c
c
c
!
!
!
!
"
#
#
!
!
!
$
%
&"'()
!
! *
+ +
, -
---
c
The most common modes of ADR are:
a.Negotiation
b.Arbitration
c.Conciliation or mediation
d.Tribunals
e.Lok-Adalats
!
This is the most simple mode of ADR. When parties themselves,
agree/negotiate to settle the disputes, without the help / assistance
of any third party, it is negotiation. Since there is an agreement
arrived at out of negotiation between the parties, the parties
generally give due regard to the outcome. It may be oral or in writing.
Generally parties, in order to bring clarity reduce the settlement into
writing. A family dispute of property or amount and payment of debt
if settled through negotiation of parties, are examples of negotiation.
"c#
]eaning of arbitration: arbitration involves the
determination of a matter in dispute by the
judgment of one or more persons, called
arbitrators. An arbitration is the reference of the
dispute or difference between parties foe
determination, after hearing both sides in a
judicial manner, by the arbitrator. In popular
parlance, arbitration may be defined as a private
process set up by the parties as a substitute for
the court litigation to obtain a decision on their
dispute.
$ c#
Domestic;
International;
Ad-hoc;
Institutional;
Specialized; and
Statutory
%&!c#
X The process of arbitration is governed by the
arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (the
act). The act has been bought into force with
effect from 25 January, 1996. The act is
broadly based on the model law on arbitration
adopted by the United Nations commission on
international trade law (UNCITRAL).
c#c!'
The act defines arbitration agreement as ͞ an agreement by
the Parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes
which have arisen between them in respect of a defined legal
relationship whether contractual or not.͟
)*'
or the first time the word Conciliation is given
statuary recognition by the arbitration and
conciliation Act, 1996. This concept is based on
conciliation rules adopted by UNCITRAL. In
conciliation, an impartial third party, the conciliator,
assists the parties to a dispute in reaching a
mutually agreed settlement of the dispute.
]ediation and conciliation are interchangeable
expression. In mediation the parties have the
freedom to agree as they please and the mediator
decides nothing, advises as to nothing. the
conciliator is not bound by the code of civil
procedure or the Indian evidence act. the
conciliator may conduct the proceeding in such a
manner as he considers appropriate taking into
account:
X The circumstances of the case.
X The wishes the parties may express, including any
request by a party that the conciliator hear oral
statements; and
X The need for the speedy settlement agreement duly
signed by the parties and authentication by the
conciliator has the same status and effect as if it is
an arbitral award on agreed terms on the substance
of the dispute rendered by an arbitral tribunal. The
conciliator and the parties are required to keep
confidential all matters relating to conciliation
proceedings. parties to a conciliation proceedings
are not to resort to initiating arbitral or judicial
proceedings are not to resort to initiating arbitral
or judicial proceedings.
#
X Disputes may be referred to tribunal for
settlement rather than courts. This is provided in
the relevant states. Examples are motor accident
claims tribunal, labor tribunal or industrial. The
advantages of this step are speed, less expensive,
no procedural tangle and at times no need of
even representation by lawyers.
+ ,-c
X When disputes are referred to lok adalats foe
settlement, it is done in accordance with the
provisions of the legal services authority
act,1987. Examples are bijli adalats, telephone
adalats etc.
.c/012