. 1
Installed Capacity(MW) of India
(as on 31/01/2019 by CEA)
Thermal 2,23,027 RE
21%
Nuclear 6,780
Hydro
Hydro 45,399 13% Thermal
64%
RE 74,082
Nuclear
Total 3,49,288 2%
Wind
Bio Mass 9,213 47%
Solar 25,212
Bio Mass
13%
Total 74,082
Copyright © 2016 Your Company All Rights Reserved. 3
Capacity Addition vis a vis Generation
• Generation CAGR of 5.7% could have been achieved with CAGR of 5.7% in installed
capacity i.e. with a capacity of 217159 MW as against 269588 MW.
• Thus 52419 MW capacity has been unutilized . Assuming average installation cost of 5 Cr
/MW , an investment of Rs 2,62,147 Cr is idling
Copyright © 2016 Your Company All Rights Reserved. 4
Accelerated RES Capacity Growth Rate
RES Capacity (GW) Target
175
72.0
30-Sep-18 31-Mar-22
89.4 86.3
84.8
78.6 76.8
71.9 70.6
56.2 60.0
54.3
8
Factors Affecting Energy choice for fresh capacity
addition
Energy Security
R anki ng St ud y
Ranking Study 107,000 MW The largest potential estimated is 38% in the
North Eastern Region followed by 36% in the
Northern Region.
Hydro Initiative 50,000 MW
18
Need for development of hydropower in India
19
Need for development of hydropower in India
20
Hydro power scenario in India
19.51
20.00
13.52
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
22
Hydro Potential in India
India is blessed with immense amount of hydro-electric potential and ranks 5th in terms of exploitable
hydro-potential on global scenario.
Indus
Basin/Rivers
23%
Probable Installed Capacity Brahmaputra
(MW) 44%
Indus 33,832
Ganga
Ganga 20,711 14%
24
Stalled Hydro Projects
other reasons Developer
7% withdrawn
Environment and 4%
Forest Clearance 23,424
issues
Env. and
other reasons 1,846 Forest
Clearance
Developer issues
1,190
withdrawn 89%
Total 26,460
Source: CEA
25
Barriers to hydropower development in India
Enabling Land
infrastructure acquisition
7% 8% Geology,
hydrology and
topography
21%
Critical
Contractual
electrical and
disputes
mechanical
19%
works
11%
Local issues, Delays in
law and order clearances
problems 14%
20% Source: PwC
26
Challenges / Roadblocks in Hydro Power
Road blocks
in Hydro
Power
Safeguards Issues
Financing & Risk Sharing
29
3. Safeguards issues
Safeguards acting as deterrent to the development of Projects
–R&R
–Climate, Biodiversity
–Environmental & Forest Clearances
–PIL
–NGT
30
4. Financing and Risk Sharing
Project financing and viability issues
High capital cost
Long Gestation period
Long Term Debt
High Risk premium
Risk-sharing profile of hydro projects
Geological, Topographical and Hydrological
Cost Plus: Higher tariff
Unsecure PPA: High Risk
31
Action Plan
Action
Plan
32
1. Governance Enablers
Declaring all hydropower irrespective of size as RE, New Policy
Creation of a Hydro Power Development Fund (HPDF): Interest Subsidy
Cost of enabling infrastructure to be shared by Govt
Power evacuation and associated infrastructure: Green Energy Corridor
Integrated river basin development and project allocation procedures
33
2. Market Development & Investment Facilitation
Differential tariff structures for peak and off-peak tariff
Ancillary services market to include spinning reserves, voltage regulation, black start,
etc.
Separate hydropower purchase obligations (HPOs)
Bundling of energy from variable renewable sources with hydropower
Streamlining of land acquisition and clearances processes : PPP Model
Land record data with DPR
NGT in the environmental and forest appraisal committees
Deferment of free power for the initial years
Amendment in tariff norms: Life 35 to 40-45 years
Financing policies for hydro projects for long term debt
Reduction in Risk premium by more equity part
34
3.Increased Development of Pumped Storage
‘Natural’ power battery: RE integration
Environmentally friendly: toxic and polluting Li-ion and lead acid batteries
Higher capital cost, but cheaper w.r.t entire project life cycle
Necessary Guidelines
Incentives for the development of pumped storage
Pumped storage hydroelectric schemes in China:
– 40 GW of pumped storage capacity by 2020
35
4. Safeguard Strengthening & Enhanced Benefit
sharing
Responsible and sustainable hydropower development
Optimal benefit sharing with all stakeholders
Nepal, provides a mechanism for locals to become active ‘co-investors’,
thereby enabling developers to obtain a ‘social license’
Society’s acceptance
36
Conclusion