EVALUATION
Waples (1985):
Three kind of source rocks
0.2
Source richness parameters
1. Waples (1985)
TOC Source implication
Poor 0.5
Fair 0.5-1.0
Good 1.0-2.0
Very good 2+
Simple parameters define petroleum potential of an
immature source rock (after Peters and Cassa, 1994)
Potential TOC Rock-Eval Rock-Eval Bitumen HC
(Quantity) (%) S1 S2 (ppm) (ppm)
500- 300-
Fair 0.5-1 0.5-1 2.5-5
1000 600
1000- 600-
Good 1-2 1-2 5-10
2000 1200
2000- 1200-
V. Good 2-4 2-4 10-20
4000 2400
Excellent >4 >4 >20 >4000 >2400
TYPE OF
ORGANIC MATERIAL
Atomic
H/C Results of kerogen evolution
CO2, H2O
Oil
1,50 Gas
increasing evolution
1,00
0,50
0
0,10 0,20
Atomic O/C
S2/TOC x 100
300
III
Experience 0
0 50 100 150
INDEKS OKSIGEN (OI) S3/TOC x 100
OXYGEN INDEX (OI)
Modified
Gambar 5.1. Diagram van Krevelen yang van Krevelen
dimodifikasi diagram
menunjukkan jalur evolusi
kerogen dengan menggunakan indeks hidrogen (HI) dan indeks oksigen
(OI). Diambil dari Espitalie et al. (1977; dalam Waples, 1985).
Modified van Krevelen diagram
Type of kerogen?
Maturation Generation
Maturity Ro Bitumen
Tmax TAI Bit/TOC PI
(%) (mg/g)
0.20- 1.5-
Immature <435 <0.05 <50 <0.10
0.60 1.26
Mature
0.60- 435- 0.05- 0.10-
Early 2.6-2.7 50-100
0.65 445 0.10 0.15
0.65- 445- 0.15- 0.25-
Peak 2.7-2.9 150-250
0.90 450 0.25 0.40
0.90- 450-
Late 2.9-3.3 -- -- >0.40
1.35 470
Post-
mature
>1.35 >470 >3.3 -- -- --
(Peters and Cassa, 1991)
Immature zone
Oil zone
Immature zone
Oil zone
Depth
Ro (%)
FAULTS
Normal fault
Depth
Reverse fault
Ro (%)
OVERPRESSURE
Depth
(Top overpressure)
Ro (%)
INTRUSIONS
Sill
Depth
Dyke
Ro (%)
HEATFLOW
Depth
Ro (%)
New source rock analyses
Analysis Kabul-1 SW NE N Berkah-1 Total
Betara-1 Betara-5 Geragai-1
Total organic carbon (TOC) 40 40 80
Rock-Eval Pyrolysis 20 20 40
Vitrinite reflectance 20 19 39
Kerogen typing 20 19 39
Thermal extract Py-GC 4 4 2 2 4 16
Py-GC S2 fraction 4 4 2 2 4 16
Solvent extraction 2 2 2 2 4 12
Liquid chromatography 2 2 2 2 4 12
C10+ sats GC 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
Lower Talang Akar Formation
Source Quality vs. Organic Richness
Jabung Block, South Sumatra
Hydrogen Index mg/gC
1,200
1,000
HC
TYPE I
TYPE
900
800
700
600
500
300
GAS-PRONE TYPE III
200
100
POOR - FAIR - GOOD - EXCELLENT - COALS
0
Well: Kabul-1
FORMATION
Air Middle
2000 Benakat Miocene
Upper
Gumai intra-Gumai
3000 marker
Early
Lower Miocene
4000 Gumai
9.625" @
4484 ft
Baturaja
5000 U.TAF
Oligocene
/Eocene
L.TAF
6000
7" @
Bsmt pre-Tert 6510 ft
PetroChina (2004)
7000 G.E. 117 ft 0.5%Ro
K.B. 135 ft early
T.D. 6539 ft mature
8000 0.7%Ro
9000 1.0%Ro
10000 1.3%Ro oil
mature
11000
0.1 1 10 0.1
100 1 5 10 100 300
0.01 0.1 1 10 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10 300 600 0 25 50 75 100
400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 0.5 0.7 1 1.3
TOC = Total Organic S1+S2 = Pyrolysis Yields S1 = Free Oil Content S1/(S1+S2) = OPI = Hydrogen Index = Oil Prone Kerogen = Tmax = Temperature of EM = Early Mature
