9 Seraiwangi Damanik PDF
9 Seraiwangi Damanik PDF
ABSTRACT
Economic Analysis of Cintronella
Farming System (Cose Study in Halu
Mountani, South Bandung Districk)
Cymbopogon Nardus L representing
one of oil atsiri crops, what pertained have
expanded. The commodity sharing very big to
resource of stock -exchange of farmer earnings and and also the labour absorbtion.
Problems faced by Indonesia in development
serai fragrant include; cover raw material
levying, handling pasca harvest, production
process, tataniaga, technological of distillation equipments and processing. pre-eminent
use Varietas of serai fragrant of like G1, G2,
G3, G115, G127 and G135 can yield oil atsiri
obstetrically is high geraniol and sitronellal.
In line with above problem hence this research aim to obtain : get pattern of farming
system fragrant supporting agriculture development have continuation to studied economic and respon farmer to pattern of farming
system recommended. The research on start
January 2005 to December 2006 with location
Gunung Halu Sub Distric. The research method are : (1) Analycis Revanue (2) Analysis
profit function, (3) Analysis farmer respons
and method multiple regression. The experiment result was Revanue farming system
Rp 10,500,000,-/ha and B/C ratio 1.75
maximum advantage of farmer influenced
manifestly by kapital factory land; ground,
building appliance And labour at belief sto rey; level 95%. Maximum advantage elasticity
to Labour change, Kapital Building Appliance
and Factory Land; Ground have the character
of inelastis. Produce serai fragrant influenced
203
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
manifestly by farmer earnings, formal education and labour. elasticity produce serai
fragrant to earnings change, formal education
and labour have the character of inelastis.
Respon analysis for farmer and education with
coefficient 1.5 and income with coefficient 1.4.
Keywords : Cintronella, analisis economy, farming syste
PENDAHULUAN
Serai wangi (Cymbopogon
nardus L) merupakan salah satu jenis
tanaman minyak atsiri, yang tergolong
sudah berkembang. Dari hasil penyulingan daunnya diperoleh minyak serai
wangi yang dalam dunia perdagangan
dikenal dengan nama Citronella Oil.
Minyak serai wangi Indonesia dipasaran dunia terkenal dengan nama Citronella Oil of Java. Volume ekspor minyak serai wangi beberapa tahun terakhir mengalami penurunan, Pada tahun
2002 mencapai 142 ton dengan nilai
1.066.000 US $ dan pada tahun 2004
sebesar 114 ton dengan nilai ekspor sebesar 700.000 US $ (Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, 2006). Salah satu penyebab penurunan ekspor tersebut adalah persaingan negara-negara produsen
dengan munculnya Chinessa Citronella
Oil dan Formusan Citronella Oil yang
berasal dari negara RRC dan Srilangka
dengan memiliki harga dan mutu lebih
baik dari Citronella Oil of Java.
Peranan komoditas ini sangat
besar sebagai sumber devisa dan pendapatan petani serta penyerapan tenaga
kerja. Produksi minyak serai wangi di
Indonesia dihasilkan dari Nangroe
Aceh Darussalam, Jawa Barat, Jawa
Timur dan Lampung dengan total luas
areal seluruh Indonesia pada tahun
2004 mencapai 3492 hektar. (Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, 2006).
