Analisa Potensi Sumur Dua Fasa “X”

Berdasarkan Hasil Analisa Uji Komplesi dan Uji

Produksi di Lapangan Panasbumi Wayang Windu

Oleh:
Nama: Dwi Agung Sumarsono
NIM: 15412007
OUTLINE 1. Pendahuluan
 Latar Belakang
 Batasan Masalah
 Maksud & Tujuan
 Metodologi Penelitian
2. Tinjauan Pustaka
3. Tinjauan lapangan
4. Pembahasan
5. Kesimpulan & Saran
Latar Belakang
Pada saat setelah proses pemboran panas bumi selesai.
Dilakukan uji komplesi (completion test) untuk memastikan
dimana letak zona produksi pada di dalam lubang sumur,
menghitung besarnya kontribusi zona produksi (bila > 1 zona)
dari sumur, dan karakteristik reservoir (P,T)
Setelah proses uji komplesi dilakukan terdapat uji produksi
untuk membuktikan potensi yang sesungguhnya dari sumur
dua fasa tersebut. Uji produksi ini dilakukan untuk
mendapatkan deliverability curve atau kurva tekanan kepala
sumur vs uap yang dihasilkan.
Batasan Masalah
Pada penulisan skripsi ini, penulis akan
membatasi masalah hanya pada analisis uji
komplesi menggunakan PTS analisis, multirate
analisis dan analisis uji produksi menggunakan
metode lip pressure horizontal discharge .
 Tujuan Penelitian
Mengetahui indikasi data Tekanan, Temperatur dan
Spinnner yang dihasilkan oleh survey logging sumur
terhadap informasi yang berkaitan dengan keberadaan
feed zone setelah pemboran usai.
Mengetahui seberapa besar uap yang dihasilkan pada
saat uji produksi setelah uji komplesi
Membandingkan hasil yang diperoleh dari data uji
produksi terhadap prediksi yang dihasilan dari data uji
komplesi dalam menghitung besar potensi sumur
 Analisa Potensi Produksi Sumur Dua Fasa “X”
Berdasarkan hasil analisa Uji Komplesi & Uji
Produksi di Lapangan “WW”
Metodology

Uji Komplesi

Uji Produksi
Pressure Temperature Multi-rate
Spinner Injection Test

Data Sumur :
Data Logging : WHP, Weir box
Data : Pump Rate , P
P, T, Spinner indication, Lip Pressure

Calculation and Calculation, Plot Calculation Using

Simulation Pump Rate vs P James Lip Method

-Feed Zone -Deliverability Curve

Distribution WHP vs Mass flow
-Injectivity Index -Deliverability Curve
-Mass flow each
Feed Zone WHP vs enthalpy

Integrasi Data

Potensi Sumur “X” Dua Fasa

Tinjauan Pustaka
Uji Komplesi
Uji komplesi adalah suatu rangkaian pengujian sumur yang dilakukan
untuk mengetahui kedalaman zona produksi dan kedalaman pusat-
pusat rekahan (feed zone) serta produktivitasnya.

PTS Injectivity
Test
Fall off Test
Uji Produksi Start

Uji produksi adalah suatu uji sumur yang Input Data :

dilakukan untuk mengetahui Jenis Fluida WHP, Weir box, Lip
Produksi dan Kemampuan Produksi Sumur Pressure and diameter

Calculation using Lip

Pressure Method

Output :
-Deliverability Curve
WHP vs Mass flow
-Deliverability Curve
WHP vs enthalpy

End
Tinjauan Lapangan
 Profil Star Energy Geothermal (Wayang
Windu), Ltd.
Star Energy Geothermal (Wayang
Windu), Ltd. merupakan perusahaan
nasional yang bergerak di bidang
panas bumi yang memulai usahanya
dari tahun 1991 dan beroperasi sejak
tahun 2000,
Pembahasan
 Analisa Potensi Produksi Sumur Dua Fasa “X”
Berdasarkan hasil analisa Uji Komplesi & Uji
Produksi di Lapangan “WW”

Uji Komplesi

Uji Produksi
Pressure Temperature Multi-rate
Spinner Injection Test

Data Sumur :
Data Logging : WHP, Weir box
Data : Pump Rate , P
P, T, Spinner indication, Lip Pressure

