frameworks. Curriculum Frameworks • When analyzing a curriculum, it is useful to consider it under headings such as: aims and purposes, content, teaching and learning principles (pedagogy), and assessment of learning. Aims and Purposes • There are many forms curricula can take and these reflect the different aims they were designed to achieve. Aims and Purposes • The current National Curriculum in English schools, for example, aims to provide a broad and balanced education for all students in state schools between the ages of 5 and 16. Aims and Purposes • This involves promoting their spiritual, moral, cultural, mental and physical developments and preparing them for adult life (see page 88). Aims and Purposes • The effectiveness of the curriculum can be judged in terms of how well it does these things. Aims and Purposes • Other curricula may be much more specific in their aims. Aims and Purposes • Much vocational training, for instance, has a clearly defined set of practical skills and knowledge in which trainees are expected to demonstrate competence to successfully complete the program. Aims and Purposes • It is very important to consider aims and purposes as these greatly influence the content, methods of teaching and learning, and forms of assessment that make up a curriculum. Content • Many considerations govern the content of a curriculum and these stem from its overall aim or purposes. Content What kinds of knowledge should be taught? What values do they represent? How useful are they? How relevant is this knowledge? Content • Practical relevance is not the only criterion for establishing the value of knowledge. Content • There may be powerful cultural reasons for learning certain things. Content • The content of the school curriculum is defined in terms of subject knowledge but also in terms of the kinds of thinking and related skills - literacy and numeracy, for example - that might be appropriate for learning. Content • Subject organization implies different and discrete areas of knowledge. Content • The National Curriculum for England and Wales had ten specified subjects when it was first introduced. Content • It included three core subjects (English, mathematics and science) and seven foundation subjects (history, geography, technology, music, art, physical education and, at secondary level, a modern foreign language). Content • This selection of subjects indicates a particular view of knowledge and learning. Content • One of the issues with basing a curriculum around subjects is that a significant decision has to be made by someone about which subjects to include and which to leave out. Content • At first sight, deciding what to teach in mathematics and science may appear unproblematic. Content • In reality, however, what is included in these subjects and how the material is taught and learned are hotly debated issues. Content • The same is true for all subjects. Content • For example, what aspects of history should be taught? • History looks very different when presented from different perspectives. • The Scots, English and French do not interpret British and European history in the same way. Content • Such decisions about content and its presentation relate to all subjects to a greater or lesser degree. Content • There are various ways of organising curriculum content. Content • These may not be subject based, but instead organised around key experiences. Content • Stenhouse for instance, working for the Schools Curriculum Council in the 1960s, advocated a more integrated approach to curriculum design that centred on themes or issues rather than separate subjects. Content • He developed the Integrated Humanities Project that aimed to make the content more relevant to the learners. Content • He felt that subjects created artificial boundaries that made understanding more difficult. Content • In an integrated curriculum when learning about their local environment, for example, a student would look at aspects of history, geography, and social and moral education. Content • Students would collect information, measure, count, present results and produce written accounts. Content • They would be 'doing' different subjects simultaneously and learning the appropriate skills in an applied way. Content • In vocational learning the organisation of knowledge is often more clearly combined with the development of practical skills. Pedagogy • Pedagogy, or the science of teaching, is concerned with the methods of teaching and learning. Pedagogy • Pedagogy involves structural features such as the learning environment, the classroom and a mode of practice (for example, a teacher giving instructions or asking questions). Pedagogy • Pedagogical ideas are in part developed from theories about how people learn. Pedagogy • Different and contradictory accounts of how learning takes place exist and conflict with one another. Pedagogy • There are many different traditions of learning. Pedagogy • In Europe, for example, there is much more emphasis on pedagogy as a distinctive branch of educational knowledge. Pedagogy • In 1972 Bruner claimed that any aspect of any subject could be taught to anybody at any age. Pedagogy • Plowden report (1967) in the UK stimulated an emphasis on child-centred learning. Pedagogy • Child-centred learning stressed creativity, spontaneity and individuality . Pedagogy • More recently, there has been a stress on using social constructivist theory that derives from Vygotsky (Engestrom, 1993). Pedagogy • These theorists see individual learning as structured mental development. Pedagogy • Learning is always a development of the self; it is always social and cultural. Pedagogy • This implies a different way of organising the experiences of learning from that of child- centred approaches. Pedagogy • Vygotskyans tend to believe that teaching must: take the child forward, be concerned with new concepts, new hierarchies of ideas and ever more complex forms of mental operation. Pedagogy • The pedagogic approaches of social constructivism have become very influential in UK schools. Pedagogy • Methods of teaching and learning give rise to questions about autonomy and authority. Pedagogy • We might consider what are the 'best', most productive, most relevant and socially desirable forms of practice. Pedagogy • How much should teaching and learning within a curriculum be concerned to promote the development of autonomy, initiative, critical awareness and other qualities that might be thought of as central aspects of citizenship? Pedagogy • How much should it be about developing discipline of thought and acquiring important formal knowledge? Pedagogy • Once again the answer depends upon the particular curriculum but also on how we perceive the nature and purposes of education. Pedagogy • Teaching and learning can take many forms. Pedagogy • The emphasis may be on practical applications, experimentation, or open learning. Pedagogy • Even within a particular course the teaching methods can