Institution
Emilio Cordoba Janssen¹, Eduardo Farinazzo Gama¹, Marcus Vinícius Manfrin de logo
Oliveira Filho¹
Positivo University, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
emilio9245@yahoo.com.br
RESULTS
The first six natural frequencies calculated for the undamaged hook can be seen in the table The results of the six natural frequencies for each scenario are shown in the next figure. Can be
below. It can be observed that the first two frequencies have very close results, but are seen that the fourth natural frequency is most affected by breathing crack, followed by the fifth
associated with different modes of vibration. and sixth ones. On the other hand, the first, second, and third natural frequencies and vibrational
modes are not so sensitive to this type of crack in that region. The greater the crack, the lower the
Natural stiffness of the structure and, consequently, the lower the natural frequency.
Modes
frequency (Hz)
1 97.750 Natural frequencies x Cracked scenario
2 98.488 N6 (hz) N5 (hz) N4 (hz) N3 (hz) N2 (hz) N1 (hz)
1200
3 313.020
4 707.480 1000
5 871.500
6 1018.300 800
Frequency (hz)
The first six modes of vibration for the hook with crack were analyzed. Some of them are
weakly influenced by the presence of crack, while others suffer a significant influence from the 600
damage. Figure below shows the first six vibrational modes of the hook with cracks.
1600
1400
1200
Ti K
1000
400
counts
800
600
400
200 O K
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
keV
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Scenario
Scenario 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Crack angle
10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40
(°)
Crack depth
40 30 20 10 5 40 30 20 10 5 40 30 20 10 5 40 30 20 10 5
(mm)
b)
CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
The results of the simulations make clear the variation of the vibrational behavior of the hooks • Agarwalla, D.K. and Parhi, D.R., 2013. “Effect of crack on modal parameters of a cantilever beam
subjected to the presence of cracks; the change in vibration modes and natural frequencies is subjected to vibration”. In Procedia Engineering, Vol. 51, Pages 665-669.
proportional to the magnitude of the damage: the deeper the crack, the greater the difference in • Chati, M., Rand, R. and Mukherjee, S., 1997. “Modal analysis of a cracked beam”. In Journal of
the value of natural frequencies. For the analyzed hook with the boundary conditions adopted, the Sound and Vibration, 207(2), 249-270.
fourth mode of vibration presented a greater sensitivity to the localized damage, followed by the • Priyadarshini, A., 2013. “Identification of cracks in beams using vibration analysis”. Master of
fifth and sixth modes, respectively. technology in structural engineering – Civil Engineering. Nat. Inst. of Technology Rourkela.
• Rezaee, M. and Fekrmandi, H., 2012. “A theoretical and experimental investigation on free
vibration behavior of a cantilever beam with a breathing crack”. Shock and Vibration 19, 175-186.