Anda di halaman 1dari 38

Marine Services

Sustainable Shipping Conference

Sustainable Energy in
Marine Transportation

Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds


Lloyd’s Register EMEA

IMarEST Conference,
Sustainable Shipping, 1-2 February 2005
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Content

• Introduction to fuel use and exhaust


emissions;

• Energy sustainability analysis;

• International initiatives;

• Technology developments;

• Market-based mechanisms;

• Conclusions.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference

Marine Transport
Energy Use and Exhaust Emissions
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
World Oil Demand
World Oil De mand
100
90
80
70 64
% Oil Demand

60 55
50 2002
40 2030
30
19
20 16 16 14
10
10 6
0
T ransport Indust ry P ower Gen. Ot hers
S ector
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Bunker Demand

Year 1970 2002

Total oil demand [MTOE] 2413 3676

International marine bunker 106 146


[MTOE]

Bunker [% of world oil demand] 4.34% 3.97%


Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Share of Marine in Transportation CO2

Maritime
7%
Aircraft
12%

Rail, inland
w ater
6% Light duty
road
vehicles
45%

Heavy duty
road
vehicles
30%
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Summary on Fuel Consumption and Emissions

Source Share of Marine


World oil consumption 3.97%
World fossil fuel 1.95%
consumption
Oil consumption by 7.2%
transport sector
Wold NOx due to fossil 11% - 12%
fuels
World SOx due to fossil 7%
fuels
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference

Freight Transport
Energy Sustainability Analysis
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Sustainable Energy Indices

• Energy Intensity: Amount of energy needed


per unit of transport activity (kJ/t-km);

• CO 2 Emissions Intensity: Amount of CO2


generated per unit of transport activity (g/t-
km).

• NOx Emissions Intensity: Amount of NOx


generated per unit of transport activity (g/t-
km).

• SOx Emissions Intensity: Amount of SOx


generated per unit of transport activity (g/t-
km).
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Estimation Method

• Energy Intensity: Taken from


literature;

• CO 2 Emissions Intensity: Estimated


using energy intensity, fuel heating
value and fuel carbon content;

• NOx Emissions Intensity: Estimated


using energy intensity, fuel heating
value and NOx emission factor.

• SOx Emissions Intensity: Estimated


using energy intensity, fuel heating
value and fuel sulphur content.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Comparisons: Energy Intensity
16000

14000
Energy Intensity [kJ/t-km]

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
Air Road Rail Marine
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Comparisons: CO2 Intensity
1200

1000
CO2 Intensity [g/t-km]

800

600

400

200

0
Air Road Rail Marine
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Comparisons: NOx Intensity
6000

5000
NOx Intensity [g/t-km]

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
Air Road Rail Marine
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Comparisons: SOx Intensity
1200

1000
SOx Intensity [g/t-km]

800

600

400

200

0
Air Road Rail Marine
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Energy Intensity versus Ship Size (Tankers)
Ene rgy Inte ns ity ve rs us Dis pla c e m e nt
200
Energy intensity [kJ/t-km]

150

100

50

0
50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000
Dis p lace m e n t [to n n e ]
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Overall Picture

• Marine freight transportation has:

Lowest energy and CO2 emission


intensities;

Lowest NOx emissions intensity but a


reduced gap with other modes in
particular rail;

Higher level of SOx emissions than


road and rail but still lower than air
transport.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Reasons for Action

• More stringent emissions control targets for


other modes of transport;

• Issues relating to port air quality and ship


operation in environmentally sensitive areas;

• The relatively high level of NOx emissions factor


of marine engines;

• The high level of sulphur content of marine fuels;

• The economic factor: Any reduction in CO2


proportionally leads to fuel saving.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference

International Initiatives
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Climate Change Convention

UNFCCC
COP Agreed: Rio 1992
(Conference of Parties) Ratified: 1994

SBSTA SBI Kyoto Protocol


(Subsidiary Body for (Subsidiary Body Agreed: Kyoto 1997
Scientific and Technical for Implementation) Ratified: 2005
Advice)

IMO ICAO
(Shipping) (Aircraft)
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
International Maritime Organisation (IMO)

IMO Assembly

MEPC MSC
(Marine Environment Protection (Marine Safety Committee)
Committee)
Current Working Groups

Air Pollution from Ships Ballast Water Ship Recycling


(Dealing with NOx, SOx, GHG
emissions, )
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
IMO Activities on GHG Emissions

• Study of GHG emissions from shipping


(report published in 2000);

• Resolution A.963(23) on “IMO policies


and practices related to reduction of
GHG emissions from ships” (2003):

