BUDGET
Annie Rose Perez
Nicholson Demalata
Christopher Garcia
Maureen Ilagan
Joanna Rose L. Vasquez
. .
. .
.
VARIANCE ANALYSIS
CYCLE
- Quantitative investigation of the difference between actual
result and budgeted/planned.
Prepare Performance
Report Begin
Prepare Performance Report
Rick’s Hairstyling
Planning Budget
For the month ended August 2018
Budgeted client-visits 1,000.00
Revenue 180,000.00
Expenses:
Wages and Salaries 102,000.00
Hairstyling Supplies 1,500.00
Client Gratuites 4,100.00
Electricity 1,600.00
Rent 28,500.00
Liability Insurance 2,800.00
Employee Health insurance 21,300.00
Miscellaneous 1,400.00
Total Expense 163,200.00
Begin
FLEXIBLE BUDGET
• Identify all fixed costs and segregate them in the budget model.
• Enter the resulting flexible budget for the completed period into
the accounting system for comparison of actual expenses.
Advantages of Flexible Budget
• Adjustment for Predictions
• Adapting Change
• Inaccurate Adjustments
• Lack of Information
• Complexity
Characteristics of a Flexible Budget
Planning Budget
Rick has identified eight major categories of costs – wages and salaries, hairstyling supplies, client
gratuities (flowers, candies, and glasses of champagne), electricity, rent, liability insurance, employee
health insurance, and miscellaneous.
Working with Victoria Kho - his accounting and business adviser, Rick estimated a cost formula for
each cost. For example, the cost formula for electricity is $1,500 + $0.10q, where q equals the
number of client-visits. In other words, electricity is a mixed cost with a $1,500 fixed element and a
$0.10 per client-visit variable element. Once the budgeted level of activity was set at 1,000 client-
visits, Rick computed the budgeted amount for each line item in the budget. For example, using the
cost formula, he set the budgeted cost for electricity at $1,600 (= $1,500 + $0.10 x 1,000). To finalize
his budget, Rick computed his expected net operating income for March of $16,800. (See Planning
Budget)
Rick’s Hairstyling
Planning Budget
For the Month Ended March 31
The first thing Rick noticed when compairing Planning Budget and Income
Statement is that the actual profit of $21,230 was substantially higher than the
budgeted profit of $16,800. This was, of course, good news, but Rick wanted to
know more. Business was up by 10% - the salon had 1,100 client-visits instead
of the budgeted 1,000 client-visits. Could this alone explain the higher net
operating income? The answer is NO. An increase in net operating income of
10% would have resulted in net operating income of only $18,480 (=1.1 x
$16,800), not the $21,230 actually earned during the month.
Rick’s Hairstyling
Income Statement
For the Month Ended March 31
This like compairing apples to oranges. Because Rick had 100 more client-visits than
expected, some of his costs should be higher than budgeted. From Rick's standpoint, the
increase in activity was good; however, it appears to be having a negative impact on
most of the costs in the report. Rick knew that something would have to be done to
make the report more meaningful, but he was unsure of what to do. So he contacted his
accountant, Victoria Kho, and asked her to analyze his salon's performance using the
data in Planning Budget and Income Statement.
Rick’s Hairstyling
Comparison of Actual Results to Planning Budget
For the Month Ended March 31
Actual Planning
Results Budget Variances
Budgeted client-visits .......………… 1,100 1,000
Revenue .................…………………… 194,200 $180,000 $ 14,200 F
Expenses:
Wages and salaries …….............. 106,900 102,000 4,900 U
Hairstyling supplies ………………… 1,620 1,500 120 U
Client gratuities ……………………… 6,870 4,100 2,770 U
Electricity ……………………….......... 1,550 1,600 50 F
Rent ……………………………………….. 28,500 28,500 0
Liability Insurance …………………… 2,800 2,800 0
Employee health insurance …….. 22,600 21,300 1,300 U
Miscellaneous ………………........... 2,130 1,400 730 U
Total Expense…………………………….. 172,970 163,200 9,770 U
Net operating income……………….. $ 21,230 $ 16,800 $ 4,430 F
Victoria responded to Rick's request by preparing the flexible budget (See Flexible Budget).
Her flexible budget shows what the revenues and costs should have been given the actual
level of activity in March. She calculated the expenses in her flexible budget by using Rick's
cost formula (See Planning Budget) to estimate what each expense should have been for
1,100 client-visits - the actual level of activity. For example, using the cost formula $1,500 +
$0.10q, the cost of electricity in March should have been $1,610 (= $1,500 + $0.10q x 1,100).
