journal
All the outcomes which are important explained in the result v
The drop out subject still counted in this research v
The statistical result such as mean, SD and P are written v
There is no any statistical math which is not planned before v
There is confidence interval V
There is no comment and no suggestion in result v
Remove vertical and inner horizontal line (red
line)
There are different values in both tables (blue
line)
do not repeat in the passage of things that
have been presented in a table or drawing
unless it mentions some to emphasize, for
example the most striking or controversial
1 table represents 1000 words
limited research
The discussion part
discusses
coherences
between the result
of this research
and any other
earlier research
The discussion
mainly discusess
matters related to
the main
question
Kriteria Ada Tidak
All relevant matter in this research are clearly explained v
There is no recurrences regarding the result part of this research V
The limitation of this journal and its probability to affect this research are V
explained
This journal mentions the deviance of the protocol and the chances to v
differ the result
The discussion mainly discusess matters related to the main question v
The discussion part discusses the coherences between the result of this V
research and any other earlier research
The researcher writes the link between the result of this journal and its v
application in general dental practice
The research elaborates the adverse effect of this research v
Researcher writes any further result and the complementary one from this V
observation
Any further and complementary result of this Journal are not counted with v
statistical analysis
The primary conlusion of this research are written v
The conclusion of this research are based on datas written in this Journal v