Document
Date
This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be
Estonian Leadership
circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client
organisation without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company.
Conference
This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral
presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
September 9, 2004
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Demand for
talented
managers
Viewpoint:
• Focus on
managerial/”Top200”
executive talent in large
* Footnote
Source: Source 2
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
23 16
77 84
Retains almost all high Develops people quickly Removes low performers
performers and effectively relatively quickly
3 33
10
90 97
* Footnote
Source:Source: McKinsey War for Talent top 200 executive survey - 5,679 respondents
Source 3
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Companies acknowledge that they often fail when making key people
decisions
Unit of measure COMPANY EXAMPLE
Marginally
Favorable
acceptable
outcome
performance “In no other area of
corporate
management would
we accept such
deplorable results”
– CEO
Unmitigated
failure
* Footnote
Source: Source 4
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Globally competitive
workforce and
improved company
performance
Instill
talent nurturing
mindset
Create a Strengthen
great EVP recruiting
* Footnote
Source: Source 5
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 6
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 7
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
“If we don’t get the people thing right, we lose; it is the most important thing
in all our businesses.”
– Jack Welch, ex-CEO, General Electric
“Not having enough leaders to grow our business…is the biggest single
issue that we face.”
– Ralph Larsen, CEO, Johnson & Johnson
* Footnote
Source: Source 8
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
99
6
Somewhat important
54
Very important
35
39 32
Somewhat agree
3
Critical
Strongly agree
* Footnote
Source: Source 9
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Role-modelling Communicating
Have the formal Has the who, what,
leaders and the why, when, and how
informal opinion “. . . I see my leaders “. . . I know what is been communicated
leaders embraced behaving differently” expected of me” throughout the
the change by organisation?
role-modelling?
“I will change
my behaviour if . . .”
* Footnote
Source: Source 10
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 11
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
What is an EVP?
Unit of measure
Delivery is crucial!
* Footnote
Source: Source 12
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
What is an EVP?
Unit of measure Most critical
Great company
•• Culture and values
Company industry reputation
• Meritocracy
• Advancement
• Lifestyle
Great leaders
• Employees
management
opinion of senior
Attractive
• Total compensation package
– Base pay
compensation – Short term incentives
– Long term wealth creation
* Footnote
Source: Source 13
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Compensation is structured to
differentiate significantly between Reasonable pace and low stress level
high, average, and low performers
* Footnote
Source: Source 14
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
60 Well
managed
Culture/values
Senior Autonomy
management Company
commitment performance Trust in sr. mgt.
40 Annual
comp.
to growth
Reward/
Promotion of recognition Open
Career high commu-
advance performers nication
Mentoring -ment Wealth creation
20 Politics
Training Differential
compensation Processes/
red tape
‘Problem areas’
0
0 50 60 70 80 90 100
Importance
Absolutely essential or very important
* Footnote
Source: Source 15
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 16
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
From To
•Recruit for vacant positions •Hunt for talent all the time
•Specify a compensation range and stay •Pay what it takes to get the candidates
with it you want
* Footnote
Source: Source 17
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Personal networks
* Footnote
Source: Source 18
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Different General Electric hired 650 military officers in the past 2 years
* Footnote
Source: Source 19
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Retention tactics
Unit of measure
% corporate officers who say company is “very effective”
Create a sense of
belonging
* Footnote
Source: Source 20
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 21
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
80
70
Stretch/
60 developmental jobs
Company effectiveness
Excellent or very good
Way jobs
50 Special projects
Speed structured
of job moves
Formal training
40 Formal Role models
Traditional training performance 360-degree
Told strengths/
outside evaluation feedback
30 weaknesses
Being Informal
Traditional training inside Individual Job coaching/
20 learning mentored
Non-traditional rotation feedback
learning programs
Development Feedback/mentoring
10 Outside testing plans
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Importance to my development
* Footnote Absolutely essential or very important
Source: Source 22
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
We give high-potential
individuals more/better
development opportunities
We put high-potential
people in jobs “before
they are ready”
* Footnote
Source: Source 23
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 24
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
1. Value it
y ear – Kevin Sharer, CEO of Amgen
h i s
ed t
p e r f o r m
_ _ _ ____
u _
w e l l yo _ _ _ ____ _ _ ___
Ho w _ _ _ _ 2. Sharpen insights about people
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ____
____ _
_ _ _ ____ – GE: Session C notes
__
____ gths _
t s tr e n
_ _ _ _ ___
s
r g r eate _ _ _ ____ _ __ __ 3. Formal, written feedback once a year
Yo u _ _ _ _
____
__
_ _ _ __ __ _ _ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ – McKinsey & Company
1. ___ __ __
_ ____ _ _ _
2. _ _ _ __ __
___
3. ed s 4. Support in various ways
e n t n e
_ _ ____
e v elop
m
_ _ ___
_
_ __
• Train managers
ur d _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Yo ___ __ __
_ • Assess managers on coaching
_ ____ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ ___
1 . _ _ _
___ _
_ • 360-degree feedback
_ ____ _ _ _ _
2.
