Anda di halaman 1dari 38

Chapter

16
Income Distribution
and Poverty

Prepared by:

Fernando & Yvonn Quijano

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair
Income Distribution
and Poverty
16
Chapter Outline
The Utility Possibilities Frontier

The Sources of Household Income


Wages and Salaries
Income from Property
Income from the Government: Transfer
Payments

The Distribution of Income


Income Inequality in the United States
Poverty
The Distribution of Wealth

The Redistribution Debate


Arguments against Redistribution
Arguments in Favor of Redistribution

Redistribution Programs and Policies


Financing Redistribution Programs: Taxes
Expenditure Programs
P A HC

How Effective Are Antipoverty Programs?

Government or the Market? A Review


© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 2 of 38
INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY

equity Fairness.

Why do some people get more than others? What


are the sources of inequality? Should the
government change the distribution generated by
the market?
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 3 of 38
THE UTILITY POSSIBILITIES FRONTIER

FIGURE 16.1 Utility Possibilities Frontier

utility possibilities frontier A graphic


representation of a two-person world that
shows all points at which A’s utility can be
P A HC

increased only if B’s utility is decreased.


© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 4 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

Households derive their incomes from three basic sources: (1) from wages or salaries
received in exchange for labor; (2) from property—that is, capital, land, and so forth; and (3)
from government.

WAGES AND SALARIES

Required Skills, Human Capital, and Working


Conditions

human capital The stock of knowledge,


skills, and talents that people possess; it
can be inborn or acquired through education
and training.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 5 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

compensating differentials Differences in


wages that result from differences in working
conditions. Risky jobs usually pay
higher wages; highly desirable jobs usually
pay lower wages.

According to experts, the Alaskan


fishing industry faces the most
dangerous working conditions in the
country. For this reason, Alaskan
fishermen are paid compensating
differentials that raise their average
wage high above the average wage
of the U.S. general population.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 6 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

Multiple Household Incomes

Another source of wage inequality among


households lies in the fact that many households
have more than one earner in the labor force.
Second, and even third, incomes are becoming more
the rule than the exception for U.S. families.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 7 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

The Minimum Wage Controversy

minimum wage The lowest wage that


firms are permitted to pay workers.

Many fast-food restaurants pay their


employees minimum wage. In some
locations, however, restaurants
find that they must pay above
minimum wage to attract and retain
staff.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 8 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME
P A HC

FIGURE 16.2 Effect of Minimum Wage Legislation

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 9 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

Unemployment

Unemployment hurts primarily those who are laid off,


and thus its costs are narrowly distributed. For some
workers, the costs of unemployment are lowered by
unemployment compensation benefits paid out of a
fund accumulated with receipts from a tax on
payrolls.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 10 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

INCOME FROM PROPERTY

property income Income from the


ownership of real property and financial
holdings. It takes the form of profits,
interest, dividends, and rents.

The amount of property income that a household earns depends on (1) how much property it
owns and (2) what kinds of assets it owns. Such income generally takes the form of profits,
P A HC

interest, dividends, and rents.

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 11 of 38
THE SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME

INCOME FROM THE GOVERNMENT: TRANSFER


PAYMENTS

transfer payments Payments by


government to people who do not supply
goods or services in exchange.

Transfer programs are by and large designed to provide income to those in need. They
are part of the government’s attempts to offset some of the problems of inequality and
P A HC

poverty.

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 12 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

economic income The amount of money a


household can spend during a given period
without increasing or decreasing its net
assets. Wages, salaries, dividends, interest
income, transfer payments, rents, and so
forth are sources of economic income.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 13 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

INCOME INEQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES


TABLE 16.1 Distribution of Total Income and Components in the United States, 2000
(Percentages)
TOTAL LABOR PROPERTY TRANSFER
HOUSEHOLDS INCOME INCOME INCOME INCOME

Bottom fifth 2.7 1.7 0.7 19.2


Second fifth 7.2 6.3 4.2 25.8
Third fifth 12.6 12.7 9.2 23.0
Fourth fifth 21.3 23.6 15.1 17.0
Top fifth 56.7 55.6 73.2 14.8
Top 1 percent 14.8 10.9 31.6 1.2

Source: Julie-Anne Cronin, US Department of the Treasury, OTA Paper 85, pg 19.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 14 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

