Student members :
Gaurav Sharma (08614g) Govil Gupta (08615g) Ujwal Tyagi (08628g)
1
5/1/2012
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The study has been approved by the department of mechanical engineering,JUET guna.The technical assisstance and guidance has been provided by the Mr Yaswant Kumar Modi (faculty of mechanical engineering,JUET). We would like to acknowledge and thank the contributions of the various faculties and laboratory assistants of JUET ,guna for encouraging our project.
5/1/2012
11/1/2011
LCA STRUCTURE
11/1/2011
An Introductory Example of LCA The idea of LCA can lively be illustrated in the following example about the construction of a simple wood shed. At the beginning, we need materials including Wood Plank, Nails and other Metal Parts. Process 1 To make the wood planks, some trees need to be fell first Process 2 Felling trees requires the use of chainsaws Process 3 Use of chainsaws requires: Petrol input Process 4 Felling tree generates: Sawdust Branches left in the forest Emissions form the chainsaw
LIFE CYCLE ASSESMENT 5
11/1/2011
Up to this stage, we can first consider the tree felling unit process. In cutting the trees, petrol is burnt for the process where branch sawdust and exhaust gas emitted are considered as waste. Logs are the process product for the next unit process.
11/1/2011
METHODOLOGY
SYSTEM BOUNDARY FUNCTIONAL UNIT DATA CLASSIFICATION AND VERIFICATION CALCULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LOAD PER FUNCTIONAL UNIT SELECTION OF IMPACT ASSESMENT METHOD DATA CLASSIFICATION CHARACTERIZATION NORMALIZATION WEIGHTING
11/1/2011
SYSTEM BOUNDARY
5/1/2012
FUNCTIONAL UNIT
1 km is the well commonly accepted as the unit to measure the fuel economy. Following this, the whole assessment of this study is based on the amount of fuel required to run a car for 1 km.10 litre of petrol as detail unit are assumed to run a normal car for 1 km.
11/1/2011
METHOD CONSIDERED
CML 2 Baseline Method (2000) The CML 2 baseline method elaborates the problemoriented (midpoint) approach. The CML Guide provides a list of impact assessment categories grouped into: Global warming. Carcinogens climate change. Radiation. Ozone layer. Ecotoxicity. Acidification/Eutrophication. Fossil fuel.
11/1/2011 LIFE CYCLE ASSESMENT 12
EMISSIONS CONSIDERED
Nitrogen Compounds (Nox) Carbon Compounds (COx) Hydrogen Compounds (HCs) Sulphur Compounds (SOx) Methane (CH4)
11/1/2011
13
CLASSIFICATION
11/1/2011
14
CHARACTERIZATION
A characterization factor that characterizes contribution of a given inventory parameter to the assigned impact category provides practical means for the quantification. characterization factors only address relative contribution among inventory parameters assigned to a given impact category.
11/1/2011
15
CHARACTERIZATION
CIi,j = Loadj eqvi,j
Where, CIi,j = the magnitude of characterized impact by the jth inventory parameter in the ith impact category, g x-eq/ fu, fu = functional unit, Loadj = the quantity of the jth inventory parameter, g/fu, eqvi,j = equivalency (characterization) factor of the jth inventory parameter inthe ith impact category, g x-eq/g
11/1/2011 LIFE CYCLE ASSESMENT 16
11/1/2011
17
NORMALIZATION
Normalization is a process that divides a characterization value of an impact category of a product system by the normalization reference of the same impact category. A normalization value which is the outcome of the normalization step, represents the fractional contribution of the product system to a given impact category.
11/1/2011 LIFE CYCLE ASSESMENT 18
NORMALIZATION
Ni,k = Loadk eqvi,k
Where Ni,k = the magnitude of characterized impact of the kth inventory parameter in the ith impact category, g x-eq/ yr, Loadk = the quantity of the kth inventory parameter, g/yr, eqvi,k = equivalency (characterization) factor of the kth inventory parameter in the ith impact category, g x-eq/g
11/1/2011
19
WEIGHTING
There are two approaches in weighting, for the broader perspective approach, the outcome is qualitative, while for the narrower perspective it is quantitative taking the form of a single value or weighted impact of a product system.
11/1/2011
20
WEIGHTING
WIi = Wi CI Where, WI = weighted impact of the ith impact category, Wi = weight of the ith impact category, CIi = characterized impact of the ith impact category.
11/1/2011
21