Nitro-glycerine infusions should be administered only via a pump that can maintain a
constant infusion rate.
Risk factors for shock include: 1] patients >70 years of age, 2] heart rate >110 beats
per minute, 3] systolic BP <120 mm Hg, and 4] late presentation. Early BBs,
particularly if given intravenously, can increase the likelihood of shock in patients
with risk factors.
BBs should be used prudently with ACE inhibitors or (ARBs) in patients with
HF.
RAAS blocking agents should be cautiously added in patients with decompensated
HF.
In patients with chronic obstructive lung disease or a history of asthma, BBs are not
contraindicated in the absence of active bronchospasm. Beta-1 selective BBs
(Nebivelol, Bisoprolol, Atenolol, and Metoprolol) are preferred and should be
initiated at a low dosage.
Calcium Channel Blockers: Recommendations
Class I
1. A nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) (e.g., verapamil or
diltiazem) should be given as initial therapy in patients with NSTE-ACS in: a]
continuing or frequently recurring ischemia, b] a contraindication to BBs, c] in
the absence of 1. clinically significant LV dysfunction, 2. increased risk for
cardiogenic shock, 3. PR interval > 0.24 second, or second- or third degree
atrioventricular block without a cardiac pacemaker. (Level of Evidence: B)
2. Oral nondihydropyridine CCBs are recommended in patients with NSTE-ACS who
have recurrent ischemia in the absence of contraindications, after appropriate use
of beta blockers and nitrates. (Level of Evidence: C)
3. CCBs are recommended for ischemic symptoms when beta blockers are not
successful, are contraindicated, or cause unacceptable side effects. (Level of
Evidence: C)
4. Long-acting CCBs and nitrates are recommended in patients with coronary artery
spasm. (Level of Evidence: C)
It inhibits the late inward sodium current and reduces the deleterious effects of
intracellular sodium and calcium overload that accompany myocardial ischemia.
2. ARBs are recommended in patients with HF or MI with LVEF < 0.40 who are
ACE inhibitor intolerant. (Level of Evidence: A)
NB: ACE inhibitors reduce mortality in patients with recent MI, primarily
those with LV dysfunction (LVEF <0.40) with or without pulmonary congestion.
In patients with normal LV function (including patients with diabetes mellitus),
total mortality and MACE (including HF) are reduced.
N/A, not applicable
Clopidogrel
Administration of clopidogrel with aspirin was superior to administration of
aspirin alone in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular death and nonfatal
MI or stroke both acutely and over 12 months.
Prasugrel
In patients with NSTE-ACS and defined coronary anatomy undergoing
planned PCI, a 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel followed by 10 mg daily was
compared with a 300-mg loading dose and 75 mg daily of clopidogrel. The
composite primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke)
was reduced in patients treated with prasugrel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81;
p=0.001).
Ticagrelor
Ticagrelor is an oral, reversibly binding P2Y12 inhibitor with a relatively short plasma
half-life (12 hours). Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor has a more rapid and
consistent onset of action and, because it is reversible, it has a faster recovery of
platelet function. The loading dose of ticagrelor for patients treated either invasively
or with an ischemia-guided strategy is 180 mg followed by a maintenance dose of 90
mg twice daily.
In patients with NSTE-ACS treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, there
was a reduction in the composite outcome of death from vascular causes, MI, or
stroke (reduction: 11.7% to 9.8%; HR: 0.84; p<0.001). The mortality rate was also
lower in those patients treated with ticagrelor. The overall major bleeding was not
increased with ticagrelor. Side effects unique to ticagrelor include dyspnea and
bradycardia.
The short half-life requires twice-daily administration, which could potentially result
in adverse events in noncompliant patients, particularly after stent implantation.
In patients with ACS who are managed with medical therapy alone (without
I B-R revascularization or fibrinolytic therapy) and treated with DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor
therapy (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) should be continued for at least 12 months.
In patients with NSTEACS who are managed with medical therapy alone (without
revascularization or fibrinolytic therapy) and treated with DAPT, it is reasonable to
IIa B-R
use ticagrelor in preference to clopidogrel for maintenance P2Y12 inhibitor
therapy.
In patients with ACS treated with medical therapy alone (without revascularization
or fibrinolytic therapy) who have tolerated DAPT without bleeding complication
IIb A SR and who are not at high bleeding risk (e.g., prior bleeding on DAPT, coagulopathy,
oral anticoagulant use), continuation of DAPT for longer than 12 months may be
reasonable.
Duration of DAPT in Patients With STEMI Treated With Fibrinolytic Therapy:
Recommendations
In patients with ACS treated with DAPT after DES implantation who develop a high risk
of bleeding (e.g., treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy), are at high risk of severe
IIb C-LD
bleeding complication (e.g., major intracranial surgery), or develop significant overt
bleeding, discontinuation of P2Y12 therapy after 6 months may be reasonable.