204
TR
TC
=
=
205
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
2. Analisis Keuntungan. adalah fungsi keuntungan (profit function) seperti yang dikembangkan oleh Lau
dan Yotopoulus (1971). Penjabaran fungsi keuntungan dapat diuraikan sebagai berikut :
Y = F (X1 , X2 , ....Xm; Z1 , Z2 , ., Zn ) (2)
(3)
i 1
i 1
j 1
Y A( X ii )( Z j j )
206
A = A 1/(1-U) (1-U)
( i ) i /(1U )
i 1
i = - i (1-U)-1 , i=1,,4
j = - j (1-U)-1 , j=1,,4
i 1
j 1
A
W1
W2
W3
Z1
Z2
Z3
Z4
207
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
Produksi
daun(ton/ha/thn)
Leafs production
25
67,5
70
70
Harga daun/kg
Leafs price/kg
300
300
300
350
Nilai (Rp)
Value (Rp)
7.500.000,20.250.000,21.000.000,24.500.000,-
Penerimaan (Rp)
Benefit (Rp)
7.500.000,20.250.000,21.000.000,24.500.000,-
208
Biaya (Rp)
Cost (Rp)
8.500.000,11.500.000,14.750.000,14.000.000,-
Pendapatan (Rp)
Revenue (Rp)
- 1.000.000,8.750.000,6.250.000,10. 500.000,-
1.307.500
1.441.000
164.500
131.000
144.000
137.500
725.000
771.000
748.000
169.000
187.000
4.316.000 4.271.000
178.000
Koefisien
13.729
SE
2.236
t
6.140
Prob
0.000
Elastistas
-1.249
1.038
0.386
0.324
-3.232
3.203
0.002
0.002
-0.712
0.699
-0.965
0.329
-2.930
0.002
-0.578
209
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
Rata-rata
39.458
8.379
3.380
2.670
8.820
Standar deviasi
20.134
8.508
1.013
1.363
2.649
Koefisien
0,699
1,455
3,823
SE
4,485
0,155
1,303
t
0,156
9,381
2,935
Prob
0,876
0,000
0,004
Elastistas
1,547
0,563
2,747
0,007
0,346
0,309
0,327
KESIMPULAN
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
211
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
Pusat
212
St d. Dev iation
.44022
.13977
.18400
.11799
.13522
.06681
.11049
.15959
N
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
Correlati ons
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
Keuntungan
UOP (Ln T)
1.000
Harga
bahan baku
serai wangi
(Ln W1)
.068
.068
1.000
-.080
.221
.183
-.080
1.000
.007
Harga bahan
baku miny ak
tanah (Ln W2)
.183
Biay a lain-lain
(Ln W3)
.055
Kapital tanah
pabrik (Ln Z1)
-.631
Stock kapital
alat peny uling
(Ln Z2)
-.375
Tenaga Kerja
(Ln Z3)
.208
Alat
bangunan
(Ln Z4)
-.601
-.006
.115
.250
-.141
-.028
-.123
.153
-.150
.055
.221
.007
1.000
.066
.466
.303
-.072
-.631
-.006
-.028
.066
1.000
.605
.032
.733
-.375
.115
-.123
.466
.605
1.000
-.033
.320
.208
-.601
.
.250
-.141
.273
.153
-.150
.052
.303
-.072
.314
.032
.733
.000
-.033
.320
.000
1.000
.114
.032
.114
1.000
.000
.273
.241
.024
.477
.154
.013
.106
.052
.241
.474
.401
.138
.087
.092
.314
.024
.474
.280
.000
.003
.264
.000
.477
.401
.280
.000
.388
.000
.000
.154
.138
.000
.000
.385
.002
.032
.000
80
.013
.106
80
.087
.092
80
.003
.264
80
.388
.000
80
.385
.002
80
.
.156
80
.156
.
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
Variabl es Entered/Removedb
Model
1
2
3
4
5
Variables Entered
Variables Remov ed
Method
Enter
Backward (criterion:
Backward (criterion:
Backward (criterion:
Backward (criterion:
Probability
Probability
Probability
Probability
of
of
of
of
213
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
Model Summaryf
Model
1
2
3
4
5
R
.718a
.718b
.718c
.717d
.712e
R Square
.515
.515
.515
.514
.507
Adjusted
R Square
.468
.475
.482
.488
.487
St d. Err or of
the Estimate
.32106
.31886
.31677
.31509
.31522
DurbinW at son
1.740
a. Pr edictors: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3) ,
Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah ( Ln W2), Har ga bahan baku serai
wangi (Ln W 1), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3) , Stock kapital alat peny uling (Ln
Z2), Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z 1)
b. Pr edictors: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3) ,
Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah ( Ln W2), Har ga bahan baku serai
wangi (Ln W 1), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3) , Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z 1)
c. Pr edictors: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Har ga bahan baku
miny ak tanah ( Ln W2), Har ga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W 1), Tenaga
Kerja ( Ln Z3), Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
d. Pr edictors: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Har ga bahan baku
miny ak tanah ( Ln W2), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3), Kapital tanah pabr ik ( Ln
Z1)
e. Pr edictors: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3),
Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
f . Dependent Variable: Keuntungan UOP ( Ln T)
ANOVAf
Model
1
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of
Squares
7.888
7.422
15.310
7.888
7.422
15.310
7.884
7.425
15.310
7.864
7.446
15.310
7.758
7.551
15.310
df
7
72
79
6
73
79
5
74
79
4
75
79
3
76
79
Mean Square
1.127
.103
F
10.932
Sig.
