1
CELL NUMBER CONTROL
Cell number is the
balance of:
4
Perspective
• About 250,000 people every year are
diagnosed with cancer in the UK:
– about 120,000 die every year
– about 1 in 3 of all deaths.
7
DYSPLASIA
• A spectrum of abnormal growth
conditions with many of the
morphological and genetic changes of
neoplasia BUT without any invasion of
spread
8
DYSPLASIA IN THE COLON
Can be flat
Pre malignant
9
DYSPLASIA IN THE CERVIX
10
The purpose of classification
• is to provide an aid to diagnosis
11
Why is classification important?
PRECISE CLASSIFICATION
OF A NEOPLASM FROM A PATIENT
IS ESSENTIAL FOR THE
CORRECT AND APPROPRIATE
PLANNING OF TREATMENT
12
Two key elements of
classification of a neoplasm
Behavioural Histogenetic
classification classification
13
Behavioural classification
• Spectrum of behaviour
e.g. benign or malignant
• Thus
Common Rare
Lipo- Fat
Osteo- Bone
Chondro- Cartilage
Tumour (benign
-oma
or malignant)
Epithelial
-carcinoma
malignancy
Connective
-sarcoma tissue
malignancy
malignancy of
bone marrow
derived cells
-aemia (exceptions
exist eg.
anaemia)
19
Grade
• the degree of differentiation of a tumour.
• In general
– a low grade [or well differentiated] tumour has a less aggressive
course
– than a high grade [or poorly differentiated] tumour.
• ANAPLASTIC –
20
Stage
Stage refers to the extent of spread
of a tumour.
23
THE PROBLEMS OF EXCEPTIONS . . . . . .
• For example
– MELANOMA
– MESOTHELIOMA
– LYMPHOMA
• EPONYMS
24
Relevance
AND
26
• On examination middle aged man with evidence of weight loss,
pale skin.
• Differential diagnosis:
– Piles
– Inflammatory bowel disease
– Diverticular disease
– Tumour
27
• Flexible sigmoidoscopy:
– mass in colon
– biopsy taken
• Histology of mass
– Glandular neoplasm
– Pleomorphism
– Invasion
• Surgery planned
– Resection of colon
28
29
Evidence of
metastatic
spread
Liver deposits
30
Why epidemiology is useful
31
A range of factors can influence the
epidemiology of a disease
• Age variation
• Gender differences
• Historical variation
• Geographic variation
• Social and economic factors
• Occupational factors
• Dietary factors
• Genetic factors
etc . . . . . . . .
32
EPIDEMIOLOGY examples
• Ultraviolet light and skin cancer
• Asbestos and mesothelioma
• Smoking and lung cancer
• HPV, sexual activity and cervix cancer
• Malaria and Burkitt’s lymphoma
• Meat consumption and colon cancer
• Radiation and thyroid cancer
• Aniline dyes and bladder cancer
• Family history and many cancers
• Alcohol and cancer
• Hepatitis virus, aflatoxins and liver cancer
33
Colorectal cancer as an example
Age Incidence increases rapidly with increasing age
Gender Affects both men and women
Historical variation Is becoming more common
Associated with developed nations rather than
Geographic variation
developing nations
Social and economic
Can occur in all groups
factors
Occupational factors None known
Associated with a low fibre, high fat, high red meat
Dietary factors
diet
Familial forms well described including:-
1. Familial Adenomatous Polyposis or FAP (APC gene)
2.Hereditary non polyposis cancer (HNPCC) DNA
Genetic factors repair genes
BUT ALSO
3. Genes whose products are involved in metabolism of
carcinogens can increase the risk of neoplasia
34
MIGRATION STUDIES CAN ILLUMINATE THE
ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND GENETIC FACTORS
35
Mortality statistics
the big 5 in men and women
Males Females
Lung Lung
Prostate Breast
Colorectal Colorectal
Stomach Ovary
Oesophagus Pancreas
36
CHANGING PATTERNS OF NEOPLASIA
37
Why tumours cause problems
• grow
• press on structures
• ulcerate
• bleed
• cause loss of organ function
• invade locally
• spread to distant sites (metastasise)
• produce substances
– appropriate for the site
– inappropriate for the site
38
• It is implicit from our definition of neoplasia
that neoplastic (or tumour) cells have lost
normal regulation of cell number control
39
Clonality
• Tumours are usually clonal in origin (that is they arise
from neoplastic change in a single initial cell),
• BUT NOTE not all cell populations that are clonal are
tumours!
