4 Forecasting

PowerPoint presentation to accompany

Heizer and Render
Operations Management, 10e
Principles of Operations Management, 8e

PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-1

 Outline
 Global Company Profile: Disney
World
 What Is Forecasting?
 Forecasting Time Horizons
 The Influence of Product Life Cycle
 Types Of Forecasts

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-2

 Outline – Continued
 The Strategic Importance of
Forecasting
 Human Resources
 Capacity
 Supply Chain Management
 Seven Steps in the Forecasting
System

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-3

 Outline – Continued
 Forecasting Approaches
 Overview of Qualitative Methods
 Overview of Quantitative Methods
 Time-Series Forecasting
 Decomposition of a Time Series
 Naive Approach

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-4

 Outline – Continued
 Time-Series Forecasting (cont.)
 Moving Averages
 Exponential Smoothing
 Exponential Smoothing with Trend
Adjustment
 Trend Projections
 Seasonal Variations in Data
 Cyclical Variations in Data

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-5

 Outline – Continued
 Associative Forecasting Methods:
Regression and Correlation
Analysis
 Using Regression Analysis for
Forecasting
 Standard Error of the Estimate
 Correlation Coefficients for
Regression Lines
 Multiple-Regression Analysis

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-6

 Outline – Continued
 Monitoring and Controlling
Forecasts
 Adaptive Smoothing
 Focus Forecasting
 Forecasting in the Service Sector

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-7

 Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to :
1. Understand the three time horizons
and which models apply for each use
2. Explain when to use each of the four
qualitative models
3. Apply the naive, moving average,
exponential smoothing, and trend
methods

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-8

 Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to :
4. Compute three measures of forecast
accuracy
5. Develop seasonal indexes
6. Conduct a regression and correlation
analysis
7. Use a tracking signal

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-9

 Forecasting at Disney World
 Global portfolio includes parks in Hong
Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and
Anaheim
 Revenues are derived from people – how
many visitors and how they spend their
money
 Daily management report contains only
the forecast and actual attendance at
each park

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 10

 Forecasting at Disney World
 Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly,
annual, and 5-year forecasts
 Forecast used by labor management,
maintenance, operations, finance, and
park scheduling
 Forecast used to adjust opening times,
rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests
admitted

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 11

 Forecasting at Disney World
 20% of customers come from outside the
USA
 Economic model includes gross
domestic product, cross-exchange rates,
arrivals into the USA
 A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people
survey 1 million park guests, employees,
and travel professionals each year

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 12

 Forecasting at Disney World
 Inputs to the forecasting model include
airline specials, Federal Reserve
policies, Wall Street trends,
vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000
school districts around the world
 Average forecast error for the 5-year
forecast is 5%
 Average forecast error for annual
forecasts is between 0% and 3%

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 13

 What is Forecasting?
 Process of predicting
a future event
 Underlying basis
of all business
??
decisions
 Production
 Inventory
 Personnel
 Facilities

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 14

 Forecasting Time Horizons
 Short-range forecast
 Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months
 Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce
levels, job assignments, production levels
 Medium-range forecast
 3 months to 3 years
 Sales and production planning, budgeting
 Long-range forecast
 3+ years
 New product planning, facility location,
research and development
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 15
 Distinguishing Differences
 Medium/long range forecasts deal with
more comprehensive issues and support
management decisions regarding
planning and products, plants and
processes
 Short-term forecasting usually employs
different methodologies than longer-term
forecasting
 Short-term forecasts tend to be more
accurate than longer-term forecasts

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 16

 Influence of Product Life
Cycle
Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline

 Introduction and growth require longer

forecasts than maturity and decline
 As product passes through life cycle,
forecasts are useful in projecting
 Staffing levels
 Inventory levels
 Factory capacity

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 17

 Product Life Cycle
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Best period to Practical to change Poor time to Cost control
Company Strategy/Issues

increase market price or quality change image, critical

share image price, or quality

R&D engineering is Strengthen niche Competitive costs

critical become critical
Defend market
position Drive-through
Internet search engines restaurants
CD-ROMs
iPods LCD &
Xbox 360 plasma TVs
Sales
Avatars