.000a
1.315
.102
12.930
.000b
1.577
.100
15.715
.000c
1.966
.099
19.802
.000d
2.586
.099
26.027
.000e
a.
Predictors: (Const ant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3), Harga bahan
baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2), Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W1), Tenaga Kerja
(Ln Z 3), St ock kapital alat peny uling (Ln Z 2), Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z 1)
b. Predictors: (Const ant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3), Harga bahan
baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2), Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W1), Tenaga Kerja
(Ln Z 3), Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z 1)
c. Predictors: (Const ant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln
W2), Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W1), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3), Kapit al t anah
pabrik (Ln Z 1)
d. Predictors: (Const ant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln
W2), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3), Kapital t anah pabrik (Ln Z1)
e. Predictors: (Const ant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3), Kapital tanah
pabrik (Ln Z 1)
f . Dependent Variable: Keuntungan UOP (Ln T)
214
Coeffici entsa
Model
1
(Constant)
Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W1)
Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2)
Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3)
Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
Stock kapital alat peny uling (Ln Z2)
Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3)
Alat bangunan (Ln Z 4)
(Constant)
Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W1)
Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2)
Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3)
Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3)
Alat bangunan (Ln Z 4)
(Constant)
Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln W1)
Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2)
Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3)
Alat bangunan (Ln Z 4)
(Constant)
Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2)
Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3)
Alat bangunan (Ln Z 4)
(Constant)
Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z 3)
Alat bangunan (Ln Z 4)
Unstandardized
Coef f icients
B
Std. Error
13.611
5.178
-.120
.282
.185
.210
-.050
.400
-1.241
.502
-.036
.856
1.041
.382
-.951
.369
13.443
3.253
-.121
.279
.186
.206
-.059
.331
-1.253
.411
1.045
.369
-.949
.363
13.272
3.089
-.126
.276
.189
.204
-1.268
.400
1.025
.349
-.935
.353
12.483
2.541
.206
.200
-1.304
.390
.975
.330
-.891
.337
13.729
2.236
-1.249
.386
1.038
.324
-.965
.329
Standardized
Coef f icients
Beta
-.038
.077
-.013
-.381
-.005
.261
-.345
-.038
.078
-.016
-.385
.262
-.344
-.040
.079
-.389
.257
-.339
.086
-.400
.245
-.323
-.384
.260
-.350
t
2.629
-.427
.879
-.125
-2.471
-.042
2.726
-2.577
4.133
-.433
.901
-.179
-3.051
2.833
-2.611
4.297
-.454
.923
-3.171
2.936
-2.650
4.913
1.031
-3.344
2.959
-2.642
6.140
-3.232
3.203
-2.930
Sig.
.010
.671
.382
.901
.016
.967
.008
.012
.000
.667
.371
.858
.003
.006
.011
.000
.651
.359
.002
.004
.010
.000
.306
.001
.004
.010
.000
.002
.002
.004
Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VIF
.842
.874
.585
.283
.399
.732
.376
1.188
1.144
1.710
3.537
2.505
1.366
2.658
.844
.893
.842
.417
.774
.383
1.185
1.120
1.187
2.397
1.292
2.614
.851
.898
.435
.853
.400
1.175
1.113
2.301
1.172
2.497
.930
.452
.948
.434
1.075
2.212
1.055
2.303
.461
.981
.455
2.171
1.019
2.197
Variance Proportions
Model
1
Dimension
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Eigenv alue
7.997
.001
.001
.000
.000
.000
.000
2.30E-005
6.997
.001
.001
.000
.000
.000
9.52E-005
5.998
.001
.001
.000
.000
.000
4.998
.001
.000
.000
.000
3.999
.001
.000
.000
Condit ion
Index
1.000
78.988
111.944
147.708
158.556
217.835
248.480
589.253
1.000
73.888
105.344
139.102
152.222
207.601
271.146
1.000
70.362
103.783
140.921
187.396
241.544
1.000
66.344
111.318
154.801
188.587
1.000
70.922
129.258
163.609
(Constant)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.05
