Representation: |𝒋, 𝒎ۧ
𝑗1 𝑗2
| 𝑗1 , 𝑗2 𝑗12 , 𝑗3 ; 𝑗, 𝑚ۧ = 𝑎𝑗12𝑗23 |𝑗1 , 𝑗2 , 𝑗3 𝑗23 ; 𝑗, 𝑚ۧ
𝑗3 𝑗
𝑗23
𝑗1 𝑗2 𝑗12 𝑗 𝑗2
= (−1)𝑗1+𝑗2+𝑗3+𝑗4 2𝑗12 + 1 [2𝑗23 + 1]𝑎𝑗12𝑗23 1
𝑗3 𝑗4 𝑗23 𝑗3 𝑗4
Fusion rules
𝑅1 𝑅2
𝑎𝑅12 𝑅23 𝑅12 ∈ (𝑅1 ⊗ 𝑅2 ) ∩ (𝑅ത 3 ⨂𝑅ത 4 )
𝑅3 𝑅4
R->Representation of SU(N) 𝑅23 ∈ (𝑅2 ⊗ 𝑅3 ) ∩ (𝑅ത 1 ⨂𝑅ത 4 )
𝑅1 𝑅2 𝑅12 𝑅 𝑅2
= 𝜖{𝑅𝑖} dim𝑞 𝑅12 dim𝑞 𝑅23 𝑎𝑅12𝑅23 1
𝑅3 𝑅4 𝑅23 𝑅3 𝑅4
Four point conformal blocks of 𝑆𝑈(𝑁)𝑘 WZNW
conformal field theory
𝑘 2 𝑢 −1
𝑘
𝑆= න 𝑑 𝑥 𝑇𝑟 𝜕 𝑔 𝜕𝑢 𝑔 + න 𝑑 3 𝑦 𝜖𝛼𝛽𝛾 𝑇𝑟 𝑔−1 𝜕 𝛼 𝑔𝑔−1 𝜕𝛽 𝑔𝑔−1 𝜕 𝛾 𝑔
16𝜋 𝑆 2 24𝜋 𝐵
Racah coefficient
The coefficients which relates different 2n-point conformal block basis can
be expressed in terms of quantum Racah coefficient (6j-symbols).
Chern-Simons Theory
Knot invariant
2𝜋𝑖
Variables: 𝑞=𝑒 𝑘+𝑁 , 𝑎 = 𝑞𝑁
Basic ingredient: Relation between C-S and CFT
𝑊=ΦΨ
ۦΦ|
(−)
𝑏1
Braiding eigenvalues
+ + − −
𝜆𝑡 (𝑅1 , 𝑅2 ) = 𝜖𝑡;𝑅1,𝑅2 𝑞 𝐶𝑅1 +𝐶𝑅2 −𝐶𝑡Τ2 𝜆𝑠 (𝑅1 , 𝑅2 ) = 𝜖𝑠;𝑅1 ,𝑅2 𝑞 𝐶𝑠Τ2
Example
10151 knot
Quantum 6j symbols for SU(2)
[Kirillov, Reshetikhin]
Identities
𝑅1 𝑅2 𝑅1
𝑅2 𝑅ത1 𝑅1 𝑅 ,𝑅 dim𝑞 𝑠
≡ 𝑎0𝑠 =𝜖s 1 2
𝑅2 𝑅ത2 dim𝑞 𝑅1 dim𝑞 𝑅2
Orthogonality:
𝑅1 𝑅2 𝑅 𝑅2 𝑅1 𝑅2 𝑅 𝑅2
𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑘𝑠 1 = 𝛿𝑡,𝑘 𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑟 1 = 𝛿𝑠,𝑟
𝑅3 𝑅4 𝑅3 𝑅4 𝑅3 𝑅4 𝑅3 𝑅4
𝑠 𝑡
Identities from equivalence of states
Could do it for 𝑅2 = 𝑛 𝑏𝑜𝑥𝑒𝑠
Twist knots
L.H.S is known
Type I
Type II
Proposal:
62 , 63 , 73 , 75 knot
[Morozov et al]
10154 knot
10145 knot