Anda di halaman 1dari 81

15 Resource Planning

For Operations Management, 9e by


PowerPoint Slides
Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra
by Jeff Heyl © 2010 Pearson Education
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 1
Resource Planning

 At the heart of any organization


 Starts with sales and operations plans and
plans the input requirements
 A process relative to the firm’s competitive
priorities and an important part of
managing supply chains

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 2


Enterprise Resource Planning
 What an ERP system does
 Integrating the firm’s functional areas
 Used by many different types of organizations
 How ERP systems are designed
 Single comprehensive database
 Managers to monitor all of the company’s products at all
locations and at all times
 Information is automatically updated in the all
applications when transactions occur
 Streamlines the data flows throughout the organization
 Requires a careful analysis of major processes
 Significant changes in ERP systems - interoperability

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 3


Enterprise Resource Planning
Back-Office Processes Front-Office Processes

Data Analysis
Human • Product costing
Resources • Job costs
• Benefits Sales and Marketing
• Payroll • Sales orders
• Pricing system

Manufacturing
• Material
requirements ERP System
planning
• Scheduling

Customer Service
Accounting and Finance • Field service
• Accounts payable • Quality
and receivable Supply-Chain
• General ledgers Management
• Asset management • Forecasting
• Purchasing
• Distribution
Figure 15.1 – ERP Application Modules

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 4


Materials Requirements Planning

 MRP is a computerized information system to


manage dependent demand inventory and
schedule orders
 Translates the master production schedule into
requirements for all subassemblies, components,
and raw materials through the MRP explosion
 Dependent demand
 Quantity required varies with the production plans of
other items
 Component
 Parent

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 5


MRP Inputs

Authorized Other
master production sources
schedule of demand

Engineering
Inventory Inventory MRP Bills of
and process
transactions records explosion materials
designs

Material
requirements
plan

Figure 15.2 – Material Requirements Plan Inputs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 6


Demand Patterns
2000 – 2000 –

Order Order
1500 – 1000 on 1000 on 1500 –
day 3 day 8
Bicycles

Rims
1000 – 1000 –

500 – 500 –

Reorder point
0 | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | | |
1 5 10 1 5 10
Day Day
(a) Parent inventory (b) Component demand

Figure 15.3 – Lumpy Dependent Demand Resulting from Continuous Independent Demand

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 7


Bill of Materials

 A record of all components of an item


 Shows the parent-component relationship
 The usage quantities are derived from
engineering and process design
 Five common terms
 End items
 Intermediate items
 Subassemblies
 Purchased items
 Part commonality (sometimes called
standardization of parts or modularity)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 8


Bill of Materials

Back slats Seat cushion

Leg supports Seat-frame


boards

Back Front
legs legs A
Ladder-back
chair

Figure 15.4 – BOM for a Ladder-Back Chair

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 9


Bill of Materials
A
Ladder-back
chair

B (1) C (1) D (2) E (4)


Ladder-back Seat Front Leg
subassembly subassembly legs supports

F (2) G (4) H (1) I (1)


Back legs Back slats Seat frame Seat cushion

J (4)
Seat-frame
Figure 15.4 – BOM for a boards
Ladder-Back Chair

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 10


Master Production Schedule (MPS)

 Details how many end items will be produced


within specified periods of time
 It breaks the sales and operations plan into specific
product schedules
 Create a prospective MPS and test whether it meets the
schedule with available resources
 Sums of quantities must equal sales and
operational plan
 Production must be allocated efficiently over
time
 Capacity limitations and bottlenecks may be
determined

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 11


Master Production Schedule (MPS)

April May

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Ladder-back chair 150 150

Kitchen chair 120 120

Desk chair 200 200 200 200

Aggregate
production plans 670 670
for chair family

Figure 15.5 – MPS for a Family of Chairs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 12


Master Production Schedule (MPS)

Authorized Prospective master


Are resources No
production production
plan schedule available?