Boeing 787 Analog

TVs
Twitter
Figure 2.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 18
 Product Life Cycle
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Product design Forecasting Standardization Little product
and critical Fewer product differentiation
development Product and changes, more Cost
OM Strategy/Issues

critical process minor changes minimization

Frequent reliability Optimum Overcapacity
product and Competitive capacity in the
process design product industry
changes Increasing
improvements stability of Prune line to
Short production and options process eliminate
runs Increase capacity Long production items not
High production Shift toward runs returning
costs product focus good margin
Product
Limited models Enhance improvement Reduce
Attention to distribution and cost cutting capacity
quality

Figure 2.5
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 19
 Types of Forecasts
 Economic forecasts
 Address business cycle – inflation rate,
money supply, housing starts, etc.
 Technological forecasts
 Predict rate of technological progress
 Impacts development of new products
 Demand forecasts
 Predict sales of existing products and
services

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 20

 Strategic Importance of
Forecasting
 Human Resources – Hiring, training,
laying off workers
 Capacity – Capacity shortages can
result in undependable delivery, loss
of customers, loss of market share
 Supply Chain Management – Good
supplier relations and price
advantages

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 21

 Seven Steps in Forecasting
1. Determine the use of the forecast
2. Select the items to be forecasted
3. Determine the time horizon of the
forecast
4. Select the forecasting model(s)
5. Gather the data
6. Make the forecast
7. Validate and implement results

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 22

 The Realities!

 Forecasts are seldom perfect

 Most techniques assume an
underlying stability in the system
 Product family and aggregated
forecasts are more accurate than
individual product forecasts

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 23

 Forecasting Approaches
Qualitative Methods
 Used when situation is vague
and little data exist
 New products
 New technology
 Involves intuition, experience
 e.g., forecasting sales on
Internet
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 24
 Forecasting Approaches
Quantitative Methods
 Used when situation is ‘stable’ and
historical data exist
 Existing products
 Current technology
 Involves mathematical techniques
 e.g., forecasting sales of color
televisions
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 25
 Overview of Qualitative
Methods
1. Jury of executive opinion
 Pool opinions of high-level experts,
sometimes augment by statistical
models
2. Delphi method
 Panel of experts, queried iteratively

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 26

 Overview of Qualitative
Methods
3. Sales force composite
 Estimates from individual
salespersons are reviewed for
reasonableness, then aggregated
4. Consumer Market Survey
 Ask the customer

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 27

 Jury of Executive Opinion
 Involves small group of high-level
experts and managers
 Group estimates demand by working
together
 Combines managerial experience with
statistical models
 Relatively quick
 ‘Group-think’
disadvantage

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 28

 Sales Force Composite

 Each salesperson projects his or

her sales
 Combined at district and national
levels
 Sales reps know customers’ wants
 Tends to be overly optimistic

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 29

 Delphi Method
 Iterative group
Decision Makers
process, (Evaluate
continues until responses and
consensus is make decisions)
reached
Staff
 3 types of (Administering
survey)
participants
 Decision makers
 Staff Respondents
(People who can
 Respondents make valuable
judgments)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 30
 Consumer Market Survey

 Ask customers about purchasing

plans
 What consumers say, and what
they actually do are often different
 Sometimes difficult to answer

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 31

 Overview of Quantitative
Approaches
1. Naive approach
2. Moving averages
time-series
3. Exponential models
smoothing
4. Trend projection
5. Linear regression associative
model

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 32

 Time Series Forecasting

 Set of evenly spaced numerical data

 Obtained by observing response
variable at regular time periods
 Forecast based only on past values,
no other variables important
 Assumes that factors influencing
past and present will continue
influence in future

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 33

 Time Series Components

Trend Cyclical

Seasonal Random

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 34

 Components of Demand
Trend
component
Demand for product or service

Seasonal peaks

Actual demand
line

Average demand
over 4 years

Random variation
| | | |
1 2 3 4
Time (years)
Figure 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 35
 Trend Component
 Persistent, overall upward or
downward pattern
 Changes due to population,
technology, age, culture, etc.
 Typically several years
duration

