Prof. S. K. GARG,
PROFESSOR DELHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
SUPPLIER
MANUFACTURER
CUSTOMER
Connected by transportation and storage activities, and Integrated through information, planning, and integration activities Many large firms are moving away from inhouse Vertically Integrated structures to Supply Chain Management
3
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
$52.72
0%
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
$41.34
28%
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
$20.45
62%
10
Yarn
Export Domestic
Fabric
2 Offices 200-250 Customers 40 Agents
Sewing Thread
250-300 Sales Force 4000-5000 Dealers/ Retailers
11
12
13
14
16
1960s-1970s
Introduction of new computer technology lead to development of Materials Requirements Planning (MRP) and Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) to coordinate inventory management and improve internal communication
17
20
21
Distribution
Integration
27
31
SUCCESS FACTORS
Integration Reduction of Uncertainty Outsourcing/ Core Competency/ Strategic Alliance Flexibility/ Agility/ Lean
32
FLOW OF MATERIAL
Inventory Control Kanban Setup Time Reduction Lead Time Reduction Flexible Machines
33
Market demands
Standard products
Customized products
Available in Stock
No
No
Yes
Can be produced using available design Yes Existing designs can be modified Yes
No
Make-toorder 3 Production
Engineer- to order 4
Innovateto-order
Yes
5New product/
service design using available competence
FLOW OF MATERIAL
Purchase Management JIT Purchasing Inbound Logistics Stock to Dock Delivery 3PL Supply Base Rationalization Outbound Logistics/ Distribution Management
35
FLOW OF INFORMATION
Demand Forecasting POS Information Bar Coding/ RFID/Automatic Identification EDI/ Intranet/ Extranet/ Internet GPS CRM ERP e-Manufacturing/ Virtual manufacturing
36
FLOW OF MONEY
e- Commerce e- Business
37
FLOW OF OWNERSHIP
VMI
38
Raw material shortages Internal and supplier parts shortages Productivity inefficiencies Sales and earnings shortfall Larger than anticipated inventories Stiff competition General slowdown in the PC market Higher than expected orders for new
products over existing products
Sales at U.S. Surgical Corporation declined 25 percent, resulting in a loss of $22 million Intel reported a 38 percent decline in quarterly profit
EMC Corp. missed its revenue guidance of $2.66 billion for the second quarter of 2006 by around $100 million
39
40
41
42
The grocery industry could save $30 billion (10% of operating cost) by using effective logistics strategies A typical box of cereal spends 104 days getting from factory to supermarket. A typical new car spends 15 days traveling from the factory to the dealership.
43
Transactional Complexity
National Semiconductors: Production: Produces chips in six different locations: four in the US, one in Britain and one in Israel Chips are shipped to seven assembly locations in Southeast Asia. Distribution The final product is shipped to hundreds of facilities all over the world 20,000 different routes 12 different airlines are involved 95% of the products are delivered within 45 days 5% are delivered within 90 days.
45
PRODUCER MATRIX
COST EFFECTIVENESS
46
Customer Matrix
PERCEIVED USAGE VALUE
*
PERCEIVED PRICE
47
Customer Matrix
PERCEIVED USAGE VALUE
*
PERCEIVED PRICE
48
4 6 5 High
Low
PERCEIVED PRICE
49
ENHANCING PUV
Value Assurance Value Engineering Innovations
50
REDUCING COST
Continual cost reduction Economies of scale and scope Control and coordination Factor costs
51
Producer Matrix
PUV
*
Perceived Price
Effectiveness
*
Unit Cost
52
A
Reasons : -Price premium allows inefficiencies. -Strong brand belief, cost reduction not a priority. -Very small market share, not able to reduce cost by scale or experience. Sustainability of price premium. Leading edge technology, which is reproducible Strong brand image Sustainable Value assurance
Change the perception of price to overall cost of ownership Prescription: Define the basis of differentiation Pay greater attention to cost reduction
53
Producer Matrix
PUV
Effectiveness
Perceived Price
Unit Cost
54
B
Can cut prices, as low cost on product matrix. Decline in Market share Improve effectiveness, reduce price Explore other markets, where customer will not perceived it as low PUV However, new market will have its own new product and customer matrices. Alliance
55
Producer Matrix
PUV
*
Perceived Price
Effectiveness
Unit Cost
56
C
Low Effectiveness, high cost Customer matrix is due to previous good products. Firm resting on past laurels. Situation also arise when the firm is good on innovations but not able to transfer them into saleable products. Management may not be aware of its position on product matrix, not collecting data of other producers. If management is aware, then first try to reduce cost and then try to improve efficiency. Since competitors effectiveness is better, it is matter of time when competitor will move north on the customer matrix. The future of the firm is not good
57
Producer Matrix
PUV
Effectiveness
Perceived Price
Unit Cost
58
D
If firm donot improve effectiveness, it may have to offer large price discounts. Situation is generally of new low cost entrants to established markets They should focus on improving effectiveness.
59
Producer Matrix
PUV
*
Perceived Price
Effectiveness
*
Unit Cost
60
E
Combination to aim at. Possible problems might be management complacency. Can raise price if rivals are not able to match the high PUV. Surpluses can be used to outpace competitors with strong investments in both effectiveness and efficiency. May also explore other products, where its core competence might confer similar advantages'.
61
Producer Matrix
PUV
Effectiveness
Perceived Price
Unit Cost
62
F
Opposite of E Faces fight for survival Need to increase both effectiveness and efficiency. Simultaneously, Both may be difficult. Task is too large, may go for alliance or even merger, acquisition or taken over.
63
Which Market? Which segment? What is Value to Customer? Key Competencies required to Deliver PUV at low cost? Your core competencies?
OK No Not OK YES
65
MORAL FIRST, IDENTIFY YOUR CORE COMPETENCY AND THEN CHANGE THE PLAYING FIELD TO SUIT YOUR CORE COMPETENCY.
Working on the basis of your strengths will not only get you noticed, but will also create opportunities for growth and 69 advancement
73
Supplier Selection
The process of selecting suppliers, is complex and should be based on multiple criteria:
Product and process technologies Willingness to share technologies & information [Early supplier involvement (ESI) and concurrent engineering (CE)] Quality
Cost (Total cost of ownership or acquisition) Reliability Order System & cycle time Capacity Communication capability Location Service
74
75
Outsourcing Programs
Outsourcing allows a firm to:
Concentrate on core capabilities Reduce staffing levels Accelerate reengineering efforts Reduce management problems Improve manufacturing flexibility.
77
Operations
Logistics and Warehouse Sales and Marketing Customer Relationship Management Data Support System
79
Disadvantages
Substantial time & capital investment Complexity Firms adapt processes to meet ERP system
80
Demand management tactics are also important, as services cannot be inventoried & customer demand must be met.
83
86
88