r 12 &
13
Six-Sigma Quality &
Statistical Quality
Control
F. Robert Jacobs & Richard B. Chase, Mc.Graw Hill 15th ed.
HELLO!
We are Group 6
• Vanny Erliana (042024353038)
• Hariyatin (042024353026)
• Rezka Putri H. (042024353046)
• Stefanus Ardian S. (042024353058)
2
Chapter 12
SIX SIGMA
QUALITY
“
mengatur keseluruhan organisasi dalam
semua dimensi produk dan layanan yang
Sigma adalah huruf Yunani yang mewakili satuan statistika pengukuran yang
menentukan standar deviasi suatu populasi. Ini mengukur variabilitas atau
penyebaran data.
Tingkat kualitas sigma yang lebih tinggi berarti lebih banyak output proses,
produk dan layanan memenuhi persyaratan pelanggan, lebih sedikit cacat
(defect). .
05/20/2021 7
Apa itu Six Sigma (lanjutan)
Six Sigma dikembangkan oleh Motorola pada tahun 1980an dan selanjutnya
ditingkatkan oleh General Electric (GE) dan Caterpillar (CAT)
05/20/2021 8
Ukuran Dalam Six Sigma
Yield (Probabilitas tanpa DPMO (Defect per
cacat) million opportunity) Sigma
30,9% 690.000 11
69,2 308.000 2
93,35 66.800 3
99,4%. 6.210 4
99,98% 320. 5
99,9997% 3,4 6
05/20/2021 9
“
1 sigma mewakili 30,9% produk tanpa cacat.
Tujuannya adalah menuju six sigma, yaitu 99,9997% produk
tanpa cacat. Artinya dengan 1 juta produk hanya diperkenankan
produk cacat sebanyak 3,4 produk.
Jadi, six sigma adalah suatu manajemen
perbaikan (improvement) untuk mencapai
tingkat mutu 3,4 defect per sejuta peluang.
05/20/2021 10
Defect per Million Opportunities (DPMO)
Number of defecs
DPMO = x 1.000.000
Number ofopportunities for error per unit x Number of units
05/20/2021 11
Example :
05/20/2021 12
Six Sigma Methodology
DEFINE identify customers and their priorities
DEFINE
05/20/2021 13
Six Sigma Analytical Tools
Flowchart
a diagram of the sequence of
operations
Process control
chart
Used to assure that Run chart
processes are in depict trends in data
statistical control over time
12-15
Flowchart
12-17
Pareto Chart
“Diagram yang terdiri dari grafik balok dan grafik garis,
untuk menentukan prioritas masalah / masalah terbesar
dari sejumlah permasalahan yang ada (vital few trivial
many).”
12-18
Checksheet
Kapan?
Ketika data dapat diamati dan dikumpulkan
berulang kali oleh orang yang sama atau di
lokasi yang sama.
Ketika mengumpulkan data mengenai frekuensi
atau pola kejadian, masalah, cacat, lokasi cacat,
penyebab cacat, dan sebagainya.
12-19
Cause-and-Effect Diagram (Fishbone Diagram)
Fishbone Diagram juga biasa disebut dengan
Diagram Ishikawa, diciptakan oleh Kaoru
Ishikawa, yang memelopori teknik manajemen
kualitas di Jepang pada tahun 1960.
Faktor Utama:
1. Man
2. Material
3. Method
4. Machine
5. Environment
12-20
Opportunity Flow Diagram
Used to separate value-added from non–value added steps in a process.
12-21
Process Control Chart
12-22
Additional Six Sigma Tools (1)
FMEA
Structured approach to identify, estimate,
prioritize, and evaluate risk of possible failures at
each stage in the process.
HOW?
• Identify each element, assembly, or part of the
process and listing the potential failure modes,
potential causes, and effects of each failure.
• A risk priority number (RPN) is calculated for
each failure mode. It is an index used to
measure the rank importance of the items listed
in the FMEA chart
12-23
Additional Six Sigma Tools (1)
Design of experiments (DOE)
• Sometimes referred to as multivariate testing
• A statistical methodology to determine cause-and-
effect relationships between process variables and
output.