Yes

Material Authorized master


requirements production
planning schedule

Figure 15.6 – Master Production Scheduling Process

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 13


Developing a MPS

Step 1: Calculate projected on-hand inventories

Projected on-hand On-hand MPS quantity Projected


inventory at end = inventory at + due at start – requirements
of this week end of last week of this week this week

where:
Projected requirements = max(Forecast, Customer orders booked)

55 chairs 38 chairs already


MPS quantity
Inventory = currently + (0 for week 1) – promised for
in stock delivery in week 1

= 17 chairs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 14


Developing a MPS
Item: Ladder-back chair

April
Quantity Explanation:
on Hand: 55 1 2
Forecast is less than booked orders
in week 1; projected on-hand
Forecast 30 30 inventory balance
= 55 + 0 – 38 = 17.
Customer
orders 38 27
(booked)
Explanation:
Projected Forecast exceeds booked orders in
on-hand 17 –13 week 2; projected on-hand inventory
inventory balance = 17 + 0 – 30 = –13. The
shortage signals a need to schedule
MPS quantity 0 0 an MPS quantity for completion in
week 2.

MPS start
Figure 15.7 – Master Production Schedule
for Weeks 1 and 2

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 15


Developing a MPS

Step 2: Determine the timing and size of MPS


quantities
 The goal is to maintain a nonnegative projected
on-hand inventory balance
 As shortages are detected, MPS quantities
should be scheduled to cover them

17 chairs in
MPS quantity Forecast of
of 150 chairs –
Inventory = inventory at the +
30 chairs
end of week 1

= 137 chairs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 16


Application 15.1
Determine the MPS for Product A that has a 50-unit policy and 5
units on hand. The demand forecast and booked orders are
shown in the partially completed plan given in the Student
Notes. The lead time is one week. Here is the completed plan.
You might want to ask a question or two on how they would
respond to a customer request for a specific week and order
quantity.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 17


Application 15.1
SOLUTION
Item: Product A Order Policy: 50 units
Lead Time: 1 week
Quantity on Hand 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20

Customer orders
30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0
(booked)
Projected on-hand
inventory

MPS quantity

MPS start

Available-to-
promise (ATP)
inventory

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 18


Application 15.1
SOLUTION
Item: Product A Order Policy: 50 units
Lead Time: 1 week
Quantity on Hand 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20

Customer orders
30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0
(booked)
Projected on-hand
inventory 25 5 15 5 5 3 23 3 13 43

MPS quantity 50 50 50 50 50

MPS start 50 50 50 50

Available-to-
promise (ATP) 5 35 50 50 50
inventory

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 19


Master Production Schedule (MPS)

 Available-to-promise (ATP) inventory


 The quantity of an end item that marketing can promise
to deliver on specific dates
 It is the difference between customer orders already
booked and the quantity that operations is planning to
produce
 Freezing the MPS
 Reconciling the MPS with sales and operations
plans

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 20


Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Item: Ladder-back chair Order Policy: 150 units
Lead Time: 1 week
April May
Quantity
55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
on Hand:

Forecast 30 30 30 30 35 35 35 35

Customer
38 27 24 8 0 0 0 0
orders booked

Projected
on-hand 17 137 107 77 42 7 122 87
inventory

MPS quantity 0 150 0 0 0 0 150 0

MPS start 150 0 0 0 0 150 0 0

Explanation: Explanation:
The time needed to assemble 150 chairs is 1 week. On-hand inventory balance = 17 + 150 – 30 = 137.
The assembly department must start assembling The MPS quantity is needed to avoid a shortage
chairs in week 1 to have them ready by week 2. of 30 – 17 = 13 chairs in week 2.