Carbon Oil Production Index S2/TOC*100 Liptinite + Fluor. Amorphous Maximum S2 OW = Oil Window
GW = Gas Window
New source rock analyses
Analysis Kabul-1 SW NE N Berkah-1 Total
Betara-1 Betara-5 Geragai-1
Total organic carbon (TOC) 40 40 80
Rock-Eval Pyrolysis 20 20 40
Vitrinite reflectance 20 19 39
Kerogen typing 20 19 39
Thermal extract Py-GC 4 4 2 2 4 16
Py-GC S2 fraction 4 4 2 2 4 16
Solvent extraction 2 2 2 2 4 12
Liquid chromatography 2 2 2 2 4 12
C10+ sats GC 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
Distribution of Principal Maceral Types
Gumai Formation
100% Liptinite
(Type I - II)
* Non-fluorescent
amorphous kerogen
reducing
marine or oil-prone
lacustrine
oxidising
terrestrial /
marine or
deltaic
lacustrine
mixed
gas-prone
100% Vitrinite + Inertinite 100% NFA*
(Type III - IV) (Type III)
- LEGEND -
Octene
Phenol
Distribution of n-Octene, m+p-Xylenes and Phenol
in Whole Rock Pyrolysates
Upper Talang Akar Formation
100% n-Octene
Type I/II
Type III/II
Type III
Type IV
- LEGEND -
Geragai Deep
New source rock analyses
Analysis Kabul-1 SW NE N Berkah-1 Total
Betara-1 Betara-5 Geragai-1
Total organic carbon (TOC) 40 40 80
Rock-Eval Pyrolysis 20 20 40
Vitrinite reflectance 20 19 39
Kerogen typing 20 19 39
Thermal extract Py-GC 4 4 2 2 4 16
Py-GC S2 fraction 4 4 2 2 4 16
Solvent extraction 2 2 2 2 4 12
Liquid chromatography 2 2 2 2 4 12
C10+ sats GC 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
LECO TOC
ROCKS
ROCK-EVAL * Maturity
* Richness
* Type of OM
EXTRACTION OPTIC
(DICHLOROMETHANE) - VR
- TAI * Maturity
- SCI
- Etc.
OIL BITUMEN
REMAIN
GAS COLUMN
Biomarker
CHROMATOGRAPHY PY-GC
distribution
Biomarker
MOLECULAR THIN LAYER
distribution SIEVING CHROMATOGRAPHY
GC / GC-MS
Biomarker distribution
1
0
0%A
r
oms
c
r
ud
eo
i
l
s
s
e
di
men
t
s
i
mma
t
ur
eco
a
ls
ADTION
BIODEGR
IN
C
RE
AS
IN
GM
A
TU
R
AT
IO
N
FRACTIOMATURATIO
NATION N/
1
0
0%S
a
t
s 1
0
0%N
S
O+
As
p
h
Response_
Pr/Ph: 7.38
Pr
20000
Signal: SAMPLE01.D\FID1A.CH
Pr/C17: 1.34
nC27
19000
Ph/C18: 0.18
nC24
nC15
nC23
nC26
nC25
nC22
18000
nC14
nC19
nC21
nC17
nC16
nC20
17000
nC18
nC28
16000 CPI: 1.13
nC29
15000
nC13
14000
13000
nC30
12000
11000
nC31
10000
9000
nC12
nC32
8000
nC33
7000
Ph
6000
nC34
nC35
nC36
nC37
5000
nC11
4000
3000
Component LW-05A
nC5 0.00
nC6 0.00
nC7 0.00
nC8 0.08
nC9 0.40
nC10 1.10
nC11 4.22
nC12 7.20
nC13 9.20
nC14 11.05
Pr/Ph 2.66
nC15 9.94
nC16 7.75
nC17 6.89
nC18
nC19
6.06 Pr/nC17 1.24
5.69
Ph/nC18 0.53
nC20 5.15
nC21 3.84
nC22 3.48
nC23
nC24
2.63
2.20
CPI 1.06
nC25 2.09
nC26 1.94
nC27 1.68
nC28 1.46
nC29 1.32
nC30 1.06
nC31 1.04
nC32 0.92
nC33 0.84
nC34 0.46
nC35 0.32
nC36 0.00
nC37 0.00
nC38 0.00
Total 100.00
Pristane/nC17 vs. Pristane/Phytane
Japex, Buton Project
20
WKLB-3A oil
10
WKLB-3B oil
5 WKLB-3 oil
KWN-4 oil
Pr / nC17
2 KW-1 sediment
1 KW-11 sediment
0.5
0.2
ANOXIC TO SUBOXIC
HIGLY ANOXIC LACUSTRINE OR MARINE OXIC TERRESTRIAL
0.1
0.8 0.9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15
Pr / Ph
PLOT OF N-ALKANES DISTRIBUTION
