0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
125 tayangan31 halaman
Lighting Quality can be categorized as: Bad lighting i.e. The lighting system suffers from a quality defect indifferent lighting. Ambient light is designed to provide approximately 33%-67% of the illumination level that would have been produced by a general lighting system. Task level can have a range of 2 / 3 to 4 / 3 of the target level illumination.
Lighting Quality can be categorized as: Bad lighting i.e. The lighting system suffers from a quality defect indifferent lighting. Ambient light is designed to provide approximately 33%-67% of the illumination level that would have been produced by a general lighting system. Task level can have a range of 2 / 3 to 4 / 3 of the target level illumination.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai PPTX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
Lighting Quality can be categorized as: Bad lighting i.e. The lighting system suffers from a quality defect indifferent lighting. Ambient light is designed to provide approximately 33%-67% of the illumination level that would have been produced by a general lighting system. Task level can have a range of 2 / 3 to 4 / 3 of the target level illumination.
Hak Cipta:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Format Tersedia
Unduh sebagai PPTX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
Lighting levels are determined generally in accordance with the
prescribed standards, National Building Code and other S standards in our case. The process of setting the illumination levels in a space involves the following: Consider the task requirement Consider the occupant age Appraise the spatial configuration Determine daylight need, preference and availability Determine interaction of the tasks Establish adaptation level of the viewers Lighting Quality Lighting quality can be categorized as: Bad lighting i.e. the lighting system suffers from a quality defect ndifferent lighting i.e. the lighting has no quality defects Good lighting i.e. the lighting system is technically correct and excites the spirit of the viewer Lighting design must achieve the standards and criterion of indifferent lighting for all lighting installations. Lighting Quality llumination design process Case for day-lighting: Quality of light Suitability for human eye response (system) Lesser quantity required for same task as compared to artificial light Best color rendering Good visual environment to discern visual information Sub-conscious recognition of quality Design element (aesthetics) to be combined with environmental systems The ambient light is designed to provide approximately 33%-67% of the illumination level that would have been produced by a general lighting system. mbient requirements The intent of the ambient lighting is to illuminate the space to about 1/3 rd the task illumination levels. The common down lighting system can cause indirect glare due to surface reflectance ndirect ambient lighting system is often advocated because of its uniformity mbient and Task Lighting Directionality as well as intensity of light are main considerations for the task lighting requirements Patterns in general are a problem, and keeping surfaces within a brightness ratio of 3:1 is suggested to minimize the impact of the patterns of surface luminance. Task level can have a range of 2/3 to 4/3 of the target level illumination. Task Requirements hy Daylighting O Quality of light O Most suitable for visual response by human eye O Lesser quantity required as compared to artificial light for a given task O Best color rendering O Provides good visual environment and discerns visual information the best O Conscious-sub conscious recognition of quality if absent Daylight penetration Daylight penetration : 1.5 to 2.0 times the head height Glazed area Ior when indows are restricted to one side Daylight requirements Daylight Factor Method nalysis Components of Daylight Factor DF = SC + ERC + RC Standard Sky Conditions Sky conditions for ndia: 6500 10000 Lux W: Window area; Percent window factor; A: Area of nternal Surfaces; R: Average Reflectances lectric Lighting Design ims oI Lighting Design Aims: Comfort Productivity Safety, Health and security Experiencing Architecture Energy considerations Who selects & installs Luminaires? Architects & nteriors Decorators Electrical Designers and Contractors Owners & Tenants & very rarely actual users Electric Lighting Requirements (as per ECBC) & Issues of Concern Building Area Method : Lighting Power Densities (LPD) ospitaI 1.2 W/ft 2 Library 1.3 W/ft 2 Manufacturing 1.3 W/ft 2 Museum 1.1 W/ft 2 Office 1.0 W/ft 2 Parking Garage 0.3 W/ft 2 RetaiI 1.5 W/ft 2 SchooI 1.2 W/ft 2 Electric Lighting Requirements & Issues of Concern (Contd.) . . . Space by Space : Lighting Power Allowance for Office Building Office EncIosed 1.1 W/ft 2 Office Open 1.1 W/ft 2 Conference 1.3 W/ft 2 Training 1.4 W/ft 2 Lobby 1.3 W/ft 2 Lounge 1.2 W/ft 2 Dining 0.9 W/ft 2 Food Prep 1.2 W/ft 2 Corridor 0.5 W/ft 2 Restroom 0.7 W/ft 2 ctive Storage 0.8 W/ft 2 $ome Benchmark Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Lighting 