Changes in the Distribution of Income

TABLE 16.2 Distribution of Money Income of U.S. Families by Quintiles, 1947–2000


(Percentages)
1947 1960 1972 1980 1984 1994 1997 2000

Bottom fifth 5.0 4.8 5.4 5.2 4.7 4.2 4.2 4.2
Second fifth 11.8 12.2 11.9 11.5 11.0 10.0 9.9 9.7
Third fifth 17.0 17.8 17.5 17.5 17.0 15.7 15.7 15.5
Fourth fifth 23.1 24.0 23.9 24.3 24.4 23.3 23.0 23.0
Top fifth 43.0 41.3 41.4 41.5 42.9 46.9 47.2 47.6
Top 5% 17.2 15.9 15.9 15.3 16.0 20.1 20.7 20.8

Source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, various editions; Department of Commerce, HHES Division.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 15 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

money income The measure of income


used by the Census Bureau. Because it
excludes noncash transfer payments and
capital gains income, it is less inclusive than
“economic income.”
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 16 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

The Lorenz Curve and the Gini Coefficient

Lorenz curve A widely used graph of the


distribution of income, with cumulative
percentage of families plotted along the
horizontal axis and cumulative percentage
of income plotted along the vertical axis.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 17 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
P A HC

FIGURE 16.3 Lorenz Curve for the United States, 2002

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 18 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

Gini coefficient A commonly used


measure of inequality of income derived
from a Lorenz curve. It can range from
0 to a maximum of 1.

If income is equally distributed, there is no shaded area (because the Lorenz curve and
the 45-degree line are the same), and the Gini coefficient is zero. The Lorenz curves for
distributions with more inequality are farther down to the right, their shaded areas are
larger, and their Gini coefficients are higher. The maximum Gini coefficient is 1. As the
Lorenz curve shifts down to the right, the shaded area becomes a larger portion of the
total triangular area below 0 A. If one family earned all the income (with no one else
P A HC

receiving anything), the shaded area and the triangle would be the same, and the ratio
would equal 1.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 19 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
Differences among African-American
Households, White Households, and Single-
Person Households
TABLE 16.3 Distribution of Money Income of Households, 2002 (Percentages)
AFRICAN-
ALL AMERICAN WHITE HISPANIC ONE-PERSON
HOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHOLDS HOUSEHOLDS

0-15,000 16.1 27.4 14.5 19.1 36.3


15-25,000 13.2 16.4 12.8 17.2 19.8
25-35,000 12.3 14.5 12.0 15.7 13.7
35-50,000 15.1 14.8 15.2 16.4 13.4
50-75,000 18.3 13.9 18.9 16.9 9.7
75,-100,000 11.0 6.7 11.6 7.5 3.7
>100,000 14.1 6.4 15.0 7.2 3.5
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
P A HC

Note: Totals may not add to 100 due to rounding.


Source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2002, Tables 665 and 667.

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 20 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

POVERTY
The Problem of Definition

Although it is difficult to define precisely, the word


poverty is one that we all understand intuitively to
some degree.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 21 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

The Official Poverty Line

poverty line The officially established


income level that distinguishes the poor
from the nonpoor. It is set at three times
the cost of the Department of Agriculture’s
minimum food budget.
P A HC

The official poverty line has been set at a figure that is simply three times the cost of
the Department of Agriculture’s minimum food budget.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 22 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

Poverty in the United States Since 1960


TABLE 16.4 Percentage of Persons in Poverty by
Demographic Group, 1964–2001
OFFICIAL OFFICIAL
MEASURE MEASURE
1964 2004

All 19.0 12.7


White 14.9 10.8
African-American 49.6 24.7
Hispanic NA 21.8
Female householder –
no husband present 45.9 28.4
Elderly (65+) 28.5 9.8
Children under 18 20.7 17.8

Includes food, housing, and medical benefits.


a
P A HC

Source: Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2002-2005.

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 23 of 38
THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME

THE DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

TABLE 16.5 Percentage of Different Assets Owned by Households, 1998 Survey of


Consumer Finances
COMMON STOCK NONEQUITY
PERCENTAGE OF EXCLUDING ALL COMMON FINANCIAL HOUSING NET
OWNERS PENSIONS STOCK ASSETS EQUITY WORTH

Top .5% 41.4 37.0 24.2 10.2 25.6

Top 1% 53.2 47.7 32.0 14.8 34.0

Top 10%t 91.2 86.2 72.2 50.7 68.9

Bottom 80% 1.7 4.1 14.0 29.3 18.5

Source: James Poterba, “Stock Market Wealth and Consumption,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(2), 99 – 118 , Spring 2000.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 24 of 38
THE REDISTRIBUTION DEBATE

ARGUMENTS AGAINST REDISTRIBUTION

Those who argue against government redistribution


believe that the market, when left to operate on its
own, is fair.

