Unggahan by roveelaineeve

Bar Questions and Answers Political Law

[3] People vs. Balansi 187 SCRA 566

[1] Fortuna vs. People 348 SCRA 270

[4] People vs. Malngan 503 SCRA 294

[5] People vs. Comadre 431 SCRA 366

5. Ormoc Sugar Co. Inc. v. Treasurer of Ormoc City

FOR REVIEW ONLY People v. Santos

FOR REVIEW ONLY Astorga v. People

(1) People v. Pagalasan

Republic v. Domingo

Saguid v. Court of Appeals

9. Catu_v._Rellosa

[10] Spouses Fuentes v. Roca, GR No. 178902, April 21, 2010 (Art 96)

[11] Noveras v Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 (Art 99)

[9] Nobleza v. Nuega, GR No. 193038, March 11, 2015 (Art. 92)

[1] (Art. 34 or 35) Santiago v. People, GR No. 200233, July 15, 2015

[46] (Art. 63) Quiao v Quiao, G.R. No 176556, July 4, 2012

[44] (Art. 51) Republic v Olaybar GR 189538 2-10-2014

[26] (Art 39, AM 02-11-10) Enrico v Medinaceli, GR 173614. 9-29-2007

[15] (Art. 36) Camacho-Reyes v. Reyes, G.R. No. 185286, Aug 18, 2010

G.R. No. 63915 - Tañada v. Tuvera

[16] Republic v. Manalo, G.R. No. 221029, April 24, 2018 (Art 26)

[13] Republic v. Albios, GR 198780, 10-16-2013 (Art 6)

[5] Abbas v Abbas, G.R. No. 183896, January 30, 2013 (Art 4)

[6] Kho v. Republic, GR 187462, June 1, 2016

[10] Uy v Lacsama GR 206220 Aug 19 2015 (Marriage Ceremony)

[8] de Castro v de Castro GR 160172 Feb 13, 2009

[1] G.R. No. 225193 - Santos-Gantan v. Gantan

[2] G.R. No. 119190 - Chi Ming Tsoi v. Court of Appeals

[2] G.R. No. 173614 - Enrico v. Heirs of Spouses Medinaceli

2021 Blue Notes Political Law 1

[30] Jimenez v. Cabangbang (G.R. No. L-15905, August 3, 1966)

[69] Philconsa v. Enriquez (G.R. No. 113105, August 19, 1994)

[67] Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Tax Appeals (185 SCRA 329, 1990)

[66] Tobias v. Abalos (G.R. No. L-114783, December 8, 1994)

[55] Standard Chartered Bank v. Senate Committee (G.R. No. 167173, December 27, 2007)

[54] Sabio v. Gordon (G.R. No. 174177, October 17, 2006)

11. Lao Gi v. Court of Appeals

29. Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region v. Olalia, Jr

13. Teves v. Sandiganbayan