“Supply chain management strategy for recycled materials

to support sustainable construction”

Kelompok 3 :
1. Maghfur Rozudin 15612044
2. Mahfud Effendi 15612055
3. Achmad Alfi Djauhari 15612068
Introduction

Any construction project always needs resource projects as a

component input in the construction process. One of them is
material. Material is one of the project resources that were quite
dominant in determining the quality of the construction.
Literature Study
 Sustainable construction, The concept of sustainability must be applied into
construction industry to influence the manner in which a project shall be
conducted to strike a balance between conserving the environment and
maintaining prosperity in development.

 Supply Chain Management, is the integration of key business processes

from end user through original suppliers that provides, product,
services, and information that add value for customers and other
stakeholders.

 Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR), is a model provides a

unique framework that connects performance metric, best practices,
processes, and people into a unfield structure.
Literature Study

 Waste in Construction is defined as the difference between the value of those materials delivered
and accepted on site and those used properly as specified and accurately measured in the work,
after the deducting cost saving of substituted materials and thoose transfered elsewhere. Seven
waste in construction is Overproduction, transportation, waiting, processing, inventory,
unnecessary movement and defective product.
Research Method
The aim of study is to analyze supply chain performance in materials of
construction projects. The measurment used is the supply chain operations
reference (SCOR) model with perfect order fulfillment (POF) and overall
value at risk (VaR) as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI).
Flowchart of Research Methods
Result and Discussion
Measurements were made with a view reference to the scale of the existing
performance compared with the results of calculations on each indicator
and then determined a scale of performance per indicator.
Conclusion
The results of measurements on steel suppliers show that the value of perfect
order fulfillment is 90% while the overall value at risk by 80%. It shows that
there are about 10% of waste when measuring perfect order fufillment and 20%
waste when measuring the overall value at risk.
TERIMA KASIH