vary greatly. Pedagogy • For instance, students learning a modern foreign language may have a very different experience from peers taking the same subject in the next room. Pedagogy • One teacher may emphasise an interactive, oral approach to language development whereas another may stress writing and rote learning as ways of extending the students' vocabularies. Pedagogy • The following learning situations are commonly experienced by students: • mass lectures • whole class work • small group investigation and discussion • individual learning. Pedagogy • Learning activities can include: making notes, investigation in learning centres and libraries, searching through electronic sources, group discussion, practical activity such as experiments or problem solving individually or in groups. Pedagogy • There are many possibilities and combinations. Pedagogy • In summary, decisions on appropriate pedagogy depend upon the purposes of the learning, the type of material to be taught and the ideological views of the 'best' methods held by those 'delivering' the curriculum. Assessment • There are many ways in which educational progress and achievement may be judged (assessed). Assessment • These vary from the formal to the very informal and each provides different kinds of information from statistical results to verbal feedback. Purposes of assessment: 1. To monitor progress 1. To monitor progress: • Here assessment will indicate how the student is progressing. This is often referred to as formative assessment or assessment for learning. Purposes of assessment: 1. To monitor progress • Formative assessment may be ongoing, for example regular feedback on coursework, or it may be periodic as with regular tests. Purposes of assessment: 1. To monitor progress • It can form part of a diagnostic process providing a basis for decisions on future learning and for developing a record of progress. Purposes of assessment: 1. To monitor progress • Assessment is seen here as an integral part of the learning process rather than as something that just happens at the end. Purposes of assessment: 2. To indicate a final level of achievement 2. To indicate a final level of achievement. After completing a course a final grade or level is often awarded as part of the certification. Purposes of assessment: 2. To indicate a final level of achievement • This is referred to as summative assessment or assessment of learning. Purposes of assessment: 3. To evaluate the teaching and learning process
3. To evaluate the teaching and learning
process. Through assessment teachers can determine which aspects of the learning students find most difficult and also the effectiveness of different pedagogical approaches. Purposes of assessment: 3. To evaluate the teaching and learning process
• This can be done while the curriculum is being
taught using the results from formative assessments. Purposes of assessment: 3. To evaluate the teaching and learning process
• An end of course evaluation can also be
conducted. Purposes of assessment: 4. To enable comparisons of achievement by external agencies 4. To enable comparisons of achievement by external agencies. External agents such as local authorities, politicians and parents are able to use the results of national assessments to compare education institutions. Types of assessment • The type of assessment used depends upon the reasons for the assessment, the nature of the learning and also the ideological beliefs underpinning the curriculum. Types of assessment • Formal mechanisms tend to elicit more quantitative data on performance, allow easy comparison between individuals and whole cohorts of pupils/students and may appear more objective. Types of assessment • Those forms of assessment that provide 'hard' (formal) data may be more valued. Types of assessment • However, while appearing more accurate, their validity may actually be open to question. Types of assessment • Often the most difficult and complex issues cannot be answered through simple multiple choice type questions. Types of assessment • The softer, more informal modes of assessment, such as discussing work with a student, may reveal the full extent of an individual's understanding. Types of assessment • However, making comparisons of large numbers of students is impossible by such a method. Types of assessment • Thus different forms of assessment each have their strengths and weaknesses and are compatible with different purposes. Types of assessment • Assessment has important public functions and can dominate curriculum processes and practices. Types of assessment • The curriculum may be assessment-driven and risk losing sight of its broader objectives. Types of assessment • Hall and Sheehy suggest that 'assessing learning is not a neutral or value-free activity - it is always bound up with attitudes, values, beliefs and sometimes prejudices on the part of those carrying out the assessment and on the part of those being assessed.' Types of assessment • The purposes of the assessment have a significant effect on how the assessors and the assessed perceive the process. Types of assessment • For instance, formative assessment can be done in a relaxed manner that is open and honest. Types of assessment • Both assessor and assessed may feel it to be a positive process. Types of assessment • However, a final summative assessment, when results are to be used as part of an accountability process, is likely to be a much more anxious process for those being assessed. Types of assessment • Because of these potential conflicts the purposes of assessment need to be clear from the outset. Conclusion • The impact of different ideologies and beliefs on the creation, positioning and structure of a curriculum has been illustrated. Conclusion • We have seen that the nature of knowledge and views on what it is important to 'know' play a central part in the design of any curriculum. Conclusion • Knowledge can be structured and presented in different ways. Conclusion • In the context of modern schooling, traditional subject knowledge may be seen as important or knowledge may be presented thematically. Conclusion • Thus teaching and learning can take many different forms depending upon the purpose of the curriculum and the beliefs of the teachers. Conclusion • Assessment is a fundamental element of the curriculum and can take many forms. Conclusion • These different forms of assessment reflect what those designing and delivering the curriculum see as important in terms of student outcomes. Conclusion • They are tied very much to the purposes of the curriculum and beliefs concerning the nature of education. Conclusion • The structural features of the curriculum are thus influenced by the purposes and beliefs of the teachers, course designers, examination boards, government ministers and established discourses. Conclusion • The final delivered curriculum is often the result of a complex interaction and power struggle between the various interested parties.