.09
.85
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.07
.92
.00
.00
.00
.00
.05
.95
.00
.01
.02
.04
.93
.00
.05
.08
.88
Harga
bahan baku
serai wangi
(Ln W1)
.00
.02
.05
.29
.18
.00
.44
.01
.00
.02
.06
.33
.17
.03
.40
.00
.02
.21
.19
.11
.47
Harga bahan
baku miny ak
tanah (Ln W2)
.00
.05
.58
.02
.01
.00
.25
.09
.00
.06
.59
.02
.01
.02
.30
.00
.10
.56
.01
.04
.28
.00
.19
.51
.20
.11
Biay a lain-lain
(Ln W3)
.00
.02
.09
.39
.03
.00
.24
.23
.00
.02
.14
.66
.00
.07
.10
Kapital tanah
pabrik (Ln Z1)
.00
.04
.00
.02
.11
.46
.02
.34
.00
.06
.00
.02
.26
.62
.04
.00
.06
.01
.26
.66
.01
.00
.06
.09
.71
.14
.00
.08
.62
.30
St ock kapital
alat peny uling
(Ln Z2)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.01
.07
.91
Tenaga Kerja
(Ln Z3)
.00
.01
.00
.07
.37
.35
.13
.08
.00
.01
.00
.03
.42
.54
.00
.00
.01
.03
.46
.47
.03
.00
.02
.42
.00
.56
.00
.16
.12
.72
Alat
bangunan
(Ln Z4)
.00
.12
.00
.02
.13
.33
.33
.06
.00
.13
.00
.00
.15
.48
.25
.00
.13
.00
.15
.56
.16
.00
.13
.00
.86
.01
.00
.16
.73
.10
215
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
Model
2
3
4
Beta In
-.005a
-.014b
-.016b
-.019c
-.019c
-.040c
-.038d
-.028d
-.055d
.086d
t
-.042
-.134
-.179
-.177
-.222
-.454
-.360
-.316
-.638
1.031
Sig.
.967
.894
.858
.860
.825
.651
.720
.753
.526
.306
Part ial
Correlation
-.005
-.016
-.021
-.021
-.026
-.053
-.042
-.037
-.073
.118
Collinearity Statistics
Minimum
VI F
Tolerance
2.505
.283
1.739
.292
1.187
.383
1.724
.295
1.177
.408
1.175
.400
1.667
.310
1.167
.431
1.134
.428
1.075
.434
Tolerance
.399
.575
.842
.580
.850
.851
.600
.857
.882
.930
a. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Biay a lain-lain (Ln W3), Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2), Harga bahan
baku serai wangi (Ln W1), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3), Kapit al tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
b. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2), Harga bahan baku serai wangi (Ln
W1), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3), Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
c. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Harga bahan baku miny ak tanah (Ln W2), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3), Kapital tanah
pabrik (Ln Z1)
d. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Alat bangunan (Ln Z4), Tenaga Kerja (Ln Z3), Kapital tanah pabrik (Ln Z1)
e. Dependent Variable: Keuntungan UOP (Ln T)
Minimum
8.1036
-.76381
-1.679
-2.423
Maximum
9.2765
.64037
2.064
2.032
Mean
8.6297
.00000
.000
.000
N
80
80
80
80
216
Mean
39.4580
8.3790
3.3800
2.6700
8.8200
.5400
St d. Dev iation
20.13399
8.50783
1.01285
1.36289
2.64911
.50091
N
100
100
100
100
100
100
Correlati ons
Produksi
serai wangi
(ton) (Y)
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
Pendapatan
(jt) (Z1)
Tenaga
kerja (Z2)
Luas areal
(ha) (Z3)
Keikusertaan
dalam
pelatihan (Z5)
Pendidikan
f ormal (Z4)
1.000
.787
.499
.957
.644
.181
.787
.499
.957
.644
1.000
.318
.818
.545
.318
1.000
.526
.545
.818
.526
1.000
.657
.545
.545
.657
1.000
.088
.129
.160
.280
.181
.088
.129
.160
.280
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.036
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
.001
.000
.000
.001
.
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
.193
.100
.056
.002
.036
.193
.100
.056
.002
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables Entered
Keikusertaan
dalam pelat ihan
(Z5), Pendapatan
(jt) (Z1), Tenaga
kerja (Z2),
Pendidikan f ormal
(Z4), Luas
areal
a
(ha) (Z3)
2
3
4
5
Variables Remov ed
Method
Enter
of
of
of
of
R
.958a
.958b
.958c
.957d
.957e
R Square
.917
.917
.917
.917
.916
Adjusted
R Square
.913
.914
.914
.915
.915
St d. Error of
the Estimate
5.95096
5.92087
5.89541
5.87201
5.86979
DurbinWat son
3.038
217
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
ANOVAf
Model
1
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of
Squares
36803.480
3328.904
40132.384
36801.997
3330.386
40132.384
36795.818
3336.565
40132.384
36787.770
3344.614
40132.384
36755.848
3376.536
40132.384
df
5
94
99
4
95
99
3
96
99
2
97
99
1
98
99
Mean Square
7360.696
35.414
F
207.848
Sig.
