Complete Failure
Cancelled before completion
Failure after implementation so serious that have to roll-back to previous
version or manual alternative
Organisation is significantly worse off than before, and may be at risk of
bankruptcy
Serious Failure
Continues into operation, but does not achieve full benefits
May be less effective and efficient than existing system
More costs than benefits and significant loss of brand value
Medium Failure
Some benefits received, but not all
Many tolerances overrun
Major fixes required to recover
Mild Failure
Largely meets benefits but some of the tolerances exceeded (time, cost,
quality, benefits, risks, knowledge transfer, …)
Projects and Complexity
Failed Project
Scope
Quality
Money Risk
Time
Resource
projects fails when they meet the
The system It is on It is
works as or under delivered
required budget on time
Projects Fail:
Inadequately Failure to
Failure to set Poor effort
trained adequately
and manage estimation
and/or identify,
expectations
inexperience document
d project and track
managers requirements
Primary causes for the failure of any
projects
Poor planning
Unclear
goals and
objectives
Failure to
communicate
Objectives changing
Lack of executive
support
Unrealistic time
4 Points of failed Projects
Failed Badly
Organisation
Failure to constitute a Project Board properly
Lack of involvement from corporate management
Lack of involvement from customer
Lack of involvement from user
Wrong people selected to assist
Responsibilities not explicit
Some key responsibilities not allocated
Risks that can induce Failure/2
Communication
Lack of reporting structure
Lack of sufficient information from decision-making
Lack of usage of the information as reported – get the
information but not acted on
People who receive reports do not know what they are
supposed to do with them – think that someone else is
acting on them
Recommendations/2
Murphy’s Law
O’Leary’s Corollary to Murphy’s Law
Fetridge’s Law of Frustration