1
While the legislative proposals move in the
right direction, the problem is really big.
The National Retirement Risk Index, 2004-2016
100%
75%
25%
0%
2004 2007 2010 2013 2016
Source: Alicia H. Munnell, Wenliang Hou, and Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher. 2018. “National Retirement Risk Index Shows Modest
Improvement in 2016. Issue in Brief 18-1. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
2
2
Goals of this presentation
• Define the dimensions of the problem.
o Retirement needs are increasing.
o Retirement resources are shrinking.
o Coverage;
3
One reason people need increased income is
that they are living a lot longer.
Cohort Life Expectancy at Age 65, 1960-2020
25
Men 21.7
Women 20.2
20 18.8 19.3
17.4 17.5
14.7
15
13.2
10
0
1960 1980 2000 2020
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration. 2018. Social Security Trustees Report.
4
But they are only working a bit longer, so
the retirement span is growing.
Average Years in Retirement for Men, 1962-2050
95
Life expectancy
90 Average retirement age
85
80
21 years
75
20 years
18 years
70
13 years
65
60
Note: Average retirement defined as when 50 percent of individuals are not participating in the labor force. Life expectancy is cohort life
expectancy at age 65 from the Social Security
Trustees Report.
Sources: Authors’ estimates from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey, 1962-2017; and U.S. Social Security
Administration. 2017. Social Security Trustees Report.
5
In addition, people need more because
retiree health care costs are high and rising.
Medicare Part B and D Premiums and Out-of-Pocket Payments
as Percentage of Average Social Security Benefits, 1985-2030
30%
27.8%
22.0%
20% 18.2%
Est.
11.2%
10% Est.
0%
1985 2000 2015 2030
Note: Dotted bars indicate the estimated cost to beneficiaries of prescription drugs if Medicare Part D had been in existence during that
period.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2018. Medicare Trustees Report.
6
At the same time, the U.S. retirement system
is contracting.
Retirement Income
Employer-Sponsored
Social Security Individual Saving
Pensions
Defined Contribution
Defined Benefit Plans
- 401(k) - Plans
7
Social Security will replace a shrinking share
of pre-retirement earnings.
Social Security Replacement Rates for Average Earner Retiring at Age 65, 1985, 2000, 2015, and 2030
60%
Reported replacement rate (retirement at age 65)
After Part B+D SMI deduction
After personal income taxation
42%41%
39% 40%
40% 37% 36%36% 36%
32%
30%
20%
0%
1985 2000 2015 2030
8
And employer plans have shifted from
defined benefit to 401(k).
Workers with Plan Coverage by Type of Plan, 1983, 1998, and 2016
80%
73%
1983
62% 60% 1998
60%
2016
40%
24% 26%
20% 17% 16%
12%
10%
0%
Defined benefit only Defined contribution Both
only
Sources: Author’s calculations based on U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Survey of Consumer Finances, 1983,
1998, and 2016.
9
401(k)s could work well, but many people
make mistakes at every step.
Prevalence of 401(k) Mistakes
99%
100%
75%
52% 48%
50%
25%
25% 20%
0%
Individuals Individuals Assets in Loss if assets Individuals
not contributing high-fee due to who do not
participating 6 percent or funds leakages annuitize
in 401(k) less
Sources: Author’s calculations based on Survey of Consumer Finances, 2013; Vanguard. 2018. “How America Saves 2018;” Investment
Company Institute. 2018. “ICI Research Perspective.” 24(4); and Alicia H. Munnell and Anthony Webb. 2015. “The Impact of Leakages
from 401(k)s and IRAs.” Working Paper 2015-2. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
10
And these mistakes erode their balances.
Impact of Fees, Leakages, and Contributions on 401(k)/IRA Balances, 2016
$400,000
$364,000 Fees
$304,000
Leakages
$228,000
Intermittent
contributions
$200,000
$160,000 Immature
system
$104,000
$0
Hypothetical Observed*
11
As a result, even many with an account have
only modest 401(k)/IRA assets.
Source: Author’s calculations from the U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Survey of Consumer Finances, 2016.
12
Beyond the challenges with 401(k)s, less than
half of private sector workers have a plan.
75%
50%
25%
0%
13
Workers at small employers are much more
likely to be uncovered.
Percentage of Private Sector Workers Who Are Uncovered by Firm Size, 2018
80%
74%
60%
45%
40%
20%
0%
Fewer than 100 employees More than 100 employees
Source: Author’s calculations from U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey March Supplement, 2018.
