2. Method:
Big sample, representative
Interview - re-interview - any changes?
Control groups - avoid contamination by interviews
3. Findings:
a. Activate 14%, convert 8%
b. selective attention - high socio-economic status, the already decided
c. source of influence - face-to-face-ties
Propaganda - minimal effect
Magic bullet theory Two step flow theory
wrong confirmed
Landmark of empirical communication study II
Lazarsfeld and Katz Personal Influence (1955)
Pay attention to
Consumptio
Persons Decisions n
Voting
2 Step Acting
Seek out Buyin
g
Opinion Leaders
The two step flow theory
08/10/08 6
The two step flow theory
08/10/08 7
From the Two-Step Flow Model
to Limited Effects Theory
Paul Lazarsfeld
and
the Two-Step Flow Model of Communication
The Two-Step Flow of
Communication
Lecture Outline
• background;
• Erie County voting study;
• the two-step flow model;
• the decision-making process;
• key factors;
• limited effects model;
• contingency theory.
The Two-Step Flow Model
S M R (S/N) R 1
Decision-Making Process
• Exists on a continuum;
• depends on two factors:
– personal psyche or
disposition;
– the information itself.
Early Adopters Converts
Waverers Crystallizers
Key Factors in Decision-Making
Process