• Permits experimentation with many variables
simultaneously
12-24
Lean Six Sigma
• Lean Six Sigma combines the implementation and quality control tools of Six Sigma and the
inventory management concept of lean manufacturing.
• Lean manufacturing achieves high-volume production and minimal waste through the
use of just-in-time inventory methods.
• "Lean" --> reducing cost by lowering raw material, work-in-process, and finished goods inventory to
an absolute minimum.
• Lowering inventory requires a high level of quality because processes need to be predictable since
extra inventory is not available.
• Reducing variability is a key driver in successful lean Six Sigma programs. 12-25
Six Sigma Roles and Responsibilities
1. Executive leaders, who are truly committed to Six Sigma and who
promote it throughout the organization, and champions, who take
ownership of the processes to be improved.
• Champions are drawn from the ranks of the executives.
• Managers are expected to identify appropriate metrics early in the project
and make certain that the improvement efforts focus on business results.
2. Corporation-wide training in Six Sigma concepts and tools.
• Black belts: coach or actually lead a Six Sigma improvement team
• Master black belts: receive in-depth training on statistical tools and process
improvement (they perform many of the same functions as black belts but
for a larger number of teams)
• Green belts: Employees who have received enough Six Sigma training to
participate in a team or, to work individually on a small-scale project directly
related to their own job.
3. Set stretch objectives for improvement
4. Continuous reinforcement and rewards
12-26
What makes a good champion?
The Shingo System: Fail-Safe Design
Named after the co-developer of the Toyota just-in-time system, Shigeo Shingo.
1. How to accomplish drastic cuts in equipment setup times by single-minute exchange of die
(SMED) procedures
2. The use of source inspection and the poka-yoke system to achieve zero defects.
Shingo’s argument:
SQC methods do not prevent defects.
Defects arise when people make errors.
Defects can be prevented by providing workers with feedback on errors.
1. Successive check
2. Self-check
3. Source inspection
Poka-yoke includes:
Checklists
Special tooling that prevents workers from making errors
ISO 9000 and ISO 14000
Series of standards agreed upon by the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO)
Adopted in 1987
Used in more than 160 countries
A prerequisite for global competition?
ISO 9000 an international reference for quality
ISO 14000 primarily concerned with environmental management
2. Analyze data.
Look at gaps between what your company is doing vs what the benchmarking company is
doing:
a. Compare the actual processes
b. Compare the performance of these processes according to a set of measures.
The processes are often described using flowcharts and subjective evaluations of how workers
relate to the process.
Chapte
r 13
Statistical Quality
Control
F. Robert Jacobs & Richard B. Chase, Mc.Graw Hill 15th ed.
01 Definition
02
Section
Statistical Process Control
03 Procedures
04 Acceptance Sampling
32
Definition
Statistical Quality Control 1 33
Statistical Quality Control
“
◉ The application of statistical techniques to
control a process
◉ Periodic sampling of a process and
analysis of these data using statistically
derived performance criteria
34
Quality
Control
35
Quality Control
36
“
Recall yang Menyakitkan
Perusahaan
Ledakan—secara harfiah— di Galaxy
Note 7 tentu saja membuat Samsung
merugi. Perusahaan finansial Credit
Suisse memprediksi Samsung bisa
mengalami kerugian sebesar US$17
miliar atau sekitar Rp221 triliun akibat
gagal menjual Galaxy Note 7
2016
37
Variation Type
Assignable variation Common variation
workers not being equally trained result of the type of equipment used to complete a process
Variation that is caused by factors that can be Variation that is inherent in the process itself
identified and managed
38
Basic Statistic
Mean Standar Deviation
39
Specification Limit
Upper “ The range of values in a measure associated
with a process that is allowable given the
intended use of the product or service.