Calculation and Calculation, Plot Calculation Using

Simulation Pump Rate vs P James Lip Method

-Feed Zone -Deliverability Curve

Distribution WHP vs Mass flow
-Injectivity Index -Deliverability Curve
-Mass flow each
Feed Zone WHP vs enthalpy

Integrasi Data

Potensi Sumur “X” Dua Fasa

 Well Completion MBA-7 Well
WAYANG WINDU GEOTHERMAL
Well Name : MBA-7 • Well Coordinate UTM:
Rig : DATI-253 X: 9206713 m (Lat: 7° 10" 9' S)
Spud Date : December 29th, 2018 Y: 791017 m (Long: 107° 38" 5' E)
@ 16:00 hrs • RT Elevation : 1,952 m
Completion Date (Drilling) : January 26th, 2019 • GL Elevation : 1,942 m
@ 06:00 hrs • RKB-GL : 9.85 m

Wellbore Configuration
• Planned Depth: 1,650 m-MD RKB/ 1,578 m-TVD
30” Conductor Augered and Cemented • Max Angle/Inclination : 43 deg
• KOP: 320 mMD
@ 57 m-MD / 57 m-TVD

of “X” Well Bottom of Tie Back Stem @

243 m-MD
Overlap b/w 13-3/8" liner & tie-back = 1 m

13-3/8" TOL @242 m-MD

20” CSG 133 lbs/ft, X-56, GB3P

26" Hole: TD @ 335 mMD
Shoe at 335 m-MD / 334 m-TVD
Inclination: 8 deg, Azimuth: 211 deg

KOP @ 359 mMD

10-3/4" TOL @ 755 m-MD / 739 m-TVD

13-3/8” Liner CSG 68 lbs/ft, L80, VAM-21

Shoe @774 m-MD / 757 m-TVD

17-1/2” Hole TD @ 774 mMD

Inclination: 19 deg, Azimuth: 221 deg

8-5/8" TOL @ 1046 m-MD / 1014 m-TVD

10-3/4” 40.5 ppf K-55 BTC Slotted Liner SCC
Shoe @ 1,106 m-MD / 1,071 m-TVD
12 1/4" Hole TD @ 1,106 m-MD / 1,071 m-TVD
Inclination: 20 deg, Azimuth: 224 deg Azm

8-5/8” 28 ppf K-55 BTC Slotted Liner

9-7/8" Hole TD @ 1,513 m-MD / 1,446 m-TVD
Shoe @ 1,489 m-MD / 1,425 m-TVD
Inclination: 26 deg, Azimuth: 224 deg Azm
 Pressure Temperature Spinner Survey
Raw Data : Grouping and Calculating Slope
Logging Data (Depth,
Averaging Data (3 (Cable Speed and
Pressure, Temperature,
Spinner)
meter) Frequency)

Calculating Flow rate

Averaging Pressure Determining Fluid
using fluid velocity
and Temperature Velocity
and diameter liner

Feed Zone Location, Feedzone

Mass Flow
 Log up 30m/min Log up 60m/min
To 690md To 30md
PTS Survey Time Schedule
15:50:24 16:19:12 16:48:00 17:16:48 17:45:36 18:14:24 18:43:12 19:12:00
0

200
S S S
400 t t t
a a a
600
t t t
Depth (m)

800 i i i
o o o
1000 n n n
a a a
1200
r r r
1400 y y y

1600

Log Down Log Down

30m/min 60m/min
To 1350md To 1350md
 Raw Data :
Logging Data (Depth, Pressure,
Temperature, Spinner)
 Raw Data
Time Depth Speed Pressure Temperature Frequency
LD 30
m/min to (hh/mm/ss) M m/min Bar.a ᵒC RPM
1350 m
16:28:09 65.382 31.075 0.991 24.60 -810

Time Depth Speed Pressure Temperature Frequency

LU 30
m/min to (hh/mm/ss) M m/min Bar.a ᵒC RPM
690 m
17:25:17 1342.225 -26.003 51 113.41 -324

LD 60 Time Depth Speed Pressure Temperature Frequency

m/min
to
(hh/mm/ss) M m/min Bar.a ᵒC RPM
1350 18:02:30 735.609 60.221 2 27.79 -1458

