Hazard Identification

&

Risk Assessment

1
 Overriding factor (LC/DC/Any others)
Activity/ Services (including

OHS Hazard / Associated Risk Identification Risk Assessment

Severity(S2
Adequacy of Measure
Contractors)

=L X C)

Risk Classification
Risk Risk

Total (S1+S2+D)
Detectability (D)
Management

Scale S1
NO

Consequence

Consequence
Likelihood (L)
Measure

Level of
Required
Condition
N/
D/ R/ AN/
Hazard I NR E Existing Gaps, if any Likelihood
HIRA Guidelines
Serial Sub Hazard Condition Existing Safe Identify gaps Likelihood ( Consequence Conseque Score Score Detectab = Risk If the Measure
No. activities associated associated Guard to be associated with probability of associated with nce effect as as the ility of S1 Classificatio conseque taken to
to be listed with the with the mentioned in the particular occurrence) to particular to be per conseq hazard +S2 n based on nce of address the
subseque sub-activity hazard to be this column. Hazards to be be captured as Hazard to be captured the uence to be +D the Total hazard existing Gaps
nt to the to be identified as Safe guard captured. (Such 1.Highly unlikely mentioned as Likeli evel to captured Score to be attract to be
main mentioned. 1.Direct/ must be in the as TSL 2.Unlikely related to 1.Spot hood be as mentioned Legal mentioned
activity (Individual Indirect hierarchy of Standard gaps, 3.Likely 1.Consequence 2.Within to be mentio 1.Instant As Conseque such as
Hazard to 2. Routine/ control order, work place 4.Very Likely as Impact level Dept menti ned as aneous 1. Trival nce or Warning
be captured Non Routine/ 1.Elimination conditions or per the 2.Effect on 3.Within oned per the 2. High 2. Moderate trigger Sign's,
in separate 3.Normal/ 2.Substitution industry best guideline Human Factory guideli 3. Low 3. Domino Specific
row) Abnormal/ 3.Engineering practice) 3.Exposure 4.Outside ne As per Substantial effect or SOP's etc.
Emergency control level as per Factory the 4. any other
4.Administrati the guideline guideline In tolerable effect
ve Control such as
5.PPE's Runaway
Reaction,
etc to be
captured

Note: In case of ambiguity while deciding the score, then the next highest value shall be considered 2
 Score Matrix

DETECTIBILITY
Scale (Sl) LIKELIHOOD (L) LEVEL OF CONSEQUENCE (C)
(D) Risk
Exposure Classification
Effect on Score Criteria Score Level Human Score Level Score
level
Spot 1 Highly Unlikely: Adequate technological 1 Slightly Momentry Below / equal 2 Instantane 1 Trivial
and operational measure in place. Training (HUL) harmful discomfort to prescribed ous (4)
and competency define & complied. TLV (8 hours)
Monitoring and measurement and its
review system defined & complied.

Within deptt. 2 Unlikely: Technological and operational 2 Harmful Minor injuries Above 4 High 2 Moderate
measure in place. No gap observed in (UL) (non reportable) prescribed (5-12)
training and competency. Monitoring and requires first aid TLV (8 hours)
measurement is not upto desirable level. however
within 20%
Within 3 Likely: Technological and operational 3 Very Harmful Minor injuries Above 6 Low 3 Substantial
Factory measure in place. Training and (L) (reportable) prescribed (13-24)
competency not upto desireable level. absence from TLV (8 hours)
Monitoring and measurement and its work for more however
review system is not upto desirable level. than 48 hours/ within 20-40%
temporary
disability
Outside 4 Very likely:Technological and operational 4 Extremely Fatal/Permanent Above 8 Nill 4 Intolerable
Factory measure not in place. Training and (VL) Harmful disability, Major prescribed (25-40)
competency not seen. Monitoring and incidents TLV (8 hours)
measurement and its review system is not involving large and more
in place. number of than 40%
people

TLV: Threshold Limit Value

H/S Health/Safety
D/I Danger/Incident
R/NR Routine/Non-routine
N/AN/E Normal/Abnormal/Emergency