III:
B-R Prasugrel should not be administered to patients with a prior history of stroke or TIA
Harm
Duration of DAPT in Patients With ACS Treated With CABG: Recommendation
Assess ischemic and bleeding risks using validated risk predictors (e.g.,
CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED)
Keep triple therapy duration as short as possible; dual therapy only (oral
anticoagulant and clopidogrel) may be considered in select patients
Consider a target INR of 2.02.5 when warfarin is used
Clopidogrel is the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice
Use low-dose (100 mg daily) aspirin
PPIs should be used in patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding and
are reasonable to use in patients with increased risk of gastrointestinal
bleeding
UFH IV: initial loading dose of 60 IU/kg (maximum 4,000 IU) with initial infusion of 12 IU/kg per hour
(maximum 1,000 IU/h) adjusted per activated partial thromboplastin time to maintain therapeutic
anticoagulation according to the specific hospital protocol, continued for 48 hours or until PCI is
performed (class I). (Level of Evidence: B)
Dosing of Parenteral Anticoagulants During PCI
Risk Reduction Strategies for Secondary Prevention
CLASS I
1. Patients with NSTE-ACS should be referred to comprehensive CV rehabilitation program either before hospital discharge
or during the first outpatient visit. (Level of Evidence: B)
2. Pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for patients 65 years and in high-risk patients with CVD. (Level of Evidence: B)
3. Patients should be educated about appropriate cholesterol & BP management, smoking cessation, and lifestyle
management. (Level of Evidence: C)
4. Patients who have undergone PCI or CABG derive benefit from risk factor modification and should receive counselling
that revascularization does not obviate the need for lifestyle changes. (Level of Evidence: C)
5. Before hospital discharge, the patients need for treatment of chronic musculoskeletal discomfort should be
assessed, and a stepped-care approach should be used for selection of treatments. Pain treatment before
consideration of NSAIDs should begin with acetaminophen, nonacetylated salicylates, tramadol, or small doses of narcotics.
(Level of Evidence: C)
CLASS IIa
1. It is reasonable to use nonselective NSAIDs, such as naproxen, if initial therapy with acetaminophen, nonacetylated
salicylates, tramadol, or small doses of narcotics is insufficient. (Level of Evidence: C)
CLASS IIb
1. NSAIDs with increasing degrees of relative cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity may be considered for pain relief only for situations in
which intolerable discomfort persists despite use of acetaminophen, nonacetylated salicylates, tramadol, small doses of narcotics,
or nonselective NSAIDs. In all cases, use lowest effective doses for shortest possible time is encouraged. (Level of Evidence: C)
CLASS III: NO BENEFIT
1. Antioxidant vitamin supplements (e.g., vitamins E, C, or beta carotene) should not be used for secondary prevention in patients
with NSTE-ACS. (Level of Evidence: A)
2. Folic acid, with or without vitamins B6 and B12, should not be used for secondary prevention in patients with NSTE-ACS. (Level
of Evidence: A)
CLASS III: HARM
1. Hormone therapy with estrogen plus progestin, or estrogen alone, should not be given as new drugs for secondary prevention
of coronary events to postmenopausal women after NSTE-ACS and should not be continued in previous users unless the benefits
outweigh the estimated risks. (Level of Evidence: A)
2. NSAIDs with increasing degrees of relative cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity should not be administered to patients with NSTE-ACS
and chronic musculoskeletal discomfort when therapy with acetaminophen, nonacetylated salicylates, tramadol, small doses of
narcotics, or nonselective NSAIDs provide acceptable pain relief. (Level of Evidence: B)
Summary of Recommendations for Special Patient Groups with
NSTE-ACS - In Older Patients
CLASS I
1. Older patients** with NSTE-ACS should be treated with GDMT, an early invasive strategy,
and revascularization as appropriate. (Level of Evidence: A)
2. Pharmacotherapy in older patients** with NSTE-ACS should be individualized and dose
adjusted by weight and/or CrCl to reduce adverse events caused by age-related changes in
pharmacokinetics/dynamics, volume of distribution, comorbidities, drug interactions, and
increased drug sensitivity. (Level of Evidence: A)
CLASS IIa
1. Bivalirudin, rather than a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor plus UFH, is reasonable in older patients** with
NSTE-ACS, both initially and at PCI, given similar efficacy but less bleeding risk. (Level of
Evidence: B)
2. It is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI in older patients** with NSTE-ACS who are
appropriate candidates, particularly those with diabetes mellitus or complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g.,
SYNTAX score >22), with or without involvement of the proximal left anterior descending
artery, to reduce cardiovascular disease events and readmission and to improve survival. (Level
of Evidence: B)
*Provocative testing during invasive CA (e.g. ergonovine, acetylcholine, methylergonovine) is relatively safe,
especially when performed in a controlled manner by experienced operators. However, sustained spasm, serious
arrhythmias, and even death can also occur but very infrequently. Therefore, provocative tests should be avoided
in patients with significant LM disease, advanced 3-vessel disease, presence of high-grade obstructive lesions,
significant valvular stenosis, significant LV systolic dysfunction, and advanced HF.
