Definitions
Doctrines underpinning it
Its characteristics
Definitions
UK Constitution
Constitutional law
Examines the relationship between the individual
and the state
Examines this relationship from a certain
perspective – law
Law does not exist in isolation though and it is not
the be all and end all – political and social rules
also play an important role, so we need an
awareness and understanding of these aspects too
What is a ‘constitution’?
Bolingbroke (1733)
What is a ‘constitution’?
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.pdf
The Origins of a constitution
Constitutional law
Legislation
Case law
Parliamentary laws and customs
Academic writings
Constitutional conventions
Legislation
Case law
Constitutional conventions
Statutory Interpretation
Waddington v Miah [1974] 2 ALL ER 377
Case law
What are the qualities/characteristics of case law as a
source of the Constitution?
The doctrine of Stare Decisis means that decisions of the
Higher Courts must be followed by lower courts, giving a
certain amount of protection for Constitutional principles
The Higher Courts can, of course, reverse, amend, or qualify
earlier decisions
And do not forget that Parliament can legislate to overule the
decisions of the Courts – see Burmah Oil Co case above for
such an example
So there is much flexibility here too with this source of the
Constitution. Is this a positive or negative quality?
Constitutional Conventions
Sources of the UK Constitution
Constitutional conventions
We will spend a little more time looking at the third main
source of the UK Constitution – Constitutional Conventions (CCs)
– as they are a more peculiar animal than Acts of Parliament
and Cases
Sir Ivor Jennings said there are three questions that need to be
answered to determine whether a constitutional convention
exists:
1. Are there any precedents for the convention?
2. Is the practice normative?
3. Is there a reason for the rule?
The effects of breaching CCs
If a CC is breached what are the consequences? As they are a
non-legal source of the constitution are there any consequences
at all?
A key factor is the strength of the convention: cf the change in
PMQ time and the result if the Monarch refused Royal Assent
The consequences are a legitimate criticism of acting
unconstitutionally
The consequences are therefore usually political. For example,
if the CC of ministerial responsibility is breached by a minister,
they may be forced to resign
The effects of breaching CCs
Breach of a CC can sometimes lead to a change in
the law
It used to be a CC that the HL would give way to the
HC upon certain legislative matters and not impede
the wishes of the elected house
This CC broke down in 1908 when the HL refused to
pass the new budget bill
This led to the enactment of the Parliament Act 1911
So it depends what the CC is as to what the
consequences of breaching it could be
Enforcing/breaching CCs
Evans v Information Commissioner [2013]
EWHC 1960 (Admin)
Characteristics of CCs
Unwritten
Non-legal
Binding
Flexible
Hard to define
When do they come into existence?
Revisit the list you made earlier about the pros and
cons of having a written constitution