8 to 10 W/sqm Best so far done by DSCL 8.5 W/sqm This figure is usually around 20 to 22 for most of the big buildings in Delhi and also as per National Building Code 1983. Luminous Efficacy & Life of Light $ources SI. No. Light Source Efficacy (Im/W) verage Life (h) 1. Incandescent Iamps GLS 25W-1000W 8-18 1000 2. Tungsten haIogen incandescent Iamps 500W-2000W 22-27 2000 3. BIended Light Lamps MLL 100W-500W 18-26 5000 4. FIuorescent (TL) a) CooI dayIight 20W-80W b) Warm White 20W-80W c) SIim Line 36W d) CFL 5W-25W e) Tri-phosphor FL T 5,T 8, T 12(28W-60W) 61 67 70 40-80 88-105 5000 5000 7000 8000 15,000-30,000 Luminous Efficacy & Life of Light Sources (Contd.) . . . SI. No. Light Source Efficacy (Im/W) verage Life (h) 5. igh Pressure Mercury Vapour Lamp a) 80W b) 125W c) 250W d) 400W 36.9 41 46 52 5000 5000 5000 5000 6. igh Pressure Sodium Vapour Lamp a) 250W b) 400W c) 1000W 88 107 112 10,000 10,000 10,000 7. Low Pressure Sodium Vapour Lamps (33W- 135W) 120-160 10,000 8. MetaI aIide Lamps (35W-2000W) 62-120 10,000 Evolution of Energy $aving Lamps - CFL Type of Iamp Watts InitiaI Lumens 'accum type single coil 25 220 ncandescent lamp 40 425 Gas filled type coiled 60 720 coil incandescent lamps 100 1380 200 2920 500 8300 1000 18600 Fluorescent lamp ( TL5) 35 3650/ 3400 Compact fluorescent lamp 10/13/18 600/900/1200 Regular fluorescent lamp 40 2500 High pressure mercury vapour lamps 80 3700 125 6200 250 12700 400 22500 1000 58500 Halogen lamp 1000 22000 High pressure sodium vapour lamp 70 6000 100 9000 150 15000 250 28000 400 48000 1000 130000 Lamp Output Type Distribution of flux emitted as total flux output Upward Downward Direct 0-10 90-100 Semi-direct 10-40 60-90 General-diffusing 40-60 40-60 Semi-indirect 60-90 10-40 ndirect 90-100 0-10 Lamp Output INDI 150 300 300 300 300 450 300 300 200- 300 150- 300 100 Comparison of $tandards for lighting INDI 150 300 300 300 300 450 300 300 200- 300 150- 300 100 Comparison of $tandards for lighting Lumen Method Determination of the illumination level Selection of the light sources and luminaires Determination of the luminous flux a) Dependent Factors b) Coefficient of Utilization / Utilization Factor c) Calculation for determining Luminous Flux Arrangement of luminaires Lumen Method (Contd.) . SeIection of the Iight sources and Iuminaires Depends on the choice of lighting system i.e. general lighting / directional lighting / localized or local lighting. Determination of the Iuminous fIux Dependent Factors a) Lumen output of the lamps b) Type of luminaire c) Proportion of the room (room index) d) Reflectance of internal surfaces of the room e) Depreciation in lumen output of the lamps after burning their rated life f) Depreciation due to dirt collection on luminaires and room surface. Lumen Method (Contd.) . a) Coefficient of UtiIization / UtiIization Factor Reference to the tables Tables indicate the maintenance factor to be taken for the luminous flux depreciation throughout the life of an installation due to the ageing of the lamp & dust accumulation on lamps / luminaires/room surface 'alues for reflection factor of ceiling and wall are: (for walls account for windows without curtains/shelves/almirahs/doors with different colours) White &very Iight coIours 0.7 Light coIours 0.5 MiddIe tints 0.3 Dark coIours 0.1 Lumen Method (Contd.) . Lumen Method (Contd.) . CaIcuIation for determining Luminous FIux Lumen Method (Contd.) . rrangement of Luminaires To achieve better uniformly distributed illumination Luminaires spaced a' metre apart in either direction Distance of the end luminaire form wall: a/2 metre a is more or less equal to mounting height m between the luminaire & working plane Small rooms: where Room index (k r )<1; a< m (generally require 2-4 luminaires) 1 luminaire would provide higher utilization factor, but poor uniformity in distribution. llustration Example1: 2 lamp aluminium luminaire with louvres with 40 watt cool daylight lamps Mounting Height = 2.4 - 0.9 = 1.5m Room ndex: (L * W) / (L + W) Hm = (6 * 5) / (6+5)*1.5 = 1.8 Coeff. Of utilization = 0.43 Maintenance factor = 0.75 No. of 40 watts lamp required =N (lamp) = EA / q (lamp) d = [300 * (6*5)] / 2440 * 0.43 * 0.75 = 11 Example 2: Chandelier with opaque or dense diffusing shades Maintenance factor = 0.75 ; Coefficient of utilization = 0.24 No. of lamps = [300 * (6*5)] / 2440 * 0.24 * 0.75 = 20 Example 3: Translucent bottom and sides Maintenance factor = 0.6 ; Coefficient of utilization = 0.20 No. of lamps = [300 * (6*5)] / 2440 * 0.20 * 0.60 = 31 llustration $ystems pproach Lighting is for eye performance Selective rods for low levels and cones for high levels Color information associated with cones Safe seeing conditions, safe for the object lluminance or the extent of light coming from the object and its immediate surroundings is the parameter of interest Energy Efficiency: Task performance needs are more important than energy efficiency nergy Costs and Lighting Even high lighting levels cost equivalent of a cup of coffee Energy demand growth rate is 9% per annum Generating capacity growth rate is 6% per annum Lighting consumes about 17% of the total energy consumed