MODEL UNTUK KAJIAN ORGANIZATION

RESILIENCE DENGAN PENDEKATAN

KOMPREHENSIF
(SISTEM MANAJEMEN K3, BUDAYA K3, DAN RESILIENCE ENGINEERING)
Conceptual Note

NAR W OKO
NPM - 200 651 23 2 1
MA R 2021
 Latar Belakang
Kecelakaan besar di organisasi
01 (organization accident) masih
terjadi dan stagnan
Organisasi semakin kompleks
02
dan terjadi pergeseran tugas dan
tanggung jawab ke pihak ketiga
(kontraktor, vendor, outsourcing)
Faktor kunci penyebab
03 kecelakaan di organisasi terkait
dengan aspek OHSMS, Budaya
K3, Resilience Engineering
Pendekatan sistem menjadi
04 kritikal dalam pencegahan
kecelakaan besar di organisasi
Penilaian kinerja “K3” organisasi
dengan pendekatan sistem
05 dilakukan dengan penilaian
OHSMS, budaya K3 atau resilience
engineering
Penilaian kinerja K3 dengan tiga
06 cara ini menyulitkan organisasi dan
membutuhkan biaya serta
sumberdaya yang membebani
organisasi
 Tujuan Penelitian
Tujuan Umum
Membangun model kajian organization
resilience komprehensif yang digunakan untuk
membuat alat ukur kinerja K3 organisasi
Tujuan Khusus
Mengidentifikasi karakteristik kunci
organization resilience dan hubungannya
dengan sistem manajemen K3, budaya K3
dan resilience engineering
Membangun alat ukur untuk mengkaji
tingkat resilience organisasi berdasarkan
model tersebut
Mengkaji dampak pergeseran tanggung
jawab ke pihak ketiga (kontraktor, vendor,
outsourcing) terhadap tingkat resilient
perusahaan migas
 Kategori dan karakteristik umum
Sistem Manajemen K3, Budaya K3, Resilience Engineering
(Adolph et al., 2012)

1
Komitmen level puncak

2
Sumber daya

3
Lingkup tindakan/kepatuhan yang fleksibel

4
Proses perbaikan berkelanjutan
 Organization Resilience Framework

Organization Resilience Conceptual Model Organizational Resilience And

(Van der Vorm, Johan ; Van der Beek, Dolf; Organizational Coping Strategies
Bos, Ellen; Steijger, Niek et al., 2016) (Ma, Xiao And Yin, 2018)

Integrative Framework Of Organizational

Resilience
(Kantur, Deniz; Iseri-Say, Arzu., 2012)
 Metode Penelitian
Mixed method exploratory sequential (QUAL -> quan)

Membuat Model Kajian

Organization Resilience
02
Uji Validitas dan
Reliabilitas
04 Pengukuran tingkat
resilience organisasi
01
Systematic Literature 06
Review
03
Membuat Alat Ukur
Organization Resilience
05
Perbaikan alat ukur sesuai hasil uji
validitas dan reliabilitas
 Metode Penelitian

Systematic Literature Model Kajian Membuat Alat Ukur Pengujian Alat Ukur
Review Organization Resilience
Identifikasi • Membuat model • Identifikasi item-item Uji Validitas:
karakteristik kunci dan kajian berdasarkan untuk menilai • Content validity oleh
umum serta indikator: indikator-indikator indikator resilience Subject Matter
• sistem manajemen organization resilience • Menyusun item-item Expert
k3 (OHSMS) • Indikator resilience penilaian ke dalam • Construct Validity
• budaya K3 dikelompokkan ke kuesioner • Criterion Validity
• resilience dalam aspek budaya
engineering K3, OHSMS dan Uji Reliabilitas:
• dan kaitannya resilience engineering • Inter rater
dengan organization • Intra rater
resilience 4 • Konsistensi Internal
3
2
1
 Metode Penelitian
Rekomendasi

Membuat usulan
perbaikan peningkatan
Analisis Dampak
organization resilience
Analisis dampak pergeseran
tanggung jawab ke pihak
ketiga terhadap organization
resilience

Pengukuran Organization Resilience

Pengukuran pada industri migas

• Non random sampling karyawan
perusahaan migas termasuk
kontraktor
• Unit sampling karyawan
perusahaan dan kontraktor
 Manfaat Penelitian

Pengukuran organization resilience dilakukan secara terpadu

1 menggunakan model komprehensif yang
mempertimbangkan faktor budaya K3, system manajemen
K3 dan resilience engineering