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 36

 Seasonal Component
 Regular pattern of up and
down fluctuations
 Due to weather, customs, etc.
 Occurs within a single year
Number of
Period Length Seasons
Week Day 7
Month Week 4-4.5
Month Day 28-31
Year Quarter 4
Year Month 12
Year Week 52

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 37

 Cyclical Component
 Repeating up and down movements
 Affected by business cycle,
political, and economic factors
 Multiple years duration
 Often causal or
associative
relationships

0 5 10 15 20
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 38
 Random Component
 Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’
fluctuations
 Due to random variation or unforeseen
events
 Short duration
and nonrepeating

M T W T F
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 39
 Naive Approach
 Assumes demand in next
period is the same as
demand in most recent period
 e.g., If January sales were 68, then
February sales will be 68
 Sometimes cost effective and
efficient
 Can be good starting point

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 40

 Moving Average Method

 MA is a series of arithmetic means

 Used if little or no trend
 Used often for smoothing
 Provides overall impression of data
over time

∑ demand in previous n periods

Moving average = n

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 41

 Moving Average Example
Actual 3-Month
Month Shed Sales Moving Average
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16 (10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2/3
May 19 (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
June 23 (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16
July 26 (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 42

 Graph of Moving Average
Moving
30 –
Average
28 –
Forecast
26 – Actual
24 – Sales
Shed Sales

22 –
20 –
18 –
16 –
14 –
12 –
10 –
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 43

 Weighted Moving Average
 Used when some trend might be
present
 Older data usually less important
 Weights based on experience and
intuition
∑ (weight for period n)
Weighted x (demand in period n)
moving average = ∑ weights

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 44

 Weights Applied Period
Weighted Moving Average 3 Last month
2 Two months ago
1 Three months ago
6 Sum of weights

Actual 3-Month Weighted

Month Shed Sales Moving Average
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16 [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121/6
May 19 [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3
June 23 [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17
July 26 [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 45

 Potential Problems With
Moving Average
 Increasing n smooths the forecast
but makes it less sensitive to
changes
 Do not forecast trends well
 Require extensive historical data

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 46

 Moving Average And
Weighted Moving Average
Weighted
30 – moving
average
25 –
Sales demand

20 – Actual
sales
15 –
Moving
10 – average

5 –
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Figure 4.2
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 47
 Exponential Smoothing
 Form of weighted moving average
 Weights decline exponentially
 Most recent data weighted most
 Requires smoothing constant ()
 Ranges from 0 to 1
 Subjectively chosen
 Involves little record keeping of past
data
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 48
 Exponential Smoothing
New forecast = Last period’s forecast
+  (Last period’s actual demand
– Last period’s forecast)

Ft = Ft – 1 + (At – 1 - Ft – 1)

where Ft = new forecast

Ft – 1 = previous forecast
 = smoothing (or weighting)
constant (0 ≤  ≤ 1)

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 49

 Exponential Smoothing
Example
Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant  = .20

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 50

 Exponential Smoothing
Example
Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant  = .20

New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142)

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 51

 Exponential Smoothing
Example
Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant  = .20

New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142)

= 142 + 2.2
= 144.2 ≈ 144 cars

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 52

 Effect of
Smoothing Constants

Weight Assigned to
Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most
Recent Recent Recent Recent Recent
Smoothing Period Period Period Period Period
Constant () (1 - ) (1 - ) 2 (1 - ) 3 (1 - )4

 = .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066

 = .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 53

 Impact of Different 
225 –

Actual  = .5
200 – demand
Demand

175 –

 = .1
150 – | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 54

 Impact of Different 
225 –

Actual  = .5
200
Chose
– high values
demandof 
Demand

when underlying average

is likely to change
–
175
Choose low values of 
when underlying average  = .1
is stable|
150 – | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quarter

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 55

 Choosing 

The objective is to obtain the most

accurate forecast no matter the
technique
We generally do this by selecting the
model that gives us the lowest forecast
error

Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value

= At - Ft

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 56

 Common Measures of Error

Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)

∑ |Actual - Forecast|
MAD =
n

Mean Squared Error (MSE)

