wave
Disturbance that travels through a medium from one location to another location
.
COMSATS INSTITUE OF INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY, ISLAMABAD
Perpendicularity of
Electric and Magnetic
Field Electromagnetic Spectrum
𝜕𝐷
𝛻𝑋𝐻=𝐽 +
𝜕𝑡
𝜕𝐷
𝛻𝑋𝛻𝑋𝐻 =𝛻𝑋𝐽+𝛻𝑋
𝜕𝑡
Putting D=ɛE and J=gE and assuming ɛ and g are constant,
𝜕
we obtain 𝛻 𝑋 𝛻 𝑋 𝐻 = 𝑔𝛻 𝑋 𝐸 + ɛ 𝛻𝑋𝐸
𝜕𝑡
𝜕𝐵 𝜕𝐵
𝛻𝑋𝐸=− 𝛻 𝑋 𝛻 𝑋 𝐸 = −𝛻 𝑋
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑡
𝜕𝐷
Using eq 𝛻 𝑋 𝐻 = 𝐽 + to eliminate the magnetic
𝜕𝑡
field and treating g, μ and ε as constant yields
If B is bounded, letting h approach zero causes the last term to vanish and S1 to
approach S2 geometrically. Taking account of the opposite directions of n1 and n2
it is quickly concluded that 𝐵1𝑛 = 𝐵2𝑛
exactly as in the static case.
The tangential component of the EF can be treated in as equally simple way. The
basic eq is again one of Maxwell’s equation
𝜕𝐁
𝛻 𝑋 𝐸 + 𝜕𝑡 = 0
Integration of this eq over the surface bounded by a rectangular loop such as that
shown in fig yields and applying Stokes theorem to the left side gives
ω ω
κ1 = n1 and κ2 = n2
c c
Where n1 and n2 are indices of refraction of the two media
n
=
B 𝐮 × 𝐄
c
𝐮 = 𝐤 for the incident and transmitted waves and 𝐮 = −𝐤 for the
reflected wave, the magnetic fields associated with the electric fields
of above eqs are given by
cB1 = 𝐣n1 E1x 𝑒 𝑖(𝑘1 𝑧−ω𝑡)
cB′1 = 𝐣n1 E′1x 𝑒 −𝑖(𝑘1 𝑧+ω𝑡) ,
cB2 = 𝐣n2 E2x 𝑒 𝑖(𝑘2 𝑧−ω𝑡)
𝑛 × 𝐵1 + 𝐵′
1 = 𝑛 × 𝐵2
The Maxwell curl eq relate 𝐸 and 𝐵 to each other in each medium. With the dispersion
𝑛
relations these take the form 𝐵 = 𝑢 × 𝐸
𝑐
𝑛
its equivalent 𝐸 = − 𝑢 × 𝐵 , on substitution
𝑐
′1 = n2 𝑛 × (u2 × 𝐸2 )
n1 𝑛 × u1 × 𝐸1 + u′1 × 𝐸
′1 and 𝐸2 in terms of 𝐸1 .We can expand the vector triple Products:
solved for 𝐸
𝑛 ×(u1 × 𝐸1 ) = 𝑢. 𝐸1 u1 − (𝑛. u1 )𝐸1
P-polarization. When the E-vectors all lie in the plane of incidence eq 95 shows that the
corresponding B-vectors all lie along the s-direction. The choice of E-vectors in fig 12 was made
so that all the corresponding B-vectors point in the +j direction. This time we substitute eq 96 into
93. since 𝑛. 𝐵1𝑠 = 0 = 𝑛. 𝐵1𝑠′
= 𝑛. 𝐵2𝑠 the result simplifies to
1 1
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳1 (𝐵1𝑠 − 𝐵1𝑠
′
)= 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳2 . 𝐵2𝑠
𝑛1 𝑛2
Also eq 94 simplifies to 𝐵1𝑠 + 𝐵1𝑠′
= 𝐵2𝑠
We can write the solution of Eq 107 and 108 as 𝐵1𝑠 ′
= 𝑟12𝑝 𝐵1𝑠
𝑛 𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳1 −𝑛2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳2
𝐵2𝑠 = 2 𝑡12𝑝 𝐵1𝑠 𝑟12𝑝 = 1
𝑛1 𝑛1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳1 +𝑛2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳2
2𝑛1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳1
𝑡12𝑝 =
𝑛1 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳1 + 𝑛2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛳2
𝐸1𝑝
′
= 𝑟12𝑝 𝐸1𝑝 ,
𝐸2𝑝 = 𝑡12 𝐸1𝑝
For normal incidence 𝛳1 = 0 and according to the Snell’s law𝛳12 = 0 as well. Thus Eq 111 to 113-
114 reduce to eq 63 and 64 for normal incidence .Eq 106 becomes identical to eq 112, but from eq
105, we find that 𝑟12𝑠 = 𝑟12𝑝
Relations b/w the intensities can again be obtained from the F.C, treating each polarization direction
separately.
We define the reflectance and transmittance as the component of the respective time-averaged
Poynting vectors that is normal to the boundary, relative to the normal component of the incident
𝒏.Ŝ′𝟏𝒔 𝒏.Ŝ𝟐𝒔
Poynting vector. 𝑹𝒔 = ,𝑻𝒔 =
𝒏.Ŝ𝟏𝒔 𝒏.Ŝ𝟏𝒔
𝒏.Ŝ′𝟏𝒑 𝒏.Ŝ𝟐𝒑
𝑹𝒑 = , 𝑻𝒑 =
𝒏.Ŝ𝟏𝒑 𝒏.Ŝ𝟏𝒑