Stephanie Arpin PT MCH Jennifer Sailofsky PT JRH Krithika Sambasivan MSc (cand)
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 1
Neuro
CRW Lab.
CRW
Back pain
Lab
Lab
Back conditions
Lect
Neurological conditions
Our case for today 3 month old baby girl, coming for a physiotherapy assessment regarding a possible motor delay
Documents needed:
What do you hope to gain Development to date:from this visit? Head control, smiles, time spent in prone, other positions depending on age, feeding What would help? history and patterns
Other information: General health status, pertinent developmental or medical history of siblings, history of any illnesses
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 10
Common orthopedic reasons for consultation with an infant (details will be discussed later)
Torticollis Will be seen in detail later Clubfoot Talipes equivarus, 3 dimensional deformation of foot forefoot adducted, calcaneus is small, hindfoot in varus, equinus of ankle
11
12
13
APGAR
Sign A 0 1 2
P Pulse
Sneeze, cough, pulls away Blue-gray, pale Normal, except for Normal over all over extremities entire body Absent Slow, irregular Good, crying
15
17
Evaluation of infants
ICF Model
19
Evaluation of infants
ON EXAMINATION: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: Behavior, state regulation Spontaneous play/activity Interaction with environment, parents POSTURE: Age appropriate Size and shape of head, face, skull; asymmetries
20
Engaging infants
Baby s vigilance state quiet sleep active sleep drowsiness quiet alert active alert crying Sensory issues pain medication Developmental level
21
Evaluation of infants
ON EXAMINATION: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: Behavior, state regulation Spontaneous play/activity Interaction with environment, parents POSTURE: Age appropriate Size and shape of head, face, skull; asymmetries
22
Evaluation of infants
EVALUATION OF BODY FUNCTIONS AND STRUCTURES VISUAL RESPONSES: Visual focus Visual tracking to and past midline, symmetry of eye movements Spontaneous abnormal eye movements (nystagmus) AUDITORY RESPONSES Awakens or startles to loud noises Localization (eyes to sound, head to sound) SENSATION: As appropriate
23
Evaluation of infants
EVALUATION OF BODY FUNCTIONS AND STRUCTURES VISUAL RESPONSES: Visual focus Visual tracking to and past midline, symmetry of eye movements Spontaneous abnormal eye movements (nystagmus) AUDITORY RESPONSES Awakens or startles to loud noises Localization (eyes to sound, head to sound) SENSATION: As appropriate
24
Evaluation of infants
TONE: Rest/Activity Axial: UE: LE: Very related to age, use of Neuro evaluation Amiel Tison or INFANIB for example may help in decisions; MAI items would be another way) Associated reactions RANGE OF MOTION/FLEXIBILITY: Head/neck: UE: LE: Trunk:
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Evaluation of infants
TONE: Rest/Activity Axial: UE: LE: Associated reactions RANGE OF MOTION/FLEXIBILITY: (see reference values article for neck ROM) Head/neck: UE: LE: Trunk:
34
Evaluation of infants
REFLEXES: Primitive: DTR: STRENGTH: Head/neck: UE: LE: Trunk: POSTURAL REACTIONS Righting Equilibrium Protection
In all appropriate positions (suspension, sitting, kneeling, standing )
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 35
36
37
Evaluation of infants
REFLEXES: Primitive: DTR: STRENGTH: Stroking over muscle belly, manual muscle testing (difficult), functional performance Head/neck: UE: LE: Trunk: POSTURAL REACTIONS Righting Equilibrium Protection
Isabelle Gagnon kneeling, standing In all appropriate positions (suspension, sitting, PhD ) 38
Nonfunctional (NF)
No function (0)
Turman & Van Vranken, 2002; In Daniels and Worthingham s Muscle Testing
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 39
Nonfunctional (NF)
No function (0)
Turman & Van Vranken, 2002; In Daniels and Worthingham s Muscle Testing
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 40
Evaluation of infants
REFLEXES: Primitive: DTR: STRENGTH: Head/neck: UE: LE: Trunk: POSTURAL REACTIONS (age appropriate as per reflexes sheet) Righting Equilibrium Protection COORDINATION:
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 41
42
Evaluation of infants
REFLEXES: Primitive: DTR: STRENGTH (muscle power/endurance): Head/neck: UE: LE: Trunk: POSTURAL REACTIONS Righting Equilibrium Protection COORDINATION:
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 43
Evaluation of infants
ICF Model
44
Evaluation of infants
EVALUATION OF ACTIVITIES AND PARTICIPATION COMMUNICATION: BALANCE: Sitting : Standing:
45
Evaluation of infants
GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION: Description in all positions and transitions for appropriate age group Position, function in position, transition in and out of position
STANDARDIZED TESTS for infants (examples) Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) EVIDENCE BASED SUMMARY
46
(Piper, Darragh)
Purpose: Identify babies presenting with a motor delay and evaluate motor development over time ICF component targeted: Activities Characteristics: 58 items based on performance in 4 basic positions (supine, prone, sitting, standing) scored on a 0-1 scale, using specific descriptions for each item developed based on neuro-maturational theory but also on systems theory Age range: 0-18 months (or acquisition of independent walking) Norm-referenced Reliability Inter-rater: 0.86-0.98 Test-retest: 0.86-0.99 Validity content: 1 dimension concurrent: other tests-good predictive: 10th percentile at 4 months 5th percentile at 8Isabelle Gagnon PhD months
47
48
49
50
Environmental factors
List and prioritize the EF you identified
Personal Factors
List, if any, PF identified http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/
51
Analysis: Diagnosis
Summary
Summarize your findings and interpretation. State your physiotherapy diagnosis.
Goals
Determine your intervention goals for this patient and his family. This should be done with the family. Determining intervention objectives is part of the evaluation process. Goals must be functional, realistic and meet needs of the child and of his family. Your goal will be used as an outcome measure to determine the effectiveness of your intervention. It is expressed with the help of an Action verb. It must me Measurable (ex. Jimmy will crawl in 4pt over a 10cm obstacle; or Mary will maintain sitting for 20 minutes in her high chair).
Adequate goals: 1) need to be set with patient and family 2) should be relevant to the person (s) concerned 3) should be challenging but realistic and achievable 4) should be measurable (in order to measure or determine success) SMART goals Specific; Measurable; Achievable; Relevant; Timed
52
Treatment Plan
Plan
What is your plan with this child
53
54
Congenital Torticollis
55
Specifics of assessment
History and Subjective Assessment: Pregnancy, delivery, neonatal course Associated conditions Family history Other: Feeding position preference, gaze preference, time spent in various positions, sleeping position, carrying positions, treatments to date, what have they looked up, when did they notice the problem, orthosis Observation: Head/Neck resting posture Trunk posture Extremities position, spontaneous movements Cranio-facial morphology
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 56
Specifics of assessment
History and Subjective Assessment: Pregnancy, delivery, neonatal course Associated conditions Family history Other: Feeding position preference, gaze preference, time spent in various positions, sleeping position, carrying positions, treatments to date, what have they looked up, when did they notice the problem, orthosis Observation: Head/Neck resting posture Trunk posture Extremities position, spontaneous movements Cranio-facial morphology
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 57
normal
plagiocephaly
brachycephaly
scaphocephaly
58
Specifics of assessment
59
Anthropometric measurements
60
Plagiocephalometry
61
Specifics of assessment
Body function/structures: Neck ROM (active/passive) Neck Strength UE/LE ROM and Strength Tone Reflexes Activities/Participation: Gross Motor Development
62
63
Specifics of assessment
Body function/structures: Neck ROM (active/passive) Neck Strength UE/LE ROM and Strength Tone Reflexes Activities/Participation: Gross Motor Development
64
(Ohman, 2008)
Isabelle Gagnon PhD 65
Specifics of Treatment
Stretching-Strengthening-Positioning
Controversy over modalities So need to revert to theoretical models of intervention to determine best approach
66
Specifics of Treatment
Stretching-Strengthening-Positioning
Controversy over modalities So need to revert to theoretical models of intervention to determine best approach
67
Specifics of Treatment
The MCH exercise booklet or sheet
68