DEVELOPMENT OF TEST TO MEASURE STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING

ON SUBLIMATION EXPERIMENT IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Citra Amalia, Agus Setiabudi, Ida Kaniawati, Tuszie Widhiyanti

Presented by :

Citra Amalia NIM 1707157

SCIENCE EDUCATION
SCHOOL OF POST GRADUATE
UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA
 BACKGROUND

Critical Thinking information

The score of critical thinking in Indonesia still low

The development of test to measure only in several

topic

Separation of mixture score still stands at low

BAB I BAB II BAB III BAB IV BAB V

 (21st century skill)

Critical Thinking is one of skill that enable students to solve problem and make
decision of something happen around in daily life. It is viewed as one of cognitive
domain aspect of the 21st Century skill.
Critical thinking will trigger student to ask and analyse deeper
(Elder, 2007; Scriven& Paul, 1987)
Separation of Mixture score)

21,89 (Fuad, Nur & Zubaidah, 2017)

Science Education

Experiment

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2013

 PURPOSE

The purpose of this research is to validate a

test to measure critical thinking as the
initial research to know how far students’
think critically in certain topic.

BAB I BAB II BAB III BAB IV BAB V

 BENEFITS

Teachers Students

another educational
researcher institution

BAB I BAB II BAB III BAB IV BAB V

Critical Thinking

• Thinking process to absorp more information from

enviorenment(Inch et al, 2006)
Paul and Elder (2008:1),

No Elements   Sub Elements

a. Clearly stated the objectives.
b. Distinguishing primary objective with other objectives.
c. Stated goals on target.
1. Purpose

d. Stating a significant and realistic goals.

a. Stating the problem question clearly and accurately.
2. Question at issue b. Asking the question in several ways to
explain the meaning and scope of the problem.
c. Stating sub questions.

d. Identifying the problem question

1) The question has only one correct answer.
2) The question can be answered by a variety of angles
Or point of view.
a. Identifying assumptions and determine whether the
3. Assumptions assumptions is true.
b. Considering that the proposed assumption can
form the viewpoint of the problem.
 a. Expressed support based on the data.
b. Looking for information that opposes and supports
argument.
c. Using the information that is clear, accurate and relevant
with the problem question.
5. Information

d. Gather information.
6. Concepts a. Identify key concepts and states clearly

b. Stating alternative concepts or definitions of concepts

alternative.
c. Using the concept of carefully and thoroughly.
Population and Sample

Test has been done to 15 random junior high school

students from private school to investigate the
reliability of the test.
 DEVELOPMENT OF TEST

Analyse of critical thinking and topic

Test making

Expert judgement and revision

Trail test and analyse with spss

BAB I BAB II BAB III BAB IV BAB V

RESULT
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
R TABEL 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514 0,514
R
HITUN 0,6594 0,3772 0,0756 0,5661 0,0756 0,5490 0,8151 0,5624 0,8656 0,2887 0,6772 0,26199
G 54 43 17 84 17 24 15 97 39 92 77 1

not (revisio not

valid revision valid valid n) valid valid valid valid revision valid valid

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

,728 12
 INSTRUMENT
Multiple choice test

The test consist of 10 question

that fulfill 5 out of 8 indicator of
Inch’s (2006) critical thinking:
purpose, question at issue,
assumptions, information and
concepts.

BAB I BAB II BAB III BAB IV BAB V

Topic : Sublimation

Sublimation separation technique

is part of mixture topic and work as
one of the topic that based on daily
life phenomenon.
CONCLUSION

• The result of the test were analysed by IBM SPSS

Statistic 24 software and show that the test is valid
and reliable.
• Seven valid question, three revision based on expert
judgement, and two rejected
• These result meant that the test is feasible to measure
students’ critical thinking in sublimation topic.
 SPS
PENDIDIKAN
IPA

THANK YOU
REFERENCE
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka
Cipta

Budiningsih, C Asri. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.

Campbell, N. A. et al. (2008) Biology. 8th Ed.London: Pearson.

Elder, L and Paul, R. (1996). Defining Critical Thinking. Retrieved on November 2nd, 2014
from http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/define critical thinking.cfm.

Fraenkel, J. R, et al. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York:
McGraw-Hill.

•Nieven, Nienke dan Tjeerd Plomp. 2007. An Introduction to Educational Design Research,
(Online), (https:// Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf&usg,
diakses 18 November 2015).

Inch, E. S., Warnich, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical thinking and communication : the use
of reason in argument. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. pp. 5-7