Mempermudah proses pengukuran kinerja K3

organisasi yang sebelumnya dilakukan secara terpisah -
mengurangi faktor biaya K3 (cost of safety)
2
 Referensi
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon (retrieved on 4 March 2020)
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster (retrieved on 4 March 2020)
3. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/2340305/kronologi-kebakaran-dahsyat-pt-mandom-di-bekasi (retrieved on 4 March
2020)
4. https://industri.kontan.co.id/news/gara-gara-kebakaran-kinerja-mandom-pun-turun (retrieved 4 March 2020)
5. https://
www.tribunnews.com/sains/2020/02/17/perumahan-batan-indah-serpong-terpapar-radiasi-nuklir-hal-serupa-pernah-terjadi
-di-brazil
(retrieved 5 March 2020)
6. https://tekno.tempo.co/read/1314246/tanah-radioaktif-dari-perumahan-batan-indah-sudah-400-drum (retrieved 5 March
2020)
7. https://emars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/emars/statistics/statistics (retrieved 7 March 2020)
8. Adolph, L., Lafrenz, B., & Grauel, B. (2012). Safety Management Systems , Safety Culture and Resilience engineering :
Comparison of Concepts. Proceedings HFES Europe Chapter Conference Toulouse, 2008, 269–276.
9. Bell, Julie & Healey, N. (2006). The Causes of Major Hazard Incidents and How to Improve Risk Control and Health and Safety
Management: A Review of the Existing Literature. HSL/2006/117.
10. Carthey, J., De Leval, M. R. and Reason, J. T. (2001) ‘Institutional resilience in healthcare systems’, Quality in Health Care,
10(1), pp. 29–32. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.29.
11. Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7
12. Edwards, J. R. D., Davey, J., & Armstrong, K. (2013). Returning to the roots of culture: A review and re-conceptualisation of
safety culture. In Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.004
13. Goh, Y. M., Brown, H., & Spickett, J. (2010). Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety
culture. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.006
 References
14. Grecco, C. H. S. et al. (2012) ‘A method to assess safety and resilience in radiopharmaceuticals production process’, Work,
41(SUPPL.1), pp. 5839–5843. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0969-5839.
15. Hale, A. R. (2003) ‘Safety management in production’, Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 13(3), pp. 185–201. doi:
10.1002/hfm.10040.
16. Hollnagel, E. (2015). RAG – Resilience Analysis Grid. January, 1–7.
17. Hollnagel, E., Nemeth, C. P., & Dekker, S. (2009). Preparation and Restoration, Resilience Engineering Perspective, Volume 2.
18. Hollnagel, E. et al. (2011) Resilience Engineering in Practice, Ashgate Studies in Resilence Engineering.
19. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. In Resilience Engineering:
Concepts and Precepts. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.018390
20. Huber, G. J., Gomes, J. O., & De Carvalho, P. V. R. (2012). A program to support the construction and evaluation of resilience
indicators. Work, 41(SUPPL.1), 2810–2816. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0528-2810
21. IAEA. (2015). The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report.
22. ILO. (2009). Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems ILO OSH 2001. In INTERNATIONAL LABOUR
OFFICE. GENEVA (2nd ed.). Geneva, International Labour Office. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_101824
23. Kantur, D. D. D. et al. (2012) ‘Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework’, Journal of Management &
Organization, 18(6), pp. 762–773. doi: 10.1017/s1833367200000420.
24. Ma, Z., Xiao, L. and Yin, J. (2018) ‘Toward a dynamic model of organizational resilience’, Nankai Business Review International,
9(3), pp. 246–263. doi: 10.1108/NBRI-07-2017-0041.
25. Madni, A. M. and Jackson, S. (2009) ‘Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering’, IEEE Systems Journal, 3(2),
pp. 181–191. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397.
 References
26. Manyena, B., Machingura, F., & O’Keefe, P. (2019). Disaster Resilience Integrated Framework for Transformation (DRIFT): A new
approach to theorising and operationalising resilience. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.011
27. National Commision on the BP Deepwater Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. (2011). Deep Water – The Gulf Oil Disaster and the
Future of Offshore Drilling. In National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling.
28. Pearson, K. (2009). The causes and incidence of occupational accidents and ill-health across the globe (Issue April 2009).
https://www.britsafe.org/sites/default/files/editor/The_Causes_and_Incidence_of_Occupational_Accidents_and_Ill-Health_Acr
oss_the_Globe.sflb.pdf
29. Pidgeon, N. F. (1991) ‘Safety Culture and Risk Management in Organizations’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1), pp.
129–140. doi: 10.1177/0022022191221009.
30. Redinger, C. F., & Levine, S. P. (1998). Development and evaluation of the Michigan Occupational Health and Safety
Management System Assessment Instrument: A universal OHSMS performance measurement tool. American Industrial Hygiene
Association Journal, 59(8), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119891010758
31. dos Santos, V. M. et al. (2020) ‘A fuzzy model to assess the resilience of Protection and Civil Defense Organizations’, Quality
and Quantity. Springer Netherlands, 54(3), pp. 735–759. doi: 10.1007/s11135-019-00953-y.
32. van der Merwe, S. E., Biggs, R., & Preiser, R. (2018). A framework for conceptualizing and assessing the resilience of essential
services produced by socio-technical systems. Ecology and Society, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09623-230212
33. Van der Vorm, J. et al. (2016) ‘Images Of Resilience: The Resilience Analysis Grid Applicable At Several Organizational Levels?’,
Proceedings of the fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, pp. 263–269. doi: 10.4000/books.pressesmines.1115.