16
14
12
Weight percent
10
8
6
4
2
0
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Carbon number
30000
25000
20000
4 5
Cy
15000
Tricyclic terpanes
10000
7
X1 2
9
8
5000 Cz
1
10 12
X5 11 14
B C D F G H Gm 13 15 16
E
0
T im e -->
3 0 .0 0 3 5 .0 0 4 0 .0 0 4 5 .0 0 5 0 .0 0 5 5 .0 0 6 0 .0 0 6 5 .0 0 7 0 .0 0 7 5 .0 0 8 0 .0 0
Abundance
42000
40000
32000
30000
28000
Tricyclic terpanes
26000
24000
22000
B
20000
2 Ol
18000
C 8
16000
C30 Cz
14000
X4 Cy
12000 9
1 11
10000
8000
5 7 12
X1
6000
E K 13
4000
L 14
D F G H 10 15
I 16 17
2000 18
0
30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00
Time-->
Abundance
TRICYCLIC TERPANE PATTERNS FROM DIFFERING ORGANOFACIES
B C D E F G H B C D E F G H B C D E F G H
Hopanes/Steranes vs. Pristane/Phytane
Japex, Buton Project
anoxic to sub-oxic: highly oxidising: WKLB-3A oil
20
terrestrial influence terrestrial
WKLB-3B oil
10
WKLB-3 oil
Total Hopanes / Steranes
5 KWN-4 oil
KW-1 sed
2
KW-11 sed
1
0.5
Pr / Ph
Crossplot of Triterpane Maturity Parameters
Jabung Block
0.05
peak late mature
mature
terrestrial plant influence
0.10
C30 moretane/hopane
0.20
0.30
early
mature
0.50
immature
1.00
20.00 10.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.1
Tm/Ts
Maturity ranges for clastic source rocks after Miles, 1989
Both parameters are relatively higher in coals/coal sourced oils
Io n 2 1 7 .1 0 (2 1 6 .8 0 to 2 1 7 .8 0 ): S A T L W 0 5 A .D
A bundanc e
E,2,3
R
3500
A
5 7,8
3000
F
4 9 10
12,13
11
2500 R
B 15
1
6 14
C
2000
1500
1000
500
0
T im e - - >
5 0 .0 0 5 2 .0 0 5 4 .0 0 5 6 .0 0 5 8 .0 0 6 0 .0 0 6 2 .0 0 6 4 .0 0
C27-C29 Sterane Distribution*
and Interpreted Depositional Environment
Upper Talang Akar Formation
100% C28
Open
Marine
Terrestrial
or
Planktonic Deep Estuarine
Lacustrine or Higher
Shallow Lacustrine Plant
- LEGEND -
N Geragai-2 NE Betara-1
C28
100%
Estuarine Terrestrial
Deep marine
or
Planktonic or Higher
Shallow lacustrine
Deep lacustrine plant
C27 C29
100% WKLB-3A oil KWN-4 oil 100%
WKLB-3B oil KW-1 sediment
WKLB-3 oil
1.2
KWN-4 oil
1.0
KW-1 sed
0.8 KW-11 sed
Mature
0.6
0.4
Early Mature
0.2
immature
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
C29 abbR+S/aaaS+R Steranes
Maturity calibrated from Mesozoic
clastic sediments, after Miles, 1989
New source rock analyses
Analysis Kabul-1 SW NE N Berkah-1 Total
Betara-1 Betara-5 Geragai-1
Total organic carbon (TOC) 40 40 80
Rock-Eval Pyrolysis 20 20 40
Vitrinite reflectance 20 19 39
Kerogen typing 20 19 39
Thermal extract Py-GC 4 4 2 2 4 16
Py-GC S2 fraction 4 4 2 2 4 16
Solvent extraction 2 2 2 2 4 12
Liquid chromatography 2 2 2 2 4 12
C10+ sats GC 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
GC-MS aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope saturates 2 2 2 2 1 9
Carbon isotope aromatics 2 2 2 2 1 9
1,6
Bongka oil-seep,
1,3 + 1,7
offshore Sulawesi
m/z 156
Dimethylnaphthalenes
2,6 + 2,7
TOP OF OIL
PARAMETERS ISOMER RATIO WET GAS
GENERATION
0.9
peak mature
Equivalent Ro.