Figure 15.8 – Master Production Schedule for Weeks 1–8

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 21


Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Item: Ladder-back chair Order Policy: 150 units
Lead Time: 1 week
April May
Quantity
55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
on Hand:

Forecast 30 30 30 30 35 35 35 35

Customer
38 27 24 8 0 0 0 0
orders booked

Projected
on-hand 17 137 107 77 42 7 122 87
inventory

MPS quantity 0 150 0 0 0 0 150 0

MPS start 150 0 0 0 0 150 0 0

Available-to-
promise (ATP) 17 91 150
inventory

Explanation: Explanation: Figure 15.9 –


The total of customer orders booked The total of customer orders MPS Record with
until the next MPS receipt is 38 units. booked until the next MPS receipt an ATP Row
The ATP = 55 (on-hand) + 0 (MPS is 27 + 24 + 8 = 59 units. The ATP =
quantity) – 38 = 17. 150 (MPS quantity) – 59 = 91 units..
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 22
Inventory Record

 Inventory transactions are the basic building


blocks of up-to-date records
 Transactions include releasing new orders,
receiving scheduled receipts, adjusting due dates
for scheduled receipts, withdrawing inventory,
canceling orders, correcting inventory errors,
rejecting shipments, and verifying losses and
stock returns
 Inventory records divide the future into time
periods called time buckets
 Keep track of inventory levels and component
replenishment needs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 23


Inventory Record

 The time-phase information contained in the


inventory record consists of:
 Gross requirements
 Scheduled receipts
 Projected on-hand inventory
 Planned receipts
 Planned order releases

Scheduled
Projected on-hand Inventory on Gross
or planned
inventory balance = hand at end of + receipts in – requirements
at end of week t week t–1 in week t
week t

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 24


Inventory Record

 The on-hand inventory calculations for each week


in Figure 15.10 are as follows

Week 1: 37 + 230 – 150 = 117


Weeks 2 and 3: 117 + 0 – 0 = 117
Week 4: 117 + 0 – 120 = –3
Week 5: –3 + 0 – 0 = –3
Week 6: –3 + 0 – 150 = –153
Week 7: –153 + 0 – 120 = –273
Week 8: –273 + 0 – 0 = –273

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 25


Inventory Record
Item: C Lot Size: 230 units
Description: Seat subassembly Lead Time: 2 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements
Scheduled
230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts
Projected
on-hand 37 117 117 117 –3 –3 –153 –273 –273
inventory

Planned
receipts

Planned order
releases

Explanation:
Gross requirements are the total demand for
the two chairs. Projected on-hand inventory in Figure 15.10 – MRP Record for the
week 1 is 37 + 230 – 150 = 117 units. Seat Subassembly

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 26


Figure 15.11 – Completed Inventory

Inventory Record Record for the Seat


Subassembly

Item: C Lot Size: 230 units


Description: Seat subassembly Lead Time: 2 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements
Scheduled
230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts
Projected
on-hand 37 117 117 117 227 227 77 187 187
inventory

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned order
230 230
releases

Without a planned receipt in week 4, a The first planned receipt lasts until week 7, when
shortage of 3 units will occur: 117 + 0 + 0 – 120 projected inventory would drop to 77 + 0 + 0 – 120
= –3 units. Adding the planned receipt brings = –43 units. Adding the second planned receipt
the balance to 117 + 0 + 230 – 120 = 227 units. brings the balance to 77 + 0 + 230 – 120 = 187
Offsetting for a 2-week lead time puts the units. The corresponding planned order release is
corresponding planned order release back to for week 5 (or week 7 minus 2 weeks).
week 2.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 27
Planning Factors

 Planning lead time


 For purchased items planning lead time is
the time allowed for receiving a shipment
from the supplier
 For manufactured the planning lead time
consists of estimates for
 Setup time
 Processing time
 Materials handling time between operations
 Waiting time

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 28


Planning Factors

 Lot-sizing rules
 Fixed order quantity (FQO) rule maintains
the same order quantity each time an order
is issued
 Could be determined by quantity
discounts, truckload capacity, minimum
purchases, or EOQ

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 29


Planning Factors

 Periodic order quantity (POQ) rule allows a


different order quantity for each order issue but
tends to issue the order at predetermined time
intervals

