energy eg
d-shell
Δ split by
presence
3d sub-shell of ligand
donor-atoms
Co3+ ion
in gas-phase t2g
(d6) Co(III) in
complex
The d-orbitals: the t2g
set
z z z
y y y
x x x
dyz dxy dxz
z z
y y
the eg
x x set
dz2 dx2-y2
Splitting of the d sub-shell in
octahedral coordination
blue = ligand donor
the t2g set atom orbitals the egset
z z z
y y y
x x x
dyz dz2 dx2-y2
the three orbitals of the two orbitals of the eg set lie along the
the t2g set lie between Cartesian coordinates, and so are adjacent
the ligand donor-atoms to the donor atoms of the ligands, which
(only d shown) raises the eg set in energy
Splitting of the d sub-shell in
an octahedral complex
energy
eg
d-shell
split by
Δ presence
of ligand
3d sub-shell
donor-atoms
Co3+ ion
in gas-phase
t2g
(d6) Co(III) in
octahedral
complex
The crystal field splitting parameter (Δ)
Different ligands produce different extents of splitting between
the eg and the t2g levels. This energy difference is the crystal
field splitting parameter Δ, also known as 10Dq, and has units
of cm-1. Typically, CN- produces very large values of Δ, while F-
produces very small values.
energy
eg eg
Δ = 26,600 cm-1 Δ = 15,000 cm-1
t2g
t2g
[Cr(CN)6]3- [CrF6]3-
High and low-spin complexes:
The d-electrons in d4 to d8 configurations can be high-spin, where they
spread out and occupy the whole d sub-shell, or low-spin, where the t2g
level is filled first. This is controlled by whether Δ is larger than the spin-
pairing energy, P, which is the energy required to take pairs of electrons
with the same spin orientation, and pair them up with the opposite spin.
Paramagnetic
eg 4 unpaired e’s
eg
energy
diamagnetic
Δ>P Δ<P
no unpaired e’s
t2g t2g
low-spin d6 high-spin d6
electrons fill the t2g level first. In this electrons fill the whole d sub-
case the complex is diamagnetic shell according to Hund’s rule
High and low-spin complexes of d5 ions:
For d5 ions P is usually very large, so these are mostly high-spin. Thus,
Fe(III) complexes are usually high-spin, although with CN- Δ is large enough
that [Fe(CN)6]3- is low spin: (CN- always produces the largest Δ values)
eg Paramagnetic
5 unpaired e’s eg
energy
Δ>P paramagnetic Δ<P
one unpaired e
t2g t2g
low-spin d5 ([Fe(CN)6]3- ) high-spin d5 ([Fe(H2O)6]3+ )
electrons fill the t2g level first. In this electrons fill the whole d sub-shell
case the complex is paramagnetic according to Hund’s rule
High and low-spin complexes of d7 ions:
The d7 metal ion that one commonly encounters is the Co(II) ion. For metal
ions of the same electronic configuration, Δ tends to increase M(II) < M(III) <
M(IV), so that Co(II) complexes have a small Δ and are usually high spin.
The (III) ion Ni(III) has higher values of Δ, and is usually low-spin.
[Ni(bipy)3]3+ [Co(H2O)6]2+ Δ = 9,300 cm-1
eg Paramagnetic
3 unpaired e’s eg
energy
Δ>P paramagnetic Δ<P
one unpaired e
t2g t2g
low-spin d7 ([Ni(bipy)3]3+ ) high-spin d7 ([Co(H2O)6]3+ )
The d-electrons fill the t2g level first, electrons fill the whole d sub-shell
and only then does an electron according to Hund’s rule
occupy the e level.