LU 60 Time Depth Speed Pressure Temperature Frequency

m/min
to
(hh/mm/ss) M m/min Bar.a ᵒC RPM
30 m 18:33:45 698.379 -60.794 2 27.90 -1962
Grouping and Averaging Data
(Interval 3 meter)
 Averaging and Grouping data
Average Average Average Average
LD 30 Depth
Speed Temp. Press. Freq.
m/min to
1350 m M m/min ᵒC Bar.a RPM
753 32.40 73.16 3.86 -1868

Average Average Average Average

LU 30 Depth
Speed Temp. Press. Freq.
m/min to
690 m M m/min ᵒC Bar.a RPM
753 -30.32 74.39 3.89 -1908

Average Average Average Average

LD 60 Depth
m/min Speed Temp. Press. Freq.
to M m/min ᵒC Bar.a RPM
1350
753 60.69 72.90 3.80 -1746
Average Average Average Average
LU 60 Depth
m/min Speed Temp. Press. Freq.
to M m/min ᵒC Bar.a RPM
30 m
753 -61.29 75.43 3.99 -1962
Calculating Slope
(Cable Speed and
Frequency)
 Slope
∑ 𝒙−ẋ 𝒚−ẏ 𝒎/𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑺𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆 =
∑(𝒙 − ẋ) 𝑹𝑷𝑴

Sumber : Allen H. Lukmana, Pressure Temperature

Spinner [PTS]
at 861 m
1600

Frequency Cable Speed 1400

RPM m/min Slope @861 = 0.22 1200

-432.9 31.83 1000

800

-645.72 -29.73 600

Avg. Slope = 0.23 400

-328.2 60.07
200

-864 -60.17 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Determining Fluid Velocity
 Fluid Velocity
𝒎
𝑭𝒍𝒖𝒊𝒅 𝑽𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚 = 𝑨𝒗𝒈. 𝑺𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆 ∗ 𝑭𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒚 − 𝑪𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝑺𝒑𝒆𝒆𝒅 ( )
𝒎𝒊𝒏

at 861 m
Frequency Cable Speed
FV (m/s)
RPM m/min

-432.9 31.83 LD 30 -2.22

-645.72 -29.73 LU 30 -2.03 Av. FV = -2.23 m/s

Avg. Slope = 0.23

-328.2 60.07 LD 60 -2.28

-864 -60.17 LU 60 -2.37

 Corrected Fluid Velocity

𝑭𝒍𝒖𝒊𝒅 𝑽𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚
𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝑽𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚 = ∗ 𝑽𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑨𝒅𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕
𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓

PTS Tool Correction

Minimum Angle Correction Factor Velocity Adjusment
1.5 degree 1.2 -0.53

At 861 m −𝟐. 𝟐𝟑
Angel : 19.20 𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝑽𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝟖𝟔𝟏 =
𝟏. 𝟐
∗ −𝟎. 𝟓𝟑

𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝑽𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝟖𝟔𝟏 = 𝟏. 𝟏𝟖 𝒎/𝒔

 Depth vs Fluid Velocity Depth vs Frekuensi

Fluid Velocity (m/s) Frekuensi (RPM)

-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0
600 600

13 3/8 13 3/8
700 700

800 800

10 3/4 LD 30 10 3/4 LD 30
900
LU 30 900
LU 30
Depth (m)

Depth (m)
1000
LD 60 LD 60
1000
LU 60 LU 60
1100 1100

8 5/8
8 5/8 1200 1200

1300
1300

1400
1400
Averaging Pressure and
Temperature
Averaging Pressure and Temperature
PTS Injection

Pressure Temperature Temperature (ᵒC), Pressure (bara)

@861 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
(bar.a) (C) 0 0
50
LD 30 8.01 98.76 100
150

LU 30 7.97 100.62 200 200

250
300
LD 60 8.00 97.11
13 3/8
350
400 400

LU 60 8.03 101.29 450

500
550 Pressure (bara)
600 600

Depth (meter)
650
Temperature (deg.C)
Inflow 1 700
Avg. Press. = 8.00 Bar.a 750
800 800 Temperature Sat
10 3/4
850 (deg.C)
900
Inflow 2 950
1000 1000
1050
Temp. Sat. = 170.45 C 1100
1150
1200 8 5/8
1200
1250
1300
1350

Avg. Temp. = 99.45 C 1400

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
1400

Flow Rate (kg/s)