POQ lot size Total gross requirements Projected on-hand


to arrive in = for P week, including – inventory balance at
week t week t end of week t–1

 Figure 15.12 shows the application of the POQ


rule for P = 3

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 30


Planning Factors

 The first order using P = 3 is

Gross requirements
Inventory at
(POQ lot size) = for weeks – end of week 3
4, 5, and 6

(POQ lot size) = (120 + 0 + 150) – 117 = 153 units

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 31


Planning Factors

Figure 15.12 – The POQ (P = 3) Rule for the Seat Subassembly

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 32


Planning Factors

 Lot-for-lot (L4L) rule where the lot size covers the


gross requirements of a single week

L4L lot size Projected on-hand


Gross requirements
to arrive in = for week t – inventory balance at
week t end of week t–1

 Figure 15.13 shows the application of the L4L

Gross requirements Inventory balance


(L4L lot size) = in week 4 – at end of week 3

(L4L lot size) = 120 – 117 = 3 units

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 33


Planning Factors

Figure 15.13 – The L4L Rule for the Seat Subassembly

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 34


Application 15.2
Item H10-A is a produced item (not purchased) with an order
quantity of 80 units. Complete the rest of its MRP record using
the fixed order quantity (FOQ) rule
SOLUTION

Item: H10-A Lot Size: FOQ = 80 units


Description: Chair seat assembly Lead Time: 4 weeks
Week
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Gross
requirements 60 35 45 60
Scheduled
receipts 80
Projected
on-hand 20
inventory
Planned
receipts
Planned order
releases

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 35


Application 15.2
Item H10-A is a produced item (not purchased) with an order
quantity of 80 units. Complete the rest of its MRP record using
the fixed order quantity (FOQ) rule
SOLUTION

Item: H10-A Lot Size: FOQ = 80 units


Description: Chair seat assembly Lead Time: 4 weeks
Week
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Gross
requirements 60 35 45 60
Scheduled
receipts 80
Projected
on-hand 20 20 40 40 40 40 5 5 40 40 60
inventory
Planned
receipts 80 80
Planned order
releases 80 80

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 36


Application 15.3

Now complete the H10-A record using a POQ rule. The P should
give an average lot size of 80 units. Assume the average weekly
requirements are 20 units.

80
P= = 4 weeks
20

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 37


Application 15.3
SOLUTION

Item: H10-A Lot Size: POQ = 4


Description: Chair seat assembly Lead Time: 4 weeks
Week
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Gross
requirements 60 35 45 60
Scheduled
receipts 80
Projected
on-hand 20
inventory
Planned
receipts
Planned order
releases

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 38


Application 15.3
SOLUTION

Item: H10-A Lot Size: POQ = 4


Description: Chair seat assembly Lead Time: 4 weeks
Week
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Gross
requirements 60 35 45 60
Scheduled
receipts 80
Projected
on-hand 20 20 40 40 40 40 5 5 60 60 0
inventory
Planned
receipts 100
Planned order
releases 100

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 39


Application 15.4
Revise the H10-A record using the lot-for-lot (L4L) Rule.
(Complete the highlighted section)

SOLUTION

Item: H10-A Lot Size: FOQ = 80 units


Description: Chair seat assembly Lead Time: 4 weeks
Week
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Gross
requirements 60 35 45 60
Scheduled
receipts 80
Projected
on-hand 20
inventory
Planned
receipts
Planned order
releases

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 40


Application 15.4
Revise the H10-A record using the lot-for-lot (L4L) Rule.
(Complete the highlighted section)

SOLUTION

Item: H10-A Lot Size: FOQ = 80 units


Description: Chair seat assembly Lead Time: 4 weeks
Week
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Gross
requirements 60 35 45 60
Scheduled
receipts 80
Projected
on-hand 20 20 40 40 40 40 5 5 0 0 0
inventory
Planned
receipts 40 60
Planned order
releases 40 60