14
And plans aimed at appealing to small
employers have not moved the needle.
Percentage of Private Sector Workers Enrolled in a 401(k) or a SEP/SIMPLE Plan, 2018
50%
40% 38%
30%
20%
10%
1%
0%
401(k) plans SEP/SIMPLE plan
Source: Author’s calculations from the U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Survey of Consumer Finances, 2018.
15
Lack of coverage is important as people don’t
save on their own except in their house…
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000 $152,919
$99,900
$100,000
$44,974
$17,055 $10,886 $17,783
$0
Social Defined Primary Defined Financial Business Other
Security benefit house contribution assets
Source: Alicia H. Munnell. 2017. “401(k)/IRA Holdings in 2016: An Update from the SCF.” Issue in Brief 17-18. Center for Retirement
Research at Boston College.
16
…and almost no one plans to tap their home
equity.
Percentage of People Who Plan to Use Home Equity for Living Expenses, 2007
100%
Hundreds
75%
50%
25%
5% 7% 6%
0%
50-54 55-59 60-65
Ages
Source: Alicia H. Munnell, Jean-Pierre Aubry, and Mauricio Soto. 2007. “Do People Plan to Tap Their Home Equity in Retirement?” Issue
in Brief 7-7. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
17
What can Congress do?
18
The first step is to shore up Social Security.
Projected Social Security Income and Cost Rates, as a Percentage of Taxable Payroll, 1990-2092
20%
16%
12%
8%
4% Income rate
Cost rate
0%
1990 2010 2030 2050 2070 2090
19
The 75-year deficit can be eliminated with a
2.84 percentage-point rise in payroll taxes.
Social Security’s 75-Year Deficit as a Percentage of Taxable Payroll, 1983-2018
4%
2.84%
3%
2%
1%
0%
-1%
1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Source: 2018 Social Security Trustees Report.
20
But a host of options exist for fixing
Social Security’s finances.
Conventional Revenue and Benefit Options for Improving Social Security’s Finances
Source: Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary. 2018. Summary of Provisions that Would Change the Social Security
Program.
21
What do bipartisan legislative proposals do?
Problem solved?
22
The first step for 401(k)s is to encourage
more saving by making them fully automatic.
22%
30%
46%
54%
48%
With Without With Without Voluntary
Sources: Vanguard. 2018. “How America Saves 2018;” and Plan Sponsor Council of America. 2016. “59th Annual Survey of Profit Sharing
and 401(k) Plans.”
23
A smaller change is to show people how
their assets will translate to lifetime income.
$100,000 $460/month
(in 401(k)/IRA assets) (in retirement)
Note: The monthly income estimate is for a joint and survivor annuity for a 65-year-old husband with a 63-year old wife.
Source: ImmediateAnnuities.com.
24
The second step is to reduce $ leaking out.
0.4% 0.4%
0.3%
0.3%
0.2%
0.0%
Cashed-out Hardship Post59
Post 59½
1/2 Loan
withdrawal withdrawal
Source: Author’s estimates. Allocations to specific leakage channels are based on Vanguard. 2018. “How America Saves 2018: A Report
on Vanguard 2016 Defined Contribution Plan Data.” The total level of leakages is based on Alicia H. Munnell and Anthony Webb. 2015.
“The Impact of Leakages from 401(k)s and IRAs.” Working Paper 2015-2. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
25
One way to curb leakages is to make it easier
to roll over savings to a new plan.
$10 $9.2
$8
$6.3
$6
Trillions
$4 $3.4
$2
$0
DB plans DC plans IRAs
Source: U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Flow of Funds Accounts, 2018.
26
Another way to curtail leakages is to
establish precautionary savings accounts.
• Repeated surveys show that many households live paycheck to
paycheck and have only minimal precautionary savings.
27
Leakages could also be discouraged by
raising the penalty-free withdrawal age to 62.
Proposed
Current
59 ½
1/2 60 61 62
Age
28
A final issue with 401(k)s is how people will
draw down their assets in retirement.
People Build Up Assets While Working…and Draw Them Down While Retired
29
People may well cling to their assets rather
than draw down too fast.