 Calculating Flow rate
using fluid velocity and
diameter liner
 Flow Rate

811 m Flow Rate

𝑄=𝑉∗𝐴 Fluid 0.06 m^3/s
(m^3/min) 1.18 m/min
Velocity
ID 0.255 m
𝑄= ρ * 𝑉 *𝐴 Area 0.051 m2 54.20 kg/s
(kg/min)
Pressure 8.00 bar.a
Sumber:
Paper Fahmi Ramdhan,”
ANALISIS HASIL PTS SURVEY density 896.98 kg/m3
PADA SAAT KOMPLESI UNTUK
MENENTUKAN
ZONA PRODUKSI SUMUR “X”
 PTS Injection
Temperature (ᵒC), Pressure (bara)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0 0
50
100
150
200 200
13 3/8 250
300
350
400 400
450
500
550
Pressure (bara)
Depth (meter)

600 600
650 Temperature (deg.C)
TOP 10 3/4
@745 mD Inflow 700
750 Temperature Sat (deg.C)
800 800 Flow Rate (kg/s)
850
10 3/4 900
950
1000 1000
TOP 8 5/8 1050
@1036 mD
1100
1150
1200 Outflow 1200
1250
8 5/8 1300
1350
1400 1400
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Flow Rate (kg/s)

Feed Zone Location,
Feedzone Mass Flow
 Mass Balance Inflow Feedzone
Enthalpy in Enthalpy out
Feedzone Depth m Temperature C
kJ/kg kJ/kg
1 753-795 28-72 117.3835 301.398
2 819-873 76-100 318.1669 419.0992

PTS Injection

Temperature (ᵒC), Pressure (bara)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300
750 750
Inflow 1
800 800
Pressure (bara)
Inflow 2
Depth (meter)

850 850
Temperature (deg.C)
Temperature Sat (deg.C)
900 900
Flow Rate (kg/s)
950 950

1000 1000
8 5/8
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Flow Rate (kg/s)
 53 kg/s
28 deg.C
117.38 kJ/kg
753 m
2800 kJ/kg
3.903 kg/s
Mass Balance Inflow 795 m
72 ᵒC
301.389 kJ/kg
Mass Flow 56.903 kg/s
Feedzone Depth m
kg/s

1 753-795 -3.9
2 819-873 -2.4 76 deg.C
56.903 kg/s
318 kJ/kg
819 m
2800 kJ/kg
2.41 kg/s
873 m 419.09 kJ/kg
100 ᵒC
59.3 kg/s
 Flow Velocity vs Depth
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
750

10 3/4
850

Outflow Prediction 950

1050
8 5/8
Outflow 1 1150

1250
Outflow 2
1350
Outflow 3
Diameter Pressure Heat Up Flow Rate (kg/s) Pressure

Mass Receive Pwb Pres II PI

Depth
Kg/s Bar.a Bar.a kg/s/bara Kg/s/bara

1128 31.3 30.24 26.2 7.7 0.77

1250 12 42.37 26.42 0.7 0.07 Major
Feedzone
1340 16 50.58 33.65 0.9 0.09
 Feedzone Distribution and Mass Flow of “X” well

Depth Mass Flow Pwell Pres II PI

Feedzone Remark
(m MD) (kg/s) Bar.a Bar.a kg/s/bara Kg/s/bara
1 753-795 -3.9 2.24 25.77 - 0.16 Inflow
2 819-873 -2.4 6.76 25.87 - 0.12 Inflow
3 1128 31.3 30.2 26.2 7.7 0.77 Outflow
4 1250 12 42.3 26.4 0.7 0.07 Outflow
5 1340 16 50.5 33.6 0.9 0.09 Outflow

Major Feed Zone

 Multi-rate Injection

Raw Data : Plot Pump Rate vs

Calculate Slope and II
Pump Rate, Pressure Pressure
 Raw Data :
Pump Rate, Pressure
 Multi-rate Injection Test
Pressure Rate
33.00 53 LPS 45 LPS 60
35 LPS

Pump Rate (LPS)

32.00

Pressure (bara)
50
31.00 25 LPS 40
30.00
41.6 LPS 27 LPS 30
29.00
20
28.00

27.00 10

26.00 0
19:12 19:40 20:09 20:38 21:07 21:36 22:04 22:33 23:02 23:31

Time

Pump Rate (LPS) Pressure (bara)