CFR (also called absolute CFR) equals the ratio of maximum stress flow to rest flow
for a given arterial distribution with or without a stenosis or diffuse narrowing.
Relative coronary flow reserve (relative CFR) equals the ratio of maximum stress
flow in the diseased artery to maximum flow in the absence of disease in either the
same or adjacent arterial distribution.
FFR [fractional flow reserve] as now used clinically equals the ratio of coronary
pressure to aortic pressure at pharmacologically induced maximal coronary flow.
For a single discrete stenosis in the absence of diffuse disease, the FFR pressure
ratio also equals relative CFR by flow or flow velocity measurements
10 points to remember for the latest 2015 NSTEMI
guidelines per ESC
The following are 10 points to remember about the evaluation and treatment of patients without persistent
ST-segment elevation:
(1) ECG changes: may include transient ST-segment elevation lasting <20 minutes, persistent or transient ST-
segment depression, T-wave inversion, flat T waves, pseudo normalization of T waves, or no ECG changes)
2) In NSTE-ACS, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score provides the most accurate
stratification of risk both on admission and at discharge. A GRACE score >140 signifies high risk.
3) In patients at risk of developing cardiogenic shock (i.e., age >70 years, heart rate >110 bpm, systolic blood
pressure <120 mm Hg), the observed shock or death rate was significantly increased in patients receiving beta-
blockers within 24 hours of hospital admission.
X 4) As the optimal timing of ticagrelor or clopidogrel administration in NSTE-ACS patients scheduled for an
invasive strategy has not been adequately investigated, no recommendation for or against pretreatment with
these agents can be formulated. Based on the ACCOAST (the Comparison of Prasugrel at the Time of
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or as Pre-treatment at the Time of Diagnosis in Patients with Non-ST
Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial, pre-treatment with prasugrel is not recommended.
XA P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended in addition to aspirin, for 12 months following NSTE-ACS unless there
are contraindications. Clopidogrel (300-600 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily dose) is recommended for patients
who cannot receive ticagrelor or prasugrel or who require oral anticoagulation (Class I, Level of Evidence B).
Prasugrel is contraindicated in patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack; and there is no apparent
benefit with prasugrel in patients >75 years of age or with low bodyweight (60 kg). Previous intracranial
hemorrhage is a contraindication to the use of ticagrelor.
XCangrelor is an intravenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) analogue that binds reversibly and with high
affinity to the platelet P2Y12 receptor, and has a high affinity to the platelet P2Y12 receptor and has a
short plasma half-life (<10 minutes). Cangrelor may be considered in P2Y12 inhibitor-nave patients
undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (Class IIb, Level of Evidence A).
5) In patients on an oral anticoagulant, the following are suggested strategies to reduce bleeding risk
related to PCI:
In patients on vitamin K antagonists, avoid administration of unfractionated heparin if international
normalized ratio is >2.5 (Class I, Level of Evidence C)
In patients on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), regardless of the timing of the administration of the
NOAC, low-dose parenteral anticoagulation should be used (Class I, Level of Evidence C).
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors should be used only for bailout of periprocedural complications.
6) If a patient is at high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED 3), triple therapy with oral anticoagulant (OAC), aspirin
(75-100 mg/day), and clopidogrel 75 mg/day should be considered for a duration of 1 month, followed by
OAC and aspirin 75-100 mg/day or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) continued up to 12 months. The use of
ticagrelor or prasugrel as part of triple therapy is not recommended (Class III, Level of Evidence C).
7) Radial over femoral access is recommended for coronary angiography and PCI (Class I, Level of Evidence
A).
8) In NSTE-ACS, fractional flow reserve (FFR) may be overestimated (underestimating the relevance of a
coronary stenosis); accordingly, the value of FFR-guided PCI has not been properly addressed.
9) Among patients with diabetes mellitus, multivessel coronary artery disease, and acceptable surgical risk,
coronary artery bypass grafting is recommended over PCI.
10) High-intensity statin therapy should be initiated as early as possible (unless contraindicated) and
maintained long-term.
Summary of discrimination of various risk scores to
predict long term outcomes in populations with non
ST-segment elevation ACS.
