Magdalena Szpotowicz
University of Warsaw, Poland
*This research has been supported by a European Commission grant under the Lifelong Learning
Programme, Project n. 135632-LLP-2007-UK-KA1SCR. An additional British Council grant supported the Croatian team.
Croatia
Slavonic L1 mostly monolingual classes central curriculum ca.80 % - English two 45-min lessons per week
Poland
Slavonic L1 mostly monolingual classes central curriculum ca. 80 % - English two 45-min lessons per week
Croatia
long tradition in FLL & early start compulsory from grade 1 since 2003 grades from the start of primary school massive out-of-school exposure (media, tourism)
Poland
short tradition in FLL & early start compulsory from grade 1 since 2008 no grades in lower primary not much exposure (dubbed TV)
Aims
the interplay of contextual variables and individual learner differences impact on L2 acquisition
Language-learning milieu
School setting
Significant others
Nature of instruction
Individual variables
Ability
Gender
Linguistic self-confidence
Sample
N = 350 first graders (age: 6/7 years) (F 170; M 180) 7 schools in Croatia 7 schools in Poland
Croatia
Poland
N=172
F 85 M 87
N=178
F 85 M 93
Methodology
Measures
school setting instruction out-of-class exposure ability attitudes & motivation linguistic selfconfidence language achievement
observation oral interviews smiley questionnaires standard questionnaires listening tasks speaking tasks
RESULTS
Poor recognition
doing, writing, riding, eating
Low recall
toys (kite, train, plane)
city YLs < village & town YLs village & town YLs < city YLs
listening scores:
speaking scores: ns
Town schools
City schools
ANOVA:
linguistic self-confidence: ns Ability: ns Motivation:
(45) (city) < (76) (city), (75) (village), (72) (town), (74) (village), (71) (town), (73) (village) (46) (village) < (77) (city) (46) (village) < (77) (city)
Listening scores:
Speaking scores:
Group comparisons
Group (46) / lowest
achievement
Generalist/English T Children from all over the city Specialized English classroom
No specialized classroom
Group comparison
Group (46) / lowest
achievement
Too much L1 Whole-class Too little feedback Poor motivator Average classroom management skills
Balance of L1 & L2 In pairs & groups Appropriate feedback Very good motivator Very good classroom management skills
Grp
(46)
(77)
Grp (46)
Materials used
Textbook Flashcards CD
Error correction
T ignores mistakes, even the obvious ones
(77)
Textbook Flashcards CD
T prompts self-correction
See handout
Correlations between ability, language achievement, linguistic self-confidence and motivation (grade 1) (Croatia/Poland)
Ability Listening Speaking Motivation Linguistic confidence
Ability
1.000
Listening
Speaking
1.000
-.376* .515**
.073 .684**
Motivation
1.000
-.109 .353*
Linguistic confidence
1.000
Correlations grade 2
Ability
1.000
.257** 1.000
-.127 1.000
Grade 1
Grade 2
compreh
product
compreh
product
mot
Ling confd
mot
Ling confid
ability
ability
Conclusions
Implicatons
longitudinal approach key to understanding impact of interplay on SLA importance of triangulation include larger samples