53 33.00
45 31.80
35 31.00
27 29.37
Plot Pump Rate vs
Pressure
 Pressure VS Pump Rate
60.00

50.00

40.00
Pump Rate (LPS)

30.00

20.00

10.00

0.00
29.00 29.50 30.00 30.50 31.00 31.50 32.00 32.50 33.00 33.50

Pressure (bara)
Calculate Slope and II
 Pressure VS Pump Rate
60.00

50.00

SLOPE = Injectivity Index = 7.3 kg/s/bara

Pump Rate (LPS)

40.00

30.00

20.00 y = 7.3656x - 190.49

R² = 0.9712

10.00

0.00
29.00 29.50 30.00 30.50 31.00 31.50 32.00 32.50 33.00 33.50

Pressure (bara)
 Production Test

Calculating Mass Flow Calculating Flow Enthalpy

Raw Data:
Using 90 V Notches Weir Using Russel James
WHP, Plip, h weirbox
Box Equation

Calculating Dryness
@WHP, Steam Mass Flow Calculating Total Mass
Deliverability Curve
@WHP, Brine Mass Flow Flow from well
@WHP
 Raw Data:
WHP, Plip, h weirbox
 Raw Data

WHP Barg Plip psig H weir m WHP Bara Plipcorrection Bara

13.38 9.7 0.08 14.14 1.42
12.26 20.6 0.1 13.01 2.17
9.91 37.1 0.13 10.67 3.31

Sumur “X” Elevasi 1942 masl

Patm@1942 = (P@0m – elevasi/100) cmHg
= 76 – 19.42 cmHg = 56.58 cmHg
= 0.75 bar
Calculating Mass Flow
Using 90 V Notches
Weir Box
 90 V Notches Mass Calculation
Ꝋ 𝟓
𝑸 = 𝟒. 𝟐𝟖 𝑪 𝐭𝐚𝐧 (𝒉 + 𝒌)𝟐
𝟐

C = 0.607165052 - 0.000874466963 θ + 6.10393334x10-

6 θ2
K = 0.0144902648 - 0.00033955535 θ + 3.29819003x10-
6 θ2 - 1.06215442x10-8 θ3

Sumber : USBR
(1997) 𝟗𝟎
𝑸 = 𝟒. 𝟐𝟖 ∗ 𝟎. 𝟓𝟕𝟕𝟗𝟎𝟒𝟖𝟗 𝒕𝒂𝒏 (𝒉 + 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟐𝟗𝟎𝟐𝟓𝟐)𝟐.𝟓 𝒄𝒖𝒇𝒕/𝒔
𝟐
Mass Flow Calculation

hweir Watm (cuft/s) Watm (m^3/s)

0.08 0.09 0.00268
0.1 0.16 0.00452
0.13 0.30 0.00852

Patm = 0.75 bar

Density = 964.01 kg/m^3

hweir Watm (kg/s) Watm (ton/hr)

0.08 2.57 9.28
0.1 4.35 15.69
0.13 8.22 29.58
 Calculating Flow
Enthalpy Using Russel
James Equation
 Flow Enthalpy
𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒎 𝟎.𝟏𝟖𝟒 𝒙 𝟑𝟔𝟎𝟎 𝒙 (𝒉𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒎 −𝑯)
Russel James Equation : = =𝒀
𝑨 𝒙 𝑷𝟎.𝟗𝟔 𝒉𝒇𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒎 𝒙 𝑯𝟏.𝟏𝟎𝟐

ID Lip = 5.761 in Hgatm = 2662 kJ/kg

Area = 168.171 cm^2 Hfgatm = 2277 kJ/kg
Source : Steam Table

Sumber : Nenny Saptadjie (Teknik Panas

Bumi)

WHP Lip WHP H (kj/kg)

Y Goal Seek
(bar) (bara)
13.38 2075
13.38 1.42 0.039 Using Russel James 12.26 2014
12.26 2.17 0.044 Equation 9.91 1894
9.91 3.31 0.055
Calculating Total Mass Flow
from well
 Total Mass Flow

𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒎 ∗ 𝒉𝒇𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒎
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑴𝒂𝒔𝒔 𝑭𝒍𝒐𝒘 𝑴 =
𝒉𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒎 − 𝑯

Sumber : Nenny Saptadjie (Teknik Panas Bumi)

WHP (bar) Watm (ton/jam) Total Mass Flow Total Mass Flow
(ton/hr) (kg/s)
13.38 9.28 36.00 10.00
12.26 15.69 55.13 15.31
9.91 29.58 87.76 24.37
 Calculating Dryness
@WHP, Steam Mass Flow
@WHP, Brine Mass Flow
@WHP
 Dryness, Steam Flow, and Brine Flow at WHP

𝑯 − 𝒉𝒇
𝑫𝒓𝒚𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒙 = 𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 = 𝑥 ∗ 𝑀𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 = (1 − 𝑥) ∗ 𝑀𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝒉𝒈 − 𝒉𝒇

Sumber : Nenny Saptadjie (Teknik Panas

Bumi)

Steam Brine
WHP WHP Hf Hg H Total Flow
X Flow Flow
(barg) (bara) (kj/kg) (kj/kg) (kj/kg) (kg/s)
(kg/s) (kg/s)
13.38 14.14 832.23 2789.21 2075 0.63 10.00 6.36 3.64
12.26 13.01 815.02 2786.54 2014 0.60 15.31 9.31 6.00
9.91 10.67 775.23 2779.55 1894 0.55 24.37 13.61 10.76
 WHP 13 Barg
Total Mass Flow : 12 kg/s
Deliverability Curve Steam : 7.5 kg/s
Brine : 4.5 kg/s

WHP VS Mass Flow WHP VS Enthalpy

30 3000

25 2500
Mass Flow (kg/s)

Enthalpy (kJ/kg)
20 2000

15 1500
Mtotal
Msteam

10 Mbrine 1000

5 500

0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

WHP (barg) WHP (barg)

 Conclusion
• Dari hasil uji komplesi yang dilakukan pada sumur dua fasa “X”
dengan melihat data PTS Survey dan besaran injeksi air yang
diberikan diperoleh indikasi inflow feedzone pada kedalaman
753-795 mD dan 819-873 mD sedangkan outflow feedzone
tersebar pada kedalaman 1128 mD, 1250 mD, dan 1340 mD.

• Dari hasil perhitungan mass balance yang dilakukan pada

sumur dua fasa “X”, diperoleh informasi kontribusi mass flow
pada masing masing feedzone sebesar: Inflow 1: -3.9 kg/s,
Inflow 2: -2.4 kg/s, Outflow 1 : 31.3 kg/s, Outflow 2 : 12 kg/s dan
Outflow 3 : 16 kg/s.
• Nilai Productivity Index dan Injectivity Index pada sumur dua
fasa “X” berdasarkan analisa PTS Survey yaitu:
PI II
Inflow 1 : 0.16 kg/s/bar, Outflow 1 : 7.7 kg/s/bar,
Inflow 2 : 0.12 kg/s/bar, Outflow 2 : 0.7 kg/s/bar,
Outflow 1 : 0.77 kg/s/bar, Outflow 3 : 0.9 kg/s/bar
Outflow 2 : 0.07 kg/s/bar,
Outflow 3 : 0.09 kg/s/bar
Sedangkan nilai Injectivity Index Outflow Major Feedzone
berdasarkan hasil analisa multi-rate injection sebesar 7.3
kg/s/bar dan Productivity index sebesar 0.73 kg/s/bar

• Dengan melihat kurva deliverability curve yang dihasilkan dari

performance test sumur dua fasa “X” dalam uji produksi, maka
nilai ekonomis pada tekanan kepala sumur 13 barg (tekanan
operational minimum yang ditentukan di lapangan wayang
windu) sebesar 12 kg/s (dengan estimasi steam sebesar 7.5 kg/s
dan brine 4.5 kg/s).
 Recommendation
• Fall off test setelah multi-rate injection test sebaiknya
dilakukan untuk mengetahui seberapa cepat naiknya
tekanan reservoir (build up pressure) setelah proses
injeksi dihentikan. Data fall of test dapat memberikan
informasi lanjutan berupa permeabilitas formasi dan
skin factor di sekitar lubang sumur.

• Perlu dilakukan PTS Survey under flowing untuk

memastikan letak feedzone pada sumur dua fasa “x”.
TERIMA KASIH