40
Growth of tumours
41
How tumours present
• A consequence of local disease
– (eg. grow, compression, ulcerate, bleed, destroy adjacent
structures)
• An incidental finding
– (eg. on screening or on routine medical examination)
42
When thinking about a tumour
at a given anatomical site, it might be
or be a
a secondary deposit (a metastasis)
from another site
43
Spread of tumours
• Metastasis is the process whereby malignant
tumour cells spread from
44
INVASION and METASTASIS
• The two properties that accounts for
most of the serious (and lethal)
consequences of neoplasia.
• Associated with
– increased cellular motility,
– the production of enzymes with proteolytic
activity and
– alterations in cell adhesion
45
ROUTES OF METASTASIS
1. BLOOD [ HAEMATOGENOUS] SPREAD
2. LYMPHATIC SPREAD
3. TRANSCOELOMIC SPREAD
4. PERINEURAL SPREAD
5. IMPLANTATION
46
SPREAD OF
TUMOURS
47
The process of metastasis . . . .
• Local growth
TNM System
• T How big the primary tumour is
• N Whether nodes are involved
• M Whether distant sites are involved
(eg. Liver or bone marrow)
49
WHY IS STAGE SO IMPORTANT?
• Key determinant
of prognosis
54
Properties of tumour cells
1. Self-sufficiency in growth signals
2. Insensitivity to anti-growth signals
3. Evasion of apoptosis
4. Unrestricted replicative potential
5. Sustained angiogenesis
6. Tissue invasion and metastasis
7. Genetic instability
55
Self-sufficiency in growth signals
• Normal cells depend on exogenous growth factors to
stimulate growth and cell proliferation.
• Why?
– because of mutations in genes that encode components of
the signalling pathways that normally regulate these
processes.
– Such mutations lead to constitutively active signalling
56
Insensitivity to anti-growth signals
57
Evasion of apoptosis
• A critical component of normal cell number control is
apoptosis (programmed cell death).
58
Unrestricted replicative potential
61
Tissue invasion & metastasis
• Normal cells remain where they are supposed to be
and normal tissue boundaries are maintained.
62
Genetic instability
• Normal cells maintain the integrity of their genomes
63
Evidence that neoplasia is a genetic disease
6 Specific mutations in
growth control genes are
common in tumours
7 Genetic instability is a
characteristic feature of
tumours
66
TUMOUR PROGRESSION
• Clinical and experimental phenomenon
• With time tumours grow and successive
populations become increasingly abnormal,
accumulating more genetic abnormalities
(mutations)
• Associated with increasingly abnormal
appearance and behaviour
• Increasingly insensitive to growth inhibitory
signals, more resistant to apoptosis,
increasingly unstable etc.
67
Tumours: Multiple genetic
events are needed
Evidence: clinical examples eg. colorectal cancer
68
Tumours: Multiple
genetic events
are needed
Evidence: clinical
examples eg. tumour
progression
69
Tumours: Multiple genetic events are needed
Evidence: Experimental skin tumours in mice
70
Molecular events in neoplasia
Exactly what genes are involved in neoplasia?
• Tumour suppressor -
genes TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR
GENES
73
Cancer critical genes
Cancer critical genes ONCOGENES
74
Oncogenes
Involved in cancer by an increased activity of the (proto)oncogene
stimulating an increase in cell number
Genetically dominant
Function like an accelerator
Genetically recessive
Functions like a brake
• Examples include the p53 gene, the APC gene and the Rb gene
76
Understanding cancer critical genes:
an analogy
A foot on the accelerator can make you You have two brakes
go faster! If one stops working you can use the other.
Oncogenes encode potential If both stop working you cannot stop and will
accelerators of growth. accelerate.
77
Oncogene
Pathways
2 1 3
79
1. GENE AMPLIFICATION
Receptor amplification
Positive growth
signal
81
Many signalling proteins are
molecular switches
Mutant ras is always switched on
3. CHROMOSOMAL
REARRANGEMENTS
Altered regulation: myc
gene over-expressed in
lymphoma
84
Tumour suppressor genes
The Knudson Hypothesis
Knudson studies children Familial form
with an eye tumour called • present earlier in
retinoblastoma childhood
• often had bilateral
2 groups of patients:- disease
• within an eye could be
multi-focal.