∑ (Forecast Errors)2
MSE =
n

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 57

 Common Measures of Error

Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)

n
∑100|Actuali - Forecasti|/Actuali
MAPE = i=1
n

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 58

 Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute
Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with for
Quarter Unloaded  = .10  = .10  = .50  = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50
3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61
8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 59

 Comparison of Forecast
Error
∑ |deviations|
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute
MADActual
= Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage n
with for with for
Quarter Unloaded  = .10  = .10  = .50  = .50
1
For 180
= .10 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 = 82.45/8
175.5 = 10.31
7.50 177.50 9.50
3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 For 175
= .50 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 = 98.62/8
175.02 = 12.33
29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61
8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 60

 Comparison of Forecast
Error2
∑ (forecast errors)
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute
MSE = Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage
n
with for with for
Quarter Unloaded  = .10  = .10  = .50  = .50
1
For 180
= .10 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 = 1,526.54/8
168 175.5 = 190.82
7.50 177.50 9.50
3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 For 175
= .50 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 = 1,561.91/8
205 175.02 = 195.24
29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61
8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD 10.31 12.33

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 61

 Comparison of Forecast
n Error
∑100|deviation |/actual i i
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute
MAPE = i=1
Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with n for with for
Quarter Unloaded  = .10  = .10  = .50  = .50
1
 = .10 175
For 180 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 = 44.75/8
175.5 = 7.50
5.59% 177.50 9.50
3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 =
For 175 .50 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 = 54.05/8
175.02 =29.98
6.76% 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61
8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD 10.31 12.33
MSE 190.82 195.24
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 62
 Comparison of Forecast
Error
Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute
Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation
Tonnage with for with for
Quarter Unloaded  = .10  = .10  = .50  = .50
1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00
2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50
3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61
8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30
82.45 98.62
MAD 10.31 12.33
MSE 190.82 195.24
MAPE 5.59% 6.76%
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 63
 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment
When a trend is present, exponential
smoothing must be modified

Forecast Exponentially Exponentially

including (FITt) = smoothed (Ft) + smoothed (Tt)
trend forecast trend

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 64

 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment

Ft = (At - 1) + (1 - )(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1)

Tt = b(Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - b)Tt - 1

Step 1: Compute Ft
Step 2: Compute Tt
Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 65

 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17
3 20
4 19
5 24
6 21
7 31
8 28
9 36
10

Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 66
 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17
3 20
4 19
5 24 Step 1: Forecast for Month 2
6 21
7 31 F2 = A1 + (1 - )(F1 + T1)
8 28 F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)
9 36
10 = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units
Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 67
 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80
3 20
4 19
5 24 Step 2: Trend for Month 2
6 21
7 31 T2 = b(F2 - F1) + (1 - b)T1
8 28 T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)
9 36
10 = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units
Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 68
 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80 1.92
3 20
4 19
5 24 Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2
6 21
7 31 FIT2 = F2 + T2
8 28 FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92
9 36
10 = 14.72 units
Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 69
 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
Forecast
Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including
Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt
1 12 11 2 13.00
2 17 12.80 1.92 14.72
3 20 15.18 2.10 17.28
4 19 17.82 2.32 20.14
5 24 19.91 2.23 22.14
6 21 22.51 2.38 24.89
7 31 24.11 2.07 26.18
8 28 27.14 2.45 29.59
9 36 29.28 2.32 31.60
10 32.48 2.68 35.16

Table 4.1
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 70
 Exponential Smoothing with
Trend Adjustment Example
35 –

30 – Actual demand (At)

Product demand

25 –

20 –

15 –

10 – Forecast including trend (FITt)

with  = .2 and b = .4
5 –

0 – | | | | | | | | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Figure 4.3
Time (month)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 71
 Trend Projections
Fitting a trend line to historical data points
to project into the medium to long-range
Linear trends can be found using the least
squares technique

y^ = a + bx
^ = computed value of the variable to
where y
be predicted (dependent variable)
a = y-axis intercept
b = slope of the regression line
x = the independent variable

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 72

 Values of Dependent Variable Least Squares Method

Actual observation Deviation7

(y-value)

Deviation5 Deviation6

Deviation3

Deviation4

Deviation1
(error) Deviation2
Trend line, y^ = a + bx

Time period Figure 4.4

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 73
 Values of Dependent Variable Least Squares Method