the maximum acceptable
value for a characteristic
Lower
40
Variability Costs
Traditional View Taguchi’s View
41
Variability Costs
Taguchi’s View
42
Measuring Process
Capability
Specification limits “
The ability of a process to consistently produce
a good or deliver a service with a low
probability of generating a defect
range of variation that is considered
acceptable by the designer or
customer
Process limits
43
Measuring Process
Capability
Example
44
Measuring Process
Capability
“
We say that a process is capable when
the mean and standard deviation of the
process are operating such that the upper
and lower control limits are acceptable
relative to the upper and lower
specification limits
45
Process Capability Index (Cpk)
46
Process Capability Index (Cpk)
Example 13.1
47
Process Capability Index (Cpk)
48
Process Capability Index (Cpk)
49
Process Capability Index (Cpk)
50
Statistical Process
Control
The difference of Atribute and Variable 2 51
Statistical Process Control
Atribute
52
Procedures
Process Control with Attribute Measurement 3 53
Process Control with Attribute Measurement – p-Charts
◉ Used when an item or service is either good or bad (yes-no decision)
◉ Trait : Upper Control Limit (UCL) and Lower Control Limit (LCL)
◉ How to create p-charts :
Calculate fraction defective
54
p-Charts Example
Process Control with Attribute Measurement – c-Charts
◉ Used when an item or service may have multiple defects
◉ Trait : UCL and LCL, Poisson distribution
◉ How to create c-charts :
Calculate avg number of defects per unit
56
c-Charts Example
Process Control with Variable Measurement – and R-
Charts 𝑿 ´
◉ Using actual variable to create control charts
◉ There are 4 things to be considered :
Size of samples preferable to take small (commonly 4-5 units)
Number of samples minimum 25
Frequency of samples trade of between cost of sampling + cost of
goods vs benefit of adjusting the system
Control limit In SPC, best practices using 3 std dev or 3 sigma
58
Factor for 𝑿 ´ Chart dan R Chart for each n
59
𝑿 ´and R-Charts Example
𝑿 ´ -Charts
R-Charts
60
Process Control Charts Interpretation
61
Control Chart Example at PG
Batasan N2 Rerata
Tanggal BKA BKB
Plant : Urea 1A minimum ( Xi ) (X)
Sampling Loc : Outlet Prilling Tower 1 46,00 46,40 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
2 46,00 46,40 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
Date of Sampling : April 2019 3 46,00 46,41 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
4 46,00 46,41 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
5 46,00 46,39 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
6 46,00 46,40 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
7 46,00 46,40 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
8 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
9 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
10 46,00 46,41 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
11 46,00 46,41 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
12 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
13 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
14 46,00 46,40 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
15 46,00 46,39 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
16 46,00 46,39 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
17 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
18 46,00 46,40 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
19 46,00 46,41 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
20 46,00 46,44 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
21 46,00 46,43 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
22 46,00 46,43 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
23 46,00 46,43 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
24 46,00 46,43 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
25 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
26 46,00 46,43 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
27 46,00 46,41 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
28 46,00 46,42 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
29 46,00 46,39 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
30 46,00 46,39 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
31 46,00 46,41 46,4390 46,3827
Rata-rata 46,41
Maximum 46,44 stdev = 0,01406922
Minimum 46,39
62
Acceptance Sampling
Let’s start with the first set of slides 4 63
Sampling Acceptance
◉ Performed on goods that already exist to determine what percentage of the
products conform to specifications
◉ Executed through a sampling plan
◉ Results include accept, reject, or retest
64
Sampling Acceptance – Pros & Cons
Pros Cons
◉ Economy ◉ Risks of accepting “bad” lots
◉ Less handling damage and rejecting “good” lots
◉ Fewer inspectors ◉ Added planning and
documentation
◉ Upgrading of the inspection
job ◉ Sample provides less
information than 100 percent
◉ Applicability to destructive
inspection
testing
65
Creating Sampling Plan
Determine :
(1) How many units (n) to sample Lot
Acceptance Tolerance
from a lot Quality Percent
Level
(2) Maximum number of defective (AQL)
Defective
(LTPD)
items (c) that can be found in the
sample before the lot is rejected
Producer’s Consumer’s
risk (α) risk (β)
66
Creating Sampling Plan Example
1. LTPD/AQL = 8/2 = 4
AQL = 2%
2. Match with the closest one at
α = 5% 2nd column, didapat c = 4
LTPD = 8% 3. Check 3rd column which
β = 10% corresponding with c=4,
didapat n = 1,97/AQL =
1,97/0,02 = 98,5
4. C = 4 ; n = 99
67
Operating Characteristic Curve
68
THANKS!
Any questions?
69