Nilai
Review
3
4
Firefighting
Unexpected events
Stress
Greater Lost opportunities
Planning Unrecoverable variations
Effort
Little
Planning
EFFORT
Effort
Fewer
Issues
Schedule Cost
over run
5
6
What is
Gerbang
Nilai
Review
7
Gerbang Nilai Review
An adaption of the United Kingdom's
Office of Government Commerce (OGC)
Gateway™ Review Process to improve
the delivery of major projects.
OGC Gateway™ Review derived from
the 1999 Gershon Report on Civil
Procurement, which established OGC.
8
Concept of GATEWAY™ Review
9
Gateway 0 Gateway 0 Gateway 0 Gateway 0
Gateway 5
Operational
Gateway 3 Award & Manage Contract (services & contract)
Gateway 5
00 –– strategic
strategic
assessment
assessment Gateway 4
11 -- Business
Business
justification
justification Gateway 5
22 –– Procurement
Procurement Renew service contract
strategy
strategy
33 –– Investment
Investment Gateway 5
decision
decision
44 -- Readiness
Readiness for
for OGC GATEWAY REVIEW
service
service
55 –– Benefit
Benefit realisation
realisation PROCESS Disposal
Gerbang Nilai Review in JKR
Gerbang Nilai is being introduced in 10th
Malaysian Plan.
11
Benefits of the Gerbang Nilai
Review
Improved accuracy in planning
Appropriate skills and experience
deployed on the project.
Increased stakeholder understanding of
key success criteria, project status and
the issue involved
Repeated deficiencies corrected
Knowledge transfer and application of
best practice
Achieve more realistic time and cost
target for projects
Increased success of outcomes
12
Methodology of Gerbang Nilai
Project assurance
methodology – short,
intensive review at 4 key point
of the project lifecycle.
Independent, expert,
peer review
process
Focuses on
issues that will 13
Methodology of Gerbang Nilai
Assess the project against
specific objectives
Provide early identification of
areas require corrective action
Provide validation – ready to
progress to next stage.
14
Methodology of Gerbang Nilai
Review are based on open and
honest communication
Review reports are action-
orientated
Gerbang Nilai is
NOT a compliance tool
NOT an audit
16
iran kerja projek RMk-10
peringkat
perancangan
Penerimaa
n Projek
dari EPU Project Problem Solving
Governance
Daftar projek di
SKALA
Tidak
Pengkategorian Gerbang
Gerbang
Projek (ACAT) Nilai
Nilai 1
1
(Penerimaan
Pelaksanaan
Ya Projek)
Perancangan
Projek
17
Gerbang Nilai 1 (
Implementation Acceptance)
18
iran kerja projek RMk-10
peringkat
perancangan
Mengurus
Rekabentuk
Konsep
Tidak
Merancang
Penyediaan
Rekabentuk
Terperinci
19
Gerbang Nilai 2 (Readiness for Design)
Siap Rekabentuk
Terperinci dan Gerbang
Gerbang
Dokumen Tender Nilai
Nilai 3
3
(Kesediaan untuk
Tender)
Ya
Tender Projek
21
Gerbang Nilai 3 (Readiness for Tender)
Focuses on:
assurance a clear definition of the
project and a plan for its
implementation /execution,
assessment of the project’s
potential for success.
ensures appropriate procurement
which facilitates a value for money
outcome
ensure project is ready to tender.
22
iran kerja projek RMk-10
peringkat
perolehan
Penilaian Tender
Perakuan
Perakuan
ke
ke
Lembaga
Lembaga
Tender
Tender
Pemilihan
Kontraktor
Perlantikan
Kontraktor
23
iran kerja projek RMk-10
Peringkat
Merancang
Pengurusan Pembinaan
pembinaan
Memantau dan
melapor prestasi
pembinaan
Merancang Proses
Penyerahan
Tidak
Mengurus Proses Gerbang
Gerbang
Penyerahan Nilai
Nilai 4
4
Penyerahan (Kesediaan untuk
Projek kepada Perkhidmatan)
Ya
pelangan
Penamat
an Projek
24
Gerbang Nilai 4 (Readiness for Service)
Focuses on providing;
assurance on whether the product is
robust before delivery.
25
Greater
Planning
EFFORT
Effort
GN
GN 3
2
GN
GN
4
1
Fewer
Issues
26
Participants in Gerbang Nilai
Review
The following participants shall work
co-operatively to complete a review
successfully:
Program Manager
Project Manager
Portfolio /Program /Project
Office;
Gerbang Nilai Review
Team; and 27
Importance of Participants
Participants in a Gerbang Nilai review should:
engage fully in the process,
28
Selection of Gerbang Nilai
Reviewers
Consideration will be given to factors such as:
29
The Gerbang
Nilai Review
Report
30
The Gerbang Nilai Review
Report
• provide an overall status for the
project at the Gerbang.
31
The Gerbang Nilai Review
Report
RED • critical to the overall success
of the project.
32
The Gerbang Nilai Review
Report
AMBER
33
The Gerbang Nilai Review
Report
Green
The project is on target to
succeed, but
may benefit from implementing
the recommendations in this
review.
34
The Gerbang Nilai Review
Report
Also indicate if recommendations in earlier
reviews have been addressed.
35
The Gerbang Nilai Review
Report
NOTE:
36
Kategori SP Gerbang Nilai 2: Rekabentuk Gerbang Nilai 3: Perolehan Gerbang Nilai 4: Pembinaan
Pejabat
Bil. Pengurus 1 2 3 Putih Merah Kuning Hijau Putih Merah Kuning Hijau Putih Merah Kuning Hijau
Program
SEKTOR IN
1 FRASTRUKT
0 0 44 40 0 1 3 40 0 1 3 44 0 0 0
UR (INFRA
)
SEKTOR BA
2 NGUNAN (B
0 0 188 175 1 1 11 178 1 0 9 187 0 0 1
GN)
SEKTOR PA
3 KAR (PAKA
0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
R)
SEKTOR P
4 ENGURUSA
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
SEKTOR S
5 ENGGARA
0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
6 LAIN-LAIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
44