0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
31 tayangan9 halaman
This document discusses different perspectives on liberalism from several influential thinkers. It outlines that liberalism focuses on protecting individual freedom and sees this as the central goal of politics. Social liberalism also emphasizes some level of social justice and sees individual liberty as harmonious with the common good. The document then examines Hobbes, Locke, and Kant's contributions to liberal thought, noting things like Hobbes seeing equality in natural rather than moral terms, Locke introducing rights-based liberties, and Kant prioritizing individual rights over collective goods, limiting state power.
This document discusses different perspectives on liberalism from several influential thinkers. It outlines that liberalism focuses on protecting individual freedom and sees this as the central goal of politics. Social liberalism also emphasizes some level of social justice and sees individual liberty as harmonious with the common good. The document then examines Hobbes, Locke, and Kant's contributions to liberal thought, noting things like Hobbes seeing equality in natural rather than moral terms, Locke introducing rights-based liberties, and Kant prioritizing individual rights over collective goods, limiting state power.
This document discusses different perspectives on liberalism from several influential thinkers. It outlines that liberalism focuses on protecting individual freedom and sees this as the central goal of politics. Social liberalism also emphasizes some level of social justice and sees individual liberty as harmonious with the common good. The document then examines Hobbes, Locke, and Kant's contributions to liberal thought, noting things like Hobbes seeing equality in natural rather than moral terms, Locke introducing rights-based liberties, and Kant prioritizing individual rights over collective goods, limiting state power.
Liberalism Liberalism Isa political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberalism as Tolerance Liberal Society
Social liberalism believes individual liberty requires a
level of social justice. Social liberalism endorses a market economy and the expansion of civil and political rights and civil liberties, but differs in that it believes the legitimate role of the government includes addressing economic and social issues such as poverty, health care, and education. Under social liberalism, the common good is viewed as harmonious with the freedom of the individual. Hobbes and Liberalism It implicitly entails a rejection of natural authority – the authority of the sovereign derives from a contract and not from inheritance or divine right. People are equal in the state of nature because, with stealth, the weaker can kill the strongest. Admittedly this is a claim about individuals’ physical powers – and a questionable one at that – rather than a claim for moral equality. Later contract theorists fundamentally received the nature of the contract, but the method remains, so Hobbes's argument has proved remarkably productive of liberal thought. Hobbes vs Lock
Liberty is simply the Liberty takes the form of
absence of restraint. actionable rights. We are equal because no Equality in naturalistic person has a natural right rather than moral to subordinate another. terms. Laws have theological Laws of nature basis- we have a natural duty to preserve ourselves, a duty owed to God , who created us. Locke and Liberalism The idea that there are what Robert Nozick calls ‘side constraint’’, which limit what the state, or society in general, can do to human beings. Natural (or moral) rights provide a standpoint from which we can judge the state. Unlike Hobbes, obligation to obey the state is not for Locke can ‘all or nothing’ matter. Although we give up a certain degree of moral judgment when we contract into the state, we do not ‘hand over’ all our autonomy. There is much more discussion of the institution of liberal democracy in Locke than in Hobbes. Immanuel Kant Kant outlines a method of determining how we should behave. He offers a number of formulations, the differences intended to capture different aspects of moral relationships. Simplifying a great deal, what autonomous standpoint, unaffected by emotional, and other, attachments. Kant and Liberalism
Entailing the right over the good.
A Political consequence of the priority of the right over the good is that the state’s functions are limited. If the state is only justified insofar as it protects individual rights it cannot have purposes of its own which are independent of that function.