Actual observation Deviation7

(y-value)

Deviation5 Deviation6

Deviation3 Least squares method

minimizes the sum of the
Deviation
squared errors (deviations)
4

Deviation1
(error) Deviation2
Trend line, y^ = a + bx

Time period Figure 4.4

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 74
 Least Squares Method
Equations to calculate the regression variables

y^ = a + bx

Sxy - nxy
b=
Sx2 - nx2

a = y - bx

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 75

 Least Squares Example
Time Electrical Power
Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy
2003 1 74 1 74
2004 2 79 4 158
2005 3 80 9 240
2006 4 90 16 360
2007 5 105 25 525
2008 6 142 36 852
2009 7 122 49 854
∑x = 28 ∑y = 692 ∑x2 = 140 ∑xy = 3,063
x=4 y = 98.86

∑xy - nxy 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)

b= = = 10.54
∑x - nx
2 2 140 - (7)(4 2)

a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 76
 Least Squares Example
Time Electrical Power
Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy
2003 1 74 1 74
2004 2 79 4 158
2005The trend
3 line is 80 9 240
2006 4 90 16 360
2007 y^ 5= 56.70 + 10.54x
105 25 525
2008 6 142 36 852
2009 7 122 49 854
∑x = 28 ∑y = 692 ∑x2 = 140 ∑xy = 3,063
x=4 y = 98.86

∑xy - nxy 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)

b= = = 10.54
∑x - nx
2 2 140 - (7)(4 2)

a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 77
 Least Squares Example
160 –
Trend line,
150 – y^ = 56.70 + 10.54x
140 –
Power demand

130 –
120 –
110 –
100 –
90 –
80 –
70 –
60 –
50 –
| | | | | | | | |
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Year
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 78
 Seasonal Variations In Data

The multiplicative
seasonal model
can adjust trend
data for seasonal
variations in
demand

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 80

 Seasonal Variations In Data
Steps in the process:
1. Find average historical demand for each season
2. Compute the average demand over all seasons
3. Compute a seasonal index for each season
4. Estimate next year’s total demand
5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the
number of seasons, then multiply it by the
seasonal index for that season

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 81

 Seasonal Index Example
Demand Average Average Seasonal
Month 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
Jan 80 85 105 90 94
Feb 70 85 85 80 94
Mar 80 93 82 85 94
Apr 90 95 115 100 94
May 113 125 131 123 94
Jun 110 115 120 115 94
Jul 100 102 113 105 94
Aug 88 102 110 100 94
Sept 85 90 95 90 94
Oct 77 78 85 80 94
Nov 75 72 83 80 94
Dec 82 78 80 80 94
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 82
 Seasonal Index Example
Demand Average Average Seasonal
Month 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 85 80 94
Mar 80 93 Average
82 85 monthly 94
2007-2009 demand
Seasonal90index95= 115
Apr 100 94
Average monthly demand
May 113 125 131 123 94
= 90/94 = .957
Jun 110 115 120 115 94
Jul 100 102 113 105 94
Aug 88 102 110 100 94
Sept 85 90 95 90 94
Oct 77 78 85 80 94
Nov 75 72 83 80 94
Dec 82 78 80 80 94
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 83
 Seasonal Index Example
Demand Average Average Seasonal
Month 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851
Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904
Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064
May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309
Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223
Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117
Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064
Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957
Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851
Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851
Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 84
 Seasonal Index Example
Demand Average Average Seasonal
Month 2007 2008 2009 2007-2009 Monthly Index
Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957
Feb 70 85 Forecast
85 for802010 94 0.851
Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904
Apr 90Expected
95 115annual demand
100 = 1,200
94 1.064
May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309
Jun 110 115 120 1,200 115 94 1.223
Jul Jan 113
100 102 x .957 = 96 94
105 1.117
12
Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064
1,200
Sept 85 90
Feb 95 x90.851 = 85 94 0.957
Oct 77 78 85 12 80 94 0.851
Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851
Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 85
 Seasonal Index Example
2010 Forecast
140 – 2009 Demand
130 – 2008 Demand
2007 Demand
120 –
Demand