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 41


Planning Factors

 Comparing lot-sizing rules

227 + 227 + 77 + 187 + 187


FOQ: = 181 units
5

150 + 150 + 0 + 0 + 0
POQ: = 60 units
5

0+0+0+0+0
L4L: = 0 units
5

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 42


Planning Factors

 Lot sizes affect inventory costs and setup and


ordering costs
 The FOQ rule generates a high level of average
inventory because it creates inventory remnants
 The POQ rule reduces the amount of average on-
hand inventory because it does a better job of
matching order quantity to requirements
 The L4L rule minimizes inventory investment, but
it also maximizes the number of orders placed

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 43


Planning Factors

 Safety stock for dependent demand items with


lumpy demand (gross requirements) is helpful
only when future gross requirements, the timing
or size of scheduled receipts, and the amount of
scrap that will be produced are certain
 Safety stock is used for end items and purchased
items to protect against fluctuating customer
orders and unreliable suppliers

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 44


Planning Factors

Figure 15.14 – Inventory Record for the Seat Subassembly Showing the
Application of a Safety Stock

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 45


Outputs from MRP

MRP
explosion

Material requirements plan


Action notices Priority reports Capacity reports
 Releasing new orders  Dispatch lists  Capacity requirements planning
 Adjusting due dates  Supplier schedules  Finite capacity scheduling
 Input-output control
Routings
and time
standards

Manufacturing resources plan


Cost and
Performance reports price data
Figure 15.15 – MRP Outputs

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 46


MRP Explosion

 Translates the MPS and other sources of demand


into the requirements needed for all of the
subassemblies, components, and raw materials
the firm needs to produce parent items
 An item’s gross requirements are derived from
three sources
 The MPS for immediate parents that are end items
 The planned order releases for parents below the MPS
level
 Any other requirements not originating in the MPS, such
as the demand for replacement parts

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 47


MRP Explosion

C(1)
Seat
subassembly

H(1) I(1)
Seat Seat
frame cushion

J(4)
Seat-frame Figure 15.16 – BOM for the Seat
boards Subassembly

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 48


MRP Explosion
Item: Seat subassembly
Lot size: 230 units

Week
Lead
time: 2 weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
requirements 150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0

Scheduled
receipts 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Projected
on-hand 37 117 117 117 227 227 77 187 187
inventory

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned order
230 230
releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 49
MRP Explosion Item: Seat subassembly
Lot size: 230 units

Week
Lead
time: 2 weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned
order 230 230
releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 50
MRP Explosion Item: Seat subassembly
Lot size: 230 units

Week
Lead
time: 2 weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned
order 230 230
releases

Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion


Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
requirements requirements

Scheduled Scheduled
0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts receipts

Projected Projected
on-hand 40 on-hand 0
inventory inventory

Planned Planned
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order order
releases releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 51
MRP Explosion Item: Seat subassembly
Lot size: 230 units

Week
Lead
time: 2 weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned
order 230 230
releases

Usage quantity: 1 Usage quantity: 1


Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion
Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
0 230 0 230
requirements requirements

Scheduled Scheduled
0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts receipts

Projected Projected
on-hand 40 on-hand 0
inventory inventory

Planned Planned
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order order
releases releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 52
MRP Explosion Item: Seat subassembly
Lot size: 230 units

Week
Lead
time: 2 weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned
order 230 230
releases

Usage quantity: 1 Usage quantity: 1


Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion
Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
0 230 0 0 230 0 230 0 0 230
requirements requirements

Scheduled Scheduled
0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts receipts

Projected Projected
on-hand 40 on-hand 0
inventory inventory

Planned Planned
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order order
releases releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 53
MRP Explosion Item: Seat subassembly
Lot size: 230 units

Week
Lead
time: 2 weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
150 0 0 120 0 150 120 0
requirements

Planned
230 230
receipts

Planned
order 230 230
releases

Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion


Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0
requirements requirements

Scheduled Scheduled
0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts receipts