_ _ _ ____ Arrow Electronics
_
3.
* Footnote
Source: Source 25
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
France France
* Footnote
Source: Source 26
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Germany 58 Norway 64
48 54
Switzerland Sweden
44 44
Great Britain Spain
34 41
Norway 33
Switzerland 31
Average 29 Average 31
Ireland 27 France 30
26 25
Spain Germany
25 23
Finland Denmark
22 23
Sweden Great Britain
19 12
Netherlands 13 Netherlands 8
France Ireland
Denmark Finland
* Footnote
Source: Source 27
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 28
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Evaluation
• An honest and ethical evaluation system needed
as the backbone of performance management
• Reasonable distribution along performance levels
is practical
* Footnote
Source: Source 29
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
By having low
performers in critical
… fewer “A” players
executive/management
are attracted to join
positions without any
the company
consequence
management…
• Large variety of options
exist for consequence
… high performers management, from
leave the company “hard” to “soft”
Demotion or
Immediate dismissal Dismissal for repeatedly
sideways move
for missing targets missing targets
for missing targets
Frito Lay Johnson Barrick Gold GE Microsoft AIG Hewlett Emerson Nucor
• ‘Unaccep- & Johnson • ‘(CEO) will • ‘People • ‘3 strikes • ‘Continu- Packard Electric • ‘We rarely
table • ‘Non per- not settle who miss and ous low • ‘Under • ’Under terminate
performers formance for lower the numbers you’re performers performers performers anyone for under
given 90- frequently quality and but have the out’ dismissed’ moved to moved performance,
120 days to leads to this attitude values get a alternate sideways they figure it out
improve or dismissal’ carries second position’ but not from their pay
face through to chance. usually checks’
dismissal’ the people People with no dismissed’
he hires values and no
and fires’ numbers get
fired; those
Merck Gillette SAP
who make the
numbers but
• ‘Under • ‘Un- • ‘Those who
performers successful don’t fit or don’t
don’t have the
given executives meet targets
values are now
second usually are laterally
also fired’
chance given transferred. It’s
through second the only way to
retraining or chances encourage
transfer’ and are not innovation’
dismissed’
* Footnote
Source: Source 31
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Globally competitive
workforce and
improved company
performance
Instill
talent nurturing
mindset
Create a Strengthen
great EVP recruiting
* Footnote
Source: Source 32
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
APPENDIX
Unit of measure
* Footnote
Source: Source 33
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
* Footnote
Source: Source 35
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
Description Points
Concierge service Help with personal life 1 per hour of concierge time
• Contact execu-
tive search firm
REQUISITIO
N
• Query sourcing
database
• Post position on
RLR intranet and
internet sites
• Place newspaper
ads, etc.
CANDIDATES
1. Alex Smith
2. Juile Jones
3. Tom Hall
4. Sue Cook
5. Mary
Performance Potential
* Footnote
Source: Source 38
HEL-ZYN093-20040909-War-for-Talent-Estonian-Leadership-Conference
‘Outstanding’
100% = 9 8 10 4 6 7 2 13 10 3 7
11.1 16.7 14.2
22.2
28.6 33.3
40.0 38.5
50.0
33.3 62.5
High 42.9
4 2 1 50.0
20.0 100.0 33.3 55.6
Potential
38.5
Medium 25.0 71.4
7 5 3 55.6 40
42.9
37.5 33.3 33.3
25.0 23 22.2
Low
9 8 6‘Tracking’
Low Medium High
‘Issues’ A B C D E F G H I J K
* Footnote
Source: Source 39