Also, notice that the amounts for rent ($28,500), liability insurance ($2,800), and employee
health insurance ($21,300) in Victoria's flexible budget equal the corresponding amounts
included in Rick's planning budget. This occurs because fixed costs are not affected by the
activity level.
We can see from the flexible budget that the net operating income in March should have
been $30,510, but recall from Income Statement that the net operating income was actually
only $21,230.
To summarize to this point, Rick had budgeted for a profit of $16,800. The actual profit was
quite a bit higher - $21,230. However, Victoria's analysis shows that given the actual number
of client-visits in March, the profit should have been higher - $30,510. What are the causes of
these discrepancies?
Rick’s Hairstyling
Flexible Budget
For the Month Ended March 31
Revenue Variances:
A revenue variance is the difference between the actual total
revenue and what the total revenue should have been, given
the actual level of activity for the period. If actual revenue
exceeds what the revenue should have been, the variance is
labelled FAVORABLE. If actual revenue is less than what the
revenue should have been, the variance is labelled
UNFAVORABLE.
Spending Variances:
A spending variance is the difference between the actual
amount of the cost and how much a cost should have been,
given the actual level of activity. If the actual cost is greater
than what the cost should have been, the variance is labelled
as UNFAVORABLE. If the actual cost is less than what the cost
should have been, the variance is labelled FAVORABLE.
Rick’s Hairstyling
Revenue and Spending Variances
For the Month Ended March 31
A pool Cost
Product
of costs Drivers
NUMBER OF CLIENT-VISITS
Cost drivers:
Number of client-visits
Number of operating hours
Employees paid on an hourly basis
Cost of electricity
Exhibit 8-7: flexible budget based
on more than one cost drvier
For the flexible budget for Rick’s Hairstyling, two cost drivers
are listed:
Client-Visits and Hours of Operation
Where:
q1 – client-visits
q2 – hours of operation
Rick's Hairstyling
Flexible Budget
For the Month Ended March 31
Budgeting
Inventory Costing
Overhead Application
Price formulation
Problem:
The Colonial Pewter Company makes only one product- an elaborate
reproduction of an 18th century pewter statue. The statue is made largely by hand,
using traditional metal-working tools. Consequently, the manufacturing process is
labor intensive and requires a high level of skill.
Colonial Pewter has recently expanded its workforce to take advantage of
unexpected demand for the statue as a gift. The company started with a small
cadre of experienced pewter workers but has had to hire less experienced workers
as a result of the expansion. The management wants to know the production
problems. They asked Terry Sherman, the controller, to give the answers that is
related to worker productivity, material waste and input prices.
First, she set the quantity standard for pewter at 3.0 pounds per status.
After consulting with purchasing manager, Terry set the standard price of pewter at
$4.00 per pound. After consulting with the production manager and considering
reasonable allowances for breaks, personal needs of employees, cleanup and
machine downtime, Terry set the standard hours per unit at 0.50 direct labor-hours
per statue. Using wage records and in consultation with the production manager,
Trey Sherman established a standard rate per hour of $22.00. At Colonial Pewter,
the variable portion of the predetermined overhead rate is $6.00 per direct labor-
hour.
STANDARD QUANTITY PER UNIT
Defines the amount of direct materials that should be used
for each unit of finished product.
Spending Variance
(1) - (3)
Direct Materials Variances
Direct Material Standard:
3.0 pounds per statue X $4.00 per pound = $12.00 per statue
Actual purchased: (QTY MATERIAL PURCHASED EQUAL THE QTY USED IN
PRODUCTION)
Actual Quantity (AQ) - 6,500 pounds (Used to manufacture 2,000 unit of statue)
Actual Price (AP) - $ 3.80 per pound
Material Price Variance = (AQ X AP) - (AQ X SP)
=(6,500 pounds x $3.80 per pound) - (6,500 pounds x $4.00 per pound)
=$24,700 - $26,000
= - $1,300
Direct Materials Variances
Direct Material Standard:
3.0 pounds per statue X $4.00 per pound = $12.00 per statue
Actual purchased:(QTY MATERIAL PURCHASED EQUAL THE QTY USED IN PRODUCTION)
Actual Quantity (AQ) - 6,500 pounds (Used to manufacture 2,000 unit of statue)
Actual Price (AP) - $ 3.80 per pound
Material Price Variance 1,300 (F) Material Quantity Variance 2,000 (U)
Labor Rate Variance 420 (F) Labor Efficiency Variance 1,100 (U)
Variable Overhead Rate Variace 840 (U) Variable Overhead Rate Variance 300 (U)
THE END