Projected Projected
on-hand 40 40 110 110 110 180 180 180 180 on-hand 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
inventory inventory

Planned Planned
300 230 230
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order 300 order 230 230
releases releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 54
MRP Explosion
Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion
Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0
requirements requirements

Planned Planned
300 230 230
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order 300 order 230 230
releases releases

Item: Seat-frame boards


Lot size: 1500 units

Week
Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
requirements

Scheduled
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts

Projected
on-hand 200
inventory

Planned
receipts

Planned
order
releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 55
MRP Explosion
Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion
Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0
requirements requirements

Planned Planned
300 230 230
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order 300 order 230 230
releases releases

Usage quantity: 4
Item: Seat-frame boards
Lot size: 1500 units

Week
Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0
requirements

Scheduled
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts

Projected
on-hand 200
inventory

Planned
receipts

Planned
order
releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 56
MRP Explosion
Item: Seat frames Item: Seat cushion
Lot size: 300 units Lot size: L4L

Week Week
Lead Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross Gross
0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 230 0 0 0
requirements requirements

Planned Planned
300 230 230
receipts receipts

Planned Planned
order 300 order 230 230
releases releases

Item: Seat-frame boards


Lot size: 1500 units

Week
Lead
time: 1 week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Gross
0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0
requirements

Scheduled
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
receipts

Projected
on-hand 200 200 200 200 500 500 500 500 500
inventory

Planned
1500
receipts

Planned
order 1500
releases

Figure 15.17 – MRP Explosion of Seat Assembly Components


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 57
Other Important Reports

 Action notice
 Capacity requirements planning (CRP)
 Theory of constraints principles can be
applied to keep bottleneck operations fed
by adjusting some lot sizing rules or
occasionally overriding planned order
releases
 Priority reports
 Manufacturing resource planning (MRP II)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 58


MRP and the Environment

 Consumer and government concern about


the deterioration of the natural
environment has driven manufacturers to
reengineer their processes to become
more environmentally friendly
 Companies can modify their MRP systems
to help track these waste and plans for
their disposal

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 59


Application 15.5
A firm makes a product (Item A) from three components
(intermediate Items B and D, and purchased item C). The latest
MPS for product A calls for completion of a 250-unit order in
week 8, and its lead time is 2 weeks. The master schedule and
bill of material for Product A are given below.

Item: End Item A Lead Time: 2 wks


Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
MPS quantity 250
MPS start 250

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 60


Application 15.5
Develop a material requirements A
plan for items B, C, and D, given the
following inventory data. Blank
MRP records are provided in the
Student Notes, and the completed
B(1) C(1) D(2)
records are shown on the next
slide.
C(2) B(1)

Item C(2)
Data Category B C D
Lot-sizing rule POQ (P = 5) FOQ = 1000 L4L
Lead time 2 weeks 1 week 3 weeks
Scheduled
None 1000 (week 1) None
receipts
Beginning
0 800 0
inventory

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 61


Application 15.5
SOLUTION
An item’s gross requirements cannot be derived until all of its
immediate parents are processed. Thus we must begin with
Item D. Its only immediate parent is item A, and its planned
“production plan” is shown by the MPS start row. Note the 2-
for-1 usage quantity when deriving D’s gross requirements.

Item: D Lot Size: L4L


Description: Lead Time: 3 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross requirements 500
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Planned receipts 500
Planned order releases 500

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 62


Application 15.5
We can do item B next, because the planned “production
quantities” for its two immediate parents (A and D) are known.
Item C cannot be done yet, because one of its parents is item
B, and its PORs are still unknown.

Item: B Lot Size: POQ = 5


Description: Lead Time: 3 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Planned receipts
Planned order releases

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 63


Application 15.5
We can do item B next, because the planned “production
quantities” for its two immediate parents (A and D) are known.
Item C cannot be done yet, because one of its parents is item
B, and its PORs are still unknown.