• The Working Group is currently


exploring technical and operational
issues relating to ways of reducing CO2
emissions.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
European Union (EU)
• EU is active on all aspects of energy sustainability:
Pollutant control;
Fuel sulphur control;
Emissions trading.
• For marine transport, the main emphasis is on fuel
sulphur for ships operating within the EU waters;
• Directive 1999/32/EC sets future tough limits:
1.5% fuel sulphur limit in North Sea/English Channel
& Baltic, compatible with IMO’s SECA (May 2006 for
the Baltic);
1.5% fuel sulphur limit for passenger ships on regular
services between EU ports (July 2007);
0.2% fuel sulphur limit for inland vessels and ships at
berth in EU ports (0.1% from 2010).
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Local Requirements
• Mainly in USA:
The US EPA aims to bring the IMO MARPOL Annex
VI NOx emissions limits into force for US flagged
ships;
In Alaska, exhaust emission opacity limits have
been introduced;
Ships visiting Californian ports are required to
operate on MDO rather than HFO;
Designation of selected areas as SECAs is also
anticipated.
• Other local incentive schemes:
Swedish environmentally differentiated fairways
and port dues;
Recent Hamburg’s environmentally differentiated
port dues.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Technology Developments
• Alternative fuels:
Low sulphur fuels;
Natural gas;
Hydrogen.

• Alternative Technologies:
Natural gas (dual fuel) engines;
Fuel cell;
Electric ship;

• Energy Efficiency
Energy efficient technologies;
Operational controls;
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Low Sulphur Fuel
• Move to lower sulphur fuel seems to be inevitable (Unless
cost effective flue gas desulphurisation systems become
available);

• Issues:
Fuel price differentials and economic consequences;

Adaptability of engine technologies to low sulphur fuels;

Lack of widespread availability of low sulphur bunkers;

Ship design and operational complexities associated


with the use of multiple fuel storage and distribution
systems.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Natural Gas
• A clean and low-carbon fuel;
• Significant worldwide reserves;
• In transportation, mainly used in light duty road
vehicles;
• Marine application is limited to LNG ships;
• Favourable prospect:
Production of dual fuel diesel engines;
Development of fuel cells;
Seen as a precursor to future hydrogen economy.
• Major technical issues:
Storage (Main barrier);
Safety.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Hydrogen
• Fuel for the long term future;

• Main alternative to currently used fossil fuels;

• Zero emissions if used with fuel cell;

• Issues:
Availability;
Cost;
Storage;
Infrastructure;
Conversion technology.

• All the above aspects are under intense development.


Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Fuel Cell
Fuel
channel

- ve + ve

End plate
Oxidant
channel Bipolar Cathode
plate
Anode Electrolyte
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Fuel Cell
• Compared to thermal power plants:
Very effective in reducing pollutant;

Some energy efficiency gains especially in combined


heat and power configuration;

• Issues:
Technical (low power density, high specific weight, high
specific volume, low reliability and so on);

Needs very clean gaseous fuel (almost sulphur free)


Hydrogen is ideal;

Natural gas require internal fuel reformer;

Other liquid fuels require external reformer including desulphurisation unit.

Cost.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Electric Ship
• Mainly naval applications and to some extent passenger
ships;
• Significant flexibility in terms of machinery arrangement;
• Not yet as efficient as conventional mechanical drive ships;
• Driving force:
Specific operational requirements;
Advent of podded propulsors;
Multi-engine power management systems;
Future potential use of fuel cells;
Future use of shore power;
Future potential use of electrical storage devices;
Moves in automotive sector towards hybrid-electric
systems.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Technology Roadmap

Fu el E n gin e Propu lsion

H FO or D iesel D irect/geared
MDO drive

Natural G as Dual fuel iesel


d / H yb rid/electric
CODAG system

H ydrogen Fuel C ell E lectrical M ore


su sta in a b le
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Market-based Mechanisms

• Emissions Trading;

• Fairways and port dues;

• Fuel price.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Fuel Price
• It is an effective market mechanism for uptake of new
technologies;

• Has adverse effect on the economy of ship operation;

• Advantages:
Cleaner fuels become more cost-effective;
Makes the ETS activities more cost-effective by
correspondingly raising CO2 prices;

Cleaner and more efficient new technologies


become more cost effective;
Improves operational and fleet management
practices in a manner that reduces fuel
consumption.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Conclusions
• On energy sustainability and
compared to other modes of freight
transport, marine transportation:

Is the most sustainable mode of


transport from climate change
point of view;
Has the lowest NOx emissions
intensity;
Its SOx emissions intensity is
higher than road and rail but
still lower than air transport.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Conclusions
• To improve the marine
transport energy
sustainability further:
Fuel sulphur needs further reduction
preferably by setting medium to long
term targets;
Energy rating standards, for ship
design and operation, should be
developed and implemented (in-line
with IMO’s current activities);
Market-based mechanisms, including
ETS, need to be monitored for future
application in marine.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Conclusions
• On future fuels and technologies:

Natural gas is seen as the precursor


to move to hydrogen economy.
Storage capacity is the main barrier
to its use in ships.

The use of hydrogen, as the fuel, and


fuel cells as the main power plant
will evolve in the longer term as the
shift to a low-carbon / hydrogen
economy occurs.
Marine Services
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Conclusions
• On future fuels and technologies:

The above moves, plus other


developments (e.g. electric storage,
shore power, podded drives, etc.),
would lead to future stronger moves
towards electric ships.
Sustainable Shipping Conference
Marine Services

Thank You

Anda mungkin juga menyukai