Kebijakan Pendidikan Tinggi dan Kurikulum

Outcome Base
Prof. Dr.-ing. Misri Gozan, IPM,
Chair of IABEE Executive Committee

The Institution of Engineers Indonesia /

Indonesian Accreditation Board for Engineering Education (PII / IABEE)
LOKAKARYA MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: KURIKULUM OUTCOME BASE &
AKREDITASI 4.O, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, 5 Oktober, 2019
Perkenalkan……

1981 SDN Pucang 1, Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur

1984 SMPN 40, Jakarta Pusat
1987 SMAN 4, Jakarta Pusat
1993 Dosen di FT UI
1996-1998 S2 di Massey University, Selandia Baru
2000-2004 S3 di TU Dresden, Jerman
2009-2010 Postdoct. di King Saud Univ, Ryadh, SA
2013 Guru Besar di Teknik Kimia
Perkenalkan …….. Dosen

 Publikasi ilmiah :
 > 35 jurnal internasional terindeks,
 > 83 prosiding internasional terindeks, dll

 6 buku Teknik +1 buku Teknik Populer + 1 on the way:

 Utilitas Air Industri Kimia (terbitan sendiri), 1994
 Biobarrier (Cuvilier Verlag, Jerman), 2004
 Absorpsi, Ekstraksi, Leaching pada Industri Kimia (UI Press), 2006
 (Erlangga): Teknologi Bioethanol Generasi kedua (2014); Pengantar Teknologi Bioproses (2016);
Simulasi Proses Hayati (2018)
 Hikayat si Induk Bumbu (Kompas Gramedia), 2018
 Produk Kimia dari TKKS (Permata GIP), 2020, insya Allah

 Founder-Chair, BIOREFINERY Lab. UI 2014 - ….

Perkenalkan … Teknopreneurship

 10 paten terdaftar,

 3 diberikan (granted)

 3 lisensi (dibeli/dipinjam perusahaan)

 1 produk komersial (Frizan)

 1 pabrik (biopestisida PT Zeus Kimiatama )

Perkenalkan …… bagian dari masyarakat

 2018 - … Ketua IABEE (Indonesian Accreditation Board for Eng. Education)

 2017- … Majelis Penilai Profesi Insinyur, Badan Kejuruan Kimia (BKK) PII
 2015 - 2020 Direktur Research Centre for Biomedical Engineering UI
 2014 - … Pengasuh Pondok Pesantren Tahfidz Al Husna, Jonggol
 2014-2022 Wakil Presiden, AFOB (Asian Federation of Biotechnology)
 2012 - … Anggota, Ikatan Ahli Bioenergi Indonesia (IKABI)
 2012 - 2015 Ketua Konsorsium Bioteknologi Indonesia (KBI)
 2011 - 2015 Tim Pakar Garam Nasional, Kementerian Kelautan & Perikanan
Kebijakan Pendidikan Tinggi

Tentang Akreditasi
 “Measurement is the first step that
leads to control and eventually to
improvement. If you can’t measure
H. James something, you can’t understand it.
Harrington
(politikus Inggris If you can’t understand it, you can’t
abad 17) control it. If you can’t control it, you
can’t improve it.”

Jika kita tak bisa mengukur, maka kita tak bisa mengendalikan dan
memperbaikinya
(5) Akreditasi Program Studi sebagai bentuk akuntabilitas
publik dilakukan oleh lembaga akreditasi mandiri.

(6) Lembaga akreditasi mandiri sebagaimana dimaksud pada

ayat (5) merupakan lembaga mandiri bentukan Pemerintah
atau lembaga mandiri bentukan Masyarakat yang diakui oleh
Pemerintah atas rekomendasi Badan Akreditasi Nasional
Perguruan Tinggi.

UU Republik Indonesia No. 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi, Pasal 55

8
Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi wajib:
a. …..
e. dijadikan dasar pengembangan dan penyelenggaraan
sistem penjaminan mutu internal; dan
f. dijadikan dasar penetapan kriteria sistem penjaminan
mutu eksternal melalui akreditasi.
Ministry of RISTEKDIKTI regulation number 44/2015, Ch. 2

9
 AKREDITASI
DEFINISI
Kegiatan penilaian untuk menentukan kelayakan program studi dan perguruan tinggi

TUJUAN a. Menentukan kelayakan Prodi dan PT berdasarkan interaksi antar standar dlm SN Dikti
b. Menjamin mutu Prodi dan PT baik akademik maupun non akademik

PRINSIP
Independen, Akurat, Obyektif, Transparan, danAkuntabel

DASAR
StandarNasionalPendidikanTinggi
SUMBER
DATA/INFORMASI Pangkalan Data PendidikanTinggi

LUARAN
Status dan Peringkat Akreditasi
 Desain Baru
Sistem Akreditasi di Indonesia
IABEE is recognized by • Voluntary
KEMENRISTEKDIKTI under PII
Engineering IABEE • Outcome Based
• Accords: WA, SA, etc.
August 26th, 2019

Programs LAM-PS • Compulsary

• Input based /
BAN-PT • 2015 was launched by PII Under construction • Outcome base

