new products firms come up with: Dinosaur Fit for museum Ostrich Blind to the future Flamingo beautiful but unsalable Pearl Source of profitable future
Intrinsic characteristics of innovations that influence an individual s decision to adopt or reject an innovation. Relative Advantage
How improved an innovation is over the previous generation. The level of compatibility that an innovation has to be assimilated into an individual s life. If the innovation is too difficult to use an individual will not likely adopt it. How easily an innovation may be experimented with as it is being adopted. If a user has a hard time using and trying an innovation this individual will be less likely to adopt it. The extent that an innovation is visible to others. An innovation that is more visible will drive communication among the individual s peers and personal networks and will in turn create more positive or negative reactions.
Product uniqueness (innovativeness) or superiority Management's possession of market knowledge and marketing proficiency Presence of technical and production synergies and proficiency.
Case in point GSK s Zantac success vs/ Wellcome s
Invention is about generation of new ideas whether by research or any other forms of creativity Invention is the first occurrence of an idea for a new product or process, while innovation is the first attempt to carry it out in practice.
Fagerberg (2005)
An innovation takes place when the new idea is used in a company s production process or is first offered for sale in a market. Swann (2008)
So Innovation is much wider than invention it involves value adding, it s a process (from invention to market/consumer).
Idea, Screening, Business Analysis, Development, Testing and Launch Role of marketing in each phase Types of Products to be developed
Classification is based on degree of newness to
Table 13.1
Figure 13.7
Table 13.2
Aids to thinking
Figure 13.9
Lead users are users of a product or service that currently experience needs still unknown to the public and who also benefit greatly if they obtain a solution to these needs. (von Hipple 1986) The Lead User market research method is built around the idea that the richest understanding of new product and service needs is held by just a few "Lead Users." They can be identified and drawn into a process of joint development of new product or service concepts with manufacturer personnel (Herstatt and von Hippel 1992)
Von Hippel argument that users are not passive recipients Eg. PickUp trucks not designed in Detroit but in farms where users wanted more than a family saloon adapted by removing seats, welding on new parts, cutting off part of the roof etc thus prototyping the first model of pick up Today pickup trucks - in innovation space of positioning in Thailand ? Concept LEAD USERS They not just adopt passively but either change or use innovatively products and services - leading to innovation banana / chocolate milk lead users = moms Medical devices lead users = medical practicioners Identify Lead users and they help in co-creation
von Hippel, Eric (1986) "Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts," Management Science 32, no. 7 (July):791-805.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbQ5mAEE1lk
Highly secretive industries where lead users may not feel comfortable or may not be able to disclose information and knowledge are not suited for this [lead user] process; The lengthy [nature of the lead user] process can prevent this methodology from being applied effectively in industries with really short term innovation cycles or where quick turnaround from research to market delivery is required;
What co-creation IS Co-creation is about joint creation of value by the company and the customer. It is not the firm trying to please the customer
Customer is king or customer is always right Delivering good customer service or pampering the customer with lavish customer service Allowing the customer to coconstruct the service experience to suit her context
What co-creation is NOT Mass customazation of offerings that suit the industrys supply chain Transfer of activities from the firm to the customer as in self-service
What co-creation IS Joint problem definition and problem solving Creating an experience environment in which consumers can have active dialogue and co-construct personalized experiences; product may be the same, but customers can construct different experiences
What co-creation is NOT Customer as product manager or co-designing products and services Product variety Segment of one Meticulous market research Staging experiences Demand-side innovation for new products and services
What co-creation IS
Experience variety Experience of one Experiencing the business as consumers do in real time Co-constructing personalized experiences Innovating experience environ-ments for new co-creation experiences
From
To
One-way Firm to consumer Controlled by firm Consumers are prey Choice = buy/not buy Firm segments and target consumers; consumers must fit into firms offerings
Two-way Consumer to firm Consumer to consumer Consumer can hunt Consumer wants to/can impose her view of choice Consumer wants to/is being empowered to co-construct a personalized experience around herself, with firm s experience environment
Prahalad & Ramaswamy 2004:12
Planetfeedback.com
Thecomplaintstation.com
The new trend: Customer-made The phenomenon of corporations creating goods, services and experiences in close cooperation with consumers, tapping into their intellectual capital, and in exchange giving them a direct say in what acutally gets produced, manufactured, developed, designed, serviced, or processed. TRENDWATCHINS.COM 2006
Epinions.com
About.com
True customer-made involves co-created goods, co-created services, co-created expriences. There are hundreds of thousands of experts, innovators, inventors and so on outside company walls and research labs, and innovation units at large corporations are increasingly NOT going it alone. TRENDWATCHING 2006
The IKEA contest fiffigafolket (ingenious people) asked amateur outsiders to send in clever designs for storing home media in the living room. Out of 5,000 ideas submitted, fourteen winners went to the IKEA headquaters to participate in a workshop and receive EUR 2,500, and the designs will actually get produced and end up in IKEA stores for all to see, buy and assemple. TRENDWATCHING 2006
34
35
A But the biggest money2000$us: 18 Mio USD sales winning designer gets is for Get: 800 submissions per week; Print: - this is great money for these and all this with in 2006, 35% profit margin products each week; this makes about 4 new guys. fun and less than 20 employees much 50,000 to 65,000 shirts a month.