.000a
9200.499
35.057
262.446
.000b
12265.273
34.756
352.898
.000c
18393.885
34.481
533.457
.000d
36755.848
34.454
1066.795
.000e
Model
1
(Constant)
Pendapatan (jt) (Z1)
Tenaga kerja (Z2)
Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
Pendidikan f ormal (Z4)
Keikusertaan dalam pelatihan (Z5)
(Constant)
Tenaga kerja (Z2)
Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
Pendidikan f ormal (Z4)
Keikusertaan dalam pelatihan (Z5)
(Constant)
Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
Pendidikan f ormal (Z4)
Keikusertaan dalam pelatihan (Z5)
(Constant)
Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
Keikusertaan dalam pelatihan (Z5)
(Constant)
Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
Unstandardized
Coef f icients
B
St d. Error
1.100
2.428
.026
.127
-.267
.755
13.819
.909
.181
.326
1.022
1.250
1.021
2.385
-.305
.727
13.958
.601
.188
.322
.998
1.238
.529
2.068
13.891
.577
.147
.305
1.010
1.233
1.270
1.375
14.070
.439
1.148
1.194
1.710
1.296
14.138
.433
218
St andardized
Coef f icients
Beta
.011
-.013
.935
.024
.025
-.015
.945
.025
.025
.940
.019
.025
.952
.029
.957
t
.453
.205
-.353
15.210
.554
.818
.428
-.420
23.235
.585
.806
.256
24.090
.481
.819
.924
32.074
.962
1.319
32.662
Sig.
.652
.838
.725
.000
.581
.416
.670
.676
.000
.560
.422
.799
.000
.631
.415
.358
.000
.338
.190
.000
Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VI F
.308
.611
.233
.480
.913
3.246
1.636
4.286
2.083
1.096
.653
.528
.487
.920
1.533
1.893
2.054
1.086
.568
.538
.921
1.759
1.860
1.086
.974
.974
1.026
1.026
1.000
1.000
a
Colli neari ty Diagno stics
Variance Proportions
Model
1
Dimension
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
Eigenv alue
5.106
.478
.308
.047
.032
.029
4.440
.379
.114
.038
.030
3.503
.359
.109
.030
2.557
.336
.107
1.892
.108
Condit ion
Index
1.000
3.269
4.074
10.371
12.626
13.169
1.000
3.423
6.247
10.815
12.222
1.000
3.125
5.682
10.856
1.000
2.758
4.890
1.000
4.177
(Constant)
.00
.00
.04
.50
.00
.46
.00
.01
.17
.35
.47
.01
.01
.33
.65
.03
.06
.92
.05
.95
Pendapatan
(jt) (Z1)
.00
.14
.13
.34
.33
.06
Tenaga
kerja (Z2)
.00
.00
.02
.17
.75
.05
.00
.01
.02
.97
.00
Luas areal
(ha) (Z3)
.00
.01
.00
.33
.28
.38
.00
.02
.60
.03
.34
.01
.03
.58
.38
.03
.12
.86
.05
.95
Pendidikan
f ormal (Z4)
.00
.00
.01
.01
.31
.67
.00
.00
.00
.08
.91
.00
.01
.01
.99
Keikusertaan
dalam
pelatihan (Z5)
.01
.44
.51
.00
.03
.01
.01
.94
.01
.01
.03
.02
.93
.02
.03
.05
.93
.02
Model
2
3
4
Beta In
.011a
.016b
-.015b
.017c
-.009c
.019c
.013d
-.007d
.027d
.205
.304
-.420
.324
-.253
.481
.250
-.201
.693
Sig.