Item: B Lot Size: POQ = 5


Description: Lead Time: 3 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross requirements 500 250
Scheduled receipts
Projected on-hand inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Planned receipts 750
Planned order releases 750

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 64


Application 15.5
Finally we can do Item C, because we now know the planned
“production quantities” of both of its immediate parents (A
and B). Note that the usage quantity for its parent B is 2-for-1.

Item: C Lot Size: 1000


Description: Lead Time: 1 week
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross requirements 1500 250
Scheduled receipts 1000
Projected on-hand inventory 800 300 300 300 300 300 1050 1050 1050
Planned receipts 1000
Planned order releases 1000

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 65


Resource Planning for Service
Providers

 Dependent demand for services


 Restaurants
 Airlines
 Hospitals
 Hotels
 Bill of resources (BOR)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 66


Bill of Resources
Level 1
Discharge

Level 2
Intermediate care Level 6
Preoperative care
(Angiogram)

Level 3
Postoperative care
(Step down)

Level 4 Pharmacy
Nurse MD Therapy Bed Lab Kitchen
Postoperative care (10
(6 hr) (1 hr) (1 hr) (24 hr) (3 tests) (1 meal)
(Intensive) medicines)

Level 5 (b)
Surgery

Level 6
Preoperative care
(Angiogram)

Level 7
Preoperative care Figure 15.18 – BOR for Treating an Aneurysm
(Testing)

(a)

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 67


Solved Problem 1
Refer to the bill of materials for product A shown in Figure
15.19. If there is no existing inventory and no scheduled
receipts, how many units of items G, E, and D must be
purchased to produce 5 units of end item A?

LT = 1

B (3) C (1)

LT = 2 LT = 3

D (1) E (2) F (1) D (1)

LT = 3 LT = 6 LT = 1 LT = 3

G (1)
Figure 15.19 – BOM for Product A
LT = 3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 68
Solved Problem 1
SOLUTION
Five units of item G, 30 units of item E, and 20 units of item D
must be purchased to make 5 units of A. The usage quantities
shown in Figure 15.21 indicate that 2 units of E are needed to
make 1 unit of B and that 3 units of B are needed to make 1 unit
of A; therefore, 5 units of A require 30 units of E(2  3  5 = 30).
One unit of D is consumed to make 1 unit of B, and 3 units of B
per unit of A result in 15 units of D(1  3  5 = 15); 1 unit of D in
each unit of C and 1 unit of C per unit of A result in another 5
units of D(1  1  5 = 5). The total requirements to make 5 units
of A are 20 units of D(15 + 5). The calculation of requirements
for G is simply 1  1  1  5 = 5 units.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 69


Solved Problem 2
The order policy is to produce end item A in lots of 50 units.
Using the data shown in Figure 15.20 and the FOQ lot-sizing
rule, complete the projected on-hand inventory and MPS
quantity rows. Then complete the MPS start row by offsetting
the MPS quantities for the final assembly lead time. Finally,
compute the available-to-promise inventory for item A. If in
week 1 a customer requests a new order for 30 units of item A,
when is the earliest date the entire order could be shipped?

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 70


Solved Problem 2
Item: A Order Policy: 50 units
Lead Time: 1 week
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast 20 10 40 10 0 0 30 20 40 20

Customer
orders 30 20 5 8 0 2 0 0 0 0
(booked)
Projected
on-hand 25
inventory

MPS quantity 50

MPS start

Available-to-
promise (ATP)
inventory

Figure 15.20 – MPS Record for End Item A

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 71


Solved Problem 2
SOLUTION
The projected on-hand inventory for the second week is

Projected on-hand On-hand


MPS quantity Requirements
inventory at end = inventory in + due in week 2 – in week 2
of week 2 week 1

