Tonights Talk
What is Lymphoma? Do we know what causes it? Hodgkins Lymphoma Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma Whats New? Questions and discussion Resourses and Information
WHAT IS LYMPHOMA?
LYMPHOMA is the term applied to a heterogeneous collection of diseases characterised by the presence of malignant lymphoid cells. i.e. Cancer of the Lymphatic System
LYMPHOMA
Traditionally 2 main Types of Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma 6th Most Common Cancer 4.1% of cancers in Australia 3500 new cases / year Incidence increases with age Many different subtypes Hodgkins Lymphoma Much less common 0.5% of cancers 400 new cases / year Peak incidence in Adolescence and >50
RISK FACTORS
Haemopoiesis
AML
ALL
Lymphoma/ CLL
T lymphoid
Types of lymphocytes
(defined by surface antigens, in vitro function, types of illness when lacking)
B cell malignancies
Bone marrow Lymph node, lymph, blood, bone marrow Lymph node, lymph, blood, bone marrow Bone marrow
Mature B cell
Plasma cell
B cell lymphoma
Multiple myeloma
Indolent
Aggressive
small cell
large cell
xxxxxx
xxx
Radiotherapy
MOPP 50 % cure
partial non-cross resistance with MOPP salvage 20 % of MOPP failures 1990s 5 randomised trials:
7 independent prognostic factors Albumin < 40g/l Hb < 10.5g/dl Male > 45 y.o. Ann Arbor stage IV WCC > 15 x 10 9 /l 9 Lymphopaenia <0.6 x10 /l or < 8 % total WCC
BEACOPP
Developed as COPP / ABVD variant by GHLSG with same dosages (except vincristine and procarbazine) in a shorter 3 week cycle): COPP / ABVD BEACOPP
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y N etoposide N instead
BEACOPP-dose escalated + accelerated regimen+ RT vs COPP/ ABVD +RT (HD 9 Trial) 5th interim analysis
A B C COPP /ABVD Sd. BEACOPP esc BEACOPP p (A vs C) CR % 5y FFTF% 5y OS% IPFP 0-1 2,3 4-7 AML/ MDS 84 67 79 88 75 90 96 89 90 <0.0001 0.0014
91 81 57
1
91 90 85
4
95 90 77
9
NS NS <0.0099
BEACOPP-dose escalated + accelerated regimen+ RT vs COPP/ ABVD +RT (HD 9 Trial) 5th interim analysis
BIOPSY Tissue
STAGING CT/PET
PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
ABVD (6 8)
BEACOPP (6-8)
Second Malignant Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkins Disease: A Population-Based Evaluation Over 25 Years
Graa M. Dores, Catherine Metayer et al,
Data from 32,591 HD patients (1,111 25-year survivors) reported to 16 population-based cancer registries in North America and Europe (1935 to 1994) were analyzed. 2153 second cancers [O/E] = 2.3; 95% [CI] = 2.2 to 2.4) including 1,726 solid tumors (O/E = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.9 to 2.0) reported Cancers of the lung digestive tract female breast (Obs = 377; O/E = 2.9) (Obs = 376; O/E = 1.7) (Obs = 234; O/E = 2.0)
25 years after HD diagnosis, the risk of developing a solid tumor was 21.9%.
Increased risks for all solid tumors taken together were observed after therapy with either radiation alone (Obs = 632; O/E = 2.3; chemotherapy alone (Obs = 211; O/E = 1.7; combined-modality therapy (Obs = 149; O/E = 3.1;
Types of lymphoma
Indolent lymphoma
nodular or follicular lymph node pattern slowly growing respond to treatment but incurable treatment can be observe only or start with mild and simple therapy
Randomised intergroup trial of first line treatment for patients 60 years with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (DLBCL) with a CHOP-like regimen with or without the anti-CD20 antibody MabThera early stopping after first interim analysis
M Pfreundschuh, L Trmper, D Ma, A sterborg, R Pettengell, M Trneny, L Shepherd, J Walewski, P-L Zinzani, and M Loeffler for the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group
6 x CHOP-like CD20+ DLBCL 1860 years IPI 0,1 Stages IIIV, I with bulk
+ 3040 Gy (Bulk, E)
Randomisation
6 x CHOP-like + MabThera
+ 3040 Gy (Bulk, E)
R-Chemo n= 161
47
96
4 52
95
5 49
B-symptoms (%)
Extranodal involvement (%)
29
33
27
32
R-Chemo n= 161
19 60 12 9 100 34
40
30 20 10 0
40 39
MabThera + chemotherapy
11
8
2
*Reported
10
15
20
45
50
*crit for updated interim analysis Pfreundschuh M, et al., Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2004;23:556 (Abstract 6500)
10
15
20
45
50
MInT: conclusions
MabThera plus CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy in
Autologous
Allogeneic
YEAR
..
. . . .... .. . . . ...... . . . ..
... . ... .......... . . . . ... .. . ... ..... . ..... ............. ........... ... ... .. . . ... .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . .... . .... . . . .
2
TRANSPLANTS
80
PROBABILITY, %
60
Never in remission (N = 823)
40
Relapse (N = 1,744)
20
P = 0.0001
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
YEARS
33
80
PROBABILITY, %
CR2+ (N = 322)
60
Never in remission (N = 418)
Relapse (N = 791)
40
20
P = 0.0009
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
YEARS
34
PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL AFTER HLA-IDENTICAL SIBLING MYELOABLATIVE TRANSPLANTS FOR FOLLICULAR NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA, 1996-2001
100
Never in remission (N = 138)
80
PROBABILITY, %
CR1-3 (N = 79)
60
Relapse (N = 193)
40
20
P = NS
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
YEARS
35
PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL AFTER AUTOTRANSPLANTS FOR DIFFUSE LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA, 1996-2001
100
80
PROBABILITY, %
60
40
Relapse (N = 1,443)
20
P = 0.0001
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
YEARS
36
PROBABILITY OF SURVIVAL AFTER HLA-IDENTICAL SIBLING MYELOABLATIVE TRANSPLANTS FOR DIFFUSE LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA, 1996-2001
100
80
PROBABILITY, %
60
40
20
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
YEARS
37