Percentage of Remaining Median Assets in 2002 for Singles Ages 72-81 in 1995,
by Permanent Income Quintile
100%
92%
77%
75% 72%
64%
50%
25%
14%
0%
Bottom Second Third Fourth Top
Source: Mariacristina De Nardi, Eric French, and John Bailey Jones. 2009. “Life Expectancy and Old Age Savings.” American Economic
Review: Papers and Proceedings 99(2): 110-115.
30
One solution is to allow 401(k) participants
to build up lifetime income as they save.
• In 2014, the Treasury Department explicitly allowed plan
sponsors to include annuities in target date funds as a default
or regular investment alternative.
31
How do existing legislative proposals
address the problems in 401(k)s?
Existing Congressional Proposals
Goal Proposed action Relevant bill
1. Require 401(k) statements to include “Retirement Enhancement and Savings Act”
lifetime income. (S.2526)
2. Create new safe harbor to persuade
“The Retirement Security Flexibility Act.”
Encourage more saving more plans to adopt auto-enrollment and
(S.3221)
auto-escalation.
“Lifetime Income Disclosure Act” (H.R.
2055)
“Strengthening Financial Security Through
1. Create “sidecar accounts.”
Short-Term Savings Accounts” (S.3218)
Reduce leakages 2. Pre-commit tax refunds to savings. “Refund to Rainy Day Savings Act” (S.3220)
“Savings Enhancement by Alleviating
Leakage in 401(k) Savings Act” (H.R. 2030)
1. Provide safe harbor for choosing “Retirement Enhancement and Savings Act”
Encourage lifetime provider. (S.2526)
income options 2. Make it easier to move lifetime income “Increasing Access to a Secure Retirement
to new plan. Act” (H.R. 4604)
Source: Author’s analysis of current legislative activity.
32
What do bipartisan legislative proposals do?
Problem solved?
33
Many have proposals to cover the half of
private sector workers without a plan.
• USA Retirement Funds (former Senator Harkin)
34
Auto-IRAs even got a little traction, as they
were proposed by the Obama Administration.
35
But, with no federal action, states have
begun stepping in.
States That Have Enacted Retirement Saving Programs, as of June 2018
No legislation enacted
Voluntary payroll deduction IRA enacted
MEP enacted
Auto-IRA enacted
Marketplace enacted
Source: Author’s analysis.
36
Oregon is the first state up and running.
37
Initial results from Oregon are now available.
Participation in OregonSaves
Non-participants,
30.8%
Contributing
participants,
Non-contributing 62.3%
participants,
6.9%
38
At the federal level, the action has focused
on multiple employer plans (MEPs).
• MEPs allow firms to band together to establish a retirement savings
plan, reducing the administrative burden and costs.
• Several bills would make MEPs more attractive by eliminating
rules that:
o require firms to share a common bond; and
o can disqualify an entire plan if one member violates a rule.
• In addition to the legislation, the Department of Labor and the IRS
are pursuing the same goals through the regulatory process.
39
What do bipartisan legislative proposals do?
Problem solved?
40
One lever retirees can control on their own is
tapping their home equity.
$20
$15.8
$14.0
$15
$10
$5
$0
Primary house 401(k)/IRA assets
Source: U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Survey of Consumer Finances, 2018.
41
To date, experts have focused on two options:
downsize or take a reverse mortgage.
Source: Steven A. Sass, Alicia H. Munnell, and Andrew D. Eschtruth. 2014. Using Your House for Income in Retirement. Center for
Retirement Research at Boston College.
42
Another tool is state property tax deferrals.
43
What do bipartisan legislative proposals do?
Problem solved?
44
Working longer is the most powerful lever,
and people can still enjoy a lengthy retirement.
45
Working longer helps in three ways.
0% $0 0
62 70 62 70 62 70
Age Age Age
Sources: Author’s calculations; and Charles D. Ellis, Alicia H. Munnell, and Andrew D. Eschtruth. 2014. Falling Short: The Coming
Retirement Crisis and What to Do About It. Oxford University Press.
46
By itself, working until age 70 would do the
trick for most people.
Cumulative Readiness by Retirement Age
100%
75%
SS benefits available
at age 62
50%
DB plans
available at age 55
25%
0%
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Source: Alicia H. Munnell, Anthony Webb, Luke Delorme, and Francesca Golub-Sass. 2012. “National Retirement Risk Index: How Much
Longer Do We Need to Work?” Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
47
What could Congress do?
48
What do bipartisan legislative proposals do?
Problem solved?
49
Conclusion
• Congress has generated a flurry of bipartisan activity on
retirement security.
50