110 –
100 –
90 –
80 –
70 –
| | | | | | | | | | | |
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Time
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 86
 San Diego Hospital
Trend Data
10,200 –

10,000 –
Inpatient Days

9,800 – 9745
9659 9702
9573 9616 9766
9,600 – 9530 9680 9724
9594 9637
9,400 – 9551

9,200 –

9,000 – | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
Figure 4.6
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 87
 San Diego Hospital
Seasonal Indices
1.06 –
Index for Inpatient Days

1.04 1.04
1.04 – 1.03
1.02
1.02 – 1.01
1.00
1.00 – 0.99
0.98
0.98 – 0.99
0.96 – 0.97 0.97
0.96
0.94 –
0.92 – | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
Figure 4.7
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 88
 San Diego Hospital
Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast
10,200 –
10068
10,000 – 9911 9949
Inpatient Days

9,800 – 9764 9724

9691
9,600 – 9572

9,400 – 9520 9542

9411
9265 9355
9,200 –

9,000 – | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
Figure 4.8
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 89
 Associative Forecasting
Used when changes in one or more
independent variables can be used to predict
the changes in the dependent variable

Most common technique is linear

regression analysis

We apply this technique just as we did

in the time series example

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 90

 Associative Forecasting
Forecasting an outcome based on
predictor variables using the least squares
technique
y^ = a + bx
^
where y = computed value of the variable to
be predicted (dependent variable)
a = y-axis intercept
b = slope of the regression line
x = the independent variable though to
predict the value of the dependent
variable
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 91
 Associative Forecasting
Example
Sales Area Payroll
($ millions), y ($ billions), x
2.0 1
3.0 3
2.5 4 4.0 –
2.0 2
2.0 1 3.0 –
3.5 7 Sales
2.0 –

1.0 –

| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 92
 Associative Forecasting
Example
Sales, y Payroll, x x2 xy
2.0 1 1 2.0
3.0 3 9 9.0
2.5 4 16 10.0
2.0 2 4 4.0
2.0 1 1 2.0
3.5 7 49 24.5
∑y = 15.0 ∑x = 18 ∑x2 = 80 ∑xy = 51.5

∑xy - nxy 51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5)

x = ∑x/6 = 18/6 = 3 b=
∑x2 - nx2
= 80 - (6)(32) = .25

y = ∑y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5 a = y - bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 93
 Associative Forecasting
Example
y^ = 1.75 + .25x Sales = 1.75 + .25(payroll)

If payroll next year

4.0 –
is estimated to be
$6 billion, then: 3.25
3.0 –
Nodel’s sales
2.0 –
Sales = 1.75 + .25(6)
Sales = $3,250,000 1.0 –

| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 94

 Standard Error of the
Estimate
 A forecast is just a point estimate of a
future value
 This point is 4.0 –
actually the 3.25
mean of a 3.0 –
Nodel’s sales
probability 2.0 –
distribution
1.0 –

| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll
Figure 4.9

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 95

 Standard Error of the
Estimate

∑(y - yc)2
Sy,x =
n-2

where y = y-value of each data point

yc = computed value of the dependent
variable, from the regression
equation
n = number of data points

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 96

 Standard Error of the
Estimate
Computationally, this equation is
considerably easier to use

∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy

Sy,x =
n-2

We use the standard error to set up

prediction intervals around the
point estimate

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 97

 Standard Error of the
Estimate
∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy 39.5 - 1.75(15) - .25(51.5)
Sy,x = =
n-2 6-2

Sy,x = .306 4.0 –

3.25
3.0 –
Nodel’s sales
The standard error
2.0 –
of the estimate is
$306,000 in sales 1.0 –

| | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Area payroll

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 98

 Correlation
 How strong is the linear
relationship between the variables?
 Correlation does not necessarily
imply causality!
 Coefficient of correlation, r,
measures degree of association
 Values range from -1 to +1

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 99

 Correlation Coefficient
nSxy - SxSy
r=
[nSx2 - (Sx)2][nSy2 - (Sy)2]