.838
.762
.676
.747
.801
.631
.803
.841
.490
Part ial
Correlation
.021
.031
-.043
.033
-.026
.049
.025
-.020
.070
.962
.338
.097
.029
Collinearity Statistics
Minimum
Tolerance
VI F
Tolerance
.308
3.246
.233
.329
3.041
.268
.653
1.533
.487
.329
3.037
.323
.721
1.387
.714
.538
1.860
.538
.331
3.019
.331
.723
1.383
.723
.569
1.757
.569
.974
1.026
.974
a. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Keikusertaan dalam pelat ihan (Z5), Tenaga kerja (Z2), Pendidikan f ormal (Z4), Luas
areal (ha) (Z3)
b. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Keikusertaan dalam pelat ihan (Z5), Pendidikan f ormal (Z4), Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
c. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Keikusertaan dalam pelat ihan (Z5), Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
d. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Luas areal (ha) (Z3)
e. Dependent Variable: Produksi serai wangi (ton) (Y )
Mean
39.4580
8.3790
3.3800
8.8200
.5400
N
100
100
100
100
100
219
Sabarman Damanik : Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Serai Wangi (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Gunung Halu,
Correlati ons
Produksi
serai wangi
(ton) (Y)
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
Pendapatan
(jt) (Z1)
Tenaga
kerja (Z2)
Pendidikan
f ormal (Z4)
1.000
.787
.499
.644
.787
.499
.644
1.000
Model
.318
1
.545
.318
1.000
(Constant)
.545
.545
.545
1.000
.181
.088
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
.001
.000
.036
.193
Keikusertaan
dalam
pelatihan (Z5)
Unstandardized
.181
Coef f icients
.088
B
St d. Error
.129
.581
4.493
.280
1.465
.156
1.000
3.853
1.305
1.417
.584
.036
1.999
2.310
.193
.699
4.485
.100
1.455
.155
.002
3.823
1.303
1.547.
.563
100
a.
Variable: Produksi100
serai wangi (t on) (Y)
100Dependent 100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Colli nearity
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Condition
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model Dimension
Eigenv alue
Index
1
Model
Variables Entered
Variables Remov1ed
Method4.179
1.000
1
Keikusertaan dalam
2
.443
3.071
pelatihan (Z5), Pendapat an
3
.307
3.691
. Enter
(jt) (Z1), Tenaga kerja (Z2),
a
4
.040
10.202
Pendidikan f ormal (Z4)
5
.031
11.650
2
Keikusertaan dalam
Backward (criterion: Probability of
.
2
1
3.565
1.000
pelatihan (Z5)
F-t o-remov e >= . 100).
2
.363
3.133
a. All requested v ariables entered.
3
.040
9.414
b. Dependent Variable: Produksi serai wangi (ton) (Y)
4
.032
10.550
R
.844a
.843b
R Square
.713
.711
Adjusted
R Square
.701
.702
St andardized
Coef f icients
Beta
t
.129
9.408
2.953
2.426
.865
.156
9.381
2.935
2.747
.619
.194
.186
.050
.615
.192
.204
Sig.
.897
.000
.004
.017
.389
.876
.000
.004
.007
Collinearit
Tolerance
.698
.702
.512
.915
.702
.702
.549
a
Di agnostics
Variance Proportions
Pendapatan
(jt) (Z1)
.01
.40
.36
.03
.20
.02
.76
.03
.19
(Constant)
.00
.00
.03
.69
.27
.00
.02
.66
.31
Tenaga
kerja (Z2)
.00
.00
.02
.76
.21
.00
.01
.79
.20
Pendidikan
f ormal (Z4)
.00
.00
.01
.00
.99
.00
.00
.00
.99
Model Summaryc
Model
1
2
Coeffi ci entsa
St d. Error of
the Estimate
11.01296
10.99856
DurbinWat son
Predicted Value
2.136
Std. Residual
Minimum
16.8097
-19.52664
-1.334
-1.775
Maximum
94.3884
32.34336
3.236
2.941
Mean
39.4580
.00000
.000
.000
Regression
Residual
Total
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of
Squares
28610.271
11522.112
40132.384
28519.420
11612.963
40132.384
Mean Square
7152.568
121.285
F
58.973
Sig.
.000a
Model
Beta In
9506.473
78.586
.000b
a
2
Keikusertaan dalam
.050
120.968pelatihan (Z5)
Collinearity Stat
t
Sig.
.865
.389
Part ial
Correlation
.088
Tolerance
VI F
.915
a. Predictors in t he Model: (Constant), Pendapatan (jt) (Z1), Tenaga kerja (Z2), Pendidikan f ormal (Z4)
a. Predictors: (Const ant), Keikusertaan dalam pelatihan (Z5), Pendapatan (jt) (Z1),
b. Dependent Variable: Produksi serai wangi (t on) (Y )
Tenaga kerja (Z2), Pendidikan f ormal (Z4)
b. Predictors: (Const ant), Pendapatan (jt ) (Z1), Tenaga kerja (Z2), Pendidikan f ormal
(Z4)
c. Dependent Variable: Produksi serai wangi (t on) (Y)
220
1.093