36
Case of HTC
Invested in Building Brand Not for just sales growth But for Dialogue with Customer
2001 top 500 global businesses had an average of 60 alliances each 1993 IBM reported 5% sales (outside pc s) were derived through alliances in 2001 IBM was managing 100,000 alliances which account for more than 30% of their income Vantage Partners survey of top 1000 US companies in 2001 found that had 20% of their income resulted from alliances ......
Vertically disaggregated organisations .. Functions of product design and development, manufacturing and distribution . Will be brought together and held in temporary alignment by a variety of market mechanisms (Miles and Snow 1984)
Experience Economy
Gen C (Creative Generation)
Cravens et al (1996) propose a model of network organisation types arguing that networks differed and can be classified in two important respects The type of Network Relationship
Highly collaborative to mainly transactional
Figure 16.2
(Figure 16.4)
Present a framework of how firms can achieve success with any individual alliance
by considering critical factors at each phase of the
alliance life cycle. by developing and institutionalizing firm-level capabilities to manage alliances. Highlight the benefits of taking a portfolio approach to alliance strategy and management.
At the level of a single alliance of a firm, firm should select a complementary, compatible, and committed partner at the time of alliance formation, and make relevant choices with respect to alliance design in terms of equity or contractual or relational governance, then the alliance is more likely to succeed. During the postformation stage, alliance success depends on the effective use of relevant coordination mechanisms to manage the interdependence between the two firms, and the successful development of trust between partners as the alliance evolves.
Hence firms should Alliance Capability Development a dedicated alliance function within a firm and a set of institutionalized processes to accumulate and leverage alliance management know-how across the firm Relational Capabilities Also Capabilities are different for Single Alliances Alliance Portfolios
First choose appropriate coordination mechanisms to leverage the interdependence between the two separate firms. Second, need to build trust between the two firms such that employees in each firm work in the interests of both firms and are willing to share relevant know-how with each other for mutual benefit. Third, it needs to establish appropriate mechanisms to resolve or escalate any conflicts that might arise.
Table 16.1
Nature/Governance
To create add l revenue, to reduce costs, entering new
markets
Typology of Alliances
Technology or market related like distribution channels,
Strategic Inertia among executives Lack of stakeholder commitment Strategic Drift. Strategic dilution
focus more on operational or tactical rather than
Failure to understand progress (no goals or related metrics) Initiative Fatigue or Impatience No Celebrating Success
implementation in strategic marketing is strategic internal marketing (Cespesdes and Piercy 1996)
Conventional Marketing Training focuses primarily on external environment of customers, competitors and markets and matching orgn resources to targets Implicit assumption that marketing strategy will sell itself
And the organisation is made of people, culture, systems, structures and developments whose skills and resources, participation, support and commitment are needed to implement marketing strategy. Hence internal marketing programme needed to parrlel the marketing programme aimed at external market place
Services literature conceptualised employees as internal customers in the context of Bank marketing (Berry 1981) . Scholars from Nordic School of Services talk about use of internal marketing to achieve culture change in orgn s Internal Marketing types
and customer satisfaction Development of internal communications programme to win employee support Systematic approach to managing adoption of innovations within organisation Concerned with providing products and services to used inside the organisation
Internal Marketing can be seen as a Management philosophy of promoting the firm and its policies to employees as if they are the (internal) customers of the firm.
Comes from Services Marketing to improve quality Market Place largely dependent on the employees who are far removed from the strategy making process Hence need for Selling to the Staff As the product promoted is the persons job as a creator of the service and value Lot of training and development
Figure 17.1
The service-profit chain establishes relationships between profitability, customer loyalty, and employee satisfaction, loyalty, and productivity. Profit and growth stimulated primarily by customer loyalty which is a result of customer satisfaction. Which comes from value being created by employees who are satisfied, loyal and productive
Source: http://hbr.org/2008/07/putting-the-service-profit-chain-to-work/ar/1
Table 17.1
Figure 17.2 Strategic Internal Marketing Internal and external marketing programmes
Delivering value results from a complex set of processes and activities inside the organisation and also in a network of organisations
Many of these processes or activities are not
Figure 17.3
Marketing and Sales interface Marketing and HRM Marketing and Finance &Accounting Marketing, R&D and Production
Market Led Strategic Management Role of Marketing in Strategic Management & Market Orientation Marketing Environment Frameworks + Competitor Analysis and Customer Analysis Organisational Resources and Competitive Advantage Sustainable Competitive Advantage Different Routes Marketing Segmentation and Positioning Competing through New Marketing Mix Customer Management Competing through Innovation and Alliances Marketing Implementation and Internal Marketing