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 100

 y y
Correlation Coefficient
nSxy - SxSy
r=
[nSx 2 - (Sx)2][nSy2 - (Sy)2]
(a) Perfect positive x (b) Positive x
correlation: correlation:
r = +1 0<r<1

y y

(c) No correlation: x (d) Perfect negative x

r=0 correlation:
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
r = -1 4 - 101
 Correlation
 Coefficient of Determination, r2,
measures the percent of change in
y predicted by the change in x
 Values range from 0 to 1
 Easy to interpret

For the Nodel Construction example:

r = .901
r2 = .81
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 102
 Multiple Regression
Analysis
If more than one independent variable is to be
used in the model, linear regression can be
extended to multiple regression to
accommodate several independent variables

y^ = a + b1x1 + b2x2 …

Computationally, this is quite

complex and generally done on the
computer
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 103
 Multiple Regression
Analysis
In the Nodel example, including interest rates in
the model gives the new equation:

y^ = 1.80 + .30x1 - 5.0x2

An improved correlation coefficient of r = .96

means this model does a better job of predicting
the change in construction sales

Sales = 1.80 + .30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00

Sales = $3,000,000
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 104
 Monitoring and Controlling
Forecasts
Tracking Signal
 Measures how well the forecast is
predicting actual values
 Ratio of cumulative forecast errors to
mean absolute deviation (MAD)
 Good tracking signal has low values
 If forecasts are continually high or low, the
forecast has a bias error

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 105

 Monitoring and Controlling
Forecasts

Tracking Cumulative error

signal =
MAD

∑(Actual demand in
period i -
Forecast demand
Tracking in period i)
signal = (∑|Actual - Forecast|/n)

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 106

 Tracking Signal

Signal exceeding limit

Tracking signal
Upper control limit
+

0 MADs Acceptable
range

–
Lower control limit

Time

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 107

 Tracking Signal Example
Cumulative
Absolute Absolute
Actual Forecast Cumm Forecast Forecast
Qtr Demand Demand Error Error Error Error MAD

1 90 100 -10 -10 10 10 10.0

2 95 100 -5 -15 5 15 7.5
3 115 100 +15 0 15 30 10.0
4 100 110 -10 -10 10 40 10.0
5 125 110 +15 +5 15 55 11.0
6 140 110 +30 +35 30 85 14.2

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 108

 Tracking Signal Example
Tracking Cumulative
Absolute Absolute
Actual Signal
Forecast Cumm Forecast Forecast
Qtr (CummDemand
Demand Error/MAD)
Error Error Error Error MAD

1 90-10/10
100= -1 -10 -10 10 10 10.0
2 95
-15/7.5
100= -2 -5 -15 5 15 7.5
3 115 0/10
100
= 0 +15 0 15 30 10.0
4 100-10/10
110= -1 -10 -10 10 40 10.0
5 125
+5/11110
= +0.5+15 +5 15 55 11.0
6 140
+35/14.2
110= +2.5
+30 +35 30 85 14.2

The variation of the tracking signal

between -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptable
limits
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 109
 Adaptive Forecasting
 It’s possible to use the computer to
continually monitor forecast error
and adjust the values of the  and b
coefficients used in exponential
smoothing to continually minimize
forecast error
 This technique is called adaptive
smoothing

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 110

 Focus Forecasting
 Developed at American Hardware Supply,
based on two principles:
1. Sophisticated forecasting models are not
always better than simple ones
2. There is no single technique that should
be used for all products or services
 This approach uses historical data to test
multiple forecasting models for individual
items
 The forecasting model with the lowest
error is then used to forecast the next
demand
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 111
 Forecasting in the Service
Sector
 Presents unusual challenges
 Special need for short term records
 Needs differ greatly as function of
industry and product
 Holidays and other calendar events
 Unusual events

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 112

 Fast Food Restaurant
Forecast
20% –
Percentage of sales

15% –

10% –

5% –

11-12 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

12-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11
(Lunchtime) (Dinnertime)
Hour of day Figure 4.12
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 113
 FedEx Call Center Forecast
12% –

10% –

8% –

6% –

4% –

2% –

0% –
2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12
A.M. P.M.
Hour of day
Figure 4.12
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 114
 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4 - 115