-2
5.0
4.5 France Germ any Italy Greece Spain Ireland Portugal 4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
-3
How can the Euro area survive with such different countries? What kind of economic policies for countries in difficulty? More solidarity or more discipline between member States?
-4
Contents
1. The convergence process in the Euro area and its consequences on monetary policy 2. The policy mix in the Euro area since 2000 3. How coping with the debt crisis?
-5
The level of GDP per capita differs among Euro area countries although there were signs of convergence during the last 15 years
GDP per capita (SPA, Euro area =100)
Euro area (16 countries ) Belgium Germany Ireland Greece Spain France Italy Cyprus Malta Netherlands Aus tria Portugal Slovenia Slovaquia Finland Standard deviation (without Luxembourg) Max/min (without Luxembourg) 1995 100,0 113,2 113,2 90,4 73,7 80,7 101,8 106,1 77,2 75,4 107,9 118,4 67,5 64,9 42,1 94,7 21,9 2,8 2000 100,0 112,5 105,4 117,0 75,0 86,6 102,7 104,5 79,5 75,0 119,6 117,0 72,3 71,4 44,6 104,5 22,1 2,7 2005 100,0 109,1 106,4 130,9 82,7 92,7 100,9 95,5 82,7 70,9 119,1 112,7 71,8 79,1 54,5 103,6 20,6 2,4 2009 100,0 107,4 107,4 118,5 86,1 96,3 100,0 94,4 90,7 72,2 120,4 113,0 73,1 80,6 65,7 102,8 17,1 1,8
-7
The poorest countries in 1995 registered the highest economic growth during the last 15 years
-8
Because of the convergence process, we observed a higher economic growth in the peripheral countries before the crisis (except for Portugal) than the Euro area average
Real GDP growth (annual average, 19952007, %) Real Euro area (16 countries) Germany France Greece Spain Ireland Portugal 2,3 1,6 2,2 3,9 3,7 7,2 2,4
Potential (Eur. Com. Estimates) 2,0 1,5 2,0 3,5 3,3 6,8 2,1
-9
, but real convergence also implied higher inflation in high growth countries
- 10
3 2 1 0
-1 -2 -3
-1
-2
-4 -5 -6
-3
-4 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
-7
Coe-Rexecode 144
- 11
- 12
In the U.S. it also exists a discrepancy in GDP per capita even if it seems lower than in the Euro area
Dispersion of GDP per capita in the U.S. and in the Euro area U.S. (2008) Standard deviation of nominal GDP per capita (American States and EA-15)* Standard deviation of nominal GDP per capita (8 U.S. regions and EA-11)** 19,1 Euro area (2009) 29,2
10,5
22,2
* Excluding Columbia district for the U.S. and Luxembourg for the Euro area which are extreme points ** Euro area exluding Luxembourg, Cyprus, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia
- 13
To sum up: The Euro area has not all the characteristics of an optimum currency area, although signs of improvement have been noticed before the crisis . Differences in economic structure, although convergence has improved. Strong integration is visible in the high correlation between national business cycles. . Real convergence implies higher real GDP growth, with consequences in terms of higher inflation (this is the major difference with the U.S.). => Real convergence creates a dilemma for monetary policy in a single currency area, especially because not so much mobility in the
- 15
2 if the Euro area is not an optimal currency area, what kind of problems can emerge?
In an economy which is moving towards the technological frontier we can observe the following developments: Productivity Wages =>
=>
=>
Has monetary policy been appropriate to the economic situation since 2000?
An application of the Taylor rule : ECB Repo = average annual growth of potential output (95-2007) 1 (difference between long term and short term interest rates) + inflation + 0.5 * output gap (real GDP/potential GDP) + 0.5 (inflation rate -2 the ECB target)
- 17
12
-4
-8 1999
Coe-Rexecode 146
- 18
120
240
110
200
120
60
100
50 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
80 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Coe-Rexecode 128
- 19
Trade balance
250
1999=100
120
200
115
150
100
95 -50
90
85
-100
80 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
-150 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Coe-Rexecode 129
- 20
As a percentage of GDP
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35 1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Coe-Rexecode 131
- 21
3 Whats next?
Is there any exit strategy from the Euro area? NO . There is not a symmetry between entering and leaving the EMU: technically, what would be the value of the private or the public debt for the country leaving the EMU? If there is a strong depreciation of the new currency (50% or more), the increase of the external debt will not be sustainable. . Which value for the new currency? In the short run, a depreciation of the currency increases the competitiveness, but if it is followed by a strong rise in the inflation rate, interest rates would be pushed up: as a consequence GDP might be hit negatively and competitiveness would deteriorate. . Consequences on remaining countries are not clear. It
- 23
An exercise regarding the sustainability of the public debt in the Euro area countries
2011-2012 : Coe-Rexecode outlook (Spain) and European Commission (Portugal, Italy, Greece) Dec 2010 2013-2020 : Assumptions : - Real GDP close to potential growth (revised downward compared to the pre-crisis period; - Euro area inflation close to 2% (a bit higher inflation for peripheral countries) - Apparent interest rates in line with growth of nominal GDP, including a risk premium. - Public receipts increase as nominal GDP - Public expenditures are adjusted to stabilize the debt/GDP ratio in the medium run (when possible) Reminder: If Bp(t)=G(t)-T(t), the primary deficit, with G(t) the public expenditures (excluding payments) and T the public receipts Total fiscal deficit is B(t) = Bp(t) + r(t)D(t-1), where interest payments is the product between the apparent interest rate and the debt level It comes, D(t) = D(t-1) + B(t)= Bp(t)+(1+r(t))D(t-1) And in % of GDP, the debt dynamics can be written: d(t) = bp(t) + (1+r)/(1+g) d(t-1), with r the apparent interest rate and g the nominal GDP growth rate.
4.5
4.8
5.0
5.0
The stabilization of the debt/GDP ratio is possible, but only in the long run (around 2015)
Outlook of public finances in peripheral Euro area countries (% GDP)
2010
Spain Primary balance Fiscal balance Public debt Portugal Primary balance Fiscal balance Public debt Greece Primary balance Fiscal balance Public debt Ireland
2015
2020
170 %
P u b lic d e b t
140
110
80
50
Ire la n d P o rtu g a l G re e c e S p a in
20 2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
C oe -R ex e co d e
131