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF REDISTRIBUTION

The argument most often used in favor of


redistribution is that a society as wealthy as the
United States has a moral obligation to provide all its
members with the necessities of life.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 25 of 38
THE REDISTRIBUTION DEBATE

Utilitarian Justice

utilitarian justice The idea that “a dollar in


the hand of a rich person is worth less than
a dollar in the hand of a poor person.” If
the marginal utility of income declines with
income, transferring income from the rich to
the poor will increase total utility.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 26 of 38
THE REDISTRIBUTION DEBATE

Social Contract Theory—Rawlsian Justice

Rawlsian justice A theory of distributional


justice that concludes that the social
contract emerging from the “original
position” would call for an income
distribution that would maximize the well-
being of the worst-off member of society.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 27 of 38
THE REDISTRIBUTION DEBATE

The Works of Karl Marx

labor theory of value Stated most simply,


the theory that the value of a commodity
depends only on the amount of labor required
to produce it.

Income Distribution as a Public Good

We turn to government to provide things we


want that will not be provided adequately if we
act separately—in this case, help for the poor
and hungry.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 28 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

FINANCING REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS: TAXES

Redistribution always involves those who end


up with less and those who end up with more.
Because redistributional programs are
financed by tax dollars, it is important to know
who the donors and recipients are—who pays
the taxes and who receives the benefits of
those taxes.
P A HC

All people pay about the same percentage of their income in total taxes.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 29 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

TABLE 16.6 Effective Rates of Federal, State, and Local Taxes, 2000
(Taxes as a Percentage of Total Income)
FEDERAL TOTAL

Bottom 20% 5.9 28.1


Second 20 11.7 26.3
Third 20 17.4 29.2
Fourth 20 20.1 32.6

Top 20 24.6 33.9


Top 10 25.7 34.5
Top 5 26.6 34.9
Top 1 29.1 37.0
P A HC

Source: Julie-Anne Cronin, US Department of the Treasury, OTA Paper 85 and authors’ estimate.

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 30 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS

Social Security

Social Security system The federal


system of social insurance programs. It
includes three separate programs that are
financed through separate trust funds: the
Old Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI)
program, the Disability Insurance (DI)
program, and the Health Insurance (HI, or
Medicare) program.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 31 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

Public Assistance

public assistance, or welfare Government


transfer programs that provide cash benefits
to (1) families with dependent children
whose incomes and assets fall below a very
low level and (2) the very poor regardless of
whether or not they have children.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 32 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

Supplemental Security Income

The Supplemental Security Income program (SSI) is


a federal program that was set up under the Social
Security Administration in 1974.

Unemployment Compensation

unemployment compensation A state


government transfer program that pays
cash benefits for a certain period of time to
laid-off workers who have worked for a
specified period of time for a covered
employer.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 33 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

Medicaid and Medicare

Medicaid and Medicare In-kind


government transfer programs that provide
health and hospitalization benefits:
Medicare to the aged and their survivors
and to certain of the disabled, regardless of
income, and Medicaid to people with low
incomes.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 34 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

Food Stamps

food stamps Vouchers that have a face


value greater than their cost and that can be
used to purchase food at grocery stores.

Housing Programs

The Earned Income Tax Credit


P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 35 of 38
REDISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES

HOW EFFECTIVE ARE ANTIPOVERTY


PROGRAMS?

Some say economic growth is the best way to cure


poverty.

The opposite view is that poverty would be much


more widespread without antipoverty programs.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 36 of 38
GOVERNMENT OR THE MARKET? A REVIEW

Remember that government is not a cure for all


economic woes. There is no guarantee that public-
sector involvement will improve matters. Many argue
that government involvement may bring about even
more inequity and inefficiency because bureaucrats
are often driven by self-interest, not public interest.
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 37 of 38
REVIEW TERMS AND CONCEPTS

compensating differentials money income


economic income poverty line
equity property income
food stamps public assistance, or welfare
Gini coefficient Rawlsian justice
human capital Social Security system
labor theory of value transfer payments
Lorenz curve unemployment
Medicaid and Medicare compensation
minimum wage utilitarian justice
utility possibilities frontier
P A HC

© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 38 of 38

Anda mungkin juga menyukai