2. How did the courts (lower and CA) react to the theory?
IV. Objectives of the Parties
1. What are the facts found by the court that truly make
a difference?
2. What facts were presented by each side as Key Facts?
3. How did the court deal with these so-called Key Facts?
Key Facts are those facts which, if you change them, then you get
a different result. Example:
In a BP22 case, a BPI check or Metrobank check makes no
difference. (not a key fact) BUT, if it was a Promissory Note and
NOT a check, then it makes a whale of a difference.
V. Key Facts
1. What are the facts found by the court that truly make
a difference?
2. What facts were presented by each side as Key Facts?
3. How did the court deal with these so-called Key Facts?
Key Facts are those facts which, if you change them, you
get a different result. Example: