Anda di halaman 1dari 39

War for Talent –

How to find, keep and


manage talents?
CONFIDENTIAL

Document
Date

This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be
Estonian Leadership
circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client
organisation without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company.
Conference
This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral
presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
September 9, 2004
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Long-term forces fuel the war for managerial/executive talent in large


corporations
Unit of measure

Demand for
talented
managers
Viewpoint:
• Focus on
managerial/”Top200”
executive talent in large

Demand for War Demographic


corporations
• Survey data and cases
knowledge
workers
for constraints
on supply
from the USA

talent However, most principles


can be applicable to other
knowledge professions as
well
Talent is
more
mobile

* Footnote
Source: Source 2
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Companies are generally poor at managing talent


Unit of measure
Percent of top 200 executives who strongly agree it reflects their company

Brings in highly talented Knows who the high


people and low performers are

23 16

77 84

Retains almost all high Develops people quickly Removes low performers
performers and effectively relatively quickly
3 33
10

90 97

* Footnote
Source:Source: McKinsey War for Talent top 200 executive survey - 5,679 respondents
Source 3
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Companies acknowledge that they often fail when making key people
decisions
Unit of measure COMPANY EXAMPLE

Success in people decisions


Percent

Marginally
Favorable
acceptable
outcome
performance “In no other area of
corporate
management would
we accept such
deplorable results”

– CEO

Unmitigated
failure
* Footnote
Source: Source 4
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Globally competitive
workforce and
improved company
performance

Instill
talent nurturing
mindset

Create a Strengthen
great EVP recruiting

Develop Reward and


outstanding recognize
leaders performance

* Footnote
Source: Source 5
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Instill a talent nurturing mindset at all levels of


the organization

Create a great employee value proposition

Strengthen recruiting by making it a top team priority

Develop outstanding leaders by developing people


to their full potential

Evaluate performance and differentiate actions


accordingly

* Footnote
Source: Source 6
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

What is a ‘talent mindset’?


Unit of measure

1 Belief in the importance of


talent

2 Link between business strategy


and talent requirements

3 Accountability for talent by


senior managers

4 Leadership by the CEO

* Footnote
Source: Source 7
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Strong belief in importance of management talent is essential


Unit of measure

“If we don’t get the people thing right, we lose; it is the most important thing
in all our businesses.”
– Jack Welch, ex-CEO, General Electric

“Not having enough leaders to grow our business…is the biggest single
issue that we face.”
– Ralph Larsen, CEO, Johnson & Johnson

“People are the primary source of competitive advantage.


At the end of the day we bet on people, not strategies.”
– Larry Bossidy, ex-CEO, AlliedSignal

* Footnote
Source: Source 8
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Managers are not held accountable for talent


Unit of measure
Percent of corporate officers

99
6
Somewhat important

54
Very important

35
39 32
Somewhat agree
3
Critical
Strongly agree

Believe line managers Think their


should be held companies
accountable for the actually do this
quality of their people

* Footnote
Source: Source 9
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Four levers need to be addressed to change mindsets


Unit of measure

Role-modelling Communicating
Have the formal Has the who, what,
leaders and the why, when, and how
informal opinion “. . . I see my leaders “. . . I know what is been communicated
leaders embraced behaving differently” expected of me” throughout the
the change by organisation?
role-modelling?

“I will change
my behaviour if . . .”

Have training and Have the formal and


development informal policies and
programmes been “… I have the skills “. . . the system procedures (including
altered to reflect to behave in the reinforces the compensation and
the new desired new way” desired culture” appraisal) been
skill set? changed to reinforce
Developing talent Reinforcing with the new desired
and skills formal mechanisms behaviours?

* Footnote
Source: Source 10
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Instill a talent nurturing mindset at all levels of the


organization

Create a great employee value proposition

Strengthen recruiting by making it a top team priority

Develop outstanding leaders by developing people


to their full potential

Evaluate performance and differentiate actions


accordingly

* Footnote
Source: Source 11
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

What is an EVP?
Unit of measure

1. The experience employees have every day at work

2. The sum of the “gives and gets” that makes up the


relationship an employee has with a company

3. A special blend of challenge, connection, professional


growth, respect, satisfaction, opportunity, and reward

4. The company’s fingerprint that uniquely reflects the culture,


business model, leaders, management style, compensation
structure, and career paths

Delivery is crucial!
* Footnote
Source: Source 12
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

What is an EVP?
Unit of measure  Most critical

Great company
•• Culture and values
Company industry reputation
• Meritocracy
• Advancement
• Lifestyle

•• Work content


Great job • Development
Job security
opportunities
Why would a • Freedom and autonomy
talented person • Coaching, feedback and monitoring
want to work for
your company?

Great leaders
• Employees
management
opinion of senior

• Employees relationship with boss

Attractive
• Total compensation package
– Base pay
compensation – Short term incentives
– Long term wealth creation

* Footnote
Source: Source 13
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Why executives join, stay with, or leave a company


Unit of measure
% of top 200 executives rating statement ‘essential’ or ‘very important’

There is significant freedom


Total compensation is high
and autonomy to do my job

The position has exciting Company is very good at developing


challenges people

Company is well managed Company mission inspires me

Strong respect for lifestyle issues


I like the company’s values
and willingness to help me manage
and culture my work/family balance

Future career advancement and


Job security is high
growth opportunities are strong

Company has many highly The company tells people where


talented people they stand relative to their peers

Compensation is structured to
differentiate significantly between Reasonable pace and low stress level
high, average, and low performers

* Footnote
Source: Source 14
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Overview of company X’s current employee value proposition


Unit of measure COMPANY EXAMPLE
% of Level 3 and Level 4 respondents

McKinsey clusters: What matters in a job


Company 100
effectiveness ‘Strengths’
Meets/exceeds
Interest
expectations 80 of work
Ambitious goals

60 Well
managed
Culture/values
Senior Autonomy
management Company
commitment performance Trust in sr. mgt.
40 Annual
comp.
to growth
Reward/
Promotion of recognition Open
Career high commu-
advance performers nication
Mentoring -ment Wealth creation
20 Politics
Training Differential
compensation Processes/
red tape
‘Problem areas’
0
0 50 60 70 80 90 100

Importance
Absolutely essential or very important

* Footnote
Source: Source 15
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Instill a talent nurturing mindset at all levels of the


organization

Create a great employee value proposition

Strengthen recruiting by making it a top team


priority

Develop outstanding leaders by developing people


to their full potential

Evaluate performance and differentiate actions


accordingly

* Footnote
Source: Source 16
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Levers to consider when rebuilding the recruiting strategy


Unit of measure

From To

•Grow your own talent •Pump talent in at all levels

•Recruit for vacant positions •Hunt for talent all the time

•Go to a few traditional sources •Tap many diverse pools of talent

•Advertise to job hunters •Use creative channels to reach passive


candidates

•Specify a compensation range and stay •Pay what it takes to get the candidates
with it you want

•Recruiting is screening •Recruiting is also selling

* Footnote
Source: Source 17
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Use many creative channels to find people


Unit of measure

Personal networks

Executive search firms

Company Web site

Searching resumés on the Internet


Rich flow of
Advertising on job boards, other media
candidates

Long-term relationship databases

Direct mail campaigns

Experiential or educational events

* Footnote
Source: Source 18
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Be creative about talent sources


Unit of measure

Hewlett-Packard provides summer internships and part-time


Earlier jobs for hundreds of high school and college students

Amgen hires entrepreneurial “refugees” from the R&D


Later departments of big pharma companies

Different General Electric hired 650 military officers in the past 2 years

One company hired 50 of 300 graduating students from an


Global elite Indian high school and brought them to the U.S.

* Footnote
Source: Source 19
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Retention tactics
Unit of measure
% corporate officers who say company is “very effective”

Mid-quintile Top-quintile Gold standard


companies companies companies

Tell them they are


our best people

Create a sense of
belonging

Give them exciting


jobs

Pay them more than


average performers

* Footnote
Source: Source 20
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Instill a talent nurturing mindset at all levels of the


organization

Create a great employee value proposition

Strengthen recruiting by making it a top team priority

Develop outstanding leaders by developing


people to their full potential

Evaluate performance and differentiate actions


accordingly

* Footnote
Source: Source 21
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Jobs and feedback drive development


Unit of measure
Percentage of top 200 executives

80

70

Stretch/
60 developmental jobs
Company effectiveness
Excellent or very good

Way jobs
50 Special projects
Speed structured
of job moves
Formal training
40 Formal Role models
Traditional training performance 360-degree
Told strengths/
outside evaluation feedback
30 weaknesses
Being Informal
Traditional training inside Individual Job coaching/
20 learning mentored
Non-traditional rotation feedback
learning programs
Development Feedback/mentoring
10 Outside testing plans

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Importance to my development
* Footnote Absolutely essential or very important
Source: Source 22
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Promote your best people early, often


Unit of measure
% corporate officers who say this very much reflects their company

Mid-quintile Top-quintile Gold standard

We give high-potential
individuals more/better
development opportunities

We put high-potential
people in jobs “before
they are ready”

* Footnote
Source: Source 23
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Use staffing decisions to drive development


Unit of measure

Five most developmental jobs

1New position with larger scope


2Turning around a business
3Starting a new business
4Large, high-profile special projects
5Working outside your home country
Most of these jobs are
scarce, so give them
your best people!

* Footnote
Source: Source 24
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Making more/better feedback happen


Unit of measure

1. Value it
y ear – Kevin Sharer, CEO of Amgen
h i s
ed t
p e r f o r m
_ _ _ ____
u _
w e l l yo _ _ _ ____ _ _ ___
Ho w _ _ _ _ 2. Sharpen insights about people
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ____
____ _
_ _ _ ____ – GE: Session C notes
__
____ gths _
t s tr e n
_ _ _ _ ___
s
r g r eate _ _ _ ____ _ __ __ 3. Formal, written feedback once a year
Yo u _ _ _ _
____
__
_ _ _ __ __ _ _ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ – McKinsey & Company
1. ___ __ __
_ ____ _ _ _
2. _ _ _ __ __
___
3. ed s 4. Support in various ways
e n t n e
_ _ ____
e v elop
m
_ _ ___
_
_ __
• Train managers
ur d _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yo ___ __ __
_ • Assess managers on coaching
_ ____ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ ___
1 . _ _ _
___ _
_ • 360-degree feedback
_ ____ _ _ _ _
2.
_ _ _ ____ Arrow Electronics
_
3.

* Footnote
Source: Source 25
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Use of talent building levers in European companies (1/2)


Unit of measure
Percent

Systematic career planning Systematic job-rotation


Spain 31 Finland 36
27 31
Switzerland Switzerland
25 29
Netherlands Norway
24 24
Great Britain Spain
22 24
Average 21 Sweden 23
Ireland 18 Netherlands 21
17 20
Sweden Average
17 19
Norway Ireland
15 19
Denmark Great Britain
10 16
Germany 9 Denmark 10
Finland Germany

France France

* Footnote
Source: Source 26
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Use of talent building levers in European companies (2/2)


Unit of measure
Percent

Succession planning High-potential programs

Germany 58 Norway 64
48 54
Switzerland Sweden
44 44
Great Britain Spain
34 41
Norway 33
Switzerland 31
Average 29 Average 31

Ireland 27 France 30
26 25
Spain Germany
25 23
Finland Denmark
22 23
Sweden Great Britain
19 12
Netherlands 13 Netherlands 8
France Ireland
Denmark Finland

* Footnote
Source: Source 27
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Instill a talent nurturing mindset at all levels of the


organization

Create a great employee value proposition

Strengthen recruiting by making it a top team priority

Develop outstanding leaders by developing people to


their full potential

Evaluate performance and differentiate actions


accordingly

* Footnote
Source: Source 28
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Managers/executives perform develop differently – a performance evaluation and


management
Unit of measure system is needed for an organization to develop to it’s full potential

Evaluation
• An honest and ethical evaluation system needed
as the backbone of performance management
• Reasonable distribution along performance levels
is practical

Differentiated • Reward and provide development opportunities


actions for best performers
• Affirm and grow the solid performers (majority)
• Have a consequence management system for
non-performing executives/managers

* Footnote
Source: Source 29
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Having a consistent consequence management system for non-performance


is
Unitimportant
of measure
Complacency on underperformance is damaging

By having low
performers in critical
… fewer “A” players
executive/management
are attracted to join
positions without any
the company
consequence
management…
• Large variety of options
exist for consequence
… high performers management, from
leave the company “hard” to “soft”

• In every case, the


system needs to be
consistent and aligned
…development/advancement with the culture and
opportunities are blocked values of the
…subordinates are not organization
developed
…productivity and morale
of group is low

…performance in job is low


* Footnote
Source: Source 30
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Consequence management should reflect the culture and values of an


organization
Unit of measure – some examples for the US

Demotion or
Immediate dismissal Dismissal for repeatedly
sideways move
for missing targets missing targets
for missing targets

Frito Lay Johnson Barrick Gold GE Microsoft AIG Hewlett Emerson Nucor
• ‘Unaccep- & Johnson • ‘(CEO) will • ‘People • ‘3 strikes • ‘Continu- Packard Electric • ‘We rarely
table • ‘Non per- not settle who miss and ous low • ‘Under • ’Under terminate
performers formance for lower the numbers you’re performers performers performers anyone for under
given 90- frequently quality and but have the out’ dismissed’ moved to moved performance,
120 days to leads to this attitude values get a alternate sideways they figure it out
improve or dismissal’ carries second position’ but not from their pay
face through to chance. usually checks’
dismissal’ the people People with no dismissed’
he hires values and no
and fires’ numbers get
fired; those
Merck Gillette SAP
who make the
numbers but
• ‘Under • ‘Un- • ‘Those who
performers successful don’t fit or don’t
don’t have the
given executives meet targets
values are now
second usually are laterally
also fired’
chance given transferred. It’s
through second the only way to
retraining or chances encourage
transfer’ and are not innovation’
dismissed’
* Footnote
Source: Source 31
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Building a globally competitive workforce


