Brajesh Kumar
Asstt. General Manager(Engg-TL)
Power Grid Corporation of India limited
New Delhi
Conductors
Carries the Load Current
Very Costly : Comprises 30% - 40% of
line cost
Another 30% - 40% is the cost of Tower,
Foundations etc depends on conductor
Wind Load
Tension Load
Height of Tower : Max sag dependant on Conductor
Hence, selection of Conductor is very
important
History of Conductors
Copper was the first metal used to transmit electricity during the
development of the electrical industry in the early 1880's
Because of the weight, span lengths were short, thus increasing the
overall cost of the transmission line.
Hence, Aluminium began to replace Copper
The first transmission line using aluminum conductors
was constructed in California in 1895, quickly followed
by a second line in 1898
The first transmission line using a stranded (7-strand)
aluminum cable was constructed by the Connecticut
Electric Light Company in 1899
Aluminum possesses a conductivity-to-weight
ratio twice that of copper and its strength-to-
weight ratio is 30% greater than copper.
ACSR Conductor
With the widespread use of Aluminium, need
was felt to increase the Strength of Al Conductor
Thus, in 1907 a new aluminum-steel composite
cable was introduced
This new conductor combined the light weight
and high current carrying capacity of aluminum
with the high strength of a galvanized steel core
Known to world as : ACSR : Aluminum conductor
Steel reinforced.
AAAC Conductor
ACSR Panther
30/3.00mm Aluminium + 7/3.00mm Steel
ACSR Zebra
54/3.18mm Aluminium + 7/3.18mm Steel
ACSR Bersimis.
42/4.57mm Aluminium +7/2.54 mm steel
AAAC
Alloy : Aluminum-Magnesium-Silicon
High Strength
Excellent ‘Sag – Tension’ Characteristics as
improved ‘Strength/Wt’ ratio.
ACSR MOOSE : UTS-161.2 kN, Wt- 2004 kg/km
AAAC MOOSE : UTS-159.8 kN, Wt- 1666 kg/km
Scenario II
Selection of conductor for a transmission line with identified
voltage level and a specified minimum power flow but voltage
level becomes ruling factor in selection of conductor/conductor
bundle size (EHV/UHV lines).
Scenario III
Selection of conductor for high power capacity long distance
transmission lines where selection of voltage level and
conductor/conductor bundle size are to be done together to
obtain most optimum solution (HVDC Bipole).
CAPITAL COST OF 400kV D/C TRANS.
LINE VS. DESIGN SPAN (Indicative)
80
Capital Cost (Rs/km)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
250 300 350 400 450 500 550
Design Span (M)
LOADABILITY OF TRANSMISSION LINES
Thermal limit
Stability limit
Power Flow
Line length
1200
Solar Radiation: 1045 W/sqm
1000 Wind Speed 2Km/hr
Absorption Coeff: 0.8
800 Emmisitivity coeff: 0.45
(Amp)
600
400
200
0
20 25 30 35 40 45 50