• those with a family
history
Sporadic
• and those without (the • presented later
majority) • only had a single eye
involved.
85
Tumour suppressor genes
The Knudson Hypothesis
For a tumour to develop Knudson proposed that:-
• one inherited from the father and one from the mother
86
Knudson’s Two-Hit Hypothesis
Hereditary Sporadic
87
Tumour suppressor genes
The Knudson Hypothesis
Sporadic form Familial form
• a mutation has to occur in both • the child inherits from one mutant
copies of the retinoblastoma gene. copy of the retinoblastoma gene.
• the longer the period of time that • the disease occurs earlier and also
elapses the more likely this is, but it there is a high probability of it
is unlikely to occur more than in one occurring in more than one cell, and
cells. hence tumours occur late and thus tumours may be multi-focal and
are unilateral. bilateral.
88
Familial
1 in 106
Overall
1 in 106
Sporadic
1 in 106 1 in 106
Overall
1 in 1012
89
PEDIGREE OF THE FAMILIAL FORM OF RETINOBLASTOMA
92
92
p53 TSG
• Altered in more than 50% of human
cancers
• Involved in a pathway that responds to
DNA damage and allows repair or
apoptotic cell death:
– if it is not working damage accumulates and
tumours can arise.
• Is a transcription factor: regulates
other genes
93
94
PREVALENCE
OF P53
MUTATIONS
IN HUMAN
CANCERS
95
PEDIGREE OF A FAMILY WITH LI-FRAUMENI
SYNDROME
96
The component cancers of Li-Fraumeni syndrome tend
to show up at different stages of life:
Type of Cancer
Age of Onset
1. Development of
1. Infancy adrenocortical carcinoma
2. Under 5 years of age 2. Development of soft-
3. Childhood and young tissue sarcomas
adulthood 3. Acute leukaemias and brain
4. Adolescence tumors
5. Twenties to thirties 4. Osteosarcomas
5. Premenopausal breast
cancer is common
Those who survive the first cancer are at higher risk for a second cancer. These
second cancers often occur in areas of the body previously treated with radiation.
97
Tumours: Multiple genetic
events are needed
Evidence: clinical examples eg. colorectal cancer
98
INNER SURFACE OF THE COLON OF A NORMAL
PATIENT WITH FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS COLON
POLYPOSIS
99
THE APC GENE- genotype/phenotype correlations
EXON
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
CHRPE rare CHRPE frequent
MUTATION CLUSTER
REGION
LESS PROFUSE
AAPC PROFUSE POLYOSIS
POLYPOSIS
EARLY ONSET
DUODENAL POLYPOSIS,
FAP MULTIPLE
ADENOMAS GASTRIC ADENOMAS, CHRPE
22 103
XERODERMA PIGMENTOSUM
2 mutant copies of the same gene
inherited – one from each parent
Very rare condition
Susceptibility to skin cancer
Inherited defect in DNA repair
(excision repair)
Skin cancer rates 2000-fold > normal
Average age 8yrs cf 60yrs general
population
20-fold > brain, lung, stomach, breast
& leukaemias
100
With BRCA1
mutation
With family
50
history
Without BRCA1
mutation
30 50 70
107
AGE (YEARS)
RISKS/BENEFITS OF CANCER
GENETIC TESTING
RISKS BENEFITS
• Prenatal testing
110
The causes of neoplasia
Carcinogenesis is the process by which a
normal cell is converted into a neoplastic cell
Chemical carcinogenesis
• History
– Percival Pott 1776
• Identified skin cancer in chimney sweeps as
being due to soot
– Aniline dyes and bladder cancer
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
Chemical carcinogenesis
• Diverse compounds
– Direct acting
– Indirect acting: require metabolic
activation
• Examples
– Alkylating agents (direct)
– Polycyclin hyrdocarbons (indirect)
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
Chemical Carcinogenesis
– Ames test
• Use bacteria that can only grow on particular
media
– Treat with compound: do they mutate to grow on
other media?