= 25 + 0 – 20 = 5 units

where requirements are the larger of the forecast or actual


customer orders booked for shipment during this period. No
MPS quantity is required.
Without an MPS quantity in the third period, a shortage of item
A will occur: 5 + 0 – 40 = –35. Therefore, an MPS quantity equal
to the lot size of 50 must be scheduled for completion in the
third period. Then the projected on-hand inventory for the third
week will be 5 + 50 – 40 = 15.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 72
Solved Problem 2
Figure 15.21 shows the projected on-hand inventories and MPS
quantities that would result from completing the MPS
calculations. The MPS start row is completed by simply shifting
a copy of the MPS quantity row to the left by one column to
account for the 1-week final assembly lead time. Also shown
are the available-to-promise quantities. In week 1, the ATP is

Available-to- On-hand Orders booked up


MPS quantity
promise in = quantity in +
in week 1 – to week 3 when the
week 1 week 1 next MPS arrives

= 5 + 50 – (30 + 20) = 5 units

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 73


Solved Problem 2
The ATP for the MPS quantity in week 3 is
Available-to- Orders booked up
MPS quantity
promise in = in week 3 – to week 7 when the
week 3 next MPS arrives

= 50 – (5 + 8 + 0 + 2) = 35 units
The other ATPs equal their respective MPS quantities because
no orders are booked for those weeks. As for the new order for
30 units in week 1, the earliest it can be shipped is week 3
because the ATP for week 1 is insufficient. If the customer
accepts the delivery date of week 3, the ATP for week 1 will stay
at 5 units and the ATP for week 3 will be reduced to 5 units.
This acceptance allows the firm the flexibility to immediately
satisfy an order for 5 units or less, if one comes in. When the
MPS is updated next, the customer orders booked for week 3
would be increased to 35 to reflect the new order’s shipping
date.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 74
Solved Problem 2

Figure 15.21 – Completed MPS Record for End Item A

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 75


Solved Problem 3
The MPS start quantities for
product A calls for the assembly
department to begin final assembly A
according to the following
LT = 2
schedule: 100 units in week 2; 200
units in week 4; 120 units in week 6;
180 units in week 7; and 60 units in B (1) C (2)
week 8. Develop a material
requirements plan for the next 8 LT = 1 LT = 2
weeks for items B, C, and D. The
BOM for A is shown in Figure 15.22,
and data from the inventory records D (1)
are shown in Table 15.1.
LT = 3

Figure 15.21 – BOM for Product A

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 76


Solved Problem 3

TABLE 15.1 | INVENTORY RECORD DATA


Item
Data Category B C D
Lot-sizing rule POQ (P=3) L4L FOQ = 500 units
Lead time 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks
Scheduled receipts None 200 (week 1) None
Beginning (on-hand) inventory 20 0 425

SOLUTION
We begin with items B and C and develop their inventory
records, as shown in Figure 15.23. The MPS for product A must
be multiplied by 2 to derive the gross requirements for item C
because of the usage quantity. Once the planned order releases
for item C are found, the gross requirements for item D can be
calculated.

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 77


Solved Problem 3
Item: B Lot Size: POQ (P = 3)
Lead Time: 1 week
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Gross
requirements 100 200 120 180 60

Scheduled
receipts

Projected
on-hand 20 20 200 200 0 0 240 60 0 0 0
inventory

Planned
receipts 280 360

Planned order
releases 280 360

Figure 15.23 – Inventory Records for Items B, C, and D

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 78


Solved Problem 3
Item: C Lot Size: L4L
Lead Time: 2 weeks
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Gross
requirements 200 400 240 360 120

Scheduled
receipts 200

Projected
on-hand 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
inventory

Planned
receipts 400 240 360 120

Planned order
releases 400 240 360 120

Figure 15.23 – Inventory Records for Items B, C, and D

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 79


Solved Problem 3
Item: D Lot Size: FOQ =500 units
Lead Time: 1 week
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Gross
requirements 400 240 360 120

Scheduled
receipts

Projected
on-hand 425 425 25 25 285 425 305 305 305 305 305
inventory

Planned
receipts 500 500

Planned order
releases 500 500

Figure 15.23 – Inventory Records for Items B, C, and D

Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 80


Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. 15 – 81

Anda mungkin juga menyukai