High and low-spin complexes of some d6 ions:
For d6 ions Δ is very large for an M(III) ion such as Co(III), so all Co(III)
complexes are low-spin except for [CoF6]3- .high-spin. Thus,
Fe(III) complexes are usually high-spin, although with CN- Δ is large enough
that [Fe(CN)6]3- is low spin: (CN- always produces the largest Δ values)
[Co(CN)6]3- Δ = 34,800 cm-1 [CoF6]3- Δ = 13,100 cm-1
P = 19,000 cm-1 P = 22,000 cm-1
eg Paramagnetic
eg
4 unpaired e’s
energy
Δ >> P diamagnetic Δ<P
no unpaired e’s
t2g t2g
low-spin d6 ([Co(CN)6]4- ) high-spin d5 ([CoF6]3- )
electrons fill the t2g level first. In this electrons fill the whole d sub-shell
case the complex is diamagnetic according to Hund’s rule
The spectrochemical series:
I- < Br- < Cl- < F- < OH- ≈ H2O < NH3 < CN-
The spectrochemical series:
The place of a ligand in the spectrochemical series is determined
largely by its donor atoms. Thus, all N-donor ligands are close to
ammonia in the spectrochemical series, while all O-donor ligands
are close to water. The spectrochemical series follows the positions
of the donor atoms in the periodic table as:
C N O F
?
very little
P S Cl
spectrochemical
data on series follows
S-donors ≈
P-donors – arrows around
between Br Br
may be higher starting at I and
and Cl
than N-donors ending at C
I
The spectrochemical series:
Thus, we can predict that O-donor ligands such as oxalate or
acetylacetonate will be close to water in the spectrochemical series.
It should be noted that while en and dien are close to ammonia in
the spectrochemical series, 2,2’bipyridyl and 1,10-phenanthroline
are considerably higher than ammonia because their sp2 hybridized
N-donors are more covalent in their bonding than the sp3 hybridized
donors of ammonia.
O O H3C CH3
- - O O- H2N NH2
O O
oxalate acetylacetonate en
H2N N NH2
H N N N N
[Co(NH3)6]3+ : [Cr(en)3]3+
energy
eg eg
t2g t2g
Δ = 22,900 cm-1 Δ = 21,900 cm-1
[Mn(NH3)6]2+ : [Zn(en)3]3+
energy
eg eg
t2g t2g
Δ = 22,900 cm-1 Δ = not known
= 0 cm-1 = 0 cm-1
Crystal Field Stabilization Energy
(CFSE) of d0 to d10 M(II) ions:
For M(II) ions with the same set of ligands, the variation of Δ is not large. One can
therefore use the equation for CFSE to calculate CFSE in terms of Δ for d0 through
d10 M(II) ions (all metal ions high-spin):
Ca(II) Sc(II) Ti(II) V(II) Cr(II) Mn(II) Fe(II) Co(II) Ni(II) Cu(II) Zn(II)
d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 d10
1.4
CFSE in multiples of Δ.
1.2
1
0.8 Ni2+
0.6 double-
0.4 humped
0.2
curve
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
no of d-electrons
20
= CFSE
18
logK1(EDTA)
.
16
double-
14 humped
12
curve
10 Zn2+
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
no of d-electrons Mn2+ rising baseline
due to ionic
Ca2+ contraction
Log K1(en) of d0 to d10 M(II) ions:
log K1(en) as a function of no of d-
electrons
12 = CFSE
10
logK1(en).
6 double-
4 humped
2 curve
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Zn2+
no of d-electrons
rising baseline
Ca 2+
Mn2+ due to ionic
contraction
Log K1(tpen) of d0 to d10 M(II) ions:
log K1(tpen) as a function of no of d-
electrons
20
logK1(tpen).
15
double-
10
humped
5 curve
0 Zn2+
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
no of d-electrons Mn2+ N N N N
tpen N N
Ca2+
The Irving-Williams Stability Order:
Mn(II) < Fe(II) < Co(II) < Ni(II) < Cu(II) > Zn(II)
We see that this order holds for the ligand EDTA, en, and
TPEN on the previous slides. One notes that Cu(II) does
not follow the order predicted by CFSE, which would have
Ni(II) > Cu(II). This will be discussed under Jahn-Teller
distortion of Cu(II) complexes, which leads to additional
stabilization for Cu(II) complexes over what would be
expected from the variation in CFSE.