3
 Example of Electrical Maintenance ( Activity : HT Breaker Maintenance )
HIRA

Overriding factor (LC/DC/Any

Risk Assessment
OHS Hazard / Associated Risk Identification
Severity
Adequacy of Measure (S2=L X

Risk Classification
Total (S1+S2+D)
Detectability (D)
Risk

others)
Risk C)
Management

Scale S1
NO
Measure

Consequence

Likelihood (L)

Consequence
Required

Level of
Activity/ Condition
Services N/
(including R/ AN/
Contractors) Hazard D/I NR E Existing Gaps, if any Likelihood
Example : HT Breaker Maintenance
Engineering Control : Likelihood : Conseque Scale L C D Tota
1. Door can not be nce: Risk 1Availability &
S1 : l
opened while breaker Unlikely Fatal/ 1( knowledge of
is in Service Permanen SLD .
Impact 2 8 3
position.(Interlock te Subs L
Available) Disability on 20 2.Supervisory
tantia
2.Racking out of Gaps : Spot) l Competency
Breakers is done with 1.Supervisory certification for
closed panel without competency all authorised
exposing live part. certificate is not person
3.Internal arc having with all 3. Schedule Door
withstand capacity test authorised Interlock to be
certificate available person . checked
4. Use of Insulated 4. HT PPE should
tools & Tackles 2. Test report of be tested &
Administrative some cool coat/ Checked .
Controls : Insulation
Sub Activity Hazards :
Condition : 1.Job to be executed gloves are not 4. AED to be
1 :Power Isolation Electrocution/
Direct / NR / AN under supervision available made available .
& Clearance Arc Flash
2. Supervisory 3. Provision of
competency certificate AED in the
/ Only Authorised vicinity .
person is allowed to
Operate.
3. Work Permit &
Positive isolation
formed are duly filled
& approved .
4. SLD available
5. Shock treatment &
CPR equipment
PPE:
1. Cool coat of ATPV
of 32 Cal/ cm2
2. Insulation gloves
 Example of Operation Activity : Handling of Chlorine Tonners
HIRA
Risk Assessment

Overriding factor (LC/DC/Any

OHS Hazard / Associated Risk Identification
Severity
Adequacy of Measure (S2=L X

Risk Classification
Total (S1+S2+D)
Detectability (D)
C) Risk

others)
Risk

Scale S1
Management
NO

Consequence
Likelihood (L)
Consequence
Measure
Activity/

Level of
Required
Services Condition
(including N/
Contractors D/ R/ AN/
) Hazard I NR E Existing Gaps, if any Likelihood
Example : Chlorine Tonners Handling
Engineering Control : Likelihood : Conseque Scale S1 L C D Tota 1. Signage's
1. Hydro testing of Tonner nce: : l Risk including
2.Unloading in designated Unlikely Toxic gas 2( local
Exposure Impact language .
area using F-15 crane with 2 8 2
within Subs LC 2. Regarding
tackle. dept. ) 20 Access entry
tantia
3.Tested material handling Gaps : l & Chlorine
tools ( slings, shackles ). 1.Functioning of hazards &
4.Tested Monorails & lifting Chlorine sensor protection
devices. 2.Gaps in MSDS measures.
5. Barricading of loading & understanding 3. Audibility of
Un loading area. alarms.
Specification
Administrative Controls :
s for PPE's.
1.Permit to work & Tool Box 4. Do's and
Sub Activity : Talk . Don'ts BA
Hazards :
Loading & Condition : 2. Training on material posters &
Chlorine
1 Unloading of Direct / R / AN handling hazards. Emergency
gas
Chlorine /E 3. Following Life Saving evacuation
Exposure
Tonner procedure
rules.
4. MSDS Availability display.
5.
5. Availability of Windsocks
Identification
6. Avalabity of Emergency of loading &
control Plan un loading
7. Functional Safety showers Bay (
PPE: Marking on
Chlorine Gas Detector, Hand Road )
gloves, Helmet. Canister,
Self breathing apparatus for
the required number of
people engaged for loading
& unloading .
Thank You