1.3
1.5
MPI-1
1.7
g
cin
GK-52 GK-12
-22 r Cipluk-7
NE Java Sou oil seep
-23 d
Basin oils ixe
-24 *M Cipluk-19
-25 Ardjuna diesel used in oil seep
Basin oils Java Sea wells
-26
-27
-28 *Algal
-29 Palaeogene (Marine or Non-marine)
coals
-30
Neogene no aromatics data available:
-31 saturates position plotted
coals
-32
-33 -32 -31 -30 -29 -28 -27 -26 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 -17
¹³C Saturates (ppt)
*Source Implications after Sofer, 1984
Principal characteristics of hydrocarbon gases generated
during the successive of kerogen evolution
(After Schoell, 1980)
Dry gas
Diagenesis > 0.97 -55 to -90
(biogenic)
Oil-assoc. gas
Catagenesis <0.98 -30 to -55
Wet gas
Case study 7
MODELLING
Ungerer (1992):
“Whatever the quality of geochemical
data, the information they provide is
discontinuous as it is limited to
existing wells and surface outcrops.
Moreover, it reflects the present
stage of geological history which is
the cumulative result of a long and
complex evolution.”
Ungerer (1992):
“The main purpose of modelling the oil
and gas is to extrapolate available
maturity data from wells to the entire
basin by using all geological
information and to reconstruct
according to a mathematical
formulation the maturity evolution
along time.”
Maturity model based on cross plot between depth and %Ro for Tanjung Tiram-1 well, showing depth of early mature stage
(%Ro=0.5) is reached at 900 m and depth of middle mature stage (%Ro=0.7) is reached at 1850 m.
Pseudo-1 Pseudo-2
1129 g77
Pseudo-3
Pseudo-4
1152 g77
Basemap of Simenggaris Block, showing position of lines used and pseudo wells which created for 2D modeling in this study
Present day heat flow (HFU) map in Simenggaris Block
Tanjung Bimau-1 Dasin-1
(1 km projected to south) Pseudo-1 (500 m projected to south) Pseudo-2
W E
Tarakan Fm.
Tabul Fm.
Meliat Fm.
Naintupo Fm.
Maturity cross section model along line 1129-g77 (present day), showing generally main gas generation
maturation stage for Naintupo Fm., and late mature to main gas generation stage for Meliat Fm. within deeper area
Tarakan Fm.
Tabul Fm.
Meliat Fm.
Early Mature
Middle Mature
Late Mature
Naintupo Fm.
Main Gas Generation
Depth vs %Ro curve of Pseudo-1 well (Line 1129) showing depth of oil window (%Ro=0.5)
reached at 1800 mbsl.
5-72
Mature sediment
Depth structure map of top SB-2 (Naintupo Formation) showing distribution of mature sediment.
S. Sembakung-1
Sesayap E-1
Migration simulation of Simenggaris Block for SB5 reservoir interval with assumption all
faults are leaking.
S. Sembakung-1
A
Sesayap E-1
Migration simulation of Simenggaris Block for SB5 reservoir interval with assumption most of faults
are sealing and some faults are leaking.
Sembakung-1
Bangkudulis-1
Tanjung Tiram-1
Paleo-migration simulation at first HC expelled (10 mya) of Simenggaris Block for SB5 reservoir interval
with assumption all fault are leaking.
Sembakung-1
Bangkudulis-1
Tanjung Tiram-1
Paleo-migration simulation at first HC expelled (10 mya) of Simenggaris Block for SB5 reservoir interval
with assumption all fault are sealing.
The use of petroleum geochemistry in a
reservoir study
Case study 8