Failure
Destruction Confusion
RCTQ
This is a Cargo
Plane in 1956.
We
sometimes It is transferring a
forget how 5MB IBM Hard
much things Drive.
change
over time
In 2015:
A coin-sized flash
drive has a 128GB
of space
(~16 HD movies).
Source: http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/10-mb-hard-drive-
from-the-60s-pic-tech-brahs-gtfih.3500915/
RCTQ
PPST
Teacher Quality Classroom Professional
COT of K to 12
Requirement Practice Development
The new
Classroom Observation Tool (COT)
is based on the
Philippine Professional Standards for
Teachers (PPST)
What is the Philippine Professional
Standards for Teachers (PPST)?
• Is a public statement of
professional accountability
• It has four career stages:
Beginning, Proficient,
Highly Proficient, and
Distinguished.
• It has seven Domains, 37
Strands, and 37 Indicators
for each career stage.
Classroom Observable Strands of the Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers
21 out of 37 strands are classroom observable
Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 Domain 5 Domain 6 Domain 7
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1
1.2 2.2 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 7.2
1.3 2.3 3.3 4.3 5.3 6.3 7.3
1.4 2.4 3.4 4.4 5.4 6.4 7.4
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 7.5
1.6 2.6
1.7
12 priority strands were chosen for RPMS Year 1
out of the 37 strands of the PPST
9 out of 12 strands are classroom observable
Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 Domain 5 Domain 6 Domain 7
1.1
1.1 2.1 3.1
3.1 4.1
4.1 5.1
5.1 6.1 7.1
1.2 2.2 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 7.2
1.3 2.3
2.3 3.3 4.3 5.3 6.3 7.3
1.4
1.4 2.4 3.4 4.4 5.4 6.4 7.4
1.5
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
4.5 5.5 7.5
1.6 2.6
2.6
1.7
Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Domain 1
Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 Domain 5 Domain 6 Domain 7
1.1 Apply knowledge of content within and across
1.1
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1
curriculum teaching areas
1.2 2.2 3.2 4.2 5.2 6.2 7.2
1.3 1.4
2.3 Use a range
3.3 of teaching
4.3 strategies
5.3 that enhance
6.3 7.3
1.4
1.4 learner
2.4 achievement
3.4 4.4in literacy
5.4 and numeracy
6.4 skills
7.4
1.5
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 7.5
1.6
1.5
2.6
Apply a range of teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-
1.7
order thinking skills
Learning Environment
Domain
Domain 1 22
Domain Domain 3 Domain 4 Domain 5 Domain 6 Domain 7
1.1 2.1
2.33.1Manage4.1classroom
5.1
structure
6.1
to engage
7.1
1.2 2.2
learners,
3.2
individually
4.2
or
5.2
in groups,
6.2
in meaningful
7.2
exploration, discovery and hands-on activities
1.3 2.3
2.3 3.3 4.3 5.3 6.3 7.3
within a range of physical learning environments
1.4 2.4 3.4 4.4 5.4 6.4 7.4
1.5 2.5 2.6
3.5Manage4.5learner 5.5
behavior constructively
7.5
1.6 2.6
2.6 by applying positive and non-violent discipline
1.7 to ensure learning-focused environments
Diversity of Learners
1.7
Curriculum and Planning
Highly Proficient
Discriminating
Distinguished
Synthesizing
How is COT-RPMS used in the RPMS cycle?
I PERFORMANCE
PLANNING AND
COMMITMENT
Activity:
Discussion/Issuance of
RPMS Tools
III PERFORMANCE
REVIEW AND EVALUATION
Activity: Year-End Review &
Assessment, Evaluation of
Portfolio & Computation of
Final Rating
I PERFORMANCE
PLANNING AND
COMMITMENT
Activity:
Discussion/Issuance of
RPMS Tools
IV PERFORMANCE
Teacher II PERFORMANCE
REWARDING AND DEVELOPMENT
MONITORING AND COACHING
PLANNING Quality Activity: Mid-Year Review and
Activity: Ways Forward
Assessment
Development Planning
III PERFORMANCE
REVIEW AND EVALUATION
Activity: Year-End Review &
Assessment, Evaluation of
Portfolio & Computation of
Final Rating
COT-RPMS
negotiable means of 2. Discuss within the group your reason/s for such rating. In case of different ratings, the observers must
resolve the difference and come up with an agreed rating. The final rating is not an average; it is a final rating
based on reasoned and consensual judgment.
verification (MOV) of
3. Attach all individual Rating Sheets to the Inter-Observer Agreement Form.
Observer Observer Observer FINAL
THE TEACHER: 1 2 3 RATING
2.
Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum
teaching areas
Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner
4 4 7 7
WEIGHT PER
OBJECTIVE IN
THE RPMS
PORTFOLIO
ASSESSMENT
Thank You!
REFERENCES:
Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and
supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA. Stanford Center for Opportunity
Policy in Education.
Ho, A.D. & Kane, T.J. (2013). The reliability of classroom observations by school
personnel. Harvard Graduate School of Education: Harvard, CA.
Kane, T.J. & Staiger, D.O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high
quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains.
Philippine professional standards for teachers. (2017). Department of Education.