Name Of Trial)

Proposal Owner :
Proposal Type :
Proposal Submit : DD/MM/YY (Fill in by Partner)
Proposal Number : (Fill in by TSEL)
PIC Partner :
PIC Contact Number :
PIC Contact Email :

1
 Content

1 Executive Summary

2 Company profile

3 Trial/Commercial experience

4 Technical evaluation

5 Key Benefit

2
Executive Summary

We at Qulsar have best hands-on experience on Sync technologies. Working with

various telecom operator has given us good confidence and understanding of ITU-T
recommendations and the pain of Telecom companies while SYNC deployments. With
all our expertise we can suggest you the best network engineering to suit your
budget and ease your network concern. Our strategy shall be as below:

 Understanding the TELKOMSEL network architecture and then suggesting some

locations in the network to perform “SYNC TESTING” with existing infrastructure.
 Deploying our solution in your network and performing “SYNC TESTING” at
various locations in the network.
 Qulsar shall be providing you a detailed report for all the test results at various
locations in your network. We shall also provide you detailed comparative result
analysis before and after the deployment of our solution with our suggestions and
observations along with the test report.
 Based on the detailed comparative result analysis Qulsar shall provide you the
best solution.

3
Executive Summary
 Driving Force: Standard Requirements

ITU / 3GPP sync requirements:

Today 2016+
Standard GSM CDMA LTE-FDD LTE-TDD
5G
Precision 16 X 10-9 freq 3-10 µs 16 X 10-9 freq 1.5 µs

Overlay LTE-Adv services

Future LTE
MBMS / eICIC / COMP-A 5 µs - 0.5 µs
deployment &
upgrades demanding
Higher precision  better performance /
efficiencies of LTE-A services
Future C-RAN architectures demand <0.5
µs sync
Executive Summary
 Densification Pains

 Small cells need to be deployable at all

locations

 GNSS signals weak / unavailable in

indoor & urban environments

 Higher precision requirements driving

expensive solutions

 Single-technology approaches
vulnerable & fragile

5
Company profile: Qulsar Inc.

• HQ: San Jose + R&D office in Stockholm (Sweden)

• Worldwide sales team in: US, Europe, China, Taiwan, India, S. Korea &
Japan

• Established world wide experts in precision timing solutions

• Precision timing technologies

• Time synchronization systems and subsystems
• Testing in real-world carrier networks

• Field-proven technology and solutions

• Large deployment in China Mobile

• Small cell deployment in Japan
• Integration with SOCs: Intel, TI and Cavium
• In Carrier Ethernet platforms for mobile backhaul

6
Company profile: Qulsar Inc.

 Team Strengths & Differentiation:

 Member & contributor to emerging standards

 Represented in ITU-T (G.826x & G.827x evolution)
 Packet timing & networking IEEE groups

 Extensive expertise in testing & validation

 Actual performance testing (pre & post turn up)
 Trial support & trouble shooting

 Intellectual property & 7+ patents

 Performance optimization + system design experience & expertise

7
Company profile: Qulsar Inc.

 Products:

 Embedded : MTE M6X Series, MTE M8X Series, MTE P60 Prototype
Board, Get Started Evolution Kit.

 System Solution: Qg2

 Licenced Solution: QNgine Software

8
Company profile: Qulsar Inc.

 Qg2 Features:

Optimized for deployment at the network edge

ToD + 1PPS
GNSS Frequency
PTP PTP
SyncE SyncE
1PPS Non GNSS
ToD Satellites
Wireless Sync
Self organizing resilient Qulsar
Multiple holdover options sync network slave
Scalable (slave handling) * Only with
Self healing robust sync* Qulsar slaves
Management
Metrics
Company profile: Qulsar Inc.
 Differentiation

 Designed for rapid deployment, simple operation & management = low cost
of ownership & operation.

 Highly scalable (for unicast slaves) : 32/64/128/256 @128 packets per

second.

 Long holdover (8hr for 1.5us) with OCXO.

 Innovative self-healing robust sync with Qulsar slaves (end-to-end value)

 Other satellite signals to overcome GNSS vulnerabilities.

10
Company profile: Qulsar Inc.

 Deployment Scenario:

11
Trial/Commercial experience

SYSTEM: Qg2 POC Done

(Commercial deployment is under discussion)

Embedded:M6X
(Commercial deployment started)

SYSTEM: Qg2 POC Done

(For network analysis)

12
Trial Preparation

 Scope of POC (Network Sync Testing)

• Scope Includes:
• Proposal to conduct Sync Testing at 5 Sites.
• Identification of sites in consultation with TELKOMSEL.
• Testing at each sites to be conducted in 3 different stages.

• Qg2 Pre-Configuration Stage:

• Testing at all 5 identified sites - eNodeB is configured with PTP GM
installed at the core network
• Configuration will have maximum (existing) number of Fiber POPs &
MW Hops between PTP Master and Slave.

• Qg2 Post Configuration Stage:

• Testing at all 5 identified sites - eNodeB is configured with Qg2
• Qg2 (PTP Master) will be closer to eNodeB. Configuration will have
less number of Fiber POPs & MW Hops between PTP Master & Slave

13
Trial Preparation

 Performance / Measurements

• At 5 Sites for 2 different stages (1-With existing Core GM & 2-with Qg2
at Access) we measure following parameters.
• Delay Statistics
• Time Error
• cTE (Constant Time Error)
• dTE (Dynamic Time Error)
• Asymmetry * TIE - SyncE
• MTIE & TDEV - PTP & SyncE with ITU-T masks
• PTP Messages Statistics
• ESMC Packet Generation / Analysis
• GM Clock Properties

14
KEY BENFITS

• POC reveals Network behaviour.

• After the POC we can identify the location where we need to deploy the Qg2
or EGM.

• Behaviour of the Qg2 (Accuracy, stability, interoperability, etc.).

• NE behaviour and response with PTP.

15
APPENDIX

Content
*
1. Copy of trial achievement 1
2. Copy of PO contract (min last contract) 2
*
*
3. BoQ (Bill of Quantity) 3

4. Attachment SOP (Standard Operation Procedure) 4 *

*
5. Attachment MOP (Maintenance Operation Procedure) 5
*
6. Attachment SLA (Service Level Agreement) 6

* Tick the box if the requirement complete

16
List BoQ

17