Code 3675
Lecture Five
On the other hand the solar power, food, water and urban
wildlife arguments favour lower densities. However, detailed
evaluation of these issues does begin to show a way through.
Unit 5 Urban Form and Locality
CONCLUSION: LINEAR CONCENTRATION
Four key spatial issues were identified: dispersal versus
concentration, high versus low density, segregated versus
integrated land use patterns, and nucleated versus linear form
On the first issue urban dispersal is rejected as a sustainable
solution even though, ironically, many environmentalists
advocate it. Concentration is de rigeur, but comes in two broad
variants: the ‘compact city’ model and the ‘dispersed
concentration’ model which can be equated with a polycentric
city or cluster of linked towns.
The compact city performs well empirically in relation to
transport and accessibility criteria but above a certain size less
well in theoretical tests assuming an energy constrained future.
Dispersed concentrations should not be equated with
neighbourhoods but with towns/ townships large enough and
economically attractive enough to support jobs/services.
Unit 5 Urban Form and Locality
CONCLUSION: LINEAR CONCENTRATION
The mixed use centres of such townships should be locally
accessible by non-motorized modes but also tied into the rest
of the city or urban cluster by high quality public transport to
avoid the necessity for car use while retaining city-wide choice.
Mixed use does not imply a dispersed pattern of activities.
Rather it is highly structured at both the neighbourhood and the
township level.
The linear networks of water and public transport thus give the
frame- works on which diverse urban land uses are hung. Even
where a compact city solution is appropriate it is yet important
both to maintain/enhance green parkways and to maximize
public transport accessibility. This may lead to compact linear
patterns for any necessary greenfield development rather than
simple annular expansion.
Discussion