Elda Ariyani
Preceptor : dr. Rizal Daulay, Sp.OT, MARS
ABSTRACT
Cord injury may occur during radical surgery, though the incidence is
very low. Only two out of 764 anterior procedures done in the author's
unit has resulted in a cord bruise from the graft placement into the
spinal canal. Utmost attention should be paid in positioning the grafts
between the vertebral bodies.
Stabilizing Instrumentation
Corrective and stabilizing spinal surgery is most effective in active
progressive kyphosis and nonrigid kyphosis. However, posterior
instrumentation surgery is not recommended in early tuberculosis,
because the disease can be cured with conservative treatment without
significant residual kyphosis.
Stabilizing Instrumentation
In anterior column destruction with kyphosis, posterior instrument-
aided correction of kyphosis and stabilization will produce a bone gap
in the anterior column. This should be reconstructed by anterior strut
graft surgery. Failure to do so may result in corporal re-collapse and/or
instrumentation failure.
Stabilizing Instrumentation
In children with both anterior and posterior spinal elements involved,
the affected segment becomes unstable, causing spinal deformity and an
increased risk of paraplegia. Prophylactic stabilization should be
performed if translational instability is suspected at the level of the
lesion, particularly in children [1,2,5].
Posterior Instrumentation and Anterior
Radical Surgery
In the past if it was only for cosmetic reasons, corrective surgery was
not recommended in healed severe kyphotic or kyphoscoliotic
tuberculous spine with normal neurology because of high complication
rates of neurological injury, particularly above T11.
Instrument-aided posterior corrective/stabilizing surgery and anterior
reconstruction surgery are most effective in the management of active
progressive kyphosis and established residual non-rigid kyphosis [43].
Corrective Surgical Procedures for Severe Rigid
Kyphosis
Any decision to operate must weigh the high complication and re-
operation rates against anticipated improvement. An informed consent
discussion should include the patient and his or her support group. Risks
and complications must be fully understood; and the patient will
ultimately choose balancing between those risks and his/her quality of
life. The surgeon should offer options and probability, but it is the
patient who must ultimately bear the consequences of the decision
[5,41,49].
Spinal Column Shortening