– Pre treat compound with metabolic enzymes (liver
microsaomes) and repeat
– Animal studies
• As good as it gets! . . . . but possibly not always
relevant to man
THE AMES TEST
Chemical carcinogenesis
– Human studies
– Epidemiology
Chemical carcinogenesis
– Smoking
– Huge number of chemicals involved
– Clear evidence for carcinogenic role of smoking
– “If everyone smoked then lung cancer
would be a genetic disease”
– Emphasises the point that we are all genetically
different
• Xenobiotic metabolism
• DNA repair
• Other
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
Radiation carcinogenesis
• Ionising radiation
• Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl,
Laboratory accidents
• Environmental radiation
– Aberdeen, Cornwall,
– radon exposure
• Therapeutic & diagnostic radiation
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
Radiation carcinogenesis
• Non-ionising radiation
• UV causes skin cancer
– Low risk in Negroes, high risk in Caucasians,
high risk in albinos
– Families with defective DNA repair
(Xeroderma pigmentosa)
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
SOME EXCEPTIONS
• Hormones
– Act as promoters, stimulating cell proliferation
– Breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer are
hormone dependent (used in treatment)
• Bacteria, fungi and parasites
– Gastritis caused by Helicobacter pylori
– Aflatoxins (carcinogen) produced by Aspergillus
flavus and liver cancer
– Bladder inflammation caused by Schistosomes
(Eygpt) - bladder cancer
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
Host factors
– Race,
– diet,
– gender,
– inherited factors, etc
• Familial cancers
Hereditary cancer
• Some tumours run in families
• We know the genes involved in some
cases
– Familial polyposis coli
• (APC)
– Hereditary non polyposis colon cancer
• (DNA repair enzymes)
– Breast cancer (+/- ovarian cancer)
• BRCA1 and BRCA2
– Li Fraumeni syndrome
• p53
Hereditary cancer
• Having these mutant genes inherited
from a parent is not enough: need other
mutations
• Also the other genes in the genome
contribute to overall risk
– The deck of cards!
• Modifying loci
– Penetrance
– The exact mutation
Genetic damage is the key to neoplasia
history taking
clinical examination and
appropriate special tests & investigations.
This involves
cytology (eg. fine needle aspiration)
needle or core biopsy
incision biopsy or
excision biopsy
Multi-disciplinary team approach
The diagnosis and treatment of cancer is increasingly complex
– Surgical oncologists
– Radiation oncologists
– Medical oncologists
– Pathologists
– Radiologists
– Geneticist
– General practitioners
– Palliative care specialists
– Psychologists
– Social workers
– Nurses
– Chaplains etc . . . . . . . . . .
New information helps diagnosis
• Molecular profiles
• Expression arrays
• Antibodies
• More robust and reproducible diagnoses
and classification
• Identification of subgroups that need
specific therapies
• Tailored treatments
Identifying prognostic factors
Things that predict survival
• Tumour type
• Stage and Grade
• Karnovsky status
• Tumour factors
– Gene expression
– Proliferation
Identifying predictive factors
Things that predict response to therapy
Mesothelioma Seminoma
1 yr 10 yr
Time
Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier)
STAGE
Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier)
GENE
EXPRESSION
GENE EXPRESSION ARRAYS
Analysis of expression levels of
70 ‘prognosis genes’ in 295
primary breast cancers
• Cure
• Palliation
– with the aim of improving lifespan and
quality of life
Treatment principles I
Are based upon:
• Prevention
– Behaviour modification (eg. smoking, sun exposure)
– Risk avoidance (eg. occupational risks, dietary
factors)
Cancer cure: difficult but not hopeless!
IHC of an ovarian
carcinoma stained for
p53 protein.
Occult disease
Time
Monitoring treatment IIIb
Radiological examination
Occult disease
Time
Monitoring treatment IIIc
Biochemical examination
Level of marker
Occult disease
Time
Monitoring treatment IIIc
Molecular marker
MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE
Time
New treatments are based on new
understanding of cancer biology: p53
• Drugs that reactivate mutant p53: restoring
sensitivity to current drugs.
LIGAND
ERBB2 RECEPTOR
INTRACELLULAR
TRANSDUCER
NUCLEUS
RECEPTOR
mRNA
AMPLIFICATION OF THE ERBB2 PROTO-ONCOGENE
LIGAND
ERB B2
RECEPTOR
INTRACELLULAR
TRANSDUCER
NUCLEUS
THERAPY VIA RECEPTOR BLOCKING BY ANTIBODY
LIGAND
RECEPTOR
ANTIBODY
INTRACELLULAR
TRANSDUCER
NUCLEUS
Herceptin
Understanding cancer biology leads
to rationale tailored treatments
• Next generation of treatments will be
based on our new understanding
PLUS
• Specific treatments for specific
patients based on genetic and molecular
knowledge . . . . . .