Unit of measure

Globally competitive
workforce and
improved company
performance

Instill
talent nurturing
mindset

Create a Strengthen
great EVP recruiting

Develop Reward and


outstanding recognize
leaders performance

* Footnote
Source: Source 32
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

APPENDIX
Unit of measure

* Footnote
Source: Source 33
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Employee value proposition example (1/3)


Unit of measure COMPANY EXAMPLE
Distinctive Common practice
Company Flexible
Flexibletoto
suit Tools to do the job
suit
supports individuals’ individual
individual
needs

Personalized and Knowing what we know


Effective knowledge incentivized
sharing knowledge networks

Tailored career Transparent


“Inspired to learn, Active career Tailored career
development job opportunities
required to develop, development development
recognized for
contributing,
supported by our Personalised Individual feedback, pay Clear goals for all –
global network” performance for performance and bonus for meeting them
recognition choice of benefits

Connected, Visible leaders giving Business direction


effective timely updates shared
communication

High potentials identified Leaders who ‘walk the


Inspiring leaders early; actively managed talk’ and develop their
and developed through people
* Footnote their careers
Source: Source 34
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Employee value proposition example (2/3) – Tailored


career development
Unit of measure COMPANY EXAMPLE

Established a project matching system


• Projects posted in same manner as jobs with employees showcasing
their capabilities
• Project leaders select from bids
• Central co-ordination balances needs of employee, project, and
company
• Employees create their own CVs by bidding for projects aligned with
career aspirations
• As employees are placed on new projects, learning system informs
them of appropriate development activities
• Same system also be used for role changes
Developed and publicized expertise maps
• Maps detail potential career paths through company
• Employees follow company career paths, or create their own

On reaching the executive level, staff get a talent account to spend


on self development. What they spend it on is up to them

* Footnote
Source: Source 35
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Employee value proposition example (3/3) – Creating your own


lifestyle and work environment
Unit of measure COMPANY EXAMPLE

Introduced flexible working package


• Employees can propose own flexible working hours/location. After review with
supervisor can start flexible working on three-month review cycle
• Virtual offices provided to all working from home using a budget; interactive ordering
of tools via ‘Home Workers’ website
• Career breaks and sabbaticals actively encouraged (paid or unpaid) for: community
projects, personal development, family care, and so on

Established points-based menu of lifestyle options

Description Points

Concierge service Help with personal life 1 per hour of concierge time

Childcare Vouchers to spend on selection 4 per £200


assistance of external childcare facilities

Life planning Financial/legal planning 10 per hour

Vacation Purchase additional holiday 10 per week

Employee Online informational assistance –


assistance
*programme
Footnote
Source: Source 36
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Company example – Recruiting process for senior-, mid-level professionals


Unit of measure

• Contact execu-
tive search firm
REQUISITIO
N
• Query sourcing
database
• Post position on
RLR intranet and
internet sites
• Place newspaper
ads, etc.

1. Manager completes 2. Staffing specialist 3. Staffing specialist accesses a


staffing requisition and hiring manager plan variety of channels to identify
form and sends to strategy for obtaining qualified candidates
HR broad slate of candidates

CANDIDATES
1. Alex Smith
2. Juile Jones
3. Tom Hall
4. Sue Cook
5. Mary

4. Staffing specialist 5. Hiring manager 6. Hiring manager, 7. Hiring manager


delivers a ‘short and interview team use with input from staffing makes offer, closes the
list’ of candidates ‘Selecting for specialist, evaluates deal and begins to
to Hiring Manager Success’ to interview and selects best introduce the new emp-
* Footnote
candidates candidate loyee to the company
Source: Source 37
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Example performance/potential criteria for managers/executives


Unit of measure

Performance Potential

• Resolution • Personal skills


– Responsibility
• Attainment of objectives – Initiative
– Vision
• Scope and complexity of – Flexibility
the objectives attained – Energy
– Exemplary
• Efficiency in managing
resources • Interpersonal skills
– Leadership
• Mastery of technical skills – People development
and/or education – Team work

* Footnote
Source: Source 38
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference

Looking at the talent pool by Business Unit in a large company


Unit of measure
Percentage of individuals
…but across Divisions, there is a broad spread of talent quality

‘Outstanding’
100% = 9 8 10 4 6 7 2 13 10 3 7
11.1 16.7 14.2
22.2
28.6 33.3
40.0 38.5
50.0
33.3 62.5
High 42.9
4 2 1 50.0
20.0 100.0 33.3 55.6
Potential

38.5
Medium 25.0 71.4
7 5 3 55.6 40
42.9
37.5 33.3 33.3
25.0 23 22.2
Low
9 8 6‘Tracking’
Low Medium High

‘Issues’ A B C D E F G H I J K

Performance Business units

* Footnote
Source: Source 39

Anda mungkin juga menyukai