Global Logistics
International Logistics
Changes to political landscape affect logistics
The end of Soviet rule in Eastern Europe EU economic integration
Nontariff barriers-a rule that has the effect of reducing imports Restrictions on truck traffic, forcing freight onto rail and water
NAFTA
Multinational firms
International
Estimated at 16% of world GDP today Mainly ocean and air, with significant intermodal activity Higher levels, reflecting longer lead times and greater demand and transit uncertainty Heavy reliance on forwarders, consolidators, and customs brokers High, owing to differences in currencies, inflation, levels and little recourse for default High, owing to longer and more difficult transit, frequent cargo handling, and varying levels of infrastructure development Many agencies involved (e.g., customs, commerce, agriculture, transportation Significant paperwork; the U.S. Department of Commerce estimates that paperwork cost for an average shipment is $250 Voice and paper costly and often ineffective; movement toward electronic interchange but variations in standards hinder widespread usage Cultural differences require significant market and product adaptation
Inventories
Agents Financial risk
Lower levels, reflecting short-order, leadtime requirements and improved transport capabilities
Modest usage, mostly in rail Low Low Primarily for hazardous materials, weight, safety laws, and some tariff requirements Minimal documentation involved (e.g., purchase order, bill of lading, invoice) Voice, paper-based systems adequate, with growing usage of electronic data interchange and Internet Relative homogeneity requires little product modification
Cargo risk
Government agencies
Administration
Communication Cultural differences
Product movement
Information flow
Competition
Inventory
and storage
Packaging
Transportation
Exporting Companies
Export distributor Customs house broker International freight forwarder Trading company Non-vessel-operating common carrier (NVOCC)
Documentation
Country of Origin Bills of Lading Packing Lists Customs Certified Shippers - C-T PAT
Ocean Shipping
Shipping conferences and alliances pool resources and extend market coverage
Ocean Shipping
Types of Vessels
Containerships Lighter aboard ship (LASH) vessels Roll On-Roll Off (RO-RO) vessels Tankers Specialized vessels
CHAPTER 15
Organizing for Effective Logistics
Responsibilities
Objectives Large inventories Small and frequent production runs Decentralized warehousing Large product assortment Low inventories Larger and infrequent production runs Plant warehousing Fewer products Centralized warehousing
VP Marketing
VP Production
VP Financial
Responsibilities
Objectives
15
58
44
51
41
Engineering
Manufacturing
Marketing/Sales
Finance/Accounting
Human Resources
Logistics
Logistics
Engineering
Manufacturing
Human Resources
Marketing/ Sales
Finance/ Accounting
President
Marketing Finance Operations
Distribution
channels Customer service Field inventories Revenue
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Supply
alternatives and supply costs Warehousing Purchasing Transportation
15-4
President
Marketing Finance Operations
Less
warehousing
Benefits of fragmentation elimination Encourages important cost tradeoffs to be effected Focuses on an important, defined area by top management Sets the structure within which control can take place
Organizational Choices
Informal structure -Persuasion of top management -Coordinating committees -Incentive arrangements -Profit sharing -Cross charges Semi-formal structure -Matrix organization
Inventory management
Production scheduling
Customer service
Quality assurance
Sales forecasitng
Logistics\SC coordinator
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Project authority
15-8
Functional authority
Systems analysis refers to the orderly and planned observation of one or more segments in the logistics network or supply chain to determine how well each segment functions.
General Questions
Why do we perform each task? What value is added by it? Why are the tasks performed in the order they are? Can we alter the sequence of the processing steps to increase efficiency? Why are the tasks performed by a particular group or individual? Could others perform this task? Is there a better way for the system to operate?
Reverse Logistics
Impacts
Impacts
Plan
Plan
Plan
Plan
Plan
Deliver Return
Source Return
Make
Deliver Return
Source
Make
Deliver Return
Source Return
Source Return
Make
Deliver Return
Return
Customer
Suppliers suppliers
Your Company
Internal or External
Customers customers
Processes associated with receiving returned products for any reason. These processes extend into post-delivery customer support. The process includes communication between the customer and last known holder or known return center and the generation of associated documentation.
Forecasting Carrying costs Processing costs Warehousing Distribution Transportation Personnel Marketing
Reverse Logistics is the process of moving products from their typical final destination to another point, for the purpose of capturing value otherwise unavailable, or for the proper disposal of the products.
Processing returned merchandise damaged, seasonal, restock, salvage, recall, or excess inventory Recycling packaging materials/containers Reconditioning, refurbishing, remanufacturing Disposition of obsolete stuff Hazmat recovery
Sherman Montgomery Wards - 1894 Recycling/remanufacturing in 1940s World War II - 77,000,000 square feet of storage across Europe with over $6.3 billion in excess stuff Salvage and reuse of clothing and shoes in the Pacific Theater World War II
Costs - above the cost of the item Merchandise credits to the customers.
The transportation costs of moving the items from the retail stores to the central returns distribution center. The repackaging of the serviceable items for resale.
The cost of warehousing the items awaiting disposition. The cost of disposing of items that are unserviceable, damaged, or obsolete.
Costs
Process inbound shipment at a major distribution center = 1.1 days Process inbound return shipment = 8.5 days Cost of lost sales Wal-Mart: Christmas 2003 - returns = 4 Days of Supply for all of WalMart = 2000 Containers PalmOne - 25% return rate on PDAs
Is it a problem?
Estimate of 2004 holiday returns: $13.2 billion % of estimated 2004/2005 holiday returns: 25% Wal-Mart: $6 Billion in annual returns = 17,000 truck loads (>46 trucks a day) Electronics: $10 Billion annually in returns Personal Computers: $1.5 Billion annually = approximately $95 per PC sold 79% of returned PCs have no defects
How do we know WHAT we should be doing? How do we know HOW WELL we are doing? Where are the opportunities to improve PROFITS?
1. So many people, from so many departments, at so many locations, from different companies, needed to process one return 2. For the group managers, returns is a small, annoying part of their group Most of a Return is someone elses problem /fault 3. Turn Around Time is often very slow and difficulties often arise that add days to the processing of a Return
5.
6. 7. 8.
Best Practices
All Returns under control of ONE GROUP Very Defined Business Processes Process Mapping author of text found that companies that develop process maps saved up to 40% Map all processes and add timelines Automate processes where possible
Product Returns
Authorize, Receive, Ship, Credit, Inventory, Inspect, Test, Repair, Disposition Multiple Locations Outsourced Parties Each with - their own processes - their own priority
Perfect Order Fulfillment Information Security Parts integrity Boeing 787 Product integrity Mattel Shipping Integrity Inventory Integrity Cornerstone of supply chain leadership
Questions??
Summary
Global Logistics controllable and uncontrollable factors Impacts on global inventories Traditional vs. Non-traditional organizations Functional vs. Program design Reverse Logistics impacts, causes, best practices Supply Chain Integrity