Aestheticians:
No actual objectification of feeling ever occur, only seems so. Aesthetic Experience = Hallucination
Aldrich rejects the notion that colors are apparently at a distance before the eyes
Theory of Vision
Visual Temperatures
Colors
Visual Feelers
Objectification = Impossible
Subjectified Emotions
Example: During Embarrassment, we are distressed. Man bumped by a stranger
Aestheticians
- Field of consiousness may actually include not only the native organism of the subject of experience but other existing bodies as well.
Aesthetic Attitude
- object is not a physical thing it is nowhere - does not move the native body of the observer
BEAUTY
- escape from a going out from the urgencies of place and time - escape from existence
Santayana - "beauty with pleasure" subjective sense of beauty late 19th century take subjective pleasure as a property of the object
Platonic Love
Tragic Beauty
- you can objectify a painful feeling or emotion - pleasant feeling converted by objectification into the aesthetic quality of a previously objectified painful feeling both feelings being experienced as qualities of the object.
Catharsis Theory
Ugliness
There are no negative Aesthetic qualities Ugliness Aesthetic attitude is difficult to assume -> and if the Aesthetic attitude is not assumed, there is no Aesthetic quality.
Theory of Feelings
contains the promise of a more intelligible account of the objectivity of feeling characteristic of Aesthetic experience
Beauty is not the attribute of an object. It is inherent in the fundamental nature of experience. It is the experience of recognizing that Consciousness and Reality are one.
A Theory of Feelings was a sequel to On Instinct, a kind of introduction to the former.) What is noteworthy is, first, that Heller provides the reader with a definition of feelings which are "involvements with ourselves and/or with others