National Accreditation Agency

Compulsary Accreditation
Compulsary Accreditation of Institution
of Programs & Institution

1994 - Now Future

11
 Sejarah Akreditasi
1994 National Accreditation Council (BAN-PT)
1995 Desk evaluation accreditation
1996 Accreditation of S1 (bachelor) Program
1998 Site visit as part of accreditation
1999 Accreditation of S2 (master) Program
2001 Accreditation of S3 (bachelor) & vocational Programs
2003 Compulsory, Institutional accreditation
2012 Law no 12/2012 on Higher Education
2014 LAM PT KES
2015 Establishment of IABEE
2019 Menristekdikti luncurkan: IABEE, LAM Sama, LAM EMBA, LAM Kependidikan

12
Kurikulum Outcome Base
Input Process Output Outcome

Input, Output,
Outcome
Perubahan Paradigma
 OUCOME VS OUTPUT

Level Output Outcome Impact

Dosen Telah melakukan mahasiswa mencapai kemampuan nilai, Mahasiswa mampu menggunakan
perkuliahan pengetahuian, skill (capaian kemampuan nilai, pegetahuan
pembelajaran) dari MK danskill untuk menyelesaikan
permasalahan nyata.

Prodi Jumlah lulusan lulusan dengan Lulusan berkontribusi dalam

kemampuan/pemenuhan nilai,
pengetahuan dan skill yang
relevan dengan pengguna dan
mampu menunjukan
kemampuannya sesuai harapan
Universit Jumlah lulusan tingkat keterserapan lulusan didunia
as sarjana dan kerja dan mutu lulusan yang tinggi
pascasarjana
peningkatan organisasi atau
masyarakat.
Lulusan memberikan kontribusi
terhadap masyarakat dan negara
yang lebih baik.
 OBE
OBE

Di awali dengan gambaran yang jelas tentang kemampuan

penting yang harus dupenuhi oleh mahasiswa saat lulus
(capaian pembelajaran)

Lalu mengorganisasi kurikulum, sistem

pembelajaran dan asesmen, untuk memastikan
bahwa proses pembelajaran terjadi dan capaian
pembelajaran terpenuhi.
 CAPAIAN PEMBELAJARAN

 Perlu disepakati tingkat ‘kemampuan’ lulusan (Capaian Pembelajaran)

untuk suatu jenjang/jalur/bidang pendidikan tertentu dan proses
pendidikan dilakukan untuk mencapai tingkat kemampuan tersebut.
 Program studi memiliki kebebasan cara melakukannya, sepanjang capaian
pembelajaran dijamin terpenuhi
 Penjaminan mutu: semua lulusan memenuhi capaian pembelajaran yang
ditetapkan
 OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION

OBS
(The Outcomes)
OBC
What students (Curriculum) OBLT
OBA
should be able to
How to create a (Learning & Teaching)
do
plan for outcomes
How to make (Assessment for actions)
realization
students achieve the
Learning Outcomes outcome How to measure what
students have
achieved & what
actions to improve
18
 CIRI UTAMA OBE

1. Fokus pada Student Outcome (Capaian Pembelajaran)

2. Desain Kurikulum “Backward”
3. Memfasilitasi Proses pembelajaran
4. Penyelarasan konstruktif (CPL-Metoda pembelajaran –
asesmen)
5. Siklus P-D-C-A yang sistematik

19
 SIKLUS OBE
Penetapan PPM
& CPL yang
terukur

desain
Tindak lanjut untuk kurikulum
peningkatan mutu sesuai CPL

Kesesuaian
terstruktur: peta
Benchmarking kurikulum

Asesmen MK Implementasi
(CPMK) dan pembelajaran
Program (CPL) (T&L)
 DESAIN KURIKULUM OBE

 Kurikulum merupakan suatu panduan bagi proses pembelajaran

yang dipersiapkan berdasarkan CPL yang ingin dipenuhi
 Kurikulum harus komprehensif, dinamis dan cukup fleksibel
sehingga mampu mengantarkan mahasiswa untuk mencapai
kemampuan yang ditargetkan
 Dosen berperan penting terhadap keberhasilan proses
pembelajaran melalui implementasi kurikulum
 IDENTIFIKASI KOMPETENSI AWAL

 Kompetensi awal mahasiswa perlu diketahui agar proses

pembelajaran dapat berhasil melalui pretest atau preassessment
yang obyektif,
 Pretest akan bermanfaat bagi mahasiswa sehingga mereka akan
mendapatkan proses pembelajaran yang optimum
 Identifikasi awal, sebagai proses seleksi mahasiswa, menjadi modal
menuju proses pembelajaran yang berhasil
 SELEKSI MAHASISWA

 Keragaman mutu mahasiswa yang terlalu besar akan menyulitkan

identifikasi awal dan pencapaian akhir kompetensi
 Perlu melakukan proses seleksi yang ketat dan akurat dalam
merekrut mahasiswa baru sehingga mereka memiliki kompetensi
yang memadai dan berpotensi untuk berhasil
 Proses seleksi yang ketat dan akurat akan menjamin mutu
mahasiswa dan itu merupakan awal keberhasilan proses
pembelajaran
 ALTERNATIF PROSES PEMBELAJARAN