TIMI risk score
The TIMI risk score was developed to predict the occurrence of the primary end-point (all
cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularisation) at 14 days in patients
with NSTEMI assigned to treatment with unfractionated heparin.
The components of TIMI risk score for death, new or recurrent MI, or urgent
revascularization at 14 days13:
Age 65 years
At least three of: FH of CAD, HTn, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, or current smoker
Significant coronary stenosis (for example, prior coronary stenosis 50%)
ST segment deviation on ECG
Severe anginal symptoms (for example, 2 anginal events in the last 24 hours)
Use of aspirin in the last seven days
Elevated serum cardiac markers (CK-MB and/or cardiac-specific troponin level)
Risk scores to assess prognosis in patients with
NSTE-ACS
CK-MB is much less sensitive for detection of myocardial injury than troponin, and
substantially more tissue injury is required for its detection. With the availability of
cardiac troponin, CK-MB, myoglobin, and other diagnostic biomarkers are no longer
necessary.
Low risk: <3 risks. Moderate risk: 3-4 risks. High risk: 5-7 risks.
2] Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) model
for In-Hospital Mortality for ACS
The GRACE risk model predicts in-hospital and post-discharge mortality or MI
Ischaemic risk assessment
The GRACE risk score provides the most accurate stratification of risk both on admission
and at discharge. Variables used in the GRACE 2.0 risk calculation include 1] age, 2] SBP, 3] HR,
4] serum creatinine, 5] Killip class at presentation, 6] cardiac arrest at admission, 7] elevated
cardiac biomarkers and 8] ST deviation.
The TIMI risk score uses seven variables in an additive scoring system: 1] age 65 years, 2]
CAD risk factors, 3] known CAD, 4] aspirin use in the past 7 days, 5] severe angina (two or
more episodes within 24 h), 6] ST change 0.5 mm and 7] positive cardiac marker. It is simple
to use, but its discriminative accuracy is inferior to that of the GRACE risk score and the GRACE
2.0 risk calculation.
Timing of Urgent CABG in Patients With NSTE-ACS in Relation
to Use of Antiplatelet Agents: Recommendations
Class I
1. Nonenteric-coated aspirin (81 mg to 325 mg daily) should be administered
preoperatively to patients undergoing CABG. (Level of Evidence: B)
Class IIa
1. Bivalirudin, rather than a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor plus UFH, is reasonable in older
patients with NSTE-ACS, both initially and at PCI, given similar efficacy but less
bleeding risk. (Level of Evidence: B)
2. It is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI in older patients**with NSTE-ACS
who are appropriate candidates, particularly those with diabetes mellitus or
complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g., SYNTAX score >22), with or without involvement of
the proximal LAD artery, to reduce cardiovascular disease events and readmission
and to improve survival (Level of Evidence: B)
ACS With Angiographically Normal Coronary
Arteries: Recommendation
ACS associated with angiographically normal or nonobstructive (<50% stenosis)
coronary arteries (also referred to as syndrome X) may be related to coronary
endothelial dysfunction; plaque rupture that may be evident only with intracoronary
ultrasound; coronary vasospasm; and coronary artery dissection.
Myocarditis may present with electrocardiographic and biomarker findings similar
to ACS and can be distinguished by magnetic resonance imaging. Intracoronary
ultrasound and/or optical coherence tomography to assess the extent of
atherosclerosis and exclude obstructive lesions may be considered in patients with
possible ACS and angiographically normal coronary arteries. If ECGs during chest
pain are not available and coronary spasm cannot be ruled out, coronary
angiography and provocative testing with acetylcholine, adenosine, or methacholine
and 24-hour ambulatory ECG may be undertaken after a period of stabilization.
Endothelial dysfunction is more common in women than in men, and chest pain is
typical or atypical. In the absence of a culprit coronary lesion, prognosis of coronary
endothelial dysfunction and/or occult plaque rupture is favorable.
Risk factor reduction and medical therapy with nitrates, beta blockers, and CCBs
alone or in combination are considered for endothelial dysfunction. High doses of
arginine have also been given. Imipramine or aminophylline have been used in
patients with endothelial dysfunction for continued pain despite optimal medical
therapy. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a powerful tool for
differential diagnosis between myocardial infarction (MI), acute myocarditis and
Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC).
Stress (Takotsubo) Cardiomyopathy:
Class IIa
1. It is reasonable to use catecholamines for patients with symptomatic
hypotension if outflow tract obstruction is not present. (Level of Evidence: C)
2. The use of IABP is reasonable for patients with refractory shock. (Level of
Evidence: C)
3. It is reasonable to use beta blockers and alpha-adrenergic agents in patients with
outflow tract obstruction. (Level of Evidence: C)