 Ada berbagai alternatif mode pembelajaran, misalnya PBL (problem-

based learning), CBL (case-based learning), LBE (laboratory-based
education), RBE (research-based education), hybrid learning, etc.
 Penerapan student-centered learning (SCL) perlu ditekankan,
tidak lagi teacher-centered learning, yang mana dosen berperan
sebagai fasilitator untuk memberdayakan mahasiswa.
 Mode-mode pembelajaran di atas mendukung SCL yang akan
menentukan keberhasilan OBE.
 OBE & STUDENT CENTERED LEARNING

Pendidikan berbasis luaran (OBE) adalah bukan tentang apa yang

diajarkan dosen, tetapi tentang apa yang dicapai para mahasiswa.
 PEMILIHAN PROSES PEMBELAJARAN

 Tergantung pada filosofi bidang studinya

 Tidak dapat dipaksakan secara seragam untuk semua program
dalam universitas
 Pilihan ada pada dosen atau program studi tergantung pada kondisi
realnya (mahasiswa, laboratorium, dosen, prasarana, dsb.)
 Ada kebebasan untuk memilih proses pembelajaran yang dinilai
efektif untuk mencapai tingkat kemampuan atau kompetensi yang
disepakati.
 OBE & AKREDITASI INTERNASIONAL

Ada beberapa kategori, tergantung bidang studinya

• Keteknikan : Washington Accord
• Arsitektur : Canberra Accord
• ICT : Seoul Accord
• Medical education: WFME
• Business : AACSB

Catatan:
Bologna declaration (ECTS = European credit transfer system) bukan OBE
 PENGAKUAN INTERNASIONAL

 OBE menyediakan sebuah mekanisme untuk pengakuan

internasional yang obyektif
 Dalam kompetisi global, pengakuan timbal balik akan memainkan
peran penting dalam meningkatkan daya saing
 Paradigma Lama: input-based education, Paradigma Baru: outcome based
education;
 Dengan paradigma lama sulit memberikan pengakuan kesetaraan
kepada sistem pendidikan yang lain
 Dalam kompetisi global, mobilitas lulusan ditentukan oleh pemenuhan
standar internasional
 PROSES AKREDITASI

 Mutu pendidikan dievaluasi melalui proses akreditasi, karenanya

akreditasi haruslah bersifat optional untuk menjamin akuntabilitas
publik
 Universitas haruslah akuntabel kepada masyarakat karena
dananya berasal dari masyarakat baik langsung maupun tidak
 Akuntabilitas ditunjukkan dalam bentuk mutu lulusan dan mutu
ilmu pengetahuan untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat
 Masyarakat harus tahu kinerja universitas, karenanya hasil akreditasi
haruslah memberikan informasi obyektif kepada masyarakat.
 PRINSIP AKREDITASI

 Akreditasi berubah dari basis input ke basis outcome

 Akreditasi tidak diartikan sebagai pemeringkatan universitas
 Akreditasi tidak digunakan untuk memperbandingkan antar
lembaga
 Akreditasi harus menjadi bagian dari proses perbaikan
berkelanjutan
 AKUNTABILITAS
 Universitas dan lulusan harus bertanggung jawab kepada masyarakat
 OBE akan menghilangkan kesalahpahaman antara universitas dan
masyarakat
 OBE menjamin mahasiswa akan memperoleh hak-hak pendidikan yang
tepat dan sesuai
 OBE menyediakan indikator-indikator keberhasilan yang diperlukan bagi
universitas untuk menyusun rencana strategis
 OBE mengarahkan dosen agar mengajar sesuai kurikulum.
 CATATAN UNTUK OBE

 OBE berlaku untuk semua jenjang dan bidang/jalur

 OBE tetap memperhatikan input dan menghasilkan output, meski
fokusnya pada outcome
 OBE akan memerlukan investasi jangka panjang
Pendidikan 4.0
Negara Republik Indonesia

Jakarta

34 267M +300
Provpinsi Populasi Suku

PDB thn GDP/capita Luas Total Daratan Laut ZEE

1015.4B
USD USD 3,876 5M km2 35 % 65 % 7.8M km2 39
Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
Duration TERTIARY EDUCATION INQF
APN Pendidikan
Jalur Akademik Jalur Vokasi
Rp 430.845B 3-4
yrs Doktor (S3) Sub-Specialist Lv. 9

PT 2 yrs Master (S2) Specialist Lv. 8

3267[3,73%] Profession Lv. 7

4 yrs Sarjana (S1) D4 Lv. 6

PS Teknik D3 Lv. 5
D2
5017 D1
Lv. 4
Lv. 3
Prodi S1 Teknik
SECONDARY EDUCATION
2882 3 yrs SMU SMK Lv. 2
Mhsw S1 Teknik 3 yrs SMP
Lv. 1
1.023.251 6 yrs DIKDAS
40
 International Educational Accords
“How do we build mutual understanding among nations about the quality of engineers who enter the
globally connected workplace?” George Peterson, WA Secretariat 2001-2007

International Engineering Alliance (IEA)

http://www.ieagreements.org/
IEA adalah organisasi payung untuk 7 perjanjian internasional yang menetapkan dan
menerapkan di antara anggotanya standar internasional untuk pendidikan teknik dan apa yang
disebut kompetensi "level awal" untuk menjalankan keteknikan.

Kesepakatan Pendidikan Pengakuan Komptensi/Perjanjian Mobilitas

International International Agreement for

Washington Professional Engineering International APEC
Sidney Accord Dublin Accord Engineers Technologists Engineering
Accord Engineers
Agreement Agreement Technicians

Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional

Engineers Technologists Technicians Engineers Technologists Technicians Engineers
(APEC Region)
41
 Kesetaraan substansial & Kesepakatan Washington

 Dasar perjanjian Washington

Accord: sistem akreditasi yang ABET IABEE
secara substansial setara yang P1

mengarah pada pengakuan P5

P1
P3

program setara yang substansial P2

P4
P2
dalam memenuhi persyaratan P3

akademik untuk praktik rekayasa

di tingkat profesional WA
JABEE
 Lulusan program terakreditasi di P1 P4 ABC
negara penandatangan mana pun
diakui oleh negara P2
P3
P1
P2

penandatangan lainnya telah XYZ

memenuhi persyaratan akademik P2
untuk masuk ke praktik rekayasa Signatory’s
jurisdiction
P1
PX

A Program accredited outside member’s jurisdiction is not recognized by the WA 42

 Washington Accord Membership

ECUK
Engr. Canada
EngIRE
ABET

EA
Founding Members:
 ABET (USA)
 Engineers Canada
 ECUK (UK) IPENZ
 EA (Australia), Founded in 1989 by 6 founding members, currently has 20
 EngIRE (Ireland) signatory members and 8 provisional signatory members
 IPENZ (New Zealand)
43
 Launching as Recognition by
Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education
Denpasar, June 26th, 2019

44
 Pendirian IABEE
PII 2016 Ministry of Research,
Institution of Engineers
independent Technology & Higher
Indonesia (PII) MoU
bodies Education
Registration and licensing for practicing
engineers (Engineering Law No. 11/2014) IABEE National
established Accreditation
within PII, Agency for HE
19 Engineering Discipline Criteria, aimed to be
Chapters Program evaluators WA signatory International
voluntary, int’l-level member recognition Quality assurance
Agriculture, accreditation policy
Aeronautics, through mandatory
Chemical, Civil, accreditation
Electrical, The only
Materials, programs
Mechanical, … eligible for IABEE HE Institutions
accreditation Institutions
Societies, Internal Quality
A B C
Assurance System
Expert Assoc., Programs
Industry Associations Bachelor Eng. Programs
233 854 1795 Programs
A programs B programs C programs
45
Tentang IABEE
 IABEE adalah badan akreditasi untuk program-program studi pendidikan tinggi teknik dan
komputasi di Indonesia
 Akreditasi IABEE adalah akreditasi tingkat internasional dan bersifat sukarela, tidak seperti
akreditasi wajib oleh BAN-PT / LAM-PS
 Akreditasi IABEE adalah sarana untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan tinggi dan akuntabilitas
kepada masyarakat dengan menerapkan Pendidikan Berbasis Capaian (OBE)
 Kriteria Akreditasi yang dikembangkan oleh IABEE mengikuti pengaturan persyaratan kesetaraan
substansial oleh Washington Accord (untuk program teknik) dan Seoul Accord (untuk program
komputasi)
 Kesepakatan adalah perjanjian multilateral antara lembaga yang bertanggung jawab atas akreditasi
program pendidikan tinggi yang bekerja sama untuk membantu mobilitas praktisi teknik / komputasi
Tentang IABEE
 Kesepakatan mensyaratkan bahwa
badan akreditasi independen dari
pemerintah (LSM), oleh karena itu IABEE
didirikan sebagai organisasi otonom
dalam Persatuan Insinyur Indonesia (PII)
 IABEE diprakarsai oleh DGHE dari
Kemendikbud pada tahun 2013, dan
dikembangkan dengan dukungan dari
JICA
 IABEE diumumkan secara mandiri pada
18 November 2015, dan diresmikan pada
13 Maret 2018 oleh Dirjen Kelembagaan.
 IABEE diluncurkan oleh Menristekdikti di
Bali, 26 Agustus 2019
 IABEE Bagan Organisasi
establishes and approves the
Criteria Accreditation Criteria which form the
Board of PII Committee
basis for the program evaluation.
In charge of conducting periodic reviews and
revisions of the Accreditation Criteria
Auditors

Evaluation &
develops RPEA & RPARC,
Accreditation evaluation instruments, Online
Appeal Board Executive Committee Committee Evaluation System

It also plans, conducts and monitors the program

Accreditation Secretariat accreditation processes, and recommends
Council accreditation status to the Accreditation Council.

Accreditation validates the results of

Council accreditation and ensures that
Evaluation & Finance Public International the right process has been carried out
Criteria Committee
Accreditation Affairs Committee
Committee
Committee Committee Appeal Board appointed to hear appeals; judges
whether an evaluation/accreditation decision was
Sub-Committee for Sub-Committee for right or wrong, when the party affected by it thinks
Washington Accord Seoul Accord that it was wrong

48
 Program Evaluators
 Currently 86 PEVs in total, 85% academic & 15% industry
 40 more PEVs to be recruited and trained in 2019
 Overseas training & observation: 44 PEVs trained by JABEE,
16 PEVs by ABET, 3 observed CAST, and 3 visited EA
 Since 2017, 3 domestic PEV training programs have been
conducted
 Mechanism of PEV Training is available in RPARC

Registra- Performance 2-day

evaluation Face-to- Performance PEV
tion &
Eligibility Face evaluation Assignment
Check Training
Online
Inviting Modular Assignment
Performance
IABEE PEV candidates Training evaluation as Observer
Training
https://training.iabee.or.id/
49
Our journey so far…

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2018-19 2020-beyond

Establishment Development #1 Development #2 Start accreditation Accredit & recognize Further recognition
Steering Evaluation & Online Evaluation O’seas and IABEE IABEE Inauguration Run Accreditation
Committee Accreditation System Evaluator Training IABEE Evaluator Tr. cycles
Criteria Committee Discipline Criteria Pilot Accreditation Submit proposal
General Ac. (28P)
Committee Dev’t of RPEA O’seas Evaluator Evaluation for WA signatory
Provisional Ac. (18P)
Dev’t of O’seas Evaluator Training General Accr. (5P) status
Common Training WA Provisional Receive WA
Establishment Provisional
Criteria for status verification team
Awareness within PII Accreditation (6P)
engineering Seminars Awareness Sem. (2020)
programs Awareness Sem. Awareness Sem.
50
"Having accepted as provisional signatory member, IABEE operations in Indonesia as its jurisdiction started to get
international recognition. Although the substantial equivalence recognition for programs and graduates of programs accredited
by IABEE could only be granted by the Washington Accord in June 2020 the soonest (given IABEE signatory status is granted in June
2021), some WA member countries have recognized the value of IABEE accreditation to Indonesian
engineering programs. Right after the provisional status was granted, IABEE tied a common understanding with JABEE and ABET.
JABEE and ABET understand that it is the right of an institution to seek accreditation for its programs from any accreditation board.
However, both agencies also understand the value of IABEE accreditation, which is the best for Indonesian engineering programs.
Therefore, both are in agreement that any new application from Indonesian engineering programs seeking
for accreditation to JABEE and ABET would be directed to IABEE".

Washington Accord Provisional Status, June 2019

 Accredited Programs
IPB University Mechanical and Biosystem Eng. 2016
Chemical Engineering 2018
Civil Engineering 2018
Environmental Engineering 2018 Islamic
Diponegoro Civil Engineering 2016
University
Universiy Industrial Engineering 2018 of Indonesia Environmental Engineering 2017
Mechanical Engineering 2018
Bioprocess Engineering 2017
Chemical Engineering 2018 University of
Indonesia Chemical Engineering 2017
Engineering Physics 2018 Mechanical Engineering 2018
Sepuluh Environmental Engineering 2018
Nopember Material and Metallurgical Eng. 2018
Institute of Mechanical Engineering 2018 Industrial Engineering 2018
Technology Naval Architecture 2018 Civil Engineering 2018

Tarumanagara
University Mechanical Engineering 2018
Private Institution
Chemical Engineering 2018
Public Institution Civil Engineering 2018
Engineering Physics 2018
Gadjah Mada
University Geological Engineering 2018
Institut
Bioengineering 2018 Geodetic Engineering 2018
Teknologi
Bandung 2019: Mechanical Engineering 2018
Nuclear Engineering 2018
Sebelas
Industrial Engineering 2018 12 GA & 28 PA
Maret Information Technology 2018
University Electrical Engineering 2018
Industrial Engineering 2018
Published in https://evaluation.iabee.or.id/#/accreditation/summary/search 52
Accreditation 2019

2019:
12 GA & 28 PA
 Kriteria Akreditasi: Kriteria Umum
1. Autonomous Professional Profile as PEO

C 1 2. APP Publicity & Review System

3. Program Learning Outcomes

3 1. Curriculum & Syllabus

4
2. Faculty: quality, quantity, role in student learning
2 3. Students & Academic Atmosphere
4. Facility: adequacy, proper & safe operations
D COMMON
Criteria A 5. Institutional Responsibility

2 3
1. Effective Assessment of Learning Outcomes
1 2. Assurance of LO Attainment by Graduates

P 4 1. Continual Improvement based on LO Assessment

2. Maintenance & Access of Documents & Records

Common Criteria & Criteria Guide are available for download from https://iabee.or.id/en/accrediation/accreditation-
criteria/common-criteria/ and https://iabee.or.id/en/accrediation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-guide/
54
The Accreditation Criteria: Discipline Criteria
Specific Learning Outcomes, Faculty,
DISCIPLINE
Criteria and/or Curriculum Requirements in
ENG Disciplines:

Chemical,
Agricultural Biochemical, Civil Earth &
Agroindustrial
& Biosystem Biomolecular Energy

Electrical, Computer,
Communications,
Environ- Engineering Geodetic, General
Telecomunications mental Physics Geomatic

Mechanical
Discipline Criteria are available for download from
Ocean Nuclear Materials, Industrial
Metallurgical https://iabee.or.id/en/accrediation/accreditation-
criteria/discipline-criteria/ 55
 IABEE Learning Outcomes Criterion vis-à-vis
Graduate Attribute Exemplar
1. Engineering Knowledge a
(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, natural and/or materials sciences, 2. Problem Analysis d
information technology and engineering to acquire comprehensive understanding
3. Design/development of
of engineering principles
Solutions b
(b) an ability to design components, systems, and/or processes to meet desired
needs within realistic constraints in such aspects as law, economic, environment, 4. Investigation c
social, politics, health and safety, sustainability as well as to recognize and/or 5. Modern Tool Usage e
utilize the potential of local and national resources with global perspective 6. The Engineer and
(c) an ability to design and conduct laboratory and/or field experiments as well as to Society i
analyze and interpret data to strengthen the engineering judgment 7. Environment and
(d) an ability to identify, formulate, analyze, and solve engineering problems Sustainability b
(e) an ability to apply methods, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for 8. Ethics i
engineering practices 9. Individual and Team
(f) an ability to communicate effectively in oral and written manners
Work h
(g) an ability to plan, accomplish, and evaluate tasks under given constraints
10. Communication f
(h) an ability to work in multidisciplinary and multicultural team
(i) an ability to be accountable and responsible to the society and adhere to 11. Project Management
professional ethics in solving engineering problems and Finance g
(j) an ability to understand the need for life-long learning, including access to the 12. Life-long Learning j
relevant knowledge of contemporary issues 56
Profil Lulusan dan Lulusan Program

Peran PII, IEA,

Capaian pembelajaran yang
asosiasi P dicanangkan oleh program studi
P P P profesi/dosen
mendefinisikan
Program
P
Terakreditasi

Program tidak
P
Terakreditasi
P Profil Lulusan harapan masyarakat P
Kompetensi
(Knowledge, Skill &
Attitude) Lulusan

P P P

57
Accreditation Rules and Procedures
Rules and Rules and
Procedures for Procedures for
RPEA Evaluation and
RPARC Accreditation- To be
related Committees
Accreditation accredited, a
 Background, Vision, & Mission  Introduction program must
 Accreditation Policies &  Evaluation and Accreditation
Procedures Committee satisfy the
o Confidentiality and Conflict of  Pool of Program Evaluators Accreditation
Interest  Accreditation Council
o Scope of Accreditation  Appeal Board & Appeal Criteria &
o Eligibility for Evaluation Committee RPEA
o Accreditation Criteria  Training
o Program Evaluation Process  Code of Ethics
o Accreditation Decisions  Conflict of Interest
o Public Disclosure  Confidentiality
o Feedback and Appeals RPEA and RPARC are
o Policies on Conducting On- available for download from
Site Visit https://iabee.or.id/en/accrediation/
 Indicative Schedule for rules-and-policies-for-evaluation-
Accreditation Evaluation Cycle and-accreditation/
58
 Principles of IABEE Accreditation
 Voluntary, internally driven (program attitude
towards quality); and therefore accreditation is not
the purpose, rather a means for improvement
 Accreditation is based on Learning Outcomes,
which is self-determined by the program according
to the vision, identity and uniqueness, resources,
and user needs; and therefore accreditation is not
to rank nor to compare among programs
 International equivalency (IEA graduate attributes)
 Third-party evaluation (independent, autonomous,
NGO)
 Accountable to society (outcome-based,
answering the need of stakeholders)
The Significance of IABEE Accreditation
 For students and graduates:
Gain education basics that meet global
standards, in line with science and
technology development, support career and
professional success, and wider employment
opportunities
 For programs and education institutions:
By voluntary nature, programs demonstrate a
commitment to provide quality education
and global recognition.
 For industry, government and stakeholders:
Opportunity to provide feedback on
employment needs, facilitate professional
mobility, more accountable to the
community.
59
 Program Evaluation
Procedures
Evaluation/re- Interim Evaluation Interim Evaluation
Evaluation for PA
evaluation for GA with Visit without Visit

On-Site Visit &

Initial Reviews & Exit Statement
Responses Due Processes & Final
October to Evaluation Report
July to
Submission of Self- November
September
Evaluation Report
December Discipline
& Program Profile
Harmonization & EAC
June Plenary Meetings
Formation of free-
COI PEV Team Accreditation
May Council
Decision, &
Program March Announcement
Evaluation
Registration April Cycle 60
 Secretariat Program & POI
PEV Team
• Preparation of • Registration
evaluation cycle EAC & DCs • Program evaluation • PP & SER submission
IT Dept • User accounts & • On-site visit planning • Progress monitoring
data management • PEV Team formation • Reports submission • Communication with
• System development •
• Invoice & payment • Progress monitoring Communication with Evaluation Team
& maintenance • Receive results
• Process monitoring • Decision recommendation Program

evaluation.iabee.or.id
Online Evaluation System
61
 A Quick look on the Common Criteria
All Criteria documents are available for download from IABEE website
• LOs attainment is measured
(3.1.) and assured for the
graduates (3.2.)
• Continual improvements based on LOs evaluation (4.1)
• Documents, records, and improvements are maintained
(4.2)
Autonomous
Professional
Graduates Profile

• Learning Outcomes are • Envisaged APP

Students & learning
implementation established based on the is defined as
envisaged APP, Common
PEO (1.1) and
• Curriculum (2.1) Criteria requirements (1.3.1
High school • Faculty (2.2) and 1.3.2), and Discipline informed to all
graduates • Students & Criteria (1.3.3.) faculty,
• Entry academic • Performance indicators, students, and
requirements atmosphere (2.3) assessment plan and method general public
(2.3) are • Facility (2.4) are defined for each LO (1.2.)
defined & • Institutional (1.3.3.)
announced responsibility (2.5)
62
Accreditation types

 IABEE offers two types of accreditation, namely General

Accreditation and Provisional Accreditation. Each accreditation
type entails specific eligibility requirements for programs to apply.
 General Accreditation (GA) is intended for programs seeking
international recognition through IABEE accreditation.
 Provisional Accreditation (PA) is intended for programs newly
adopting an outcome-based education system and have not yet
produced graduates under the system. A program applying for PA
will be evaluated to measure its potentials of meeting the
Accreditation Criteria within a foreseeable future.

63
Eligibility
General Accreditation
(1) The associated Program Operating Institution (POI) has
obtained National Accreditation for Institution status with a
minimum rank of “B”.
(2) The Program has obtained National Accreditation status
ranked “A”.
(3) The Program is a bachelor-level program in an engineering
or computing discipline with a curricular study period of
four years, and with a total course-load of a minimum of
144 credit units.
(4) The Program is at least in the 4th year of continuous
Outcome-Based Education (OBE) implementation.
(5) The OBE shall include assessment and evaluation of the
Learning Outcomes of the students.
(6) By the time of the on-site visit evaluation, the Program has
produced at least one graduate under its OBE system.
(7) The Program has established and publicized the
Autonomous Professional Profile statement formulated as
its educational objectives.
(8) The Program has established and publicized its Learning
Outcomes as the basis for developing its curriculum and
learning methods.
Provisional Accreditation
(1) The associated Program Operating Institution has obtained
National Accreditation for Institution status with a minimum
rank of ‘B’.
(2) The Program has obtained National Accreditation status at
least ranked “B”.
(3) The Program is a bachelor-level program in an engineering
or computing discipline with a curricular study period of
four years, and with a total credit of a minimum of 144
credit units.
(4) The Program has implemented Outcome-Based Education
(OBE) at least for one year before applying for the
evaluation.
(5) The Program has established and publicized the
Autonomous Professional Profile statement formulated as
its educational objectives.
(6) The Program has established and publicized its Learning
Outcomes as the basis for developing its curriculum and
learning methods
64
Evaluation for Accreditation Procedures (for 2019 cycle)

Application/ Eligibility Program Profile & Desk/Initial

Registration Check SER Submission Review
until 15 April 20 April (end date) 1 July (end date) 30 Sept (end date)

9 May (end date)

Evaluation Team

Evaluator Evaluator Exit On-site

Program Response
Final Report Statement Visit
22 Jan 2020 (end date) 28 Dec (end date) 10 Nov (latest date) 7 Nov (latest date)

Discipline EAC Accreditation

Harmonization Harmonization Council
30 Jan 2020 31 Jan 2020 13 Feb 2020
65
Typical Schedule for Accreditation Evaluation Procedures
Period or Completion
Step no. Activity Evaluation Type*)
Deadline
1 PR & POIR registration EGA, EPA, IE 1-15 April**
2 PR & POIR registration verification EGA, EPA, IE 1-15 April**
3 Application for Program evaluation EGA, EPA, IE 1-15 April**
4 Program eligibility verification EGA & EPA 1-15 April**
5 Evaluation scheduling EGA, EPA, IE 20 April
6 Notice of evaluation kickoff & invoicing EGA, EPA, IE 21 April
7 EAC Discipline assignment EGA, EPA, IE 15-20 April
8 Evaluation Team members selection EGA, EPA, IE 15-20 April
9 Evaluation Team Chair assignment EGA Only 15-20 April
10 Approval of evaluation observers EGA Only 15-20 April
11 Evaluation Team acceptance EGA, EPA, IE 8 May
12 Final Evaluation Team confirmation EGA, EPA, IE 8 May
13 Completed SER submission EGA, EPA, IE 30 June
** for 2019 Cycle, application period starts earlier (25 Feb) due to application subsidy grants
provided by DG Institutions KEMENRISTEK DIKTI. Please check iabee.or.id
66
Typical Schedule for Accreditation Evaluation Procedures
Step no. Activity Evaluation Type*) Period or Completion Deadline
14 Full payment reception EGA, EPA, IE 1 May
15 Program First Evaluation EGA, EPA, IE 31 July
16 Program Second Evaluation EGA only 15 August
17 Program First Response EGA, EPA, IE 15 September
18 Program Third Evaluation EGA Only 30 September
19 On-Site Visit Planning EGA, EPA, IE-V 7 October
20 On-Site Visit EGA, EPA, IE-V 7 November
21 Exit Meeting EGA, EPA, IE-V 7 November
22 Program First Evaluation EGA, IE-V 7-14 November
23 Program Second Response EGA, IE-V 14 November
24 Program Second Evaluation EGA, IE-V 28 November
25 Program Final Response EGA, IE 28 December
26 Program Final Report EGA, EPA, IE 15 January
27 EAC Discipline Harmonization EGA, IE 31 January
28 EAC Plenary Meeting EGA, EPA, IE 1 February
29 Accreditation Decision EGA, EPA, IE 15 March
30 Accreditation Announcement EGA, EPA, IE 31 March
67
 Evaluation & Decision for General Accreditation
 Program will be judged against each
No Kata kunci Kriteria Nilai of these 12 criteria (1.1 to 4.2)
1.1 Formulasi Profil Profesional Mandiri A/C/W/D  Four possible judgments for each
1.2 Publikasi Profil Profesional Mandiri A/C/W/D criterion: (A)cceptable, (C)oncern,
1.3 Formulasi Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan A/C/W/D (W)eakness, or (D)eficiency
2.1 Kurikulum A/C/W/D  Program will be accredited if there is
2.2 Dosen A/C/W/D no “D”
2.3 Mahasiswa & Suasana Akademik A/C/W/D  5-year accreditation (full) will be
2.4 Fasilitas A/C/W/D granted if Program receives “A” or
2.5 Tanggung Jawab Institusi A/C/W/D “C” judgments
3.1 Penilaian CPL yang Efektif A/C/W/D  2-year accreditation (interim) will be
3.2 Pemenuhan CPL oleh Lulusan A/C/W/D granted if Program has “W”
A/C/W/D
(improvement report and evaluation
4.1 Evaluasi & Perbaikan Berkelanjutan
required)
4.2 Pemeliharaan Dokumen & Rekaman A/C/W/D
 Program granted a “Not-Accredited”
status is given a chance to appeal
68
 Evaluation & Decision for Provisional Accreditation
 A program applying for PA will be
No Kata kunci Kriteria Nilai
evaluated to measure its potential of
1.1 Formulasi Profil Profesional Mandiri Yes/No meeting the Accreditation Criteria
1.2 Publikasi Profil Profesional Mandiri Yes/No within a foreseeable future.
1.3 Formulasi Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Yes/No  For each criterion a “Yes” or “No”
2.1 Kurikulum Yes/No judgement followed by evaluator’s
2.2 Dosen Yes/No comments shall be made in
2.3 Mahasiswa & Suasana Akademik Yes/No conclusion, indicating the potential of
2.4 Fasilitas Yes/No the program to meet the criterion
2.5 Tanggung Jawab Institusi Yes/No
within 2-4 years.
3.1 Penilaian CPL yang Efektif Yes/No  Potential programs will be granted a
Yes/No
“Provisionally Accredited” status
4.1 Evaluasi & Perbaikan Berkelanjutan
4.2 Pemeliharaan Dokumen & Rekaman Yes/No  Non-potential programs will be given
a “Not Accredited” status

69
IABEE Website & Online Evaluation System

70
IABEE Website & Online Evaluation System

71
IABEE Website & Online Evaluation System

72
IABEE Website & Online Evaluation System

73
A Possible Preparation Strategy for Program wishing to apply IABEE
Accreditation
1st graduate of OBE
Apply
Provisional
PA granted system expected
(optional)
Accreditation
Implement to IABEE
OBE + PDCA (optional) Accreditation
Apply General status granted
Recruit new Continue
students OBE+PDCA Accreditation to IABEE
Learn IABEE Common
for 3rd year Submit Self Evaluation
& Discipline Criteria, Continue
RPEA Measure & OBE+PDCA Report & Program
General review of your assess PLOs Implementation Profile
curriculum & development for 2nd year
Desk evaluation by
education system IABEE
OBE+PDCA design Onsite visit
Staff conditioning

2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 2024/2025

Assumption: The Pogram consideres to adopt OBE in 2019

74
Important Accreditation Documents
All are available for download from IABEE Website

 Common Criteria & Criteria Guide (COM & ENG)

 Discipline Criteria (COM & ENG)
 Rules and Procedures for Evaluation and Accreditation (RPEA)
 Rules and Procedures for Accreditation-related Committees (RPARC)
 Program Profile (Ikhtisar Program Studi) template
 Self-Evaluation Report template (for preparation/study purposes only,
the official template is available from the Online Evaluation System
through Program Representative’s account once his/her program has
been registered in the system)

75
Contact us

+628111857171

info@iabee.or.id

https://iabee.or.id

IABEE Secretariat 2020 pindah ke Gedung

Gedung Badan Pengkajian dan Baru PII, Jl. Halimun,
Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT) II Lt. 18,
Jln M. H. Thamrin No 8